The role of crystallinity on differential attachment/proliferation of osteoblasts and fibroblasts on poly(caprolactone-co-glycolide) polymeric surfaces

Abstract

The objective of the present study is to systematically evaluate the role of polymer crystallinity on fibroblast and osteoblast adhesion and proliferation using a series of poly(caprolactone-co-glycolide) (PCL/PGA) polymers. PCL/PGA polymers were selected since they reflect both highly crystalline and amorphous materials. PCL/PGA polymeric materials were fabricated by compression molding into thin films. Five compositions, from PCL or PGA to intermediate copolymeric compositions of PCL/PGA in ratios of 25:75, 35:65 and 45:55, were studied. Pure PCL and PGA represented the crystalline materials while the copolymers were amorphous. The polymers/copolymers were characterized using DSC to assess crystallinity, contact angle measurement for hydrophobicity, and AFM for nanotopography. The PCL/PGA films demonstrated similar hydrophobicity and nanotopography whereas they differed significantly in crystallinity. Cell adhesion to and proliferation on PCL/PGA films and proliferation studies were performed using osteoblasts and NIH-3T3 fibroblasts. It was observed that highly crystalline and rigid PCL and PGA surfaces were significantly more efficient in supporting fibroblast growth, whereas amorphous/flexible PCL/PGA 35:65 was significantly more efficient in supporting growth of osteoblasts. This study demonstrated that while chemical composition, hydrophobicity and surface roughness of PCL/PGA polymers were held constant, crystallinity and rigidity of PCL/PGA played major roles in determining cell responses.

Keywords

crystallinity / attachment / proliferation / osteoblast / fibroblast / PCL-PGA

References

[1] Anderson J M, Rodriguez A, Chang D T. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Seminars in Immunology , 2008, 20(2): 86-100
[2] Yang X B, Roach H I, Clarke N M, . Human osteoprogenitor growth and differentiation on synthetic biodegradable structures after surface modification. Bone , 2001, 29(6): 523-531
[3] Harber G M. Cell-material interactions: fundamental design issues for tissue engineering and clinical considerations. In: Guelcher S A, Hollinger J O, eds. An Introduction to Biomaterials . Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, 2006, 189-210
[4] Kalbacova M, Rezek B, Baresova V, . Nanoscale topography of nanocrystalline diamonds promotes differentiation of osteoblasts. Acta Biomaterialia , 2009, 5(8): 3076-3085
[5] Biggs D L, Lengsfeld C S, Hybertson B M, . In vitro and in vivo valuation of the effects of PLA microparticle crystallinity on cellular response. Journal of Controlled Release , 2003, 92(1-2): 147-161
[6] Degirmenbasi N, Ozkan S, Kalyon D M, . Surface patterning of poly(L-lactide) upon melt processing: In vitro culturing of fibroblasts and osteoblasts on surfaces ranging from highly crystalline with spherulitic protrusions to amorphous with nanoscale indentations. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A , 2009, 88A(1): 94-104
[7] Kawamoto N, Mori H, Terano M, . Blood compatibility of polypropylene surfaces in relation to the crystalline-amorphous microstructure. Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition , 1997, 8(11): 859-877
[8] Park A, Cima L G. In vitro cell response to differences in poly-L-lactide crystallinity. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research , 1996, 31(1): 117-130
[9] Wang S, Kempen D H, Yaszemski M J, . The roles of matrix polymer crystallinity and hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in modulating material properties of photo-crosslinked composites and bone marrow stromal cell responses. Biomaterials , 2009, 30(20): 3359-3370
[10] Washburn N R, Yamada K M, Simon C G Jr, . High-throughput investigation of osteoblast response to polymer crystallinity: influence of nanometer-scale roughness on proliferation. Biomaterials , 2004, 25(7-8): 1215-1224
[11] Winet H, Bao J Y. Comparative bone healing near eroding polylactide-polyglycolide implants of differing crystallinity in rabbit tibial bone chambers. Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition , 1997, 8(7): 517-532
[12] Wang D, Christensen K, Chawla K, . Isolation and characterization of MC3T3-E1 preosteoblast subclones with distinct in vitro and in vivo differentiation/mineralization potential. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research , 1999, 14(6): 893-903
[13] Agrawal C M, Ray R B. Biodegradable polymeric scaffolds for musculoskeletal tissue engineering. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research , 2001, 55(2): 141-150
[14] Tiaw K S, Teoh S H, Chen R, . Processing methods of ultrathin poly(?-caprolactone) films for tissue engineering applications. Biomacromolecules , 2007, 8(3): 807-816
[15] Cheng Z, Teoh S-H. Surface modification of ultra thin poly (?-caprolactone) films using acrylic acid and collagen. Biomaterials , 2004, 25(11): 1991-2001
[16] Bramfeldt H, Vermette P. Enhanced smooth muscle cell adhesion and proliferation on protein-modified polycaprolactone-based copolymers. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A , 2009, 88A(2): 520-530
[17] Chung T-W, Wang Y-Z, Huang Y-Y, . Poly (?-caprolactone) grafted with nano-structured chitosan enhances growth of human dermal fibroblasts. Artificial Organs , 2006, 30(1): 35-41
[18] Ishaug-Riley S L, Okun L E, Prado G, . Human articular chondrocyte adhesion and proliferation on synthetic biodegradable polymer films. Biomaterials , 1999, 20(23-24): 2245-2256
[19] Lee S-H, Kim B-S, Kim S H, . Elastic biodegradable poly(glycolide-co-caprolactone) scaffold for tissue engineering. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A , 2003, 66A(1): 29-37
[20] Otten J E, Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad M, Jahnke H, . Bacterial colonization on different suture materials — a potential risk for intraoral dentoalveolar surgery. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B, Applied Biomaterials , 2005, 74B(1): 627-635
[21] Kowalczyńska H M, Ko?os R, Nowak-Wyrzykowska M, . Atomic force microscopy evidence for conformational changes of fibronectin adsorbed on unmodified and sulfonated polystyrene surfaces. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A , 2009, 91A(4): 1239-1251
[22] Ajami-Henriquez D, Rodríguez M, Sabino M, . Evaluation of cell affinity on poly(L-lactide) and poly(?-caprolactone) blends and on PLLA-b-PCL diblock copolymer surfaces. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A , 2008, 87A(2): 405-417
[23] Pelham R J Jr, Wang Y. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , 1997, 94(25): 13661-13665
[24] Tzvetkova-Chevolleau T, Stéphanou A, Fuard D, . The motility of normal and cancer cells in response to the combined influence of the substrate rigidity and anisotropic microstructure. Biomaterials , 2008, 29(10): 1541-1551
[25] Mo X, Weber H-J, Ramakrishna S. PCL-PGLA composite tubular scaffold preparation and biocompatibility investigation. The International Journal of Artificial Organs , 2006, 29(8): 790-799
[26] Pamula E, Dobrzynski P, Szot B, . Cytocompatibility of aliphatic polyesters — In vitro tudy on fibroblasts and macrophages. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A , 2008, 87A(2): 524-535
[27] Tsai W B, Chen C H, Chen J F, . The effects of types of degradable polymers on porcine chondrocyte adhesion, proliferation and gene expression. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine , 2006, 17(4): 337-343
[28] Tang Z G, Callaghan J T, Hunt J A. The physical properties and response of osteoblasts to solution cast films of PLGA doped polycaprolactone. Biomaterials , 2005, 26(33): 6618-6624
[29] Müller A J, Albuerne J, Marquez L, . Self-nucleation and crystallization kinetics of double crystalline poly(p-dioxanone)-b-poly(?-caprolactone) diblock copolymers. Faraday Discussions , 2005, 128: 231-252
[30] Hamley I W, Castelletto V, Castillo R V, . Crystallization in poly(L-lactide)-b-poly(?-caprolactone) double crystalline diblock copolymers: A study using X-ray scattering, differential scanning calorimetry, and polarized optical microscopy. Macromolecules , 2005, 38(2): 463-472
[31] Gough J E, Christian P, Scotchford C A, . Craniofacial osteoblast responses to polycaprolactone produced using a novel boron polymerisation technique and potassium fluoride post-treatment. Biomaterials , 2003, 24(27): 4905-4912