Flexural and longitudinal shear performance of precast lightweight steel–ultra-high performance concrete composite beam

Ze MO , Jiangrui QIU , Hanbin XU , Lanlan XU , Yuqing HU

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (5) : 704 -721.

PDF (17768KB)
Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (5) : 704 -721. DOI: 10.1007/s11709-023-0941-6
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Flexural and longitudinal shear performance of precast lightweight steel–ultra-high performance concrete composite beam

Author information +
History +
PDF (17768KB)

Abstract

In this study, the flexural and longitudinal shear performances of two types of precast lightweight steel–ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) composite beams are investigated, where a cluster UHPC slab (CUS) and a normal UHPC slab (NUS) are connected to a steel beam using headed studs through discontinuous shear pockets and full-length shear pockets, respectively. Results show that the longitudinal shear force of the CUS is greater than that of the NUS, whereas the interfacial slip of the former is smaller. Owing to its better integrity, the CUS exhibits greater flexural stiffness and a higher ultimate bearing capacity than the NUS. To further optimize the design parameters of the CUS, a parametric study is conducted to investigate their effects on the flexural and longitudinal shear performances. The square shear pocket is shown to be more applicable for the CUS, as the optimal spacing between two shear pockets is 650 mm. Moreover, a design method for transverse reinforcement is proposed; the transverse reinforcement is used to withstand the splitting force caused by studs in the shear pocket and prevent the UHPC slab from cracking. According to calculation results, the transverse reinforcement can be canceled when the compressive strength of UHPC is 150 MPa and the volume fraction of steel fiber exceeds 2.0%.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

precast steel–UHPC composite beam / flexural performance / longitudinal shear performance / parametric study / transverse reinforcement ratio

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ze MO, Jiangrui QIU, Hanbin XU, Lanlan XU, Yuqing HU. Flexural and longitudinal shear performance of precast lightweight steel–ultra-high performance concrete composite beam. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(5): 704-721 DOI:10.1007/s11709-023-0941-6

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

de Larrard F, Sedran T. Optimization of ultra-high-performance concrete by the use of a packing model. Cement and Concrete Research, 1994, 24(6): 997–1009

[2]

Khayat K H, Meng W N, Vallurupalli K, Teng L. Rheological properties of ultra-high-performance concrete––An overview. Cement and Concrete Research, 2019, 124: 105828

[3]

Meng W N, Khayat K H. Effect of graphite nanoplatelets and carbon nanofibers on rheology, hydration, shrinkage, mechanical properties, and microstructure of UHPC. Cement and Concrete Research, 2018, 105: 64–71

[4]

Yu R, Spiesz P, Brouwers H J H. Development of an eco-friendly Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC) with efficient cement and mineral admixtures uses. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2015, 55: 383–394

[5]

Zhu Z W, Yuan T, Xiang Z, Huang Y, Zhou Y E, Shao X D. Behavior and fatigue performance of details in an orthotropic steel bridge with UHPC-deck plate composite system under in-service traffic flows. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2018, 23(3): 04017142

[6]

Shao X D, Pan R S, Zhan H, Fan W, Yang Z J, Lei W. Experimental verification of the feasibility of a novel prestressed reactive powder concrete box-girder bridge structure. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2017, 22(6): 04017015

[7]

Shao X D, Deng L, Cao J H. Innovative steel-UHPC composite bridge girders for long-span bridges. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2019, 13(4): 981–989

[8]

Liu J, Lai Z, Chen B, Xu S. Experimental behavior and analysis of steel-laminated concrete (RC and UHPC) composite girders. Engineering Structures, 2020, 225: 111240

[9]

Luo J, Shao X, Fan W, Cao J, Deng S. Flexural cracking behavior and crack width predictions of composite (steel + UHPC) lightweight deck system. Engineering Structures, 2019, 194: 120–137

[10]

Hu Y Q, Meloni M, Cheng Z, Wang J Q, Xiu H L. Flexural performance of steel–UHPC composite beams with shear pockets. Structures, 2020, 27: 570–582

[11]

Luo J, Shao X, Cao J, Xiong M, Fan W. Transverse bending behavior of the steel–UHPC lightweight composite deck: Orthogonal test and analysis. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2019, 162: 105708

[12]

Luo Y, Hoki K, Hayashi K, Nakashima M. Behavior and strength of headed stud–SFRCC shear connection. II: Strength evaluation. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2016, 142(2): 04015113

[13]

Zhu Y, Zhang Y, Hussein H H, Cai S. Flexural study on UHPC–steel composite beams with joints under negative bending moment. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2020, 25(10): 04020084

[14]

Wang Z, Nie X, Fan J S, Lu X Y, Ding R. Experimental and numerical investigation of the interfacial properties of non-steam-cured UHPC–steel composite beams. Construction & Building Materials, 2019, 195: 323–339

[15]

Wang J Q, Qi J A, Tong T, Xu Q Z, Xiu H L. Static behavior of large stud shear connectors in steel–UHPC composite structures. Engineering Structures, 2019, 178: 534–542

[16]

Wang J Q, Xu Q Z, Yao Y M, Qi J N, Xiu H L. Static behavior of grouped large headed stud–UHPC shear connectors in composite structures. Composite Structures, 2018, 206: 202–214

[17]

Tong L W, Chen L H, Wen M, Xu C. Static behavior of stud shear connectors in high-strength-steel–UHPC composite beams. Engineering Structures, 2020, 218: 110827

[18]

Ding J, Zhu J, Kang J, Wang X. Experimental study on grouped stud shear connectors in precast steel–UHPC composite bridge. Engineering Structures, 2021, 242(8): 112479

[19]

Fang Z C, Fang H Z, Huang J X, Jiang H B, Chen G F. Static behavior of grouped stud shear connectors in steel–precast UHPC composite structures containing thin full-depth slabs. Engineering Structures, 2022, 252: 113484

[20]

Xu X, Zhou X, Liu Y. Behavior of rubber-sleeved stud shear connectors under fatigue loading. Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 244: 118386

[21]

Xu C, Sugiura K, Wu C, Su Q T. Parametrical static analysis on group studs with typical push-out tests. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2012, 72: 84–96

[22]

ACI318-14. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. Farmington Hills: American Concrete Institute, 2014

[23]

Zhu J S, Guo X Y, Kang J F, Duan M H, Wang Y G. Numerical and theoretical research on flexural behavior of steel–UHPC composite beam with waffle-slab system. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2020, 171: 106141

[24]

ZhangZShaoX DLiWZhuPChenH. Axial Tensile behavior test of ultra high performance concrete. China Journal of Highway & Transport, 2015, 28(8): 50–58 (in Chinese)

[25]

YangJFangZ. Flexural behaviors of ultra high performance concrete T beams prestressed with CFRP tendons. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2009, 31(2): 94–103 (in Chinese)

[26]

Krahl P A, Carrazedo R, El Debs M K. Mechanical damage evolution in UHPFRC: Experimental and numerical investigation. Engineering Structures, 2018, 170: 63–77

[27]

Wang J Y, Gao X L, Yan J B. Developments and mechanical behaviors of steel fiber reinforced ultra-lightweight cement composite with different densities. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 171: 643–653

[28]

Esmaeily A, Xiao Y. Behavior of reinforced concrete columns under variable axial loads: Analysis. ACI Structural Journal, 2005, 102(5): 736–744

[29]

Hu Y Q, Qiu M H, Chen L L, Zhong R, Wang J Q. Experimental and analytical study of the shear strength and stiffness of studs embedded in high strength concrete. Engineering Structures, 2021, 236: 111792

[30]

He Z Q, Xu T, Xing Y, Liu Z, Ma Z J. Overlap of splitting in slabs with closely spaced intermediate anchorages. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2020, 25(8): 04020045

[31]

Johnson R P, Oehlers D J. Analysis and design for longitudinal shear in composite T-beams. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 1981, 71(4): 989–1021

[32]

Shen S L, Hou D W, Zhao J L, Horpibulsuk S, Yin Z Y. Assessment of internal forces for intermediate anchorage zone of post-tensioned concrete structure. Construction & Building Materials, 2014, 64: 370–378

[33]

Badie S S, Morgan Girgis A F, Tadros M K, Nguyen N T. Relaxing the stud spacing limit for full-depth precast concrete deck panels supported on steel girders (phase I). Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2010, 15(5): 482–492

[34]

Kruszewski D, Wille K, Zaghi A E. Push-out behavior of headed shear studs welded on thin plates and embedded in UHPC. Engineering Structures, 2018, 173: 429–441

[35]

LeA H. Evaluation of the splitting tensile strength of ultra-high performance concrete. Fibre Reinforced Concrete: Improvements and Innovations, 2021: 1149–1160

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (17768KB)

4830

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/