Structural performance of a façade precast concrete sandwich panel enabled by a bar-type basalt fiber-reinforced polymer connector

Abstract

In this study, a novel diagonally inserted bar-type basalt fiber reinforced polymer (BFRP) connector was proposed, aiming to achieve both construction convenience and partially composite behavior in precast concrete sandwich panels (PCSPs). First, pull-out tests were conducted to evaluate the anchoring performance of the connector in concrete after exposure to different temperatures. Thereafter, direct shear tests were conducted to investigate the shear performance of the connector. After the test on the individual performance of the connector, five façade PCSP specimens with the bar-type BFRP connector were fabricated, and the out-of-plane flexural performance was tested under a uniformly distributed load. The investigating parameters included the panel length, opening condition, and boundary condition. The results obtained in this study primarily indicated that 1) the bar-type BFRP connector can achieve a reliable anchorage system in concrete; 2) the bar-type BFRP connector can offer sufficient stiffness and capacity to achieve a partially composite PCSP; 3) the boundary condition of the panel considerably influenced the out-of-plane flexural performance and composite action of the investigated façade PCSP.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

precast concrete sandwich panel / basalt fiber reinforced polymer / pull-out performance / shear performance / out-of-plane flexural performance

References

[1] CommitteePCI. PCI Design Handbook. 7th ed. Chicago, IL: Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute, 2010

[2] Committee PCI. State of the art of precast/prestressed concrete sandwich wall panels. PCI Journal, 2011, 56(2): 131–176

[3] Bush T D, Stine G L. Flexural behavior of composite precast concrete sandwich panels with continuous truss connectors. PCI Journal, 1994, 39(2): 112–121

[4] Kinnane O, West R, Hegarty R O. Structural shear performance of insulated precast concrete sandwich panels with steel plate connectors. Engineering Structures, 2020, 215: 110691

[5] Salmon D C, Tadros M K, Culp T. A new structurally and thermally efficient precast sandwich panel system. PCI Journal, 1994, 39(4): 90–101

[6] Woltman G, Tomlinson D, Fam A. Investigation of various GFRP shear connectors for insulated precast concrete sandwich wall panels. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2013, 17(5): 711–721

[7] Choi K B, Choi W C, Feo L, Jang S J, Yun H D. In-plane shear behavior of insulated precast concrete sandwich panels reinforced with corrugated GFRP shear connectors. Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2015, 79: 419–429

[8] Pantelides C P, Surapaneni R, Reaveley L D. Structural performance of hybrid GFRP/steel concrete sandwich panels. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2008, 12(5): 570–576

[9] Jawdhari A, Fam A, Kadhim M. Thermal bowing of reinforced concrete sandwich panels using time-domain coupled-field finite element analysis. Engineering Structures, 2022, 252: 113592

[10] Norris T G, Chen A. Development of insulated FRP-confined Precast Concrete Sandwich panel with side and top confining plates and dry bond. Composite Structures, 2016, 152: 444–454

[11] Chen A, Norris T G, Hopkins P M, Yossef M. Experimental investigation and finite element analysis of flexural behavior of insulated concrete sandwich panels with FRP plate shear connectors. Engineering Structures, 2015, 98: 95–108

[12] Huang J, Jiang Q, Chong X, Ye X, Wang D. Experimental study on precast concrete sandwich panel with cross-shaped GFRP connectors. Magazine of Concrete Research, 2020, 72(3): 149–162

[13] Huang J Q, Dai J G. Direct shear tests of glass fiber reinforced polymer connectors for use in precast concrete sandwich panels. Composite Structures, 2019, 207: 136–147

[14] Lameiras R, Barros J, Valente I B, Azenha M. Development of sandwich panels combining fibre reinforced concrete layers and fibre reinforced polymer connectors. Part I: Conception and pull-out tests. Composite Structures, 2013, 105: 446–459

[15] Dutta D, Jawdhari A, Fam A. A new studded precast concrete sandwich wall with embedded glass-fiber-reinforced polymer channel sections: Part 1, experimental study. PCI Journal, 2020, 65(3): 78–99

[16] Jawdhari A, Fam A. A new studded precast concrete sandwich wall with embedded glass-fiber-reinforced polymer channel sections: Part 2, finite element analysis and parametric studies. PCI Journal, 2020, 65(4): 51–70

[17] Frankl B A, Lucier G W, Hassan T K, Rizkalla S H. Behavior of precast, prestressed concrete sandwich wall panels reinforced with CFRP shear grid. PCI Journal, 2011, 56(2): 42–54

[18] Hassan T K, Rizkalla S H. Analysis and design guidelines of precast, prestressed concrete, composite load-bearing sandwich wall panels reinforced with CFRP grid. PCI Journal, 2010, 55(2): 147–162

[19] Kazem H, Bunn W G, Seliem H M, Rizkalla S H, Gleich H. Durability and long term behavior of FRP/foam shear transfer mechanism for concrete sandwich panels. Construction & Building Materials, 2015, 98: 722–734

[20] Kim J H, You Y C. Composite behavior of a novel insulated concrete sandwich wall panel reinforced with GFRP shear grids: Effects of insulation types. Materials (Basel), 2015, 8(3): 899–913

[21] Choi I, Kim J H, Kim H R. Composite behavior of insulated concrete sandwich wall panels subjected to wind pressure and suction. Materials (Basel), 2015, 8(3): 1264–1282

[22] Choi I, Kim J H, You Y C. Effect of cyclic loading on composite behavior of insulated concrete sandwich wall panels with GFRP shear connectors. Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2016, 96: 7–19

[23] Shams A, Horstmann M, Hegger J. Experimental investigations on textile-reinforced concrete (TRC) sandwich sections. Composite Structures, 2014, 118: 643–653

[24] O’Hegarty R, West R, Reilly A, Kinnane O. Composite behaviour of fibre-reinforced concrete sandwich panels with FRP shear connectors. Engineering Structures, 2019, 198: 109475

[25] Huang J Q, Dai J G. Flexural performance of precast geopolymer concrete sandwich panel enabled by FRP connector. Composite Structures, 2020, 248: 112563

[26] Rolland A, Quiertant M, Khadour A, Chataigner S, Benzarti K, Argoul P. Experimental investigations on the bond behavior between concrete and FRP reinforcing bars. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 173: 136–148

[27] Yoshitake I, Tsuda H, Itose J, Hisabe N. Effect of discrepancy in thermal expansion coefficients of CFRP and steel under cold temperature. Construction & Building Materials, 2014, 59: 17–24

[28] ZhangJHuangZLiZYanPZhangP. Temperature fields of external walls of different thermal insulation placements. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2009, 30(12): 1356−1365 (In Chinese)

[29] Signorini C, Sola A, Malchiodi B, Nobili A, Gatto A. Failure mechanism of silica coated polypropylene fibres for Fibre Reinforced Concrete (FRC). Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 236: 117549

[30] Zhou Z, Qiao P. Bond behavior of epoxy-coated rebar in ultra-high performance concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 182: 406–417

[31] Choi I, Kim J H, Kim D W, Park J S. Effects of grid-type shear connector arrangements used for insulated concrete sandwich wall panels with a low aspect ratio. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 46: 103754

[32] Hou H, Wang W, Qu B, Dai C. Testing of insulated sandwich panels with GFRP shear connectors. Engineering Structures, 2020, 209: 109954

[33] HibbitH DKarlssonB ISorensenE P. ABAQUS User Manual, Version 6.12. Providence, RI: Simulia, 2012

[34] ACI318M-05. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute, 2005

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press