Tumor-suppressor effects of chemical functional groups in an in vitro co-culture system

Su-Ju XU, Fu-Zhai CUI, Xiang-Dong KONG

PDF(1776 KB)
PDF(1776 KB)
Front. Mater. Sci. ›› 2014, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (2) : 136-141. DOI: 10.1007/s11706-014-0235-y
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Tumor-suppressor effects of chemical functional groups in an in vitro co-culture system

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Liver normal cells and cancer cells co-cultured on surfaces modified by different chemical functional groups, including mercapto (--SH), hydroxyl (--OH) and methyl (--CH3) groups. The results showed that different cells exhibited changes in response to different surfaces. Normal cells on --SH surface exhibited the smallest contact area with mostly rounded morphology, which led to the death of cancer cells, while cancer cells could not grow on --CH3 groups, which also died. In the co-culture system, the --CH3 group exhibited its unique effect that could trigger the death of cancer cells and had no effects on normal cells. Our findings provide useful information on strategies for the design of efficient and safe regenerative medicine materials.

Keywords

tumor suppressor / chemical functional group / co-culture system / regenerative medicine material

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Su-Ju XU, Fu-Zhai CUI, Xiang-Dong KONG. Tumor-suppressor effects of chemical functional groups in an in vitro co-culture system. Front. Mater. Sci., 2014, 8(2): 136‒141 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11706-014-0235-y

References

[1]
Du J, Yarema K J. Carbohydrate engineered cells for regenerative medicine. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2010, 62(7-8): 671-682
[2]
Langer R, Tirrell D A. Designing materials for biology and medicine. Nature, 2004, 428(6982): 487-492
[3]
Medema J P, Vermeulen L. Microenvironmental regulation of stem cells in intestinal homeostasis and cancer. Nature, 2011, 474(7351): 318-326
[4]
Faucheux N, Schweiss R, Lützow K, . Self-assembled monolayers with different terminating groups as model substrates for cell adhesion studies. Biomaterials, 2004, 25(14): 2721-2730
[5]
Scotchford C A, Gilmore C P, Cooper E, . Protein adsorption and human osteoblast-like cell attachment and growth on alkylthiol on gold self-assembled monolayers. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 2002, 59(1): 84-99
[6]
Ren Y J, Zhang H, Huang H, . In vitro behavior of neural stem cells in response to different chemical functional groups. Biomaterials, 2009, 30(6): 1036-1044
[7]
Curran J M, Chen R, Hunt J A. Controlling the phenotype and function of mesenchymal stem cells in vitro by adhesion to silane-modified clean glass surfaces. Biomaterials, 2005, 26(34): 7057-7067
[8]
Fischbach C, Chen R, Matsumoto T, . Engineering tumors with 3D scaffolds. Nature Methods, 2007, 4(10): 855-860
[9]
Keselowsky B G, Collard D M, García A J. Surface chemistry modulates focal adhesion composition and signaling through changes in integrin binding. Biomaterials, 2004, 25(28): 5947-5954
[10]
Murray P, Vasilev K, Fuente Mora C, . The potential of small chemical functional groups for directing the differentiation of kidney stem cells. Biochemical Society Transactions, 2010, 38(4): 1062-1066
[11]
Yu X L, Xu S J, Shao J D, . Different fate of cancer cells on several chemical functional groups. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2013, 228(Supplement 1): S48-S<?Pub Caret1?>54
[12]
Liu X, Wang Y, He J, . Various fates of neuronal progenitor cells observed on several different chemical functional groups. Frontiers of Materials Science, 2011, 5(4): 358-366
[13]
Lisi A, Rieti S, Cricenti A, . ELF non ionizing radiation changes the distribution of the inner chemical functional groups in human epithelial cell (HaCaT) culture. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 2006, 25(4): 281-289
[14]
Kearns S M, Laywell E D, Kukekov V K, . Extracellular matrix effects on neurosphere cell motility. Experimental Neurology, 2003, 182(1): 240-244
[15]
Yin C, Liao K, Mao H Q, . Adhesion contact dynamics of HepG2 cells on galactose-immobilized substrates. Biomaterials, 2003, 24(5): 837-850
[16]
Rahmany M B, Van Dyke M. Biomimetic approaches to modulate cellular adhesion in biomaterials: A review. Acta biomaterialia, 2013, 9(3): 5431-5437
[17]
Keselowsky B G, Collard D M, García A J. Surface chemistry modulates fibronectin conformation and directs integrin binding and specificity to control cell adhesion. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2003, 66(2): 247-259
[18]
Cho Y, Shi R, Borgens R B. Chitosan produces potent neuroprotection and physiological recovery following traumatic spinal cord injury. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 2010, 213(9): 1513-1520
[19]
Nomura H, Zahir T, Kim H, . Extramedullary chitosan channels promote survival of transplanted neural stem and progenitor cells and create a tissue bridge after complete spinal cord transection. Tissue Engineering Part A, 2008, 14(5): 649-665
[20]
Anselme K. Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials, 2000, 21(7): 667-681

Acknowledgements

This work was in part supported by a grant from the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2011CB606205).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1776 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/