Three-dimensional printing of biomaterials for bone tissue engineering: a review

Abstract

Processing biomaterials into porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering is a critical and a key step in defining and controlling their physicochemical, mechanical, and biological properties. Biomaterials such as polymers are commonly processed into porous scaffolds using conventional processing techniques, e.g., salt leaching. However, these traditional techniques have shown unavoidable limitations and several shortcomings. For instance, tissue-engineered porous scaffolds with a complex three-dimensional (3D) geometric architecture mimicking the complexity of the extracellular matrix of native tissues and with the ability to fit into irregular tissue defects cannot be produced using the conventional processing techniques. 3D printing has recently emerged as an advanced processing technology that enables the processing of biomaterials into 3D porous scaffolds with highly complex architectures and tunable shapes to precisely fit into irregular and complex tissue defects. 3D printing provides computer-based layer-by-layer additive manufacturing processes of highly precise and complex 3D structures with well-defined porosity and controlled mechanical properties in a highly reproducible manner. Furthermore, 3D printing technology provides an accurate patient-specific tissue defect model and enables the fabrication of a patient-specific tissue-engineered porous scaffold with pre-customized properties.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

3D printing / biomaterial ink / printability / 3D printing technique / 3D printed scaffold / bone tissue engineering

References

[1] Pina S, Ribeiro V P, Marques C F, . Scaffolding strategies for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications.Materials, 2019, 12(11): 1824

[2] Sola A, Bertacchini J, D’Avella D, . Development of solvent-casting particulate leaching (SCPL) polymer scaffolds as improved three-dimensional supports to mimic the bone marrow niche.Materials Science and Engineering C, 2019, 96: 153–165

[3] Conoscenti G, Schneider T, Stoelzel K, . PLLA scaffolds produced by thermally induced phase separation (TIPS) allow human chondrocyte growth and extracellular matrix formation dependent on pore size.Materials Science and Engineering C, 2017, 80: 449–459

[4] Moghadam M Z, Hassanajili S, Esmaeilzadeh F, . Formation of porous HPCL/LPCL/HA scaffolds with supercritical CO₂ gas foaming method.Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2017, 69: 115–127

[5] Kordjamshidi A, Saber-Samandari S, Ghadiri Nejad M, . Preparation of novel porous calcium silicate scaffold loaded by celecoxib drug using freeze drying technique: Fabrication, characterization and simulation.Ceramics International, 2019, 45(11): 14126–14135

[6] Xu X, Ren S, Li L, . Biodegradable engineered fiber scaffolds fabricated by electrospinning for periodontal tissue regeneration.Journal of Biomaterials Applications, 2021, 36(1): 55–75

[7] Alagoz A S, Hasirci V . 3D printing of polymeric tissue engineering scaffolds using open-source fused deposition modeling.Emergent Materials, 2020, 3(4): 429–439

[8] Gayer C, Ritter J, Bullemer M, . Development of a solvent-free polylactide/calcium carbonate composite for selective laser sintering of bone tissue engineering scaffolds.Materials Science and Engineering C, 2019, 101: 660–673

[9] Liu R, Ma L, Liu H, . Effects of pore size on the mechanical and biological properties of stereolithographic 3D printed hap bioceramic scaffold.Ceramics International, 2021, 47(20): 28924–28931

[10] Sun W, Zhang Y, Gregory D A, . Patterning the neuronal cells via inkjet printing of self-assembled peptides on silk scaffolds.Progress in Natural Science, 2020, 30(5): 686–696

[11] Alizadeh-Osgouei M, Li Y, Wen C . A comprehensive review of biodegradable synthetic polymer–ceramic composites and their manufacture for biomedical applications.Bioactive Materials, 2018, 4(1): 22–36

[12] Turnbull G, Clarke J, Picard F, . 3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.Bioactive Materials, 2018, 3(3): 278–314

[13] El-Fiqi A, Park J H . Novel large-volume and highly porous scaffold of poly(ε-caprolactone) microfibers/collagen nanofibers for regenerative medicine.Materials Letters, 2022, 322: 132474

[14] Kirillova A, Yeazel T R, Asheghali D, . Fabrication of biomedical scaffolds using biodegradable polymers.Chemical Reviews, 2021, 121(18): 11238–11304

[15] Wang Z, Zhang M, Liu Z, . Biomimetic design strategy of complex porous structure based on 3D printing Ti–6Al–4V scaffolds for enhanced osseointegration.Materials & Design, 2022, 218: 110721

[16] Du X, Dehghani M, Alsaadi N, . A femoral shape porous scaffold bio-nanocomposite fabricated using 3D printing and freeze-drying technique for orthopedic application.Materials Chemistry and Physics, 2022, 275: 125302

[17] Zhang M, Lin R, Wang X, . 3D printing of Haversian bone-mimicking scaffolds for multicellular delivery in bone regeneration.Science Advances, 2020, 6(12): eaaz6725

[18] Liang H, Wang Y, Chen S, . Nano-hydroxyapatite bone scaffolds with different porous structures processed by digital light processing 3D printing.International Journal of Bioprinting, 2022, 8(1): 198–210

[19] Zhu H, Li M, Huang X, . 3D printed tricalcium phosphate-bioglass scaffold with gyroid structure enhance bone ingrowth in challenging bone defect treatment.Applied Materials Today, 2021, 25: 101166

[20] Guiney L M, Mansukhani N D, Jakus A E, . Three-dimensional printing of cytocompatible, thermally conductive hexagonal boron nitride nanocomposites.Nano Letters, 2018, 18(6): 3488–3493

[21] Mirkhalaf M, Dao A, Schindeler A, . Personalized Baghdadite scaffolds: stereolithography, mechanics and in vivo testing.Acta Biomaterialia, 2021, 132: 217–226

[22] Mbundi L, Gonzalez-Perez M, Gonzalez-Perez F, . Trends in the development of tailored elastin-like recombinamer-based porous biomaterials for soft and hard tissue applications.Frontiers in Materials, 2021, 7: 601795

[23] El-Fiqi A, Kim H W . Nano/micro-structured poly(ε-caprolactone)/gelatin nanofibers with biomimetically-grown hydroxyapatite spherules: high protein adsorption, controlled protein delivery and sustained bioactive ions release designed as a multifunctional bone regenerative membrane.Ceramics International, 2021, 47(14): 19873–19885

[24] Lu X, Wang C, Favier F, . Electrospun nanomaterials for supercapacitor electrodes: designed architectures and electrochemical performance.Advanced Energy Materials, 2017, 7(2): 1601301

[25] Kim J J, El-Fiqi A, Kim H W . Synergetic cues of bioactive nanoparticles and nanofibrous structure in bone scaffolds to stimulate osteogenesis and angiogenesis.ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017, 9(3): 2059–2073

[26] Kim J J, Bang S H, El-Fiqi A, . Fabrication of nanofibrous macroporous scaffolds of poly(lactic acid) incorporating bioactive glass nanoparticles by camphene-assisted phase separation.Materials Chemistry and Physics, 2014, 143(3): 1092–1101

[27] El-Fiqi A, Lee J H, Lee E J, . Collagen hydrogels incorporated with surface-aminated mesoporous nanobioactive glass: improvement of physicochemical stability and mechanical properties is effective for hard tissue engineering.Acta Biomaterialia, 2013, 9(12): 9508–9521

[28] Jo S B, Erdenebileg U, Dashnyam K, . Nano-graphene oxide/polyurethane nanofibers: mechanically flexible and myogenic stimulating matrix for skeletal tissue engineering.Journal of Tissue Engineering, 2020, 11: 2041731419900424

[29] Syed O, Kim J H, Keskin-Erdogan Z, . SIS/aligned fibre scaffold designed to meet layered oesophageal tissue complexity and properties.Acta Biomaterialia, 2019, 99: 181–195

[30] El-Fiqi A, Seo S J, Kim H W. Chapter 15: Mineralization of fibers for bone regeneration. In: Aparicio C, Ginebra M P, eds. Biomineralization and Biomaterials ― Fundamentals and Applications. Woodhead Publishing, 2015, 443–476

[31] Collins M N, Ren G, Young K, . Scaffold fabrication technologies and structure/function properties in bone tissue engineering.Advanced Functional Materials, 2021, 31(21): 2010609

[32] El-Fiqi A, Kim J H, Kim H W . Osteoinductive fibrous scaffolds of biopolymer/mesoporous bioactive glass nanocarriers with excellent bioactivity and long-term delivery of osteogenic drug.ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2015, 7(2): 1140–1152

[33] Buitrago J O, Patel K D, El-Fiqi A, . Silk fibroin/collagen protein hybrid cell-encapsulating hydrogels with tunable gelation and improved physical and biological properties.Acta Biomaterialia, 2018, 69: 218–233

[34] Lee J H, Park J H, El-Fiqi A, . Biointerface control of electrospun fiber scaffolds for bone regeneration: engineered protein link to mineralized surface.Acta Biomaterialia, 2014, 10(6): 2750–2761

[35] Lim H C, Nam O H, Kim M J, . Delivery of dexamethasone from bioactive nanofiber matrices stimulates odontogenesis of human dental pulp cells through integrin/BMP/mTOR signaling pathways.International Journal of Nanomedicine, 2016, 11: 2557–2567

[36] El-Fiqi A, Kim H W . Mesoporous bioactive nanocarriers in electrospun biopolymer fibrous scaffolds designed for sequential drug delivery.RSC Advances, 2014, 4(9): 4444–4452

[37] El-Kady A M, Ali A A, El-Fiqi A . Controlled delivery of therapeutic ions and antibiotic drug of novel alginate-agarose matrix incorporating selenium-modified borosilicate glass designed for chronic wound healing.Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 2020, 534: 119889

[38] Kim G H, Park Y D, Lee S Y, . Odontogenic stimulation of human dental pulp cells with bioactive nanocomposite fiber.Journal of Biomaterials Applications, 2015, 29(6): 854–866

[39] Liu K, Yan L, Li R, . 3D printed personalized nerve guide conduits for precision repair of peripheral nerve defects.Advanced Science, 2022, 9(12): 2103875

[40] Zhang F, Li Z, Xu M, . A review of 3D printed porous ceramics.Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2022, 42(8): 3351–3373

[41] Studart A R, Gonzenbach U T, Tervoort E, . Processing routes to macroporous ceramics: a review.Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 2006, 89(6): 1771–1789

[42] Baino F, Novajra G, Vitale-Brovarone C . Bioceramics and scaffolds: a winning combination for tissue engineering.Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2015, 3: 202

[43] Kumar M, Sharma V . Additive manufacturing techniques for the fabrication of tissue engineering scaffolds: a review.Rapid Prototyping Journal, 2021, 27(6): 1230–1272

[44] Kanwar S, Vijayavenkataraman S . Design of 3D printed scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: a review.Bioprinting, 2021, 24: e00167

[45] Feng X, Ma L, Liang H, . Osteointegration of 3D-printed fully porous polyetheretherketone scaffolds with different pore sizes.ACS Omega, 2020, 5(41): 26655–26666

[46] Soleymani Eil Bakhtiari S, Bakhsheshi-Rad H R, Karbasi S, . 3-Dimensional printing of hydrogel-based nanocomposites: a comprehensive review on the technology description, properties, and applications.Advanced Engineering Materials, 2021, 23(10): 2100477

[47] Asadi-Eydivand M, Brown T C, Bagheri A . Raft-mediated 3D printing of “living” materials with tailored hierarchical porosity.ACS Applied Polymer Materials, 2022, 4(7): 4940–4948

[48] Tesavibul P, Felzmann R, Gruber S, . Processing of 45S5 Bioglass® by lithography-based additive manufacturing.Materials Letters, 2012, 74: 81–84

[49] Chen Y, Li W, Zhang C, . Recent developments of biomaterials for additive manufacturing of bone scaffolds.Advanced Healthcare Materials, 2020, 9(23): 2000724

[50] Bahraminasab M . Challenges on optimization of 3D-printed bone scaffolds.Biomedical Engineering Online, 2020, 19(1): 69

[51] Thavornyutikarn B, Tesavibul P, Sitthiseripratip K, . Porous 45S5 Bioglass®-based scaffolds using stereolithography: effect of partial pre-sintering on structural and mechanical properties of scaffolds.Materials Science and Engineering C, 2017, 75: 1281–1288

[52] Germaini M M, Belhabib S, Guessasma S, . Additive manufacturing of biomaterials for bone tissue engineering ― a critical review of the state of the art and new concepts.Progress in Materials Science, 2022, 130: 100963

[53] Li L, Gao H, Wang C, . Assessment of customized alveolar bone augmentation using titanium scaffolds vs polyetheretherketone (PEEK) scaffolds: a comparative study based on 3D printing technology.ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering, 2022, 8(5): 2028–2039

[54] Challa B T, Gummadi S K, Elhattab K, . In-house processing of 3D printable polyetheretherketone (PEEK) filaments and the effect of fused deposition modeling parameters on 3D-printed peek structures.International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2022, 121(3–4): 1675–1688

[55] Distler T, Fournier N, Grünewald A, . Polymer–bioactive glass composite filaments for 3D scaffold manufacturing by fused deposition modeling: fabrication and characterization.Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2020, 8: 552

[56] Zhu H, Monavari M, Zheng K, . 3D bioprinting of multifunctional dynamic nanocomposite bioinks incorporating Cu-doped mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles for bone tissue engineering.Small, 2022, 18(12): 2104996

[57] Lai J, Wang C, Wang M . 3D printing in biomedical engineering: processes, materials, and applications.Applied Physics Reviews, 2021, 8(2): 021322

[58] Zhang B, Cristescu R, Chrisey D B, . Solvent-based extrusion 3D printing for the fabrication of tissue engineering scaffolds.International Journal of Bioprinting, 2020, 6(1): 28–42

[59] Schwab A, Levato R, D’Este M, . Printability and shape fidelity of bioinks in 3D bioprinting.Chemical Reviews, 2020, 120(19): 11028–11055

[60] Schwab A, Levato R, D’Este M, . Printability and shape fidelity of bioinks in 3D bioprinting.Chemical Reviews, 2020, 120(19): 10850–10877

[61] Li W, Mille L S, Robledo J A, . Recent advances in formulating and processing biomaterial inks for vat polymerization-based 3D printing.Advanced Healthcare Materials, 2020, 9(15): 2000156

[62] Pedrero S G, Llamas-Sillero P, Serrano-López J . A multidisciplinary journey towards bone tissue engineering.Materials, 2021, 14(17): 4896

[63] Ibrahim A. Chapter 13: 3D bioprinting bone. In: Thomas D J, Jessop Z M, Whitaker I S, eds. 3D Bioprinting for Reconstructive Surgery ― Techniques and Applications. Woodhead Publishing, 2017, 245–275

[64] Vidal L, Kampleitner C, Brennan M Á, . Reconstruction of large skeletal defects: current clinical therapeutic strategies and future directions using 3D printing.Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2020, 8: 61

[65] Grassie K, Khan Y. Chapter 1: Bone tissue engineering. In: Chen Y, ed. Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering. Elsevier, 2022, 1–40

[66] Maia F R, Bastos A R, Oliveira J M, . Recent approaches towards bone tissue engineering.Bone, 2022, 154: 116256

[67] Ranjan R, Kumar D, Kundu M, . A critical review on classification of materials used in 3D printing process.Materials Today: Proceedings, 2022, 61: 43–49

[68] Anandhapadman A, Venkateswaran A, Jayaraman H, . Advances in 3D printing of composite scaffolds for the repairment of bone tissue associated defects.Biotechnology Progress, 2022, 38(3): e3234

[69] Ramburrun P, Indermun S, Govender M, , . Research progress of scaffold materials. In: Mozafari M, Sefat F, Atala A, eds. Handbook of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds: Volume One. Woodhead Publishing, 2019, 93–108

[70] Zhang M, Qin C, Wang Y, . 3D printing of tree-like scaffolds for innervated bone regeneration.Additive Manufacturing, 2022, 54: 102721

[71] Daguano J K M B, Giora F C, Santos K F, . Shear-thinning sacrificial ink for fabrication of biosilicate® osteoconductive scaffolds by material extrusion 3D printing.Materials Chemistry and Physics, 2022, 287: 126286

[72] Pierantozzi D, Scalzone A, Jindal S, . 3D printed Sr-containing composite scaffolds: effect of structural design and material formulation towards new strategies for bone tissue engineering.Composites Science and Technology, 2020, 191: 108069

[73] Liu X, Miao Y, Liang H, . 3D-printed bioactive ceramic scaffolds with biomimetic micro/nano-HAp surfaces mediated cell fate and promoted bone augmentation of the bone-implant interface in vivo.Bioactive Materials, 2022, 12: 120–132

[74] Sun H, Zhang C, Zhang B, . 3D printed calcium phosphate scaffolds with controlled release of osteogenic drugs for bone regeneration.Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 427: 130961

[75] Shao H, Nian Z, Jing Z, . Additive manufacturing of hydroxyapatite bioceramic scaffolds with projection based 3D printing.Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering: Additive Manufacturing Frontiers, 2022, 1(2): 100021

[76] Van Hede D, Liang B, Anania S, . 3D-printed synthetic hydroxyapatite scaffold with in silico optimized macrostructure enhances bone formation in vivo.Advanced Functional Materials, 2022, 32(6): 2105002

[77] Wang M M, Flores R L, Witek L, . Dipyridamole-loaded 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds stimulate pediatric bone regeneration in vivo without disruption of craniofacial growth through facial maturity.Scientific Reports, 2019, 9(1): 18439

[78] Kumar A, Kargozar S, Baino F, . Additive manufacturing methods for producing hydroxyapatite and hydroxyapatite-based composite scaffolds: a review.Frontiers in Materials, 2019, 6: 313

[79] Chen Y, Chen L, Wang Y, . Lithium-containing bioactive glasses enhanced 3D-printed plga scaffolds for bone regeneration in diabetes.Composites Part B: Engineering, 2022, 230: 109550

[80] Nommeots-Nomm A, Lee P D, Jones J R . Direct ink writing of highly bioactive glasses.Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2018, 38(3): 837–844

[81] Baier R V, Contreras Raggio J I, Giovanetti C M, . Shape fidelity, mechanical and biological performance of 3D printed polycaprolactone–bioactive glass composite scaffolds.Biomaterials Advances, 2022, 134: 112540

[82] Bidgoli M R, Alemzadeh I, Tamjid E, . Fabrication of hierarchically porous silk fibroin–bioactive glass composite scaffold via indirect 3D printing: effect of particle size on physico-mechanical properties and in vitro cellular behavior.Materials Science and Engineering C, 2019, 103: 109688

[83] Dai Q, Li Q, Gao H, . 3D printing of Cu-doped bioactive glass composite scaffolds promotes bone regeneration through activating the HIF-1α and TNF-α pathway of hUVECs.Biomaterials Science, 2021, 9(16): 5519–5532

[84] Simorgh S, Alasvand N, Khodadadi M, . Additive manufacturing of bioactive glass biomaterials.Methods, 2022, 208: 75–91

[85] Wang S, Gu R, Wang F, . 3D-printed PCL/Zn scaffolds for bone regeneration with a dose-dependent effect on osteogenesis and osteoclastogenesis.Materials Today Bio, 2022, 13: 100202

[86] Fallah A, Altunbek M, Bartolo P, . 3D printed scaffold design for bone defects with improved mechanical and biological properties.Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2022, 134: 105418

[87] Kwon D Y, Kwon J S, Park S H, . A computer-designed scaffold for bone regeneration within cranial defect using human dental pulp stem cells.Scientific Reports, 2015, 5(1): 12721

[88] Yan Y, Chen H, Zhang H, . Vascularized 3D printed scaffolds for promoting bone regeneration.Biomaterials, 2019, 190–191: 97–110

[89] Seo Lee J, Nah H, Lee D, . Immediately implantable extracellular matrix-enriched osteoinductive hydrogel-laden 3D-printed scaffold for promoting vascularized bone regeneration in vivo.Materials & Design, 2022, 219: 110801

[90] Su S, Chen W, Zheng M, . Facile fabrication of 3D-printed porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds with a Sr-CaP coating for bone regeneration.ACS Omega, 2022, 7(10): 8391–8402

[91] Choi S, Kim J W, Lee S, . Mechanical and biocompatibility properties of sintered titanium powder for mimetic 3D-printed bone scaffolds.ACS Omega, 2022, 7(12): 10340–10346

[92] Zhang Y, Sun N, Zhu M, . The contribution of pore size and porosity of 3D printed porous titanium scaffolds to osteogenesis.Biomaterials Advances, 2022, 133: 112651

[93] Yin C, Zhang T, Wei Q, . Surface treatment of 3D printed porous Ti6Al4V implants by ultraviolet photofunctionalization for improved osseointegration.Bioactive Materials, 2022, 7: 26–38

[94] Liu K, Wang J, Fang S, . Effect of polycaprolactone impregnation on the properties of calcium silicate scaffolds fabricated by 3D printing.Materials & Design, 2022, 220: 110856

[95] Nie R, Sun Y, Lv H, . 3D printing of MXene composite hydrogel scaffolds for photothermal antibacterial activity and bone regeneration in infected bone defect models.Nanoscale, 2022, 14(22): 8112–8129

[96] Wang C, Meng C, Zhang Z, . 3D printing of polycaprolactone/bioactive glass composite scaffolds for in situ bone repair.Ceramics International, 2022, 48(6): 7491–7499

[97] Oliveira R L M S, Alves A P N, Barbosa L, . 3D printing of bioactive glass S53P4/sodium alginate sintering-free scaffolds.Bioprinting, 2022, 27: e00226

[98] Pant S, Thomas S, Loganathan S, . 3D bioprinted poly(lactic acid)/mesoporous bioactive glass based biomimetic scaffold with rapid apatite crystallization and in-vitro cytocompatability for bone tissue engineering.International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2022, 217: 979–997

[99] Richter R F, Ahlfeld T, Gelinsky M, . Composites consisting of calcium phosphate cements and mesoporous bioactive glasses as a 3D plottable drug delivery system.Acta Biomaterialia, 2023, 156: 146–157

[100] Monavari M, Homaeigohar S, Fuentes-Chandía M, . 3D printing of alginate dialdehyde-gelatin (ADA-GEL) hydrogels incorporating phytotherapeutic icariin loaded mesoporous SiO₂–CaO nanoparticles for bone tissue engineering.Materials Science and Engineering C, 2021, 131: 112470

[101] Sahmani S, Khandan A, Esmaeili S, . Calcium phosphate–PLA scaffolds fabricated by fused deposition modeling technique for bone tissue applications: fabrication, characterization and simulation.Ceramics International, 2020, 46(2): 2447–2456

[102] Zou L, Hu L, Pan P, . Icariin-releasing 3D printed scaffold for bone regeneration.Composites Part B: Engineering, 2022, 232: 109625

[103] Han S H, Lee J, Lee K M, . Enhanced healing of rat calvarial defects with 3D printed calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite/collagen/bone morphogenetic protein 2 scaffolds.Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2020, 108: 103782

[104] Saranti A, Tiron-Stathopoulos A, Papaioannou L, . 3D-printed bioactive scaffolds for bone regeneration bearing carbon dots for bioimaging purposes.Smart Materials in Medicine, 2022, 3: 12–19

[105] Lee J, Kim D, Jang C H, . Highly elastic 3D-printed gelatin/HA/placental-extract scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.Theranostics, 2022, 12(9): 4051–4066

[106] Ha Y, Ma X, Li S, . Bone microenvironment-mimetic scaffolds with hierarchical microstructure for enhanced vascularization and bone regeneration.Advanced Functional Materials, 2022, 32(20): 2200011

[107] Zhang J, Tong D, Song H, . Osteoimmunity-regulating biomimetically hierarchical scaffold for augmented bone regeneration.Advanced Materials, 2022, 34(36): 2202044

[108] Cao C, Huang P, Prasopthum A, . Characterisation of bone regeneration in 3D printed ductile PCL/PEG/hydroxyapatite scaffolds with high ceramic microparticle concentrations.Biomaterials Science, 2021, 10(1): 138–152

[109] Zhao S, Xie K, Guo Y, . Fabrication and biological activity of 3D-printed polycaprolactone/magnesium porous scaffolds for critical size bone defect repair.ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering, 2020, 6(9): 5120–5131

[110] Baino F, Magnaterra G, Fiume E, . Digital light processing stereolithography of hydroxyapatite scaffolds with bone-like architecture, permeability, and mechanical properties.Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 2022, 105(3): 1648–1657

[111] Chaudhary R, Fabbri P, Leoni E, , . Additive manufacturing by digital light processing: a review. Progress in Additive Manufacturing, 2022

[112] Han H H, Shim J H, Lee H, . Reconstruction of complex maxillary defects using patient-specific 3D-printed biodegradable scaffolds.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open, 2018, 6(11): e1975

[113] Jakus A E, Rutz A L, Jordan S W, . Hyperelastic “bone”: a highly versatile, growth factor-free, osteoregenerative, scalable, and surgically friendly biomaterial.Science Translational Medicine, 2016, 8(358): 358ra127

[114] Lee S H, Lee K G, Hwang J H, . Evaluation of mechanical strength and bone regeneration ability of 3D printed kagome-structure scaffold using rabbit calvarial defect model.Materials Science and Engineering C, 2019, 98: 949–959

[115] Wu R, Li Y, Shen M, . Bone tissue regeneration: the role of finely tuned pore architecture of bioactive scaffolds before clinical translation.Bioactive Materials, 2021, 6(5): 1242–1254

[116] Remy M T, Akkouch A, He L, . Rat calvarial bone regeneration by 3D-printed β-tricalcium phosphate incorporating microRNA-200C.ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering, 2021, 7(9): 4521–4534

[117] Zhang Q, Ma L, Ji X, . High-strength hydroxyapatite scaffolds with minimal surface macrostructures for load-bearing bone regeneration.Advanced Functional Materials, 2022, 32(33): 2204182

[118] Raymond Y, Lehmann C, Thorel E, . 3D printing with star-shaped strands: a new approach to enhance in vivo bone regeneration.Biomaterials Advances, 2022, 137: 212807

[119] Xu C, Wu F, Yang J, . 3D printed long-term structurally stable bioceramic dome scaffolds with controllable biodegradation favorable for guided bone regeneration.Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 450: 138003

[120] Zhang B, Gui X, Song P, . Three-dimensional printing of large-scale, high-resolution bioceramics with micronano inner porosity and customized surface characterization design for bone regeneration.ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2022, 14(7): 8804–8815

[121] Ahn J H, Kim J, Han G, . 3D-printed biodegradable composite scaffolds with significantly enhanced mechanical properties via the combination of binder jetting and capillary rise infiltration process.Additive Manufacturing, 2021, 41: 101988

[122] Putra N E, Borg K G N, Diaz-Payno P J, . Additive manufacturing of bioactive and biodegradable porous iron-akermanite composites for bone regeneration.Acta Biomaterialia, 2022, 148: 355–373

[123] Wei J, Yan Y, Gao J, . 3D-printed hydroxyapatite microspheres reinforced PLGA scaffolds for bone regeneration.Biomaterials Advances, 2022, 133: 112618

[124] Zhao X, Wang S, Wang F, , . 3D-printed Mg-1Ca/polycaprolactone composite scaffolds with promoted bone regeneration. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys, 2022, in press

[125] Wang Z, Lin D, Wang M, . Seamless route of self-assembly and 3D printing to fabricate hierarchical mesoporous bioactive glass scaffold for customized bone regeneration with enhanced efficacy.Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 446: 137270

[126] Wang X, Zhai D, Yao X, . 3D printing of pink bioceramic scaffolds for bone tumor tissue therapy.Applied Materials Today, 2022, 27: 101443

[127] Dong D, Su H, Li X, . Microstructures and mechanical properties of biphasic calcium phosphate bioceramics fabricated by SLA 3D printing.Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2022, 81: 433–443

[128] Martins M I, Rodrigues M A, Lopes M A, . Preparation and characterization of customized bone grafting hydroxyapatite models obtained by digital light processing 3D printing.Journal of Materials Research, 2022, 37(3): 784–795

[129] Pant S, Subramanian S, Thomas S, . Tailoring of mesoporous bioactive glass composite scaffold via thermal extrusion based 3D bioprinting and scrutiny on bone tissue engineering characteristics.Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2022, 341: 112104

[130] Kolan K C R, Huang Y W, Semon J A, . 3D-printed biomimetic bioactive glass scaffolds for bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects.International Journal of Bioprinting, 2020, 6(2): 274

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press