Regulation of cell morphology and viability using anodic aluminum oxide with custom-tailored structural parameters

Abstract

Anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) with independently controlled period, porosity, and height is used as the model surface to study the single structural parameter effect on breast cancer cell behaviors, including cell polarity and cell viability. It is found that the quantity of multipolar cells and cell viability increases as the nanodent period increases from 100 to 300 nm, while the number of bipolar cells has almost no change until there is a dramatic decrease as the period increases to 300 nm. After anodizing nanodents into nanopores, the numbers of both bipolar cells and the cell viability increase significantly with the porosity increase. However, as the porosity further increases and the nanopore changes into a nanocone pillar, most of the cells become nonpolar spheres and the cell viability decreases. Increasing the height of the nanocone pillar has little effect on the cell polarity; the cell viability increases slightly with the increase of the nanocone pillar height. These results reveal the influence of individual nanostructure parameters on the cell behavior, especially the cell polarity and the cell viability, which can help to design the surface to make the cell grow as desired.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

nanostructure parameter / breast cancer cell / cell morphology / cell polarity / cell viability

References

[1] Netti P, Ventre M. Cell Instructive Materials to Control and Guide Cell Function: Programmable Bioactive Interfaces. Woodhead Publishing, 2021

[2] Cai S, Wu C, Yang W, . Recent advance in surface modification for regulating cell adhesion and behaviors.Nanotechnology Reviews, 2020, 9(1): 971–989

[3] Bettinger C J, Langer R, Borenstein J T . Engineering substrate topography at the micro- and nanoscale to control cell function.Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2009, 48(30): 5406–5415

[4] Zhou J, Zhang X, Sun J, . The effects of surface topography of nanostructure arrays on cell adhesion.Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2018, 20(35): 22946–22951

[5] Nguyen A T, Sathe S R, Yim E K F . From nano to micro: topographical scale and its impact on cell adhesion, morphology and contact guidance.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 2016, 28(18): 183001

[6] Leclech C, Villard C . Cellular and subcellular contact guidance on microfabricated substrates.Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2020, 8: 551505

[7] Dalton B A, Walboomers X F, Dziegielewski M, . Modulation of epithelial tissue and cell migration by microgrooves.Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 2001, 56(2): 195–207

[8] Zhu Y, Liu X, Wu J, . Micro- and nanohemispherical 3D imprints modulate the osteogenic differentiation and mineralization tendency of bone cells.ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2019, 11(39): 35513–35524

[9] Song Y, Ju Y, Song G, . In vitro proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells on nanoporous alumina.International Journal of Nanomedicine, 2013, 8: 2745–2756

[10] Agudo-Canalejo J, Discher D E . Biomembrane adhesion to substrate topographically pattered with nanopits.Biophysical Journal, 2018, 115(7): 1292–1306

[11] Wu X, Li L, Wang L, . Cell spreading behaviors on hybrid nanopillar and nanohole arrays.Nanotechnology, 2022, 33(4): 045101

[12] Yang Y, Wang K, Gu X, . Biophysical regulation of cell behavior — cross talk between substrate stiffness and nanotechnology.Engineering, 2017, 3(1): 36–54

[13] Li Y, Xiao Y, Liu C . The horizon of materiobiology: a perspective on material-guided cell behaviors and tissue engineering.Chemical Reviews, 2017, 117(5): 4376–4421

[14] Gao C, Ito S, Obata A, . Fabrication and in vitro characterization of electrospun poly (γ-glutamic acid)–silica hybrid scaffolds for bone regeneration.Polymer, 2016, 91: 106–117

[15] Saji V S . Supramolecular organic nanotubes for drug delivery.Materials Today Advances, 2022, 14: 100239

[16] Saji V S, Choe H C, Yeung K W K . Nanotechnology in biomedical applications: a review.International Journal of Nano and Biomaterials, 2010, 3(2): 119–139

[17] Saji V S, Kumeria T, Gulati K, . Localized drug delivery of selenium (Se) using nanoporous anodic aluminium oxide for bone implants.Journal of Materials Chemistry B: Materials for Biology and Medicine, 2015, 3(35): 7090–7098

[18] Thompson G E . Porous anodic alumina: fabrication, characterization and applications.Thin Solid Films, 1997, 297(1–2): 192–201

[19] Rahman S, Ormsby R, Santos A, . Nanoengineered drug-releasing aluminium wire implants: comparative investigation of nanopore geometry, drug release and osteoblast cell adhesion.RSC Advances, 2015, 5(92): 75004–75014

[20] Rajeev G, Prieto Simon B, Marsal L F, . Advances in nanoporous anodic alumina-based biosensors to detect biomarkers of clinical significance: a review.Advanced Healthcare Materials, 2018, 7(5): 1700904

[21] Jani A M M, Losic D, Voelcker N H . Nanoporous anodic aluminium oxide: advances in surface engineering and emerging applications.Progress in Materials Science, 2013, 58(5): 636–704

[22] Ruiz-Clavijo A, Caballero-Calero O, Martín-González M . Revisiting anodic alumina templates: from fabrication to applications.Nanoscale, 2021, 13(4): 2227–2265

[23] Zajączkowska L, Norek M . Peculiarities of aluminum anodization in AHAs-based electrolytes: case study of the anodization in glycolic acid solution.Materials, 2021, 14(18): 5362

[24] Jani A M M, Habiballah A S, Halim M Z B A, . Nanoporous anodic aluminum oxide (NAAO) for catalytic, biosensing and template synthesis applications (a review).Current Nanoscience, 2019, 15(1): 49–63

[25] Tang Z, Zhang D, Cui W, . Fabrications, applications and challenges of solid-state nanopores: a mini review.Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology, 2016, 6: 35

[26] Liu S, Tian J, Zhang W . Fabrication and application of nanoporous anodic aluminum oxide: a review.Nanotechnology, 2021, 32(22): 222001

[27] Ono S . Nanostructure analysis of anodic films formed on aluminum-focusing on the effects of electric field strength and electrolyte anions.Molecules, 2021, 26(23): 7270

[28] Brüggemann D . Nanoporous aluminium oxide membranes as cell interfaces.Journal of Nanomaterials, 2013, 2013: 460870

[29] Kim G O, Lee H, Ma E, . Viability studies of cells on nanostructured surfaces with various feature sizes.Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society, 2017, 38(12): 1447–1454

[30] Park J S, Moon D, Kim J S, . Cell adhesion and growth on the anodized aluminum oxide membrane.Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology, 2016, 12(3): 575–580

[31] Poinern G E J, Le X T, O’Dea M, . Chemical synthesis, characterisation, and biocompatibility of nanometre scale porous anodic aluminium oxide membranes for use as a cell culture substrate for the Vero cell line: a preliminary study.BioMed Research International, 2014, 2014: 238762

[32] Mussano F, Genova T, Serra F G, . Nano-pore size of alumina affects osteoblastic response.International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2018, 19(2): 528

[33] Nasrollahi S, Banerjee S, Qayum B, . Nanoscale matrix topography influences microscale cell motility through adhesions, actin organization, and cell shape.ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering, 2017, 3(11): 2980–2986

[34] Che X, Boldrey J, Zhong X, . On-chip studies of magnetic stimulation effect on single neural cell viability and proliferation on glass and nanoporous surfaces.ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2018, 10(34): 28269–28278

[35] Ma Y, Wen Y, Li J, . Fabrication of self-ordered alumina films with large interpore distance by Janus anodization in citric acid.Scientific Reports, 2016, 6(1): 39165

[36] Li J, Li C, Chen C, . Facile method for modulating the profiles and periods of self-ordered three-dimensional alumina taper-nanopores.ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2012, 4(10): 5678–5683

[37] Feng C, Zhang Z, Li J, . A bioinspired, highly transparent surface with dry-style antifogging, antifrosting, antifouling, and moisture self-cleaning properties.Macromolecular Rapid Communications, 2019, 40(6): 1800708

[38] Lim J, Choi A, Kim H W, . Constrained adherable area of nanotopographic surfaces promotes cell migration through the regulation of focal adhesion via focal adhesive kinase/Racl activation.ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2018, 10(17): 14331–14341

[39] Song Y, Ju Y, Morita Y, . Effect of the nanostructure of porous alumina on growth behavior of MG63 osteoblast-like cells.Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 2013, 116(4): 509–515

[40] ter Maat J, Regeling R, Ingham C J, . Organic modification and subsequent biofunctionalization of porous anodic alumina using terminal alkynes.Langmuir, 2011, 27(22): 13606–13617

[41] Kolos E, Ruys A J . Biomimetic coating on porous alumina for tissue engineering: characterisation by cell culture and confocal microscopy.Materials, 2015, 8(6): 3584–3606

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press