Alluvial channel hydrodynamics around tandem piers with downward seepage

Rutuja CHAVAN , Wenxin HUAI , Bimlesh KUMAR

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (6) : 1445 -1461.

PDF (4426KB)
Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (6) : 1445 -1461. DOI: 10.1007/s11709-020-0648-x
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Alluvial channel hydrodynamics around tandem piers with downward seepage

Author information +
History +
PDF (4426KB)

Abstract

In this paper, we report the turbulent flow structures and the scour geometry around two piers with different diameters. An experiment was conducted on a non-uniform sand bed with two types of tandem arrangements, namely, pier (T1) with a 75 mm front and 90 mm rear, and pier (T2) with a 90 mm front and 75 mm rear, with and without-seepage flows, respectively. A strong wake region was observed behind the piers, but the vortex strength diminished with downward seepage. Streamwise velocity was found to be maximum near the bed downstream of the piers and at the edge of the scour hole upstream of the piers. Quadrant analysis was used to recognize the susceptible region for sediment entrainment and deposition. Upstream of the piers near the bed, the moments, turbulent kinetic energy (TKE), and TKE fluxes were found to decrease with downward seepage, in contrast to those in a plane mobile bed without piers. The reduction percentages of scour depth at the rear pier compared with the front one were approximately 40% for T1 and 60% for T2. Downward seepage also resulted in restrained growth of scouring with time.

Keywords

scour / seepage / Strouhal number / tandem arrangement / turbulent characteristics

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Rutuja CHAVAN, Wenxin HUAI, Bimlesh KUMAR. Alluvial channel hydrodynamics around tandem piers with downward seepage. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 1445-1461 DOI:10.1007/s11709-020-0648-x

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Melville B W. Local Scour at Bridge Sites. Auckland: The University of Auckland, 1975

[2]

Ettema R. Scour at bridge piers. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Auckland: The University of Auckland, 1980

[3]

Qadar A. The vortex scour mechanism at bridge piers. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Part Research & Theory. Aligarh, 1981

[4]

Chiew, Y. M. Local scour at bridge piers. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Auckland: University of Auckland, 1984

[5]

Richardson E V, Davis S R. Evaluating Scour at Bridges. 4th ed. Washington, D.C.: Federal Highway Administration, 2001

[6]

Pasiok R, Stilger-Szydło E. Sediment particles and turbulent flow simulation around bridge piers. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 2010, 10(2): 67–79

[7]

Melville B W, Coleman S E. Bridge Scour. Lone Tree, CO: Water Resources Publications, 2000

[8]

Izadinia E, Heidarpour M, Schleiss A J. Investigation of turbulence flow and sediment entrainment around a bridge pier. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2013, 27(6): 1303–1314

[9]

Ataie-Ashtiani B, Baratian-Ghorghi Z, Beheshti A A. Experimental investigation of clear-water local scour of compound piers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2010, 136(6): 343–351

[10]

Beg M. Characteristics of developing scour holes around two piers placed in transverse arrangement. In: Scour and Erosion. California, 2010

[11]

Salim M, Jones J S. Scour around exposed pile foundations. In: North American Water and Environment Congress & Destructive Water. California: ASCE, 1996

[12]

Ataie-Ashtiani B, Beheshti A A. Experimental investigation of clear-water local scour at pile groups. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2006, 132(10): 1100–1104

[13]

Mahjoub Said N, Mhiri H, Bournot H, Le Palec G. Experimental and numerical modelling of the three dimensional incompressible flow behaviour in the near wake of circular cylinders. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2008, 96(5): 471–502

[14]

Palau-Salvador G, Stoesser T, Rodi W. LES of the flow around two cylinders in tandem. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2008, 24(8): 1304–1312

[15]

Ataie-Ashtiani B, Aslani-Kordkandi A. Flow field around single and tandem piers. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2013, 90(3): 471–490

[16]

Okajima A, Yasui S, Kiwata T, Kimura S. Flow-induced streamwise oscillation of two circular cylinders in tandem arrangement. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2007, 28(4): 552–560

[17]

Sumner D. Two circular cylinders in cross-flow: A review. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2010, 26(6): 849–899

[18]

Elhimer M, Harran G, Hoarau Y, Cazin S, Marchal M, Braza M. Coherent and turbulent processes in the bistable regime around a tandem of cylinders including reattached flow dynamics by means of high-speed PIV. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2016, 60: 62–79

[19]

Sharma H D, Chawla A S. Manual of Canal Lining. Technical Report No. l4. Central Board of Irrigation and Power New Delhi. 1975

[20]

Krishnamurthy K, Rao S. Theory and experiment in canal seepage estimation using radioisotopes. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 1969, 9(3): 277–293

[21]

Berenbrock C. Stream Flow Gains and Losses in the Lower Boise River Basin, Idaho, 1996-97. Boise: US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey, 1999

[22]

Tanji K K, Kielen N C. Agricultural Drainage Water Management in Arid and Semi-Arid Areas. Rome, UN: FAO, 2002

[23]

Kinzli K D, Martinez M, Oad R, Prior A, Gensler D. Using an ADCP to determine canal seepage loss in an irrigation district. Agricultural Water Management, 2010, 97(6): 801–810

[24]

Martin C A, Gates T K. Uncertainty of canal seepage losses estimated using flowing water balance with acoustic Doppler devices. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2014, 517: 746–761

[25]

Lu Y, Chiew Y M, Cheng N S. Review of seepage effects on turbulent open channel flow and sediment entrainment. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2008, 46(4): 476–488

[26]

Cao D, Chiew Y M. Suction effects on sediment transport in closed-conduit flows. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2014, 140(5): 04014008

[27]

Rao A R, Sreenivasulu G, Kumar B. Geometry of sand-bed channels with seepage. Geomorphology, 2011, 128(3–4): 171–177

[28]

Francalanci S, Parker G, Solari L. Effect of seepage-induced nonhydrostatic pressure distribution on bed-load transport and bed morphodynamics. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2008, 134(4): 378–389

[29]

Qi M, Chiew Y M, Hong J H. Suction effects on bridge pier scour under clear-water conditions. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2013, 139(6): 621–629

[30]

Chavan R, Sharma A, Kumar B. Effect of downward seepage on turbulent flow characteristics and bed morphology around bridge piers. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2017, 16(1): 60–72

[31]

Wu B, Molinas A, Julien P Y. Bed material load computations for nonuniform sediments. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2004, 130(10): 1002–1012

[32]

Marsh N A, Western A W, Grayson R B. Comparison of methods for predicting incipient motion for sand beds. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2004, 130(7): 616–621

[33]

Chiew Y M, Melville B W. Local scour around bridge piers. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 1987, 25(1): 15–26

[34]

Yang S Q, Tan S K, Lim S Y. Velocity distribution and dip-phenomenon in smooth uniform open channel flows. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2004, 130(12): 1179–1186

[35]

Goring D G, Nikora V I. Despiking acoustic Doppler velocimeter data. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2002, 128(1): 117–126

[36]

Deshpande V, Kumar B. Turbulent flow structures in alluvial channels with curved cross‐sections under conditions of downward seepage. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2016, 41(8): 1073–1087

[37]

Tennekes H, Lumley J L. A First Course in Turbulence. London: MIT Press, 1972

[38]

Lu S S, Willmarth W W. Measurements of the structure of the Reynolds stress in a turbulent boundary layer. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1973, 60(3): 481–511

[39]

Cellino M, Lemmin U. Influence of coherent flow structures on the dynamics of suspended sediment transport in open-channel flow. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2004, 130(11): 1077–1088

[40]

Raupach M R. Conditional statistics of Reynolds stress in rough-wall and smooth-wall turbulent boundary layers. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1981, 108: 363–382

[41]

Maity H, Mazumder B S. Contributions of burst-sweep cycles to Reynolds shear stress over fluvial obstacle marks generated in a laboratory flume. International Journal of Sediment Research, 2012, 27(3): 378–387

[42]

Chavan R, Kumar B.Experimental investigation on flow and scour characteristics around tandem piers in sandy channel with downward seepage. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2017, 16(3), 313–322

[43]

Chavan R, Kumar B. Prediction of scour depth and dune morphology around circular bridge piers in seepage affected alluvial channels. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 18(4): 923–945

[44]

Kumar V, Raju K G R, Vittal N. Reduction of local scour around bridge piers using slots and collars. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1999, 125(12): 1302–1305

[45]

Mia M F, Nago H. Design method of time-dependent local scour at circular bridge pier. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2003, 129(6): 420–427

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (4426KB)

3155

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/