Fabrication of glycidyl methacrylate-modified silk fibroin/poly(L-lactic acid-co-ε-caprolactone)–polyethylene glycol diacrylate hybrid 3D nanofibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering
Yongyong Fan, Anlin Yin, Yunhuan Li, Qi Gu, Yan Zhou, Junlong Zhou, Ruibo Zhao, Kuihua Zhang
Fabrication of glycidyl methacrylate-modified silk fibroin/poly(L-lactic acid-co-ε-caprolactone)–polyethylene glycol diacrylate hybrid 3D nanofibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering
In order to provide a biomimetic natural extracellular matrix microenvironment with excellent mechanical capacity for tissue regeneration, a novel porous hybrid glycidyl methacrylate-modified silk fibroin/poly(L-lactic acid-co-ε-caprolactone)–polyethylene glycol diacrylate (SFMA/P(LLA-CL)–PEGDA) hybrid three-dimensional (3D) nanofibrous scaffolds was successfully fabricated through the combination of 3D nanofibrous platforms and divinyl PEGDA based photocrosslinking, and then further improved water resistance by ethanol vapor post-treatment. Scanning electron microscopy and micro-computed tomography results demonstrated significant PEGDA hydrogel-like matrices bonded nanofibers, which formed a 3D structure similar to that of “steel bar (nanofibers)‒cement (PEGDA)”, with proper pore size, high porosity, and high pore connectivity density. Meanwhile, the hybrid 3D nanofibrous scaffolds showed outstanding swelling properties as well as improved compressive and tensile properties. Furthermore, these hybrid 3D nanofibrous scaffolds could provide a biocompatible microenvironment, capable of inducing the material‒cell hybrid and regulating human umbilical vein endothelial cells proliferation. They thus present significant potential in tissue regeneration.
hybrid 3D nanofibrous scaffold / silk fibroin / tissue engineering / human umbilical vein endothelial cell
[1] |
Zhong H, Huang J, Wu J,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Yao Q, Fuglsby K E, Zheng X,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Xie X R, Chen Y J, Wang X Y,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Laschke M W, Menger M D . Prevascularization in tissue engineering: current concepts and future directions.Biotechnology Advances, 2016, 34(2): 112–121
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Pan D, Mackinnon S E, Wood M D . Advances in the repair of segmental nerve injuries and trends in reconstruction.Muscle & Nerve, 2020, 61(6): 726–739
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Rodriguez M J, Brown J, Giordano J,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Chouhan D, Dey N, Bhardwaj N,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Kim S H, Yeon Y K, Lee J M,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Fan L, Li J L, Cai Z,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Lin M, Xie W, Cheng X,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Lin N, Zuo B . Silk sericin/fibroin electrospinning dressings: a method for preparing a dressing material with high moisture vapor transmission rate.Journal of Biomaterials Science: Polymer Edition, 2021, 32(15): 1983–1997
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Wang C, Jia Y, Yang W,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Zhang K, Qian Y, Wang H,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Chen Y, Dong X, Shafiq M,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Qasim M, Chae D S, Lee N Y . Advancements and frontiers in nano-based 3D and 4D scaffolds for bone and cartilage tissue engineering.International Journal of Nanomedicine, 2019, 14: 4333–4351
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Chen W M, Xu Y, Liu Y Q,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Bongiovanni Abel S, Montini Ballarin F, Abraham G A . Combination of electrospinning with other techniques for the fabrication of 3D polymeric and composite nanofibrous scaffolds with improved cellular interactions.Nanotechnology, 2020, 31(17): 172002
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Koyyada A, Orsu P . Recent advancements and associated challenges of scaffold fabrication techniques in tissue engineering applications.Regenerative Engineering and Translational Medicine, 2021, 7(2): 147–159
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Juran C M, Dolwick M F, McFetridge P S . Engineered microporosity: enhancing the early regenerative potential of decellularized temporomandibular joint discs.Tissue Engineering Part A, 2015, 21(3–4): 829–839
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Zhang J, Zhou A, Deng A,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Somo S I, Akar B, Bayrak E S,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Jin G, He R, Sha B,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Keirouz A, Chung M, Kwon J,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Wang J, Cheng Y, Wang H,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Xu T, Miszuk J M, Zhao Y,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Sun B, Zhou Z, Wu T,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Shen J, Wang J, Liu X,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Doustdar F, Olad A, Ghorbani M . Effect of glutaraldehyde and calcium chloride as different crosslinking agents on the characteristics of chitosan/cellulose nanocrystals scaffold.International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2022, 208: 912–924
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[29] |
Yu X, Zhang T, Li Y . 3D printing and bioprinting nerve conduits for neural tissue engineering.Polymers, 2020, 12(8): 1637
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[30] |
Liu J, Zhang B, Li L,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[31] |
Zhu W, Tringale K R, Woller S A,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[32] |
Zhou X, Yin A, Sheng J,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[33] |
Chen Y, Xu W, Shafiq M,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[34] |
Chen X, Shao Z, Marinkovic N S,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[35] |
Wang Y H, Zhang B, Ma M,
|
[36] |
Bae S B, Kim M H, Park W H . Electrospinning and dual crosslinking of water-soluble silk fibroin modified with glycidyl methacrylate.Polymer Degradation & Stability, 2020, 179: 109304
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[37] |
Zeng R X. Modern Testing and Analysis Technology of Polymers. Guangzhou, China: South China University of Technology Press, 2007
|
[38] |
Zhang K H, Yin A L, Huang C,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[39] |
Ma G, Zhang X, Han J,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[40] |
Feng J, Wang F, Han X,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[41] |
Li K, Zhu Y, Zhang Q,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[42] |
Mirtaghavi A, Baldwin A, Tanideh N,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[43] |
Somo S I, Akar B, Bayrak E S,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[44] |
Higgins A M, Banik B L, Brown J L . Geometry sensing through POR1 regulates Rac1 activity controlling early osteoblast differentiation in response to nanofiber diameter.Integrative Biology, 2015, 7(2): 229–236
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[45] |
Sharma S, Tiwari S . A review on biomacromolecular hydrogel classification and its applications.International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2020, 162: 737–747
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[46] |
Zhao X D, Pei D D, Yang Y X,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[47] |
Ansar R, Saqib S, Mukhtar A,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[48] |
McClay D R . The role of thin filopodia in motility and morphogenesis.Experimental Cell Research, 1999, 253(2): 296–301
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[49] |
Prince E, Kumacheva E . Design and applications of man-made biomimetic fibrillar hydrogels.Nature Reviews Materials, 2019, 4(2): 99–115
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[50] |
Spang M T, Christman K L . Extracellular matrix hydrogel therapies: in vivo applications and development.Acta Biomaterialia, 2018, 68: 1–14
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |