Effect of recycled brick powder on the properties of self-compacting fiber reinforced mortars produced with different cement types

Abstract

It is known that clay-based building materials such as bricks and tiles accumulate in landfills at the end of their useful lives. As an alternative, recycling clay-based building material can reduce the negative environmental impacts. Recycled brick powder (RBP) is obtained by grinding waste brick and tile collected from end-of-life landfills. Within the scope of the study, the use of self-compacting fiber reinforced mortars (SCFRMs) produced with RBP using CEM-I 42.5R and 52.5R class cements for two different cement classes was investigated. In accordance with EFNARC, a water binding ratio of 0.42 was used to control the workability and strength of the SCFRM. In the produced SCFRM, 1%, 2%, and 3% by weight binder Polypropylene (PP) fiber was added to the blends with 10%, 20%, and 30% RBP substitutes. A total of 32 SCFRM mixes were produced and tested. The flexural and compressive strengths at 7, 28, 56, and 90 d were evaluated on the produced samples. In addition, porosity and water absorbency values were examined since these are significant for durability properties. It was observed that the use of RBP increases durability, and the use of fiber can have positive effects in terms of both durability and strength.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

cement strength / tile/brick dust / self-compacting fiberized mortar

References

[1] Tu T Y, Chen Y Y, Hwang C L. Properties of HPC with recycled aggregates. Cement and Concrete Research, 2006, 36(5): 943–950

[2] Külekçi G. The effect of pozzolans and mineral wastes on alkali-silica reaction in recycled aggregated mortar. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 2021, 65: 741–750

[3] Khaloo A R. Crushed tile coarse aggregate concrete. Cement, Concrete and Aggregates, 1995, 17(2): 119–125

[4] Gołaszewski J, Ponikiewski T, Kostrzanowska-Siedlarz A, Miera P. Technological aspects of usage of calcareous fly ash as a main constituent of cements. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 2021, 65: 619–637

[5] Esin T, Cosgun N. A study conducted to reduce construction waste generation in Turkey. Building and Environment, 2007, 42(4): 1667–1674

[6] Al-Omari A, Abdulkareem O M, Aldaood A, Bouasker M, Fraj A B, Al-Mukhtar M. Impact of tufa stone powder as a partial replacement of aggregate on the mechanical performance and durability of repair mortar. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 2022, 66(2): 433–444

[7] Etli S, Cemalgil S, Onat O. Effect of pumice powder and artificial lightweight fine aggregate on self-compacting mortar. Computers and Concrete, 2021, 27: 241–252

[8] Villoria Sáez P, Porras-Amores C, del Río Merino M. New quantification proposal for construction waste generation in new residential constructions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 102: 58–65

[9] Li H, Dong L, Jiang Z, Yang X, Yang Z. Study on utilization of red brick waste powder in the production of cement-based red decorative plaster for walls. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 133: 1017–1026

[10] Tang Q, Ma Z, Wu H, Wang W. The utilization of eco-friendly recycled powder from concrete and brick waste in new concrete: A critical review. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2020, 114: 103807

[11] Wu H, Zuo J, Zillante G, Wang J, Yuan H. Construction and demolition waste research: A bibliometric analysis. Architectural Science Review, 2019, 62(4): 354–365

[12] Khitab A, Riaz M S, Jalil A, Khan R B N, Anwar W, Khan R A, Arshad M T, Kirgiz M S, Tariq Z, Tayyab S. Manufacturing of clayey bricks by synergistic use of waste brick and ceramic powders as partial replacement of clay. Sustainability, 2021, 13(18): 10214

[13] de Gutiérrez R M, Díaz L N, Delvasto S. Effect of pozzolans on the performance of fiber-reinforced mortars. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2005, 27(5): 593–598

[14] Schueremans L, CizerÖ, Janssens E, Serré G, Balen K V. Characterization of repair mortars for the assessment of their compatibility in restoration projects: Research and practice. Construction and Building Materials, 2011, 25(12): 4338–4350

[15] van Balen K, Papayianni I, van Hees R, Binda L, Waldum A. Introduction to requirements for and functions and properties of repair mortars. Materials and Structures, 2005, 38(8): 781–785

[16] Li L G, Lin Z H, Chen G M, Kwan A K H. Reutilizing clay brick dust as paste substitution to produce environment-friendly durable mortar. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 274: 122787

[17] Shao J, Gao J, Zhao Y, Chen X. Study on the pozzolanic reaction of clay brick powder in blended cement pastes. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 213: 209–215

[18] Robayo-Salazar R A, Mejía-Arcila J M, Mejía de Gutiérrez R. Eco-efficient alkali-activated cement based on red clay brick wastes suitable for the manufacturing of building materials. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 166: 242–252

[19] Toledo Filho R D, Gonçalves J P, Americano B B, Fairbairn E M R. Potential for use of crushed waste calcined-clay brick as a supplementary cementitious material in Brazil. Cement and Concrete Research, 2007, 37(9): 1357–1365

[20] Bektas F, Wang K. Performance of ground clay brick in ASR-affected concrete: Effects on expansion, mechanical properties and ASR gel chemistry. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2012, 34(2): 273–278

[21] Zhu P, Mao X, Qu W, Li Z, Ma Z J. Investigation of using recycled powder from waste of clay bricks and cement solids in reactive powder concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 113: 246–254

[22] Zhao Y, Gao J, Liu C, Chen X, Xu Z. The particle-size effect of waste clay brick powder on its pozzolanic activity and properties of blended cement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 242: 118521

[23] Naceri A, Hamina M C. Use of waste brick as a partial replacement of cement in mortar. Waste Management, 2009, 29(8): 2378–2384

[24] Beaty A N S, Raymond G P. Concrete block road paving. Concrete International, 1995, 17: 36–41

[25] Jang H, Kang H, So S. Color expression characteristics and physical properties of colored mortar using ground granulated blast furnace slag and white Portland cement. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2014, 18(4): 1125–1132

[26] Veiga K K, Gastaldini A L G. Sulfate attack on a white Portland cement with activated slag. Construction and Building Materials, 2012, 34: 494–503

[27] Subaşı A, Emiroğlu M. Effect of metakaolin substitution on physical, mechanical and hydration process of white Portland cement. Construction and Building Materials, 2015, 95: 257–268

[28] ÖzçayÜ. Kiremit Sektöründeki Endüstriyel Atıkların Geri Kazanılması. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. İstanbul: Yıldız Technical University, 2010 (in Turkish)

[29] EFNARC. The European Guidelines for Self-Compacting Concrete Specification, Production and Use. Flums: EFNARC, 2005

[30] ASTMC305/C305-20. Standard Practice for Mechanical Mixing of Hydraulic Cement Pastes and Mortars of Plastic Consistency. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2009

[31] ASTMC348-02. Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2002

[32] ASTMC349-08. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic-Cement Mortars (Using Portions of Prisms Broken in Flexure). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2008

[33] ASTMC1585-13. Standard Test Method for Measurement of Rate of Absorption of Water by Hydraulic Cement Concretes. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2013

[34] Leung H Y, Kim J, Nadeem A, Jaganathan J, Anwar M P. Sorptivity of self-compacting concrete containing fly ash and silica fume. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 113: 369–375

[35] Hall C. Water sorptivity of mortars and concretes: A review. Magazine of Concrete Research, 1989, 41(147): 51–61

[36] Cemalgil S, Onat O, Tanaydın M K, Etli S. Effect of waste textile dye adsorbed almond shell on self compacting mortar. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 300: 123978

[37] Torres M L, García-Ruiz P A. Lightweight pozzolanic materials used in mortars: Evaluation of their influence on density, mechanical strength and water absorption. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2009, 31(2): 114–119

[38] ASTMC642-97. Standard Test Method for Density, Absorption, and Voids in Hardened Concrete. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 1997

[39] Gallé C. Effect of drying on cement-based materials pore structure as identified by mercury intrusion porosimetry: A comparative study between oven-, vacuum-, and freeze-drying. Cement and Concrete Research, 2001, 31(10): 1467–1477

[40] Schackow A, Stringari D, Senff L, Correia S L, Segadães A M. Influence of fired clay brick waste additions on the durability of mortars. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2015, 62: 82–89

[41] O’Farrell M, Wild S, Sabir B B. Pore size distribution and compressive strength of waste clay brick mortar. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2001, 23(1): 81–91

[42] Aliabdo A A, Abd-Elmoaty A E M, Hassan H H. Utilization of crushed clay brick in concrete industry. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2014, 53(1): 151–168

[43] BentzD PFerraris C FWingpiglerJ. Service Life Prediction for Concrete Pavements and Bridge Decks Exposed to Sulfate Attack and Freeze–Thaw Deterioration. Gaithersburg: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2001

[44] López M, Castro J T. Effect of natural pozzolans on porosity and pore connectivity of concrete with time. Revista de Ingeniería de Construcción, 2010, 25: 419–431

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press