Influence of morphology on high-temperature rheological properties of bitumen modified with styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS) copolymer

Abstract

Different microstructures of the same polymer-modified bitumen (PMB) were obtained by subjecting the bitumen modified with styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS) copolymer to isothermal annealing at various temperatures. The effects of the morphology on the rheological properties of SBS-modified bitumen were investigated within the high-temperature range. The PMB microstructures were quantitatively evaluated using image analysis. A dynamic shear rheometer was used to measure the rheological parameters of the PMB samples and perform the multiple stress creep and recovery (MSCR) test. A quantitative basis could be established on which to discuss the relationship between the PMB morphology and rheology. The image analysis indicated that conditioning by isothermal annealing evidently led to a difference in the microstructure of the samples. Variation of the thermal history is demonstrated to be a practical way to vary the morphology of the PMB with the same raw materials and formulation. Compared with the two-phase morphology, the single-phase microstructure tended to have a narrower linear viscoelastic (LVE) region of the PMB. Within the LVE region, especially at low frequencies, the homogenous PMB can store more energy when experiencing loadings and is more elastic. Outside the LVE region, based on the MSCR test results, the homogenous morphology could assist in reaching a higher percentage of strain recovery after the creep period.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

polymer / bitumen / microstructure / rheology / viscoelasticity

References

[1] Lu X, Isacsson U. Rheological characterization of styrene-butadiene-styrene copolymer modified bitumens. Construction & Building Materials, 1997, 11(1): 23–32

[2] Airey G D. Rheological properties of styrene butadiene styrene polymer modified road bitumens. Fuel, 2003, 82(14): 1709–1719

[3] Adedeji A, Grünfelder T, Bates F S, Macosko C W, Stroup-Gardiner M, Newcomb D E. Asphalt modified by SBS triblock copolymer: Structures and properties. Polymer Engineering and Science, 1996, 36(12): 1707–1723

[4] Lesueur D, Gérard J F, Claudy P, Létoffé J M, Martin D, Planche J P. Polymer modified asphalts as viscoelastic emulsions. Journal of Rheology (New York, N.Y.), 1998, 42(5): 1059–1074

[5] Lu X, Isacsson U. Modification of road bitumens with thermoplastic polymers. Polymer Testing, 2000, 20(1): 77–86

[6] Yildirim Y. Polymer modified asphalt binders. Construction & Building Materials, 2007, 21(1): 66–72

[7] Sengoz B, Isikyakar G. Evaluation of the properties and microstructure of SBS and EVA polymer modified bitumen. Construction & Building Materials, 2008, 22(9): 1897–1905

[8] Wu S, Pang L, Mo L, Chen Y, Zhu G. Influence of aging on the evolution of structure, morphology and rheology of base and SBS modified bitumen. Construction & Building Materials, 2009, 23(2): 1005–1010

[9] Polacco G, Filippi S, Merusi F, Stastna G. A review of the fundamentals of polymer-modified asphalts: Asphalt/polymer interactions and principles of compatibility. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2015, 224: 72–112

[10] Laukkanen O V, Soenen H, Winter H H, Seppälä J. Low-temperature rheological and morphological characterization of SBS modified bitumen. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 179: 348–359

[11] Zhu J, Balieu R, Wang H. The use of solubility parameters and free energy theory for phase behaviour of polymer-modified bitumen: A review. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 2021, 22(4): 757–778

[12] Pérez-Lepe A, Martínez-Boza F J, Gallegos C, González O, Muñoz M E, Santamaría A. Influence of the processing conditions on the rheological behaviour of polymer-modified bitumen. Fuel, 2003, 82(11): 1339–1348

[13] Mouillet V, Lamontagne J, Durrieu F, Planche J P, Lapalu L. Infrared microscopy investigation of oxidation and phase evolution in bitumen modified with polymers. Fuel, 2008, 87(7): 1270–1280

[14] Xia T, Xu J, Huang T, He J, Zhang Y, Guo J, Li Y. Viscoelastic phase behavior in SBS modified bitumen studied by morphology evolution and viscoelasticity change. Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 105: 589–594

[15] Zhu J, Balieu R, Lu X, Kringos N. Microstructure evaluation of polymer-modified bitumen by image analysis using two-dimensional fast Fourier transform. Materials & Design, 2018, 137: 164–175

[16] Zhu J, Lu X, Kringos N. Experimental investigation on storage stability and phase separation behaviour of polymer-modified bitumen. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2018, 19(9): 832–841

[17] Liang M, Xin X, Fan W, Wang H, Ren S, Shi J. Effects of polymerized sulfur on rheological properties, morphology and stability of SBS modified asphalt. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 150: 860–871

[18] Wang P, Dong Z, Tan Y, Liu Z. Identifying the rheological properties of polymer-modified bitumen based on its morphology. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 2017, 18(sup3): 249–258

[19] Soenen H, De Visscher J, Vanelstraete A, Redelius P. The influence of thermal history on binder rutting indicators. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 2005, 6(2): 217–238

[20] Soenen H, De Visscher J, Vanelstraete A, Redelius P. Influence of thermal history on rheological properties of various bitumen. Rheologica Acta, 2006, 45(5): 729–739

[21] Soenen H, Lu X, Redelius P. The morphology of bitumen-SBS blends by UV microscopy: An evaluation of preparation methods. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 2008, 9(1): 97–110

[22] Soenen H, Lu X, Redelius P. The morphology of SBS modified bitumen in binders and in asphalt mix. In: Advanced Testing and Characterization of Bituminous Materials: Proceedings of the 7th International RILEM Symposium ATCBM09. Leiden: CRC Press, 2009, 151–160

[23] Laukkanen O V, Soenen H. Rheological characterization of wax modified bituminous binders: Effect of specimen preparation and thermal history. Construction & Building Materials, 2015, 95: 269–278

[24] Koenders B. Routine testing and mechanical properties of bitumens. In: Hunter R N, Self A, Read J, eds. The Shell Bitumen Handbook. 6th ed. London: Shell International Petroleum Company Ltd, 2015, 87–118

[25] Tanaka H, Hayashi T, Nishi T. Application of digital image analysis to pattern formation in polymer systems. Journal of Applied Physics, 1986, 59(11): 3627–3643

[26] Moolman D W, Aldrich C, Van Deventer J S J, Stange W W. Digital image processing as a tool for on-line monitoring of froth in flotation plants. Minerals Engineering, 1994, 7(9): 1149–1164

[27] Schneider C A, Rasband W S, Eliceiri K W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods, 2012, 9(7): 671–675

[28] Liu Q, Wu S, Liu C, Wang J. Investigation of rheological properties of TPS modified bitumen. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2008, 15(S1): 118–121

[29] Anderson D, Le Hir Y, Planche J P, Martin D, Shenoy A. Zero shear viscosity of asphalt binders. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2002, 1810(1): 54–62

[30] de Visscher J, Vanelstraete A. Practical test methods for measuring the zero shear viscosity of bituminous binders. Materials and Structures, 2004, 37(5): 360–364

[31] Morea F, Agnusdei J O, Zerbino R. Comparison of methods for measuring zero shear viscosity in asphalts. Materials and Structures, 2010, 43(4): 499–507

[32] Lu X, Soenen H, Redelius P. SBS modified bitumens: Does their morphology and storage stability influence asphalt mix performance? In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Asphalt Pavements. Lino Lakes: ISAP, 2010, 1604–1613

[33] Zhu J, Balieu R, Lu X, Kringos N. Numerical investigation on phase separation in polymer-modified bitumen: Effect of thermal condition. Journal of Materials Science, 2017, 52(11): 6525–6541

[34] Petersen J C, Robertson R E, Branthaver J F, Harnsberger P M, Duvall J J, Kim S S, Anderson D A, Christiansen D W, Bahia H U, Dongre R, Antle C E, Sharma M G, Button J W, Glover C J. Binder Characterization and Evaluation: Volume 4: Test Method. Strategic Highway Research Program Report No.: SHRP-A-370. 1994

[35] Airey G D, Rahimzadeh B, Collop A C. Linear viscoelastic limits of bituminous binders. Electronic Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 2002, 71: 89–115

[36] Airey G, Rahimzadeh B, Collop A. Linear viscoelastic performance of asphaltic materials. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 2003, 4(3): 269–292

[37] Airey G D, Rahimzadeh B. Combined bituminous binder and mixture linear rheological properties. Construction & Building Materials, 2004, 18(7): 535–548

[38] Airey G D. Factors affecting the rheology of polymer modified bitumen (PMB). In: McNally T, ed. Polymer Modified Bitumen: Properties and Characterisation. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 2011, 238–263

[39] Petersen J C, Robertson R E, Branthaver J F, Harnsberger P M, Duvall J J, Kim S S, Anderson D A, Christiansen D W, Bahia H U. Binder Characterization and Evaluation: Volume 1. Strategic Highway Research Program Report No.: SHRP-A-367. 1994

[40] Subhy A. Advanced analytical techniques in fatigue and rutting related characterisations of modified bitumen: Literature review. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 156: 28–45

[41] Shenoy A. Refinement of the Superpave specification parameter for performance grading of asphalt. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2001, 127(5): 357–362

[42] Shenoy A. Model-fitting the master curves of the dynamic shear rheometer data to extract a rut-controlling term for asphalt pavements. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 2002, 30(2): 95–102

[43] Shenoy A. High temperature performance grading of asphalts through a specification criterion that could capture field performance. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2004, 130(1): 132–137

[44] Al-Khateeb G G, Ramadan K Z. Investigation of the effect of rubber on rheological properties of asphalt binders using superpave DSR. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2015, 19(1): 127–135

[45] Feng Z, Yu J, Wu S. Rheological evaluation of bitumen containing different ultraviolet absorbers. Construction & Building Materials, 2012, 29: 591–596

[46] Yao H, You Z, Li L, Shi X, Goh S W, Mills-Beale J, Wingard D. Performance of asphalt binder blended with non-modified and polymer-modified nanoclay. Construction & Building Materials, 2012, 35: 159–170

[47] Cross M M. Rheology of non-Newtonian fluids: A new flow equation for pseudoplastic systems. Journal of Colloid Science, 1965, 20(5): 417–437

[48] Zoorob S E, Castro-Gomes J P, Pereira Oliveira L A. Assessing low shear viscosity as the new bitumen softening point test. Construction & Building Materials, 2012, 27(1): 357–367

[49] Morea F, Zerbino R, Agnusdei J. Improvements on asphalt mixtures rutting performance characterization by the use of low shear viscosity. Materials and Structures, 2013, 46(1-2): 267–276

[50] Morea F, Zerbino R, Agnusdei J. Wheel tracking rutting performance estimation based on bitumen Low Shear Viscosity (LSV), loading and temperature conditions. Materials and Structures, 2014, 47(4): 683–692

[51] Sybilski D. Zero-shear viscosity of bituminous binder and its relation to bituminous mixture’s rutting resistance. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1996, 1535(1): 15–21

[52] Zhang H, Chen Z, Xu G, Shi C. Evaluation of aging behaviors of asphalt binders through different rheological indices. Fuel, 2018, 221: 78–88

[53] de Visscher J, Vanelstraete A. Equiviscous temperature based on low shear viscosity: Evaluation as binder indicator for rutting and critical discussion of the test procedure. In: Advanced Testing and Characterization of Bituminous Materials: Proceedings of the 7th International RILEM Symposium ATCBM09. Leiden: CRC Press, 2009, 1009–1018

[54] Morea F, Agnusdei J O, Zerbino R. The use of asphalt low shear viscosity to predict permanent deformation performance of asphalt concrete. Materials and Structures, 2011, 44(7): 1241–1248

[55] Hossain Z, Ghosh D, Zaman M, Hobson K. Use of the multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test method to characterize polymer-modified asphalt binders. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 2015, 44(1): 507–520

[56] Laukkanen O V, Soenen H, Pellinen T, Heyrman S, Lemoine G. Creep-recovery behavior of bituminous binders and its relation to asphalt mixture rutting. Materials and Structures, 2015, 48(12): 4039–4053

[57] Król J, Radziszewski P, Kowalski K J. Influence of microstructural behavior on multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) in modified bitumen. Procedia Engineering, 2015, 111: 478–484

[58] Chen J S, Liao M C, Shiah M S. Asphalt modified by styrene-butadiene-styrene triblock copolymer: Morphology and model. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2002, 14(3): 224–229

[59] Wang H, Liu X, Zhang H, Apostolidis P, Erkens S, Skarpas A. Micromechanical modelling of complex shear modulus of crumb rubber modified bitumen. Materials & Design, 2020, 188: 108467

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s) 2021. This article is published with open access at link.springer.com and journal.hep.com.cn