Shear stress distribution prediction in symmetric compound channels using data mining and machine learning models

Zohreh SHEIKH KHOZANI , Khabat KHOSRAVI , Mohammadamin TORABI , Amir MOSAVI , Bahram REZAEI , Timon RABCZUK

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (5) : 1097 -1109.

PDF (2781KB)
Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (5) : 1097 -1109. DOI: 10.1007/s11709-020-0634-3
TRANSDISCIPLINARY INSIGHT
TRANSDISCIPLINARY INSIGHT

Shear stress distribution prediction in symmetric compound channels using data mining and machine learning models

Author information +
History +
PDF (2781KB)

Abstract

Shear stress distribution prediction in open channels is of utmost importance in hydraulic structural engineering as it directly affects the design of stable channels. In this study, at first, a series of experimental tests were conducted to assess the shear stress distribution in prismatic compound channels. The shear stress values around the whole wetted perimeter were measured in the compound channel with different floodplain widths also in different flow depths in subcritical and supercritical conditions. A set of, data mining and machine learning algorithms including Random Forest (RF), M5P, Random Committee, KStar and Additive Regression implemented on attained data to predict the shear stress distribution in the compound channel. Results indicated among these five models; RF method indicated the most precise results with the highest R2 value of 0.9. Finally, the most powerful data mining method which studied in this research compared with two well-known analytical models of Shiono and Knight method (SKM) and Shannon method to acquire the proposed model functioning in predicting the shear stress distribution. The results showed that the RF model has the best prediction performance compared to SKM and Shannon models.

Keywords

compound channel / machine learning / SKM model / shear stress distribution / data mining models

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zohreh SHEIKH KHOZANI, Khabat KHOSRAVI, Mohammadamin TORABI, Amir MOSAVI, Bahram REZAEI, Timon RABCZUK. Shear stress distribution prediction in symmetric compound channels using data mining and machine learning models. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(5): 1097-1109 DOI:10.1007/s11709-020-0634-3

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Chiu C L, Chiou J D. Structure of 3-D flow in rectangular open channels. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1986, 112(11): 1050–1067

[2]

Chiu C L, Lin G F. Computation of 3-D flow and shear in open channels. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1983, 109(11): 1424–1440

[3]

Ghosh S N, Roy N. Boundary shear distribution in open channel flow. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, 1970, 96 (4): 967994

[4]

Knight D W, Demetriou J D, Hamed M E. Boundary shear in smooth rectangular channels. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1984, 110(4): 405–422

[5]

Flintham T P, Carling P A. Prediction of mean bed and wall boundary shear in uniform and compositely rough channels. In: International Conference on River Regime Hydraulics Research Limited. Chichester: Wiley, 1988

[6]

Khatua K K, Patra K C. Boundary shear stress distribution in compound open channel flow. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2007, 13(3): 39–54

[7]

Knight D W, Hamed M E. Boundary shear in symmetrical compound channels. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1984, 110(10): 1412–1430

[8]

Naik B, Khatua K K. Boundary shear stress distribution for a converging compound channel. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2016, 22(2): 212–219

[9]

Tominaga A, Nezu I, Ezaki K, Nakagawa H. Three-dimensional turbulent structure in straight open channel flows. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 1989, 27(1): 149–173

[10]

Rezaei B, Knight D W. Overbank flow in compound channels with nonprismatic floodplains. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2011, 137(8): 815–824

[11]

Shiono K, Knight D W. Two-dimensional analytical solution for a compound channel. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium Refined flow modeling and turbulence measurements. Tokyo, 1988, 503–510

[12]

Khodashenas S R, Paquier A. A geometrical method for computing the distribution of boundary shear stress across irregular straight open channels. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 1999, 37(3): 381–388

[13]

Yang S Q, Lim S Y. Boundary shear stress distributions in trapezoidal channels. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2005, 43(1): 98–102

[14]

Yang K, Nie R, Liu X, Cao S. Modeling depth-averaged velocity and boundary shear stress in rectangular compound channels with secondary flows. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2013, 139(1): 76–83

[15]

Bonakdari H, Tooshmalani M, Sheikh Z. Predicting shear stress distribution in rectangular channels using entropy concept. International Journal of Engineering, Transaction A: Basics, 2015, 28: 360–367

[16]

Sheikh Khozani Z, Bonakdari H, Ebtehaj I. An analysis of shear stress distribution in circular channels with sediment deposition based on Gene Expression Programming. International Journal of Sediment Research, 2017, 32(4): 575–584

[17]

Sheikh Khozani Z, Bonakdari H, Zaji A H. Efficient shear stress distribution detection in circular channels using Extreme Learning Machines and the M5 model tree algorithm. Urban Water Journal, 2017, 14(10): 999–1006

[18]

Rezaei B, Knight D W. Application of the Shiono and Knight Method in compound channels with non-prismatic floodplains. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2009, 47(6): 716–726

[19]

Sheikh Khozani Z, Bonakdari H. A comparison of five different models in predicting the shear stress distribution in straight compound channels. Scientia Iranica, 2016, 23: 2536–2545

[20]

Genç O, Gonen B, Ardıçlıoğlu M. A comparative evaluation of shear stress modeling based on machine learning methods in small streams. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 2015, 17(5): 805–816

[21]

Bonakdari H, Sheikh Khozani Z, Zaji A H, Asadpour N. Evaluating the apparent shear stress in prismatic compound channels using the Genetic Algorithm based on Multi-Layer Perceptron: A comparative study. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2018, 338: 400–411

[22]

Sheikh Khozani Z, Bonakdari H, Ebtehaj I. An expert system for predicting shear stress distribution in circular open channels using gene expression programming. Water Science and Engineering, 2018, 11(2): 167–176

[23]

Sheikh Khozani Z, Bonakdari H, Zaji A H. Estimating shear stress in a rectangular channel with rough boundaries using an optimized SVM method. Neural Computing & Applications, 2018, 30: 1–13

[24]

Azad A, Farzin S, Kashi H, Sanikhani H, Karami H, Kisi O. Prediction of river flow using hybrid neuro-fuzzy models. Arabian Journal of Geoscience, 2018, 11(22): 718

[25]

Sanikhani H, Kisi O, Maroufpoor E, Yaseen Z M. Temperature-based modeling of reference evapotranspiration using several artificial intelligence models: Application of different modeling scenarios. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2019, 135(1–2): 449–462

[26]

Vonk J, Shackelford T K. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Evolutionary Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012

[27]

Anitescu C, Atroshchenko E, Alajlan N, Rabczuk T. Artificial neural network methods for the solution of second order boundary value problems. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2019, 59(1): 345–359

[28]

Guo H, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. A deep collocation method for the bending analysis of Kirchhoff plate. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2019, 59(2): 433–456

[29]

Sheikh Khozani Z, Bonakdari H, Zaji A H. Estimating the shear stress distribution in circular channels based on the randomized neural network technique. Applied Soft Computing, 2017, 58: 441–448

[30]

Khuntia J R, Devi K, Khatua K K. Flow distribution in a compound channel using an artificial neural network. Sustainable Water Resources Management, 2019, 5(4): 1–12

[31]

Sheikh Khozani Z, Khosravi K, Pham B T, Kløve B, Wan Mohtar W H M, Yaseen Z M. Determination of compound channel apparent shear stress: Application of novel data mining models. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 2019, 21(5): 798–811

[32]

Lovell M C. CAI on pcs—Some economic applications. Journal of Economic Education, 1987, 18: 319–329

[33]

Witten I H, Frank E, Hall M A, Pal C J. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, 2016

[34]

Olson D L. Data mining in business services. Service Business, 2007, 1(3): 181–193

[35]

Guo H, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. A deep collocation method for the bending analysis of Kirchhoff plate. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2019, 59(2): 433–456

[36]

Ho T K. The random subspace method for constructing decision forests. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1998, 20(8): 832–844

[37]

Breiman L. Random forests. Machine Learning, 2001, 45(1): 5–32

[38]

Sun J, Zhong G, Huang K, Dong J. Banzhaf random forests: Cooperative game theory based random forests with consistency. Neural Networks, 2018, 106: 20–29

[39]

Chen M, Wang X, Feng B, Liu W. Structured random forest for label distribution learning. Neurocomputing, 2018, 320: 171–182

[40]

Quinlan J R. Learning with continuous classes. Mach Learn, 1992, 92: 343–348

[41]

Wang Y, Witten I H. Induction of model trees for predicting continuous classes. In: Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Machine Learning Poster Papers. Prague, 1997, 128–137

[42]

Behnood A, Behnood V, Modiri Gharehveran M, Alyamac K E. Prediction of the compressive strength of normal and high-performance concretes using M5P model tree algorithm. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 142: 199–207

[43]

Cleary J G, Trigg L E K. An instance-based learner using an entropic distance measure. Machine Learning Proceedings, 1995, 1995: 108–114

[44]

Tejera Hernández D C. An Experimental Study of K* Algorithm. International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business, 2015, 2: 14–19

[45]

Friedman J H, Stuetzle W. Projection pursuit regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1981, 76(376): 817–823

[46]

Yoshida T. Semiparametric method for model structure discovery in additive regression models. Economie & Statistique, 2018, 5: 124–136

[47]

Hu Y H, Hwang J N. Handbook of Neural Network Signal Processing. Boca Raton, Fl: CRC Rress, Inc.: 2001

[48]

Shiono K, Knight D W. Turbulent open-channel flows with variable depth across the channel. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1991, 222: 617–646

[49]

Sterling M, Knight D. An attempt at using the entropy approach to predict the transverse distribution of boundary shear stress in open channel flow. Stochastic Environmental Research & Risk, 2002, 16: 127–142

[50]

Knight D W, Yuen K W H, Alhamid A A I. Boundary shear stress distributions in open channel flow. Physical Mechanisms of mixing and Transport in the Environment , 1994, 1994: 51–87

[51]

Bonakdari H, Sheikh Z, Tooshmalani M. Comparison between Shannon and Tsallis entropies for prediction of shear stress distribution in open channels. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2015, 29(1): 1–11

[52]

Sheikh Z, Bonakdari H. Prediction of boundary shear stress in circular and trapezoidal channels with entropy concept. Urban Water Journal, 2016, 13(6): 629–636

[53]

Sheikh Khozani Z, Bonakdari H. Formulating the shear stress distribution in circular open channels based on the Renyi entropy. Physica A Statistical Mechanics & Its Applications. 2018, 490: 114–126

[54]

Dawson C W, Abrahart R J, See L M. HydroTest: A web-based toolbox of evaluation metrics for the standardised assessment of hydrological forecasts. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2007, 22(7): 1034–1052

[55]

Rezaei B. Overbank Flow in Compound Channels with Prismatic and Non-prismatic Floodplains. Birmingham: University of Birmingham, 2006

[56]

Vu-Bac N, Lahmer T, Zhang Y, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. Stochastic predictions of interfacial characteristic of polymeric nanocomposites (PNCs). Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2014, 59: 80–95

[57]

Vu-Bac N, Lahmer T, Zhuang X, Nguyen-Thoi T, Rabczuk T. A software framework for probabilistic sensitivity analysis for computationally expensive models. Advances in Engineering Software, 2016, 100: 19–31

[58]

Vu-Bac N, Rafiee R, Zhuang X, Lahmer T, Rabczuk T. Uncertainty quantification for multiscale modeling of polymer nanocomposites with correlated parameters. Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2015, 68: 446–464

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (2781KB)

3492

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/