Study of UV-curable composite resin of transfer tray for orthodontics

YANG Lin1, NIE Jun1, WU Wei2, JIA Pei-zeng2, XU Bao-hua3

Front. Mater. Sci. ›› 2008, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (4) : 430-436.

PDF(185 KB)
PDF(185 KB)
Front. Mater. Sci. ›› 2008, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (4) : 430-436. DOI: 10.1007/s11706-008-0060-2

Study of UV-curable composite resin of transfer tray for orthodontics

  • YANG Lin1, NIE Jun1, WU Wei2, JIA Pei-zeng2, XU Bao-hua3
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objectives: the aim of this study was to investigate the properties of UV-curable composite resin of transfer tray for indirect bonding system of the lingual brackets. Methods: the conversion of double-bond in the different concentration of UV-initiator was monitored by real time infrared (RTIR). The three-point flexure strength was measured by a universal testing machine. The storage modulus, loss modulus, and loss factor (tan delta) of the resin were measured by a Dynamic Mechanical Analyzer. The cytotoxicity of composite resin was evaluated by the agar covering test. Results: the double bond conversion exceeded 70% at [benzophenone] = 0.7 wt.%, [Ethyl 4-dimethylaminobenzoate] = 0.7 wt.% and [2-Hydroxy-2-methyl-1-phenyl propanon] = 1 wt.%. The mean value of flexural strength came to 122 MPa. The value of storage modulus was 1.04 × 109 MPa at 23°C. The glass transition temperature was 142°C. The toxicity grade was zero at 2 h and one at 24 h. Conclusions: in the preliminary evaluations, we indicated that the UV-curable composite resin of transfer tray could satisfy the clinical requirements.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
YANG Lin, NIE Jun, WU Wei, JIA Pei-zeng, XU Bao-hua. Study of UV-curable composite resin of transfer tray for orthodontics. Front. Mater. Sci., 2008, 2(4): 430‒436 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11706-008-0060-2

References

1. Melsen B, Biaggini P . The Ray Set: A new techniquefor precise indirect bonding. Journal ofClinical Orthodontics, 2002, 36(11): 648–654
2. Silverman E, Cohen M, Gianelly A A, et al.. A universal direct bonding system for both metaland plastic brackets. American Journalof Orthodontics, 1972, 62: 236–244. doi:10.1016/S0002-9416(72)90264-3
3. Thomas R G . Indirect bonding: Simplicity in action. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics, 1979, 13: 93–105
4. Proffit W R . Contemporary fixed appliances. In: Proffit W R, ed. Contemporary Orthodontics. St Louis: The CV Mosby Company, 1993, 342–373
5. Hickham J H . Predictable indirect bonding. Journalof Clinical Orthodontics, 1993, 27: 215–217
6. Kalange J T, Thomas R G . Indirect bonding: a comprehensivereview of the literature. Seminars in Orthodontics, 2007, 13(1): 3–10. doi:10.1053/j.sodo.2006.11.003
7. Wu G Q, Shi S Q, Xiao P, et al.. Synthesis and characterization of aliphaticamine co-initiator with different chain length for photopolymerizationof dimethacrylate. Journal of Photochemistryand Photobiology A: Chemistry, 2007, 188: 260–266. doi:10.1016/j.jphotochem.2006.12.015
8. Mueller R H, Maassen S, Weyhers H, et al.. Cytotoxicity of magnetite-loaded polylactide,polylactide/glycolide particles and solid lipid nanoparticles. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 1996, 138: 85–94. doi:10.1016/0378-5173(96)04539-5
9. Higgins D W . Indirect bonding with light-cured adhesive and a hybrid transfertray. Seminars in Orthodontics, 2007, 13(1): 64–68
10. Johnson M A, Oldring K T . Amine synergy in UV curablecoatings. Journal of the Oil and ColourChemists' Association, 1991, 73(10): 415–418
11. Viljanen E K, Skrifvars M, Vallittu P K . Dendritic copolymers and particulate filler compositesfor dental applications: Degree of conversion and thermal properties. Dental Materials, 2007, 23(11): 1420–1427. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.028
12. Sevnur K, Steffen J, Nicholas T, et al.. 2-Mercaptothioxanthone as sensitizer and coinitiatorfor acylphosphine oxide photoinitiators for free radical polymerization. Macromolecules, 2008, 41: 4631–4634. doi:10.1021/ma800472u
13. Nau W M, Pischel U . Photoreactivity of n,π*-excitedazoalkanes and ketones. Molecular and SupramolecularPhotochemistry, 2006, 14: 75–129
14. Davidson R S . The role of amines in UV curing. In: Fouassier J P, Rabek J F, eds. Radiation Curing in Polymer Science and Technology(vol III). London: Elsevier, 1993, 153–176
15. Lovell L G, Berchtold K A, Elliott J E, et al.. Understanding the kinetics and network formationof dimethacrylate dental resins. Polymersfor Advanced Technologies, 2001, 12: 335–345. doi:10.1002/pat.115
16. Lu H, Stansbury J W, Nie J, et al.. Development of highly reactive mono-(meth)acrylatesas reactive diluents for dimethacrylate-based dental resin systems. Biomaterials, 2005, 26: 1329–1336. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.041
17. Carioscia J A, Lu H, Stanbury J W, et al.. Thiol-ene oligomers as dental restorative materials. Dental Materials, 2005, 21(12): 1137–1143. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.002
18. Torno V, Soares P, Martin J M H, et al.. Effects of irradiance, wavelength, and thermalemission of different light curing units on the Knoop and Vickershardness of a composite resin. Journalof Biomedical Materials Research, 2008, 85: 166–171
19. Turssi C P, Ferracane J L, Vogel K . Filler features and their effects on wear and degreeof conversion of particulate dental resin composites. Biomaterials, 2005, 26: 4932–4937. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.01.026
20. Combe E C, Shaglouf A-M S, Watts D C, et al.. Mechanical properties of direct core build-upmaterials. Dental Materials, 1999, 15(3): 158–165. doi:10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00027-5
21. Kannurpatti A R, Anseth J W, Bowman C N . A study of the evolution of mechanical properties andstructural heterogeneity of polymer networks formed by photopolymerizationsof multifunctional (meth)acrylates. Polymer, 1998, 39: 2507–2513. doi:10.1016/S0032-3861(97)00585-5
22. Lu H, Lovell L G, Bowman C N . Exploiting the heterogeneity of cross-linked photopolymersto create high-Tg polymers from polymerizations performed at ambient conditions. Macromolecules, 2001, 34: 8021–8025. doi:10.1021/ma010542g
23. Anandkumar R K, Jay W A, Bowman C N . A study of the evolution of mechanical properties andstructural heterogeneity of polymer networks formed by photopolymerizationsof multifunctional (meth)acrylates. Polymer, 1998, 12: 2507–2513
24. Sideridou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G . Study of water sorption, solubility and modulus of elasticityof light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Biomaterials, 2003, 24: 655–665. doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00380-0
25. Moin Jan C, Nomura Y, Urabe H, et al.. The relationship between leachability of polymerizationinitiator and degree of conversion of visible light-cured resin. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 2001, 58(1): 42–46. doi:10.1002/1097-4636(2001)58:1<42::AID-JBM60>3.0.CO;2-#
26. Liso P A, Vazquez B, Rebuelta M, et al.. Analysis of the leaching and toxicity of newamine activators for the curing of acrylic bone cements and composites. Biomaterials, 1997, 18: 15–20. doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(96)00082-8
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(185 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/