Temperature segregation and its impact on the quality and performance of asphalt pavements

Abstract

Temperature segregation is non-uniform temperature distribution across the uncompacted asphalt mat during paving operations and may have detrimental effects on the quality and performance of asphalt pavements. However, many research studies conducted across the US have reported mixed observations regarding its effects on the initial quality and long-term performance of asphalt pavements. ƒThe objective of this study was to determine the effects of the temperature segregation on the density and mechanical properties of Louisiana asphalt mixtures. Seven asphalt rehabilitation projects across Louisiana were selected. A multi-sensor infrared bar (Pave-IR) system and a hand-held portable thermal camera were used to measure the temperature of asphalt mats. Field core samples were collected from various areas with varying severity levels of temperature segregation and tested for the density, fracture resistance (J_c) by semi-circular bending (SCB), rut depth by wheel tracking, and dynamic modulus (|E*|) by indirect tension (IDT) devices. ƒTwo distinctive patterns of non-uniform temperature distribution were observed: a cyclic and irregular temperature segregations. Laboratory test results showed that highly temperature segregated asphalt pavements (i.e., temperature differentials ≥ 41.7°C) can have significantly lower densities and the mechanical properties than the non-segregated area, especially when the temperature differentials are measured at compaction.

Keywords

temperature segregation / temperature differential / pavement density / semi-circular bending / wheel tracking / dynamic modulus

References

[1] Don Brock J. Segregation of asphaltic mixtures.  Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists. 1986, 55

[2] Stroup-Gardiner M, Ray Brown E. Segregation in hot-mix asphalt pavements. No. 441. Transportation Research Board, 2000

[3] Mahoney J, Zinke S A, Stephens J E, Myers L A, DaDalt A J.  Application of Infrared Thermographic Imaging to Bituminous Concrete Pavements–Final Report. 2003. No. 2229-F

[4] Gilbert K. Thermal segregation. No. CDOT-DTD-R-2005-16. Colorado Department of Transportation, Research Branch, 2005

[5] Henault J W, Larsen D A, Scully J J. Development of guidelines for reduction of temperature differential damage (TDD) for hot mix asphalt pavement projects in Connecticut. No. FHWA-CT-RD-2222-1-99-5. Connecticut Department of Transportation, Bureau of Engineering and Highway Operations, Division of Research, 1999

[6] Amirkhanian S M, Putnam B J. Laboratory and field investigation of temperature differential in HMA mixtures using an infrared camera. No. FHWA-SC-06-06. Clemson University Department of Civil Engineering, 2006

[7] Gunter, Caleb B.  Field evaluation of temperature differential in HMA mixtures. No. FHWA-SC-12-02. 2012

[8] Brown E R, Collins R, Brownfield J R.  Investigation of segregation of asphalt mixtures in the state of Georgia. No. 1217. 1989

[9] Cho Y K, Bode T, Song J, Jeong J H. Thermography-driven distress prediction from hot mix asphalt road paving construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2012, 138(2): 206–214

[10] Mohammad L N, Hassan M M, Kim M. Effects of paver stoppage on temperature segregation in asphalt pavements. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2016, 29(2): 04016200

[11] Kim M, Mohammad L N, Phaltane P, Elseifi M. Density and SCB measured fracture resistance of temperature segregated asphalt mixtures. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 2017, 10(2): 112–121

[12] Fernandez S.Thermal Segregation: Causes and Effects on In-Place Density and Fatigue Performance of Asphalt Mixtures. Auburn University. National Center for Asphalt Technology, 2012, 1–111

[13] Sebesta S, Scullion T.  Performance monitoring pavements with thermal segregation in Texas. No. FHWA/TX-12/0-6080-1. 2012

[14] Sebesta S, Scullion T. Statewide implementation of PAVE-IR in the Texas department of transportation. No. FHWA/TX-12/5-4577-05-1. Texas Transportation Institute, 2012

[15] Song J, Abdelrahman M, Asa E. Use of a thermal camera during asphalt pavement construction. Materials and Research Division, North Dakota Department of Transportation. 2009

[16] Willoughby K A, Mahoney J P, Pierce L M, Uhlmeyer J S, Anderson K W, Read S A, Muench S T, Thompson T R, Moore R. Construction-related asphalt concrete pavement temperature differentials and the corresponding density differentials.  Washington State Transportation Center, University of Washington, Washington State Department of Transportation, Report No. WA-RD 476. 2001

[17] Louisiana D O T D. Standard Specifications for Roads and Bridges – Section V. LA: Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, 2013, 207–295

[18] Kim Y, Seo Y, King M, Momen M. Dynamic modulus testing of asphalt concrete in indirect tension mode. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2004, 1891: 163–173

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature