Heisenberg, uncertainty, and the scanning tunneling microscope

Abstract

We show by a statistical analysis of high-resolution scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) experiments, that the interpretation of the density of electron charge as a statistical quantity leads to a conflict with the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Given the precision in these experiments we find that the uncertainty principle would be violated by close to two orders of magnitude, if this interpretation were correct. We are thus forced to conclude that the density of electron charge is a physically real, i.e., in principle precisely measurable quantity.

Keywords

scanning tunneling microscope / electron charge / density functional theory / uncertainty relations

References

[1] G. Binnig, H. Rohrer, Ch. Gerber, and E. Weibel, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1982, 49(1): 57

[2] G. Binnig and H. Rohrer, Rev. Mod. Phys., 1987, 59(3): 615

[3] E. J. Heller, M. F. Crommie, C. P. Lutz, and D. M. Eigler, Nature, 1994, 394(6480): 464

[4] H. Gawronski, M. Mehlhorn, and K. Morgenstern, Science, 2008, 319(5865): 930

[5] N. Néel, J. Kröger, L. Limot, K. Palotas, W. A. Hofer, and R. Berndt, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2007, 98(1): 016801

[6] K. R. Harikumar, T. Lim, I. R. McNab, J. C. Polanyi, L. Zotti, S. Ayissi, and W. A. Hofer, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2008, 3(4): 222

[7] W. A. Hofer, A. S. Foster, and A. L. Shluger, Rev. Mod. Phys., 2003, 75(4): 1287

[8] Z. T. Deng, H. Lin, W. Ji, L. Gao, X. Lin, Z. H. Cheng, X. B. He, J. L. Lu, D. X. Shi, W. A. Hofer, and H. J. Gao, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2006, 96(15): 156102

[9] J. Tersoff and D. R. Hamann, Phys. Rev. B, 1985, 31(2): 805

[10] . K. H. Rieder, G. Meyer, S.W. Hla, F. Moresco, K. F. Braun, K. Morgenstern, J. Repp, S. Foelsch, and L. Bartels, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, 2004, 362(1819): 1207

[11] P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev., 1964, 136(3B): B864

[12] W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev., 1965, 140(4A): A1133

[13] M. Born, Zeitschr. F. Phys., 1926, 37(12): 863

[14] M. Born, Zeitschr. F. Phys., 1926, 38: 803

[15] W. Heisenberg, Zeitschr. F. Phys., 1927, 43: 172

[16] W. A. Hofer, Found. Phys., 2011, 41(4): 754

[17] E. Schrödinger, Phys. Rev., 1926, 28(6): 1049

[18] W. Heisenberg, Zeitschr. F. Phys., 1925, 33: 879

[19] J. L. Park and H. Margenau, Int. J. Theor. Phys., 1968, 3(3): 211 See in particular page 213, “Many gedankenexperiments have been designed to illustrate Heisenberg’s famous law; unfortunately, the false impression is often conveyed that his principle, which is actually a theorem about standard deviations in collectives of measurement results, imposes restrictions on measur-ability.” italics in the original text.

[20] A. J. Heinrich, J. A. Gupta, C. P. Lutz, and D. M. Eigler, Science, 2004, 306(5695): 466

[21] D. Bohm, Phys. Rev., 1952, 85(2): 166

[22] D. Bohm, Phys. Rev., 1952, 85(2): 180

[23] L. De Broglie, Non-linear Wave Mechanics: A Causal Interpretation, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1960

[24] D. Hestenes, Found. Phys., 2010, 40(1): 1

[25] J. C. Lian, Z. H. Cheng, Y. H. Jiang, Y. Y. Zhang, L. W. Liu, W. Ji, W. D. Xiao, S. X. Du, W. A. Hofer, and H. J. Gao, Phys. Rev. B, 2010, 81(19): 195411

[26] A. Khrennikov, Europhys. Lett., 2009, 90(4): 40004

[27] G. Gröessing, S. Fussy, J. Mesa Pascasio, and H. Schwabl, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 2011, 306: 012040

[28] H. T. Elze, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 2009, 171: 012034

[29] G. t’Hooft, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 2007, 67: U166

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg