The key spatial elements and high-density development of urban peninsula: A discussion on the relationship between core and cape

Dongzhu Chu , Huilin Lan , Yuwen Deng

Front. Archit. Res. ›› 2022, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (5) : 934 -948.

PDF (9086KB)
Front. Archit. Res. ›› 2022, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (5) :934 -948. DOI: 10.1016/j.foar.2022.02.009
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The key spatial elements and high-density development of urban peninsula: A discussion on the relationship between core and cape

Author information +
History +
PDF (9086KB)

Abstract

Urban peninsulas are an important category with distinctive geographical characteristics in the history of human settlements. Despite their time-honored development, abundant cultural accumulation, and developed water transportation, a considerable number of world-famous urban peninsulas demonstrate a remarkable feature of high-density development because of their limited space for expansion. Based on the in-depth analysis of the connotation and features of urban peninsulas, this study summarizes five basic elements concerning the space of urban peninsulas, namely, capes, boundaries, networks, nodes, and cores. On the basis of these five elements, different high-density developmental modes of urban peninsulas are construed to provide a reference model for the location, density control, and urban structure of high-rise building clusters in peninsulas and further reveal the significance and value of high-rise buildings in shaping the special urban form of peninsulas.

Keywords

Urban peninsula / Spatial elements / High-density development / High-rise buildings

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Dongzhu Chu, Huilin Lan, Yuwen Deng. The key spatial elements and high-density development of urban peninsula: A discussion on the relationship between core and cape. Front. Archit. Res., 2022, 11(5): 934-948 DOI:10.1016/j.foar.2022.02.009

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Aldo, R., 1999. The Architecture of the City. Tenth Printing. MIT Press.

[2]

Boddy, T., 2004. New urbanism: „the vancouver model” [Speaking of places]. Places 16 (2).

[3]

Douay, N., 2015. Vancouverism: hybridisation and spread of an urban model. Metropolitics (accessed 28 March 2020). eu/Vancouverism-hybridisation-and.html.

[4]

Lynch, K., 1960a. The Image of the City. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, p. 208.

[5]

Lynch, K., 1960b. The Image of the City. MIT press, pp. 42–43.

[6]

Malott, D., 2010. Case study: international commerce centre. CTBUH J. 12–17.

[7]

Oswald, F., Baccini, P., Michaeli, M., 2003. Netzstadt. Springer Science & Business Media.

[8]

Scott, A.J., Agnew, J., Soja, E.W., 2001. Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 11–30.

[9]

Vähäaho, I., 2016. Development for urban underground space in Helsinki. Energy Proc. 96, 824–832.

[10]

Xue, C.Q., Sun, C., 2018. How much development can a rail station lead? A case study of Hong Kong. Int. J. High-Rise Build. 7 (2), 95–109.

[11]

Zhong, C., Schläpfer, M., Müller Arisona, S., 2017. Revealing centrality in the spatial structure of cities from human activity patterns. Urban Stud. 54 (2), 437–455.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2022 Higher Education Press Limited Company. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

PDF (9086KB)

1568

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/