Smoothed particle hydrodynamics based numerical study of hydroplaning considering permeability characteristics of runway surface

Yang YANG , Xingyi ZHU , Denis JELAGIN , Alvaro GUARIN

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (3) : 319 -333.

PDF (29812KB)
Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (3) : 319 -333. DOI: 10.1007/s11709-024-0969-2
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Smoothed particle hydrodynamics based numerical study of hydroplaning considering permeability characteristics of runway surface

Author information +
History +
PDF (29812KB)

Abstract

The presence of water films on a runway surface presents a risk to the landing of aircraft. The tire of the aircraft is separated from the runway due to a hydrodynamic force exerted through the water film, a phenomenon called hydroplaning. Although a lot of numerical investigations into hydroplaning have been conducted, only a few have considered the impact of the runway permeability. Hence, computational problems, such as excessive distortion and computing efficiency decay, may arise with such numerical models when dealing with the thin water film. This paper presents a numerical model comprising of the tire, water film, and the interaction with the runway, applying a mathematical model using the smoothed particle hydrodynamics and finite element (SPH-FE) algorithm. The material properties and geometric features of the tire model were included in the model framework and water film thicknesses from 0.75 mm to 7.5 mm were used in the numerical simulation. Furthermore, this work investigated the impacts of both surface texture and the runway permeability. The interaction between tire rubber and the rough runway was analyzed in terms of frictional force between the two bodies. The SPH-FE model was validated with an empirical equation proposed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Then the computational efficiency of the model was compared with the traditional coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian (CEL) algorithm. Based on the SPH-FE model, four types of the runway (Flat, SMA-13, AC-13, and OGFC-13) were discussed. The simulation of the asphalt runway shows that the SMA-13, AC-13, and OGFC-13 do not present a hydroplaning risk when the runway permeability coefficient exceeds 6%.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

SPH-FE approach / hydroplaning / numerical simulation / surface texture / runway surface reconstruction

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yang YANG, Xingyi ZHU, Denis JELAGIN, Alvaro GUARIN. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics based numerical study of hydroplaning considering permeability characteristics of runway surface. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2024, 18(3): 319-333 DOI:10.1007/s11709-024-0969-2

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Mounce J M, Bartoskewitz R T. Hydroplaning and roadway tort liability. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1993, (1401): 117

[2]

DreherR CHorneW. Phenomena of Pneumatic Tire Hydroplaning. Washington, D.C.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1963

[3]

GallawayB MIveyDRossH ELedbetterW BWoodsDSchillerR. Tentative Pavement and Geometric Design Criteria for Minimizing Hydroplaning. Washington, D.C.: Federal Highway Administration, 1975

[4]

Beautru Y, Cerezo V, Do M-T, Kane M. Influence of thin waterfilm on skid resistance. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2014, 2: 36–44

[5]

HuebnerR SAndersonD AWarnerJ C. Proposed Design Guidelines for Reducing Hydroplaning on New and Rehabilitated Pavements. Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research Board, 1999

[6]

Kogbara R B, Masad E A, Kassem E, Scarpas A, Anupam K. A state-of-the-art review of parameters influencing measurement and modeling of skid resistance of asphalt pavements. Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 114: 602–617

[7]

Fwa T F, Ong G P. Wet-pavement hydroplaning risk and skid resistance: Analysis. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2008, 134(5): 182–190

[8]

Ong G, Fwa T. Mechanistic interpretation of braking distance specifications and pavement friction requirements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2010, 2155(1): 145–157

[9]

Kumar S S, Kumar A, Fwa T. Analyzing effect of tire groove patterns on hydroplaning speed. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 2010, 8: 2018–2031

[10]

Zhu X, Yang Y, Zhao H, Jelagin D, Chen F, Gilabert F A, Guarin A. Effects of surface texture deterioration and wet surface conditions on asphalt runway skid resistance. Tribology International, 2021, 153: 106589

[11]

Zhang X, Xu F, Ren X, Gao X, Cao R. Consideration on aircraft tire spray when running on wet runways. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2020, 33(2): 520–528

[12]

Hermange C, Oger G, Le Chenadec Y, Le Touzé D. A 3D SPH–FE coupling for FSI problems and its application to tire hydroplaning simulations on rough ground. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 355: 558–590

[13]

Zhu X, Pang Y, Yang J, Zhao H. Numerical analysis of hydroplaning behaviour by using a tire–water-film–runway model. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2022, 23(3): 784–800

[14]

Cho J R, Kim K W, Yoo W S, Hong S I. Mesh generation considering detailed tread blocks for reliable 3D tire analysis. Advances in Engineering Software, 2004, 35(2): 105–113

[15]

Zhu S Z, Liu X Y, Cao Q Q, Huang X M. Numerical study of tire hydroplaning based on power spectrum of asphalt pavement and kinetic friction coefficient. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2017, 2017: 1–11

[16]

Cho J R, Choi J H, Lee H W, Woo J S, Yoo W S. Braking distance prediction by hydroplaning analysis of 3-D patterned tire model. Journal of System Design and Dynamics., 2007, 1(3): 398–409

[17]

Fwa T F, Kumar S S, Anupam K, Ong G P. Effectiveness of tire-tread patterns in reducing the risk of hydroplaning. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2009, 2094(1): 91–102

[18]

Heinrich G, Klüppel M. Rubber friction, tread deformation and tire traction. Wear, 2008, 265(7−8): 1052–1060

[19]

Persson B, Bucher F, Chiaia B. Elastic contact between randomly rough surfaces: Comparison of theory with numerical results. Physical Review B: Condensed Matter, 2002, 65(18): 184106

[20]

Le G A, Yang X, Klüppel M. Evaluation of sliding friction and contact mechanics of elastomers based on dynamic-mechanical analysis. Journal of Chemical Physics, 2005, 123: 1

[21]

Persson B N J, Albohr O, Tartaglino U, Volokitin A I, Tosatti E. On the nature of surface roughness with application to contact mechanics, sealing, rubber friction and adhesion. Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, 2005, 17(1): R1–R62

[22]

HorneW BJoynerU T. Pneumatic tire hydroplaning and some effects on vehicle performance. SAE Transactions, 1966: 623–650

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s). This article is published with open access at link.springer.com and journal.hep.com.cn

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (29812KB)

2334

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/