Prediction of falling weight deflectometer parameters using hybrid model of genetic algorithm and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system

Abstract

A falling weight deflectometer is a testing device used in civil engineering to measure and evaluate the physical properties of pavements, such as the modulus of the subgrade reaction (Y1) and the elastic modulus of the slab (Y2), which are crucial for assessing the structural strength of pavements. In this study, we developed a novel hybrid artificial intelligence model, i.e., a genetic algorithm (GA)-optimized adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS-GA), to predict Y1 and Y2 based on easily determined 13 parameters of rigid pavements. The performance of the novel ANFIS-GA model was compared to that of other benchmark models, namely logistic regression (LR) and radial basis function regression (RBFR) algorithms. These models were validated using standard statistical measures, namely, the coefficient of correlation (R), mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean square error (RMSE). The results indicated that the ANFIS-GA model was the best at predicting Y1 (R = 0.945) and Y2 (R = 0.887) compared to the LR and RBFR models. Therefore, the ANFIS-GA model can be used to accurately predict Y1 and Y2 based on easily measured parameters for the appropriate and rapid assessment of the quality and strength of pavements.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

falling weight deflectometer / modulus of subgrade reaction / elastic modulus / metaheuristic algorithms

References

[1] Li C, Ashlock J C, Lin S, Vennapusa P K. In situ modulus reduction characteristics of stabilized pavement foundations by multichannel analysis of surface waves and falling weight deflectometer tests. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 188: 809–819

[2] Jolly M R, Prabhakar A, Sturzu B, Hollstein K, Singh R, Thomas S, Foote P, Shaw A. Review of non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques and their applicability to thick walled composites. Procedia CIRP, 2015, 38: 129–136

[3] SmithK DBruinsmaJ EWadeM JChattiKVandenbosscheJYuH T. Using Falling Weight Deflectometer Data With Mechanistic-Empirical Design and Analysis, Volume I. Report No. FHWA-HRT-16-009. 2017

[4] PierceL MBruinsmaJ ESmithK DWadeM JChattiKVandenbosscheJ. Using Falling Weight Deflectometer Data with Mechanistic-empirical Design and Analysis, Volume III: Guidelines for Deflection Testing, Analysis, and Interpretation. Report No. FHWA-HRT-16-011. 2017

[5] Deng Y, Luo X, Zhang Y, Lytton R L. Determination of complex modulus gradients of flexible pavements using falling weight deflectometer and artificial intelligence. Materials and Structures, 2020, 53(4): 1–17

[6] AllandKBechNVandenbosscheJ M. Interpreting Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) Data (for Asphalt and Concrete Pavements). Report No. FHWA-PA-2018-004-PIT WO 6. 2018

[7] HoernerTSmithKYuHPeshkinDWadeM J R M. PCC Pavement Evaluation and Rehabilitation. Arlington, VA: National Highway Institute, 2001

[8] Han Z, Yang L, Fang H, Zhang J. Dynamic simulation of falling weight deflectometer tests on flexible transversely isotropic layered pavements. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 139: 106353

[9] Vyas V, Singh A P, Srivastava A. Prediction of asphalt pavement condition using FWD deflection basin parameters and artificial neural networks. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 2021, 22(12): 2748–2766

[10] Kavussi A, Abbasghorbani M, Moghadas Nejad F, Bamdad Ziksari A. A new method to determine maintenance and repair activities at network-level pavement management using falling weight deflectometer. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 2017, 23(3): 338–346

[11] Hadidi R, Gucunski N. Comparative study of static and dynamic falling weight deflectometer back-calculations using probabilistic approach. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2010, 136(3): 196–204

[12] NabizadehHHajjESiddharthanRElfassSNimeriN. Application of falling weight deflectometer for the estimation of in-situ shear strength parameters of subgrade layer. In: Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railways and Airfields. 2017, 743–749

[13] Sun J, Chai G, Oh E, Bell P. A review of PCN determination of airport pavements using FWD/HWD test. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 2022, 1–19

[14] White G. Use of falling weight deflectometer for airport pavements. In: Proceedings of the 5th GeoChina International Conference 2018, Hangzhou. Berlin: Springer International Publishing, 2019, 119–133

[15] Al Thobiani F, Khatir S, Benaissa B, Ghandourah E, Mirjalili S, Wahab M A. A hybrid PSO and grey wolf optimization algorithm for static and dynamic crack identification. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2022, 118: 103213

[16] Ho L V, Trinh T T, De Roeck G, Bui-Tien T, Nguyen-Ngoc L, Wahab M A. An efficient stochastic-based coupled model for damage identification in plate structures. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2022, 131: 105866

[17] Sang-To T, Hoang-Le M, Wahab M A, Cuong-Le T. An efficient planet optimization algorithm for solving engineering problems. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12(1): 1–18

[18] Ho L V, Nguyen D H, Mousavi M, De Roeck G, Bui-Tien T, Gandomi A H, Wahab M A. A hybrid computational intelligence approach for structural damage detection using marine predator algorithm and feedforward neural networks. Computers & Structures, 2021, 252: 106568

[19] MeierR W. Backcalculation of flexible pavement moduli from falling weight deflectometer data using artificial neural networks. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology, 1995

[20] Bayrak M B, Ceylan H. Neural network-based approach for analysis of rigid pavement systems using deflection data. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2008, 2068(1): 61–70

[21] Liu H, Cao J, Huang W, Shi X, Zhou X. A data-driven approach to the evaluation of asphalt pavement structures using falling weight deflectometer. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems-S, 2022, 15(11): 3223–3241

[22] Bellary A, Suresha S. ANN model to predict joint stiffness of white-topped pavements using falling weight deflectometer (FWD) data. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 2022, 1–15

[23] Karballaeezadeh N, Zaremotekhases F, Shamshirband S, Mosavi A, Nabipour N, Csiba P, Várkonyi-Kóczy A R. Intelligent road inspection with advanced machine learning; hybrid prediction models for smart mobility and transportation maintenance systems. Energies, 2020, 13(7): 1–22

[24] Han C, Ma T, Chen S, Fan J. Application of a hybrid neural network structure for FWD backcalculation based on LTPP database. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2022, 23(9): 3099–3112

[25] AASHTO. Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. Washington, D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 1993

[26] ASTM. Standard Test Method for Obtaining and Testing Drilled Cores and Sawed Beams of Concrete, Code C42/C42M-13. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2013

[27] ASTM. Standard Test Method for Obtaining and Testing Drilled Cores and Sawed Beams of Concrete, Code C42/C42M-16. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2016

[28] ASTM. Standard Test Method for Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson’s Ratio of Concrete in Compression, Code C469/C469M-14. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2014

[29] SchmalzerP N. LTPP Manual for Falling Weight Deflectometer Measurements Version 4.1, 2006

[30] KhazanovichLTayabjiS DDarterM I. Backcalculation of Layer Parameters for Performance/LTPP/Test Sections, Volume I: Slab on Elastic Solid and Slab on Dense-Liquid Foundation Analysis of Rigid Pavements. Report No. FHWA-RD-00-086. 2001

[31] VandenbosscheJ M. Interpreting falling weight deflectometer results for curled and warped portland cement concrete pavements. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, 2003

[32] Golafshani E M, Behnood A, Arashpour M. Predicting the compressive strength of normal and high-performance concretes using ANN and ANFIS hybridized with grey wolf optimizer. Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 232: 117266

[33] Yilmaz I, Kaynar O. Multiple regression, ANN (RBF, MLP) and ANFIS models for prediction of swell potential of clayey soils. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38(5): 5958–5966

[34] Yadav D, Chhabra D, Gupta R K, Phogat A, Ahlawat A. Modeling and analysis of significant process parameters of FDM 3D printer using ANFIS. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2020, 21: 1592–1604

[35] Jang J S. ANFIS: Adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1993, 23(3): 665–685

[36] Islam M R, Jaafar W Z W, Hin L S, Osman N, Hossain A, Mohd N S. Development of an intelligent system based on ANFIS model for predicting soil erosion. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2018, 77(5): 1–15

[37] Jalal F E, Xu Y, Iqbal M, Javed M F, Jamhiri B. Predictive modeling of swell-strength of expansive soils using artificial intelligence approaches: ANN, ANFIS and GEP. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 289: 112420

[38] Sivanandam S, Deepa S N. Introduction to Genetic Algorithms. Berlin: Springer, 2008, 15–37

[39] Hamdia K M, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. An efficient optimization approach for designing machine learning models based on genetic algorithm. Neural Computing & Applications, 2021, 33(6): 1923–1933

[40] Hilali-Jaghdam I, Ishak A B, Abdel-Khalek S, Jamal A. Quantum and classical genetic algorithms for multilevel segmentation of medical images: A comparative study. Computer Communications, 2020, 162: 83–93

[41] Lin L, Wu C, Ma L. A genetic algorithm for the fuzzy shortest path problem in a fuzzy network. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 2021, 7(1): 225–234

[42] Gadagi A, Adake C. A constrained multi-objective optimization of turning process parameters by genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization techniques. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021, 42: 1207–1212

[43] Alade I O, Abd Rahman M A, Saleh T A. Modeling and prediction of the specific heat capacity of Al₂O₃/water nanofluids using hybrid genetic algorithm/support vector regression model. Nano-Structures & Nano-Objects, 2019, 17: 103–111

[44] Hanandeh S, Ardah A, Abu-Farsakh M. Using artificial neural network and genetics algorithm to estimate the resilient modulus for stabilized subgrade and propose new empirical formula. Transportation Geotechnics, 2020, 24: 100358

[45] Książek W, Gandor M, Pławiak P. Comparison of various approaches to combine logistic regression with genetic algorithms in survival prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 2021, 134: 104431

[46] KomarekP. Logistic regression for data mining and high-dimensional classification. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, 2004

[47] Bewick V, Cheek L, Ball J. Statistics review 14: Logistic regression. Critical Care (London, England), 2005, 9(1): 1–7

[48] HosmerD W JrLemeshowSSturdivantR X. Applied Logistic Regression. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2013

[49] Zhang Z T, Gao W H, Zeng C F, Tang X Y, Wu J. Evolution of the disintegration breakage of red-bed soft rock using a logistic regression model. Transportation Geotechnics, 2020, 24: 100382

[50] BishopC M. Pattern recognition and Machine Learning. Singapore: Springer, 2006

[51] Rymarczyk T, Kozłowski E, Kłosowski G, Niderla K. Logistic regression for machine learning in process tomography. Sensors (Basel), 2019, 19(15): 1–19

[52] Wang R, Xiu N, Zhou S. An extended Newton-type algorithm for ℓ2-regularized sparse logistic regression and its efficiency for classifying large-scale datasets. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2021, 397: 113656

[53] Yang X S, Gandomi A H, Talatahari S, Alavi A H. Metaheuristics in Water, Geotechnical and Transport Engineering. London: Elsevier, 2013, 231–267

[54] Huang C M, Hsieh C T, Wang Y S. Evolution of radial basic function neural network for fast restoration of distribution systems with load variations. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2011, 33(4): 961–968

[55] Habibagahi G. Reservoir induced earthquakes analyzed via radial basis function networks. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1998, 17(1): 53–56

[56] Iqbal M, Zhang D, Jalal F E, Javed M F. Computational AI prediction models for residual tensile strength of GFRP bars aged in the alkaline concrete environment. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 232: 109134

[57] Ly H B, Asteris P G, Pham T B. Accuracy assessment of extreme learning machine in predicting soil compression coefficient. Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences, 2020, 42(3): 228–336

[58] Le H A, Nguyen T A, Nguyen D D, Prakash I. Prediction of soil unconfined compressive strength using Artificial Neural Network Model. Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences, 2020, 42(3): 255–264

[59] Nguyen T A, Ly H B, Jaafari A, Pham B T. Estimation offriction capacity of driven piles in clay using. Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences, 2020, 42(2): 265–275

[60] Thai P B, Nguyen D D, Thi Q-A B, Nguyen M D, Vu T T, Prakash I. Estimation of ultimate bearing capacity of bored piles using machine learning models. Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences, 2022, 44(4): 1–12

[61] Pham B T. Singh S K, Ly H B. Using Artificial Neural Network (ANN) for prediction of soil. Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences, 2020, 42(4): 311–319

[62] Pham B T, Amiri M, Nguyen M D, Ngo T Q, Nguyen K T, Tran H T, Vu H, Anh B T Q, Le H V, Prakash I. Estimation of shear strength parameters of soil using Optimized Inference Intelligence System. Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences, 2021, 43(2): 189–198

[63] Nguyen D D, Roussis P C, Pham B T, Ferentinou M, Mamou A, Vu D Q, Bui Q-AT, Trong D K, Asteris P G. Bagging and multilayer perceptron hybrid intelligence models predicting the swelling potential of soil. Transportation Geotechnics, 2022, 36: 100797

[64] Onyelowe K C, Iqbal M, Jalal F E, Onyia M E, Onuoha I C. Application of 3-algorithm ANN programming to predict the strength performance of hydrated-lime activated rice husk ash treated soil. Multiscale and Multidisciplinary Modeling, Experiments and Design, 2021, 4: 259–274

[65] Iqbal M, Zhang D, Jalal F E, Faisal Javed M. Computational AI prediction models for residual tensile strength of GFRP bars aged in the alkaline concrete environment. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 232: 109134

[66] Iqbal M, Onyelowe K C, Jalal F E. Smart computing models of California bearing ratio, unconfined compressive strength, and resistance value of activated ash-modified soft clay soil with adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and ensemble random forest regression techniques. Multiscale and Multidisciplinary Modeling, Experiments and Design, 2021, 4(3): 207–225

[67] Azim I, Yang J, Javed M F, Iqbal M F, Mahmood Z, Wang F, Liu Q. Prediction model for compressive arch action capacity of RC frame structures under column removal scenario using gene expression programming. Structures, 2020, 25: 212–228

[68] Azim I, Yang J, Iqbal M F, Javed M F, Nazar S, Wang F, Liu Q F. Semi-analytical model for compressive arch action capacity of RC frame structures. Structures, 2020, 27: 1231–1245

[69] Li M, Wang H. Development of ANN-GA program for backcalculation of pavement moduli under FWD testing with viscoelastic and nonlinear parameters. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2019, 20(4): 490–498

[70] Li M, Wang H. Prediction of asphalt pavement responses from FWD surface deflections using soft computing methods. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2018, 142(2): 04018014

[71] Rahimi NahoujyM. An artifical neural network approach to model and predict asphalt deflections as a complement to experimental measurements by falling weight deflectometer. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Bochum: Ruhr University Bochum, 2020

[72] NedjahNde Macedo MourelleL. Fuzzy Systems Engineering: Theory and Practice. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media, 2005

[73] Yang H, Hasanipanah M, Tahir M, Bui D T. Intelligent prediction of blasting-induced ground vibration using ANFIS optimized by GA and PSO. Natural Resources Research, 2020, 29(2): 739–750

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the support provided by the University of Transport Technology.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 Higher Education Press