Bile duct injury repair — earlier is not better

Vinay K. Kapoor

Front. Med. ›› 2015, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (4) : 508 -511.

PDF (80KB)
Front. Med. ›› 2015, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (4) : 508 -511. DOI: 10.1007/s11684-015-0418-7
COMMENTARY
COMMENTARY

Bile duct injury repair — earlier is not better

Author information +
History +
PDF (80KB)

Abstract

Bile duct injury is a common complication of cholecystectomy. The timing of bile duct injury repair remains controversial. A recent review conducted in France reported 39% complications and 64% failure after immediate repair in 194 patients compared with 14% complications and 8% failure after late repair in 133 patients. A national review of 139 consecutive early repairs conducted at five hepatopancreaticobiliary centers in Denmark reported 4% mortality, 36% morbidity, and 42 restrictures (30%) at a median follow-up of 102 months, and only 64 patients (46%) demonstrated uneventful short-term and long-term outcomes. Most patients with bile duct injury present with bile leak and sepsis; thus, early repair is not recommended. Percutaneous drainage of bile and endoscopic stenting are the mainstays of treatment of bile leak because they convert acute bile duct injury into a controlled external biliary fistula. The ensuing benign biliary stricture should be repaired by a biliary surgeon after a delay of 4–6 weeks once the external biliary fistula has closed.

Keywords

bile duct injury / cholecystectomy / laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Vinay K. Kapoor. Bile duct injury repair — earlier is not better. Front. Med., 2015, 9(4): 508-511 DOI:10.1007/s11684-015-0418-7

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Thomson BNParks RWMadhavan KKWigmore SJGarden OJ. Early specialist repair of biliary injury. Br J Surg 200693(2): 216–220

[2]

Holte KBardram LWettergren ARasmussen A. Reconstruction of major bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dan Med Bull 201057(2): A4135

[3]

Perera MTSilva MAHegab BMuralidharan VBramhall SRMayer ADBuckels JAMirza DF. Specialist early and immediate repair of post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy bile duct injuries is associated with an improved long-term outcome. Ann Surg 2011253(3): 553–560

[4]

Iannelli APaineau JHamy ASchneck ASSchaaf CGugenheim J. Primary versus delayed repair for bile duct injuries sustained during cholecystectomy: results of a survey of the Association Francaise de Chirurgie. HPB (Oxford) 201315(8): 611–616

[5]

Törnqvist BStrömberg CPersson GNilsson M. Effect of intended intraoperative cholangiography and early detection of bile duct injury on survival after cholecystectomy: population based cohort study. BMJ 2012345: e6457

[6]

de Reuver PRBusch ORRauws EALameris JSvan Gulik TMGouma DJ. Long-term results of a primary end-to-end anastomosis in peroperative detected bile duct injury. J Gastrointest Surg 200711(3): 296–302

[7]

Sahajpal AKChow SCDixon EGreig PDGallinger SWei AC. Bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: timing of repair and long-term outcomes. Arch Surg 2010145(8): 757–763

[8]

Kapoor VK. Bile duct injury repair: when? what? who? J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 200714(5): 476–479

[9]

Strasberg SMHelton WS. An analytical review of vasculobiliary injury in laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. HPB (Oxford)13(1): 1–14

[10]

Felekouras EPetrou ANeofytou KMoris DDimitrokallis NBramis KGriniatsos JPikoulis EDiamantis T. Early or delayed intervention for bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A dilemma looking for an answer. Gastroenterol Res Pract 20152015: 104235

[11]

Stilling NMFristrup CWettergren AUgianskis ANygaard JHolte KBardram LSall MMortensen MB. Long-term outcome after early repair of iatrogenic bile duct injury. A national Danish multicentre study. HPB (Oxford)2015; 17(5):394–400 

[12]

Nuzzo GGiuliante FGiovannini I. Timing of repair of bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 2011146(1): 117, author reply 117–118

[13]

Stewart LWay LW. Laparoscopic bile duct injuries: timing of surgical repair does not influence success rate. A multivariate analysis of factors influencing surgical outcomes. HPB (Oxford) 200911(6): 516–522

[14]

Xu XDZhang YCGao PBahrani-Mougeot FZhang LYHe ZYZhang YWMa JZ. Treatment of major laparoscopic bile duct injury: a long-term follow-up result. Am Surg 201177(12): 1584–1588

[15]

Perera MTSilva MAShah AJHardstaff RBramhall SRIssac JBuckels JAMirza DF. Risk factors for litigation following major transectional bile duct injury sustained at laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 201034(11): 2635–2641

[16]

Gossage JAForshaw MJ. Prevalence and outcome of litigation claims in England after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Int J Clin Pract 201064(13): 1832–1835

[17]

Dageforde LALandman MPFeurer IDPoulose BPinson CWMoore DE. A cost-effectiveness analysis of early vs. late reconstruction of iatrogenic bile duct injuries. J Am Coll Surg 2012214(6): 919–927

[18]

Sikora SSPottakkat BSrikanth GKumar ASaxena RKapoor VK. Postcholecystectomy benign biliary strictures — long-term results. Dig Surg 200623(5−6): 304–312

[19]

Lillemoe KDMelton GBCameron JLPitt HACampbell KATalamini MASauter PAColeman JYeo CJ. Postoperative bile duct strictures: management and outcome in the 1990s. Ann Surg 2000232(3): 430–441

[20]

Silva MAColdham CMayer ADBramhall SRBuckels JAMirza DF. Specialist outreach service for on-table repair of iatrogenic bile duct injuries—a new kind of ‘travelling surgeon’. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 200890(3): 243–246

[21]

Krige JEBornman PCKahn D. Bile leaks and sepsis: drain now, fix later. Arch Surg 2010145(8): 763

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (80KB)

1803

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/