Dynamic material performance of cold-formed steel hollow sections: a state-of-the-art review
Cameron B. RITCHIE , Jeffrey A. PACKER , Xiao-Ling ZHAO , Amin HEIDARPOUR , Yiyi CHEN
Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (2) : 209 -227.
Dynamic material performance of cold-formed steel hollow sections: a state-of-the-art review
This paper presents a literature review focused on the material performance of cold-formed, carbon steel, hollow structural sections under impulsive (highly dynamic) loading. Impulsive loading, represented by impact and blast, is characterized by a very rapid, time-dependent loading regime in the affected members and materials. Thus, the effect of high-strain-rate loading is initially reviewed. Next the material toughness, an important energy-absorption property and one measure of a material’s ability to arrest fracture, is considered by means of studying the Charpy V-notch behavior. The response of hollow sections under axial and lateral impact loading is then reviewed. Studies of blast on hollow sections, most of which fall under the categories of contact/near-field loading or far-field loading are presented. Under large-scale field blast experiments, cold-formed hollow sections have shown excellent behavior. Software for modeling blast loading and structural response, the latter including single degree of freedom analysis and explicit finite element analysis, is described and discussed.
cold-formed steel / hollow structural sections / composites / impulsive loading / impact / blast / experimentation / analysis / material properties
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
DOD. Structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions. UFC 3–340–02, Department of Defense, Washington, DC, USA, 2008 |
| [5] |
ASCE. Design of blast resistant buildings in petrochemical facilities. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, USA, 2010 |
| [6] |
ASCE. Blast protection of buildings. ASCE/SEI 59–11, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, USA, 2011 |
| [7] |
CSA. Design and assessment of buildings subjected to blast loads. S850–12, Canadian Standards Association, Toronto, Canada, 2012 |
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
CEB. Concrete structures under impact and impulsive loading. CEB Bulletin 187, Comité Euro-International du Béton, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1988 |
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
CEN. Cold formed welded structural hollow sections of non-alloy and fine grain steels – Part 1: Technical Delivery Conditions. EN10219–1:2006(E), European Committee for Standardisation, Brussels, Belgium, 2006 |
| [36] |
CEN. Cold formed welded structural hollow sections of non-alloy and fine grain steels – Part 2: Tolerances. EN10219–2:2006(E), European Committee for Standardisation, Brussels, Belgium, 2006 |
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
ASTM. Standard specification for cold-formed welded and seamless carbon steel structural tubing in rounds and shapes. ASTM A500/A500M–13, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2013 |
| [40] |
MOC. Cold formed steel hollow sections for building structures. JG/T 178–2005. Ministry of Construction, Beijing, China, 2005 |
| [41] |
ASTM. Standard specification for cold-formed welded carbon steel hollow structural sections (HSS). ASTM A1085–13, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2013 |
| [42] |
AASHTO. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. 7th ed, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, USA, 2016 |
| [43] |
ASTM. Standard test methods and definitions for mechanical testing of steel products. ASTM A370–09a. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2009 |
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
|
| [89] |
|
| [90] |
|
| [91] |
|
| [92] |
|
| [93] |
|
| [94] |
|
| [95] |
|
| [96] |
|
| [97] |
|
| [98] |
|
| [99] |
|
| [100] |
|
| [101] |
USACE. Single-degree-of-freedom blast effects design spreadsheets (SBEDS). PDC-TR 05–01. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, USA, 2005 |
| [102] |
LSTC. LS-DYNA Theory Manual. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore, CA, USA, 2014 |
| [103] |
Simulia. ABAQUS Theory Manual. Providence, RI, USA, 2014 |
| [104] |
ANSYS. ANSYS Autodyn user’s guide. Canonsburg, PA, USA, 2015 |
Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |