Development of new ionic gelation strategy: Towards the preparation of new monodisperse and stable hyaluronic acid/β-cyclodextrin-grafted chitosan nanoparticles as drug delivery carriers for doxorubicin
Amina Ben MIHOUB, Boubakeur SAIDAT, Youssef BAL, Céline FROCHOT, Régis VANDERESSE, Samir ACHERAR
Development of new ionic gelation strategy: Towards the preparation of new monodisperse and stable hyaluronic acid/β-cyclodextrin-grafted chitosan nanoparticles as drug delivery carriers for doxorubicin
In the present study, β-cyclodextrin-grafted chitosan nanoparticles (β-CD-g-CS NPs) were prepared using a new ionic gelation strategy involving a synergistic effect of NaCl (150 mmol/L), 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES, 10 mmol/L), and water bath sonication. This new strategy afforded smaller and more monodisperse β-CD-g-CS NPs vs. the classical ionic gelation method. New HA/β-CD-g-CS NPs were also prepared using the above-mentioned strategy by adding hyaluronic acid (HA) to the β-CD-g-CS copolymer at different weight ratios until the ZP values conversion. The best result was obtained with the weight ratio of w(HA):w(β-CD-g-CS) = 2:1 and furnished new spherical and smooth HA/β-CD-g-CS NPs. Furthermore, the stability of β-CD-g-CS NPs and HA/β-CD-g-CS NPs at 4°C in physiological medium (pH 7.4) was compared for 3 weeks period and showed that HA/β-CD-g-CS NPs were more stable all maintaining their monodispersity and high negative ZP values compared to β-CD-g-CS NPs. Finally, preliminary study of HA/β-CD-g-CS NPs as carrier for the controlled release of the anticancer drug doxorubicin was investigated. These new HA/β-CD-g-CS NPs can potentially be used as drug delivery and targeting systems for cancer treatment.
β-cyclodextrin-grafted chitosan / hyaluronic acid / ionic gelation / drug delivery / physicochemical parameters control
[1] |
Dey A, Koli U, Dandekar P,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Al-Qadi S, Grenha A, Remuñán-López C. Chitosan and its derivatives as nanocarriers for siRNA delivery. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, 2012, 22(1): 29–42
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Al-Qadi S, Alatorre-Meda M, Zaghloul E M,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Amidi M, Mastrobattista E, Jiskoot W,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Szejtli J. Introduction and general overview of cyclodextrin chemistry. Chemical Reviews, 1998, 98(5): 1743–1754
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Duchêne D, Bochot A. Thirty years with cyclodextrins. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2016, 514(1): 58–72
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Otero-Espinar F J, Torres-Labandeira J J, Alvarez-Lorenzo J C,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Zhang J, Ma P X. Cyclodextrin-based supramolecular systems for drug delivery: recent progress and future perspective. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2013, 65(9): 1215–1233
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Prabaharan M, Mano J F. Chitosan derivatives bearing cyclodextrin cavities as novel adsorbent matrices. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2006, 63(2): 153–166
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Zhang X G, Wu Z M, Gao X J,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Lu L, Shao X, Jiao Y,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Yuan Z, Ye Y, Gao F,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Zhang H, Oh M, Allen C,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Fan W, Yan W, Xu Z,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Nasti A, Zaki N M, de Leonardis P,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Jonassen H, Kjoniksen A L, Hiorth M. Effects of ionic strength on the size and compactness of chitosan nanoparticles. Colloid & Polymer Science, 2012, 290(10): 919–929
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Sawtarie N, Cai Y, Lapitsky Y. Preparation of chitosan/tripolyphosphate nanoparticles with highly tunable size and low polydispersity. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2017, 157: 110–117
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Gokce Y, Cengiz B, Yildiz N,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Kedjarune-Leggat U, Supaprutsakul C, Chotigeat W. Ultrasound treatment increases transfection efficiency of low molecular weight chitosan in fibroblasts but not in KB cells. PLoS One, 2014, 9(3): e92076
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[20] |
So M H, Ho C M, Chen R,
Pubmed
|
[21] |
Stern R, Kogan G, Jedrzejas M J,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Sivadas N, O’Rourke D, Tobin A,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Kalam M A. Development of chitosan nanoparticles coated with hyaluronic acid for topical ocular delivery of dexamethasone. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2016, 89: 127–136
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Li L, Qian Y, Jiang C,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Lokeshwar V B, Mirza S, Jordan A. Targeting hyaluronic acid family for cancer chemoprevention and therapy. Advances in Cancer Research, 2014, 123: 35–65
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Mok H, Park J W, Park T G. Antisense oligodeoxynucleotide-conjugated hyaluronic acid/protamine nanocomplexes for intracellular gene inhibition. Bioconjugate Chemistry, 2007, 18(5): 1483–1489
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Melton L D, Slessor K N. Synthesis of monosubstituted cyclohexaamyloses. Carbohydrate Research, 1971, 18(1): 29–37
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Gonil P, Sajomsang W, Ruktanonchai U R,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[29] |
Kievit F M, Wang F Y, Fang C,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[30] |
Ji J, Hao S, Liu W,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[31] |
Yuan Z, Ye Y, Gao F,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[32] |
Prabaharan M, Gong S. Novel thiolated carboxymethyl chitosan-g-β-cyclodextrin as mucoadhesive hydrophobic drug delivery carriers. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2008, 73(1): 117–125
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[33] |
Ito T, Iida-Tanaka N, Niidome T,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[34] |
Deng X, Cao M, Zhang J,
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[35] |
Singh R, Lillard J W Jr. Nanoparticle-based targeted drug delivery. Experimental and Molecular Pathology, 2009, 86(3): 215–223
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |