Parametric study on seismic performance of self-centering reinforced concrete column with bottom-placed rubber layer

Yangchao RU , Liusheng HE , Huanjun JIANG

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (8) : 1145 -1162.

PDF (18282KB)
Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (8) : 1145 -1162. DOI: 10.1007/s11709-023-0945-2
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Parametric study on seismic performance of self-centering reinforced concrete column with bottom-placed rubber layer

Author information +
History +
PDF (18282KB)

Abstract

To realize seismic-resilient reinforced concrete (RC) moment-resisting frame structures, a novel self-centering RC column with a rubber layer placed at the bottom (SRRC column) is proposed herein. For the column, the longitudinal reinforcement dissipates seismic energy, the rubber layer allows the rocking of the column, and the unbonded prestressed tendon enables self-centering capacity. A refined finite element model of the SRRC column is developed, the effectiveness of which is validated based on experimental results. Results show that the SRRC column exhibits stable energy dissipation capacity and no strength degradation; additionally, it can significantly reduce permanent residual deformation and mitigate damage to concrete. Extensive parametric studies pertaining to SRRC columns have been conducted to investigate the critical factors affecting their seismic performance.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

seismic resilience / self-centering / rubber layer / flag-shaped hysteresis loop / parametric study

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yangchao RU, Liusheng HE, Huanjun JIANG. Parametric study on seismic performance of self-centering reinforced concrete column with bottom-placed rubber layer. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(8): 1145-1162 DOI:10.1007/s11709-023-0945-2

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

BruneauMMacRae G A. Reconstructing Christchurch: A Seismic Shift in Building Structural Systems. Quake Center Report, Department of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, University of Canterbury. 2017

[2]

Lu X, Ye L, Ma Y, Tang D. Lessons from the collapse of typical RC frames in Xuankou School during the great Wenchuan Earthquake. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2012, 15(1): 139–153

[3]

Marquis F, Kim J J, Elwood K J, Chang S E. Understanding post-earthquake decisions on multi-storey concrete buildings in Christchurch, New Zealand. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2017, 15(2): 731–758

[4]

Housner G W. The dynamic behavior of water tanks. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1963, 53(2): 381–387

[5]

Priestley M J N, Evison R J, Carr A J. Seismic response of structures free to rock on their foundations. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 1978, 11(3): 141–150

[6]

Rutenberg A, Jennings P C, Housner G W. The response of veterans hospital building 41 in the San Fernando earthquake. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1982, 10(3): 359–379

[7]

Bruneau M, Reinhorn A. Exploring the concept of seismic resilience for acute care facilities. Earthquake Spectra, 2007, 23(1): 41–62

[8]

Ru Y, He L, Jiang H. Study on a new type of beam−column joint equipped with inclined tapered steel plates. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 45: 103581

[9]

Ru Y, He L, Jiang H. Investigation on a self-centering beam−column joint with tapered steel plate dampers. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2022, 197: 107479

[10]

Chi H, Liu J. Seismic behavior of post-tensioned column base for steel self-centering moment resisting frame. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2012, 78: 117–130

[11]

Kamperidis V C, Karavasilis T L, Vasdravellis G. Self-centering steel column base with metallic energy dissipation devices. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2018, 149: 14–30

[12]

Freddi F, Dimopoulos C A, Karavasilis T L. Experimental evaluation of a rocking damage-free steel column base with friction devices. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2020, 146(10): 04020217

[13]

Chen Y A, Chen C A, Chen C B. Study on seismic performance of prefabricated self-centering beam to column rotation friction energy dissipation connection. Engineering Structures, 2021, 241: 112136

[14]

Wang B, Zhu S, Qiu C, Jin H. High-performance self-centering steel columns with shape memory alloy bolts: Design procedure and experimental evaluation. Engineering Structures, 2019, 182: 446–458

[15]

Lu Y, Guo Z, Liu Y, Basha S H. Performance of prefabricated RC column with replaceable column-base connection under cyclic lateral loads. Engineering Structures, 2021, 240: 112343

[16]

Guo T, Song L, Yang K, Zhu R, Tesfamariam S. Experimental investigation and numerical simulation of self-centering concrete frames with sliding infill walls. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 52: 104435

[17]

Wang X, Xie C, Lin L, Li J. Seismic behavior of self-centering concrete-filled square steel tubular (CFST) column base. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2019, 156: 75–85

[18]

Yang Y, Yang P, Shen P, Cai S, Gao H. Experimental study on seismic behavior of SCRC column base joints with replaceable dampers. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 45: 103174

[19]

Billington S L, Yoon J K. Cyclic response of unbonded posttensioned precast columns with ductile fiber-reinforced concrete. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2004, 9(4): 353–363

[20]

Marriott D, Pampanin S, Palermo A. Quasi-static and pseudo-dynamic testing of unbonded post-tensioned rocking bridge piers with external replaceable dissipaters. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2009, 38(3): 331–354

[21]

Hassanli R, Youssf O, Mills J E, Karim R, Vincent T. Performance of segmental self-centering rubberized concrete columns under different loading directions. Journal of Building Engineering, 2018, 20: 285–302

[22]

Priestley M J N, Sritharan S, Conley J R, Pampanin S. Preliminary results and conclusions from the PRESSS five-story precast concrete test building. PCI Journal, 1999, 44(6): 42–67

[23]

Lu X, Cui Y, Liu J, Gao W. Shaking table test and numerical simulation of a 1/2-scale self-centering reinforced concrete frame. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2015, 44(12): 1899–1917

[24]

Cui Y, Lu X, Jiang C. Experimental investigation of tri-axial self-centering reinforced concrete frame structures through shaking table tests. Engineering Structures, 2017, 132: 684–694

[25]

Zhang Y, Xu L. Cyclic response of a self-centering RC wall with tension−compression-coupled disc spring devices. Engineering Structures, 2022, 250: 113404

[26]

Zhang Y, Xu L. Experimental investigation of a new self-centering shear wall with resilient hinge devices. Engineering Structures, 2022, 266: 114657

[27]

Zhang Y, Xu L. Cyclic loading tests of a resilient hinged self-centering RC wall. Engineering Structures, 2022, 270: 114920

[28]

Xu L, Lin Z, Xie X. Assembled self-centering energy dissipation braces and a force method-based model. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2022, 190: 107121

[29]

Yang T Y, Boddapati V K, Al-Janabi M A Q, Tung D P. Seismic performance of controlled-rocking concentrically braced frames designed by the equivalent energy procedure. Engineering Structures, 2021, 237: 112209

[30]

Al-Janabi M A Q, Yang T Y. Seismic performance assessment of novel self-centering friction-based eccentrically braced frames. Engineering Structures, 2021, 241: 112456

[31]

Wang B, Jiang H, Wang J. Numerical simulation and behavior insights of steel columns with SMA bolts towards earthquake resilience. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2019, 161: 285–295

[32]

Elettore E, Freddi F, Latour M, Rizzano G. Design and analysis of a seismic resilient steel moment resisting frame equipped with damage-free self-centering column bases. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2021, 179: 106543

[33]

Goshtaei S M, Moradi S, Hossain K M A. Sensitivity analysis of self-centering column base connections with shape memory alloy bolts. Structures, 2022, 38: 1050–1065

[34]

Guo T, Hao Y, Song L, Cao Z. Shake-table tests and numerical analysis of self-centering prestressed concrete frame. ACI Structural Journal, 2019, 116(3): 3–17

[35]

ZhangDChen HHanL. Experimental study on the seismic behavior of RC column with rubber layer built in its plastic hinge. Engineering Mechanics, 2009, 26(10): 102–110 (in Chinese)

[36]

GB50010-2010. Code for Design of Concrete Structures. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2010 (in Chinese)

[37]

XiaoYChen ZZhouJLengYXiaR. Concrete plastic-damage factor for finite element analysis: Concept, simulation, and experiment. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 9(9): 1687814017719642

[38]

QuZ. Predicting nonlinear response of an RC bridge pier subject to shake table motions. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Urban Earthquake Engineering (9CUEE). Tokyo: Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2012, 1717–1724

[39]

Hocheng H, Nien C C. Numerical analysis of effects of mold features and contact friction on cavity filling in the nanoimprinting process. Journal of Microlithography Microfabrication & Microsystems, 2006, 5(1): 011004

[40]

Liu Y, Wang W. Concept and analysis of a low-cost energy dissipater with partially self-centering mechanism. Journal of Building Engineering, 2021, 44: 102881

[41]

Zhu Y, Zhang Y, Shi J. Finite element analysis of flexural behavior of precast segmental UHPC beams with prestressed bolted hybrid joints. Engineering Structures, 2021, 238: 111492

[42]

ChopraA K. Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2017

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (18282KB)

3464

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/