Field validation of UHPC layer in negative moment region of steel-concrete composite continuous girder bridge

Minghong QIU , Xudong SHAO , Weiye HU , Yanping ZHU , Husam H. HUSSEIN , Yaobei HE , Qiongwei LIU

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (6) : 744 -761.

PDF (10135KB)
Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (6) : 744 -761. DOI: 10.1007/s11709-022-0843-z
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Field validation of UHPC layer in negative moment region of steel-concrete composite continuous girder bridge

Author information +
History +
PDF (10135KB)

Abstract

Improving the cracking resistance of steel-normal concrete (NC) composite beams in the negative moment region is one of the main tasks in designing continuous composite beam (CCB) bridges due to the low tensile strength of the NC deck at pier supports. This study proposed an innovative structural configuration for the negative bending moment region in a steel-concrete CCB bridge with the aid of ultrahigh performance concrete (UHPC) layer. In order to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of this new UHPC jointed structure in the negative bending moment region, field load testing was conducted on a newly built full-scale bridge. The newly designed structural configuration was described in detail regarding the structural characteristics (cracking resistance, economy, durability, and constructability). In the field investigation, strains on the surface of the concrete bridge deck, rebar, and steel beam in the negative bending moment region, as well as mid-span deflection, were measured under different load cases. Also, a finite element model for the four-span superstructure of the full-scale bridge was established and validated by the field test results. The simulated results in terms of strains and mid-span deflection showed moderate consistency with the test results. This field test and the finite element model results demonstrated that the new configuration with the UHPC layer provided an effective alternative for the negative bending moment region of the composite beam.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

field test / steel-concrete composite beam / continuous girder bridge / negative bending moment region / ultrahigh performance concrete

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Minghong QIU, Xudong SHAO, Weiye HU, Yanping ZHU, Husam H. HUSSEIN, Yaobei HE, Qiongwei LIU. Field validation of UHPC layer in negative moment region of steel-concrete composite continuous girder bridge. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2022, 16(6): 744-761 DOI:10.1007/s11709-022-0843-z

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

ChenS. Experimental study of prestressed steel-concrete composite beams with external tendons for negative moments. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2005, 61( 12): 1613– 1630

[2]

SunQ, Yang Y, FanJ, ZhangY, BaiY. Effect of longitudinal reinforcement and prestressing on stiffness of composite beams under hogging moments. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2014, 100 : 1– 11

[3]

SuQ, Yang G, BradfordM A. Behavior of a continuous composite box girder with a prefabricated prestressed-concrete slab in its hogging-moment region. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2015, 20( 8): B4014004

[4]

RyuH K, ChangS P, KimY J, KimB S. Crack control of a steel and concrete composite plate girder with prefabricated slabs under hogging moments. Engineering Structures, 2005, 27( 11): 1613– 1624

[5]

RyuH K, KimY J, ChangS P. Crack control of a continuous composite two-girder bridge with prefabricated slabs under static and fatigue loads. Engineering Structures, 2007, 29( 6): 851– 864

[6]

GaraF, LeoniG, DeziL. Slab cracking control in continuous steel-concrete bridge decks. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2013, 18( 12): 1319– 1327

[7]

KwakH G, SeoY J, JungC M. Effects of the slab casting sequences and the drying shrinkage of concrete slabs on the short-term and long-term behavior of composite steel box girder bridges. Part 1. Engineering Structures, 2000, 22( 11): 1453– 1466

[8]

BrozzettiJ. Design development of steel-concrete composite bridges in France. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2000, 55( 1−3): 229– 243

[9]

NieJ G TaoM X NieX. New technique and application of uplift-restricted and slip-permitted connection. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2015, 48 (4): 7− 14 (in Chinese)

[10]

LinW, Yoda T, TaniguchiN. Application of SFRC in steel-concrete composite beams subjected to hogging moment. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2014, 101 : 175– 183

[11]

HamodaA, HossainK M A, SennahK, ShoukryM, MahmoudZ. Behaviour of composite high performance concrete slab on steel I-beams subjected to static hogging moment. Engineering Structures, 2017, 140 : 51– 65

[12]

ZhangY, CaiS, Zhu Y, FanL, ShaoX. Flexural responses of steel-UHPC composite beams under hogging moment. Engineering Structures, 2020, 206 : 110134

[13]

HaberZ B VargaI D l GraybealB A NakashojiB El-HelouR. Properties and Behavior of UHPC-Class Materials. Report No. FHWA-HRT-18-036. 2018

[14]

QiuM, Shao X, WilleK, YanB, Wu J. Experimental investigation on flexural behavior of reinforced ultra high performance concrete low-profile T-beams. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 2020, 14( 1): 5

[15]

QiuM, Shao X, ZhuY, ZhanJ, YanB, Wang Y. Experimental investigation on flexural cracking behavior of ultrahigh performance concrete beams. Structural Concrete, 2020, 21( 5): 2134– 2153

[16]

AbbasS, NehdiM L, SaleemM A. Ultra-high performance concrete: Mechanical performance, durability, sustainability and implementation challenges. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 2016, 10( 3): 271– 295

[17]

GraybealB A. Design and Construction of Field-Cast UHPC Connections. Report No. FHWA-HRT-14-084. 2014

[18]

WangZ, NieX, Fan J S, LuX Y, DingR. Experimental and numerical investigation of the interfacial properties of non-steam-cured UHPC-steel composite beams. Construction & Building Materials, 2019, 195 : 323– 339

[19]

YooS W, ChooJ F. Evaluation of the flexural behavior of composite beam with inverted-T steel girder and steel fiber reinforced ultra high performance concrete slab. Engineering Structures, 2016, 118 : 1– 15

[20]

ZhuY, Zhang Y, HusseinH H, CaiS. Flexural study on UHPC-steel composite beams with joints under negative bending moment. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2020, 25( 10): 04020084

[21]

HuY, Meloni M, ChengZ, WangJ, XiuH. Flexural performance of steel-UHPC composite beams with shear pockets. Structures., 2020, 27 : 570– 582

[22]

QiJ, Cheng Z, WangJ, TangY. Flexural behavior of steel-UHPFRC composite beams under negative moment. Structures., 2020, 24 : 640– 649

[23]

WangK, ZhaoC, WuB, Deng K, CuiB. Fully-scale test and analysis of fully dry-connected prefabricated steel-UHPC composite beam under hogging moments. Engineering Structures, 2019, 197 : 109380

[24]

SharifaA M, AssiN, Al-OstaM. Use of UHPC slab for continuous composite steel-concrete girders. Steel and Composite Structures, 2020, 34( 3): 321– 332

[25]

HunanProvincial Communication Planning Survey& Design Institute. Report of Design Scheme of Changsha-Yiyang Expressway Expansion Project. 2018 (in Chinese)

[26]

GB/T31387-2015 31387-2015G.T. Reactive Powder Concrete. Beijing: General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China, 2015

[27]

JTG/TD64-01-2015. Specification for Design and Construction of Highway Steel-concrete Composite Bridge. Beijing: China Communication Press, 2015

[28]

QiuM H, ZhangY, QuS Q, ZhuY P, ShaoX D. Effect of reinforcement ratio, fiber orientation, and fiber chemical treatment on the direct tension behavior of rebar-reinforced UHPC. Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 256 : 119311

[29]

ZhangY, LiX, Zhu Y, ShaoX. Experimental study on flexural behavior of damaged reinforced concrete (RC) beam strengthened by toughness-improved ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) layer. Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2020, 186 : 107834

[30]

GraybealB A. Material Property Characterization of Ultra-high Performance Concret. McLean: Federal Highway Administration, Office of Research, Development and Technology, Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, 2006

[31]

Eurocode4: Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures––Part 1-1: General Rules And Rules for Buildings. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization, 1994

[32]

ZhangY, ZhangC, ZhuY, Cao J, ShaoX. An experimental study: Various influence factors affecting interfacial shear performance of UHPC-NSC. Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 236 : 117480

[33]

HusseinH H, WalshK K, SargandS M, SteinbergE P. Interfacial properties of ultrahigh-performance concrete and high-strength concrete bridge connections. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2016, 28( 5): 04015208

[34]

ZmetraK M, McMullenK F, ZaghiA E, WilleK. Experimental study of UHPC repair for corrosion-damaged steel girder ends. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2017, 22( 8): 04017037

[35]

McMullenK F, ZaghiA E. Experimental evaluation of full-scale corroded steel plate girders repaired with UHPC. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2020, 25( 4): 04020011

[36]

KruszewskiD, ZaghiA E, WilleK. Durability evaluation of headed shear studs embedded in ultrahigh-performance concrete via electrochemical corrosion. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2019, 24( 5): 04019038

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (10135KB)

2865

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/