Overcoming doping bottleneck by using surfactant and strain

Junyi ZHU(), Su-Huai WEI

PDF(319 KB)
PDF(319 KB)
Front. Mater. Sci. ›› 2011, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (4) : 335-341. DOI: 10.1007/s11706-011-0148-y
REVIEW ARTICLE
REVIEW ARTICLE

Overcoming doping bottleneck by using surfactant and strain

  • Junyi ZHU(), Su-Huai WEI
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Overcoming the doping bottleneck in semiconductors, especially in wide band gap semiconductors, has been a challenge in semiconductor physics for many years. In this paper, we review some recent progresses in enhancing doping by surfactant and strain. We show that surfactant and strain are two effective approaches to enhance dopant solubility in epitaxial growth. The surfactant can introduce an energy level deep inside the band gap, making the host compound less stable, thus lower the formation energy of the intentional dopant. The strain enhanced doping is based on the observation that dopant induces volume change in the host. If the external strain is in the same direction as the dopant induced volume change, the formation energy of the dopant is reduced. This effect can be used to tune doping sites, thus doping type, in a host. A hybrid method to both include strain and surfactant is proposed, which can be a promising general method to further enhance doping.

Keywords

semiconductor / surfactant / strain / doping / band gap

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Junyi ZHU, Su-Huai WEI. Overcoming doping bottleneck by using surfactant and strain. Front Mater Sci, 2011, 5(4): 335‒341 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11706-011-0148-y

References

[1] Schubert E F. Doping in III-V Semiconductors, Cambridge Studies in Semiconductor Physics and Microelectronic Engineering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005, 1
[2] Shockley W, Moll J L. Solubility of flaws in heavily-doped semiconductors. Physical Review , 1960, 119(5): 1480-1482
[3] Pearton S J, Cho H, Ren F, . In: Feenstra R, Myers T, Shur M S, et al., eds. GaN and Related Alloys. Materials Research Society , 2000, 595: W10.6.1-W10.6.10
[4] Wei S-H. Overcoming the doping bottleneck in semiconductors. Computational Materials Science , 2004, 30(3-4): 337-348
[5] Copel M, Reuter M C, Kaxiras E, . Surfactants in epitaxial growth. Physical Review Letters , 1989, 63(6): 632-635
[6] Rosenfeld G, Servaty R, Teichert C, . Layer-by-layer growth of Ag on Ag(111) induced by enhanced nucleation: A model study for surfactant-mediated growth. Physical Review Letters , 1993, 71(6): 895-898
[7] Meyer J A, Vrijmoeth J, van der Vegt H A, . Importance of the additional step-edge barrier in determining film morphology during epitaxial growth. Physical Review B , 1995, 51(20): 14790-14793
[8] Pillai M R, Kim S-S, Ho S T, . Growth of InxGa1-xAs/GaAs heterostructures using Bi as a surfactant. Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology B , 2000, 18(3): 1232-1236
[9] Fetzer C M, Lee R T, Shurtleff J K, . The use of a surfactant (Sb) to induce triple period ordering in GaInP. Applied Physics Letters , 2000, 76(11): 1440-1442
[10] Chapman D C, Howard A D, Stringfellow G B. Zn enhancement during surfactant-mediated growth of GaInP and GaP. Journal of Crystal Growth , 2006, 287(2): 647-651
[11] Howard A D, Chapman D C, Stringfellow G B. Effects of surfactants Sb and Bi on the incorporation of zinc and carbon in III/V materials grown by organometallic vapor-phase epitaxy. Journal of Applied Physics , 2006, 100(4): 044904(8 pages)
[12] Zhu J Y, Liu F, Stringfellow G B. Dual-surfactant effect to enhance p-type doping in III-V semiconductor thin films. Physical Review Letters , 2008, 101(19): 196103 (4 pages)
[13] Zhu J, Liu F, Stringfellow G B. Enhanced cation-substituted p-type doping in GaP from dual surfactant effects. Journal of Crystal Growth , 2010, 312(2): 174-179
[14] Zhang L, Yan Y, Wei S-H. Enhancing dopant solubility via epitaxial surfactant growth. Physical Review B , 2009, 80(7): 073305 (4 pages)
[15] Sadigh B, Lenosky T J, Caturla M-J, . Large enhancement of boron solubility in silicon due to biaxial stress. Applied Physics Letters , 2002, 80(25): 4738-4740
[16] Zhu J, Liu F, Stringfellow G B, . Strain-enhanced doping in semiconductors: Effects of dopant size and charge state. Physical Review Letters , 2010, 105(19): 195503 (4 pages)
[17] Zhu J, Wei S-H. Tuning doping site and type by strain: Enhanced p-type doping in Li doped ZnO. Solid State Communications , 2011, 151(20): 1437-1439
[18] Ahn C, Bennett N, Dunham S T, . Stress effects on impurity solubility in crystalline materials: A general model and density-functional calculations for dopants in silicon. Physical Review B , 2009, 79(7): 073201 (4 pages)
[19] Bennett N S, Smith A J, Gwilliam R M, . Antimony for n-type metal oxide semiconductor ultrashallow junctions in strained Si: A superior dopant to arsenic? Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology B , 2008, 26(1): 391-395
[20] Kahwaji S, Roorda S, Xiao S Q F, . The influence of a Pb surfactant on Mn delta-doped layers on Si(001). APS March Meeting , 2010, 55(2): H25.6
[21] Sato T, Mitsuhara M, Iga R, . Influence of Sb surfactant on carrier concentration in heavily Zn-doped InGaAs grown by metalorganic vapor phase epitaxy. Journal of Crystal Growth , 2011, 315(1): 64-67
[22] Lu G-H, Liu F. Towards quantitative understanding of formation and stability of Ge hut islands on Si(001). Physical Review Letters , 2005, 94(17): 176103 (4 pages)
[23] Chen G, Cheng S F, Tobin D J, . Direct evidence for a hydrogen-stabilized surface indium phosphide (001)-(2×1): reconstruction. Physical Review B , 2003, 68(12): 121303(R) (3 pages)
[24] Larsen P K, Chadi D J. Surface structure of As-stabilized GaAs(001): 2×4, c(2×8), and domain structures. Physical Review B , 1988, 37(14): 8282-8288
[25] McCluskey M D, Haller E E, Walker J, . Spectroscopy of hydrogen-related complexes in GaP:Zn. Applied Physics Letters , 1994, 65(17): 2191-2192
[26] Rao E V K, Theys B, Gottesman Y, . In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Indium Phosphide and Related Materials. New York: IEEE, 1999
[27] Chen C H, Stockman S A, Peanasky M J, . In: Stringfellow G B, Craford M G, eds. Semiconductors and Semimetals. New York: Academic Press, 1997, 48: 122
[28] Jiao W, . Electronic Materials Conference 2011
[29] Van Vechten J A, Phillips J C. New set of tetrahedral covalent radii. Physical Review B , 1970, 2(6): 2160-2167
[30] Duclere J-R, Novotny M, Meaney A, . Properties of Li-, P- and N-doped ZnO thin films prepared by pulsed laser deposition. Superlattices and Microstructures , 2005, 38(4-6): 397-405
[31] Oral A Y, Bahsi Z B, Aslan M H. Microstructure and optical properties of nanocrystalline ZnO and ZnO:(Li or Al) thin films. Applied Surface Science , 2007, 253(10): 4593-4598
[32] Majumdar S, Banerji P. Effect of Li incorporation on the structural and optical properties of ZnO. Superlattices and Microstructures , 2009, 45(6): 583-589
[33] Poizot P, Laruelle S, Grugeon S, . Nano-sized transition-metal oxides as negative-electrode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Nature , 2000, 407(6803): 496-499
[34] Hu Y-S, Guo Y-G, Sigle W, . Electrochemical lithiation synthesis of nanoporous materials with superior catalytic and capacitive activity. Nature Materials , 2006, 5(9): 713-717
[35] Koudriachova M V, Harrison N M, de Leeuw S W. Effect of diffusion on lithium intercalation in titanium dioxide. Physical Review Letters , 2001, 86(7): 1275-1278
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(319 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/