Frontiers in Energy >

2008 , Vol. 2 >Issue 2: 129 - 133

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-008-0029-y

Assessment indices for uniform and non-uniform thermal environments

Expand
  • 1.Department of Architecture, State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, South China University of Technology; 2.Department of Thermal Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing; 3.Department of Building Science, Tsinghua University

Published date: 05 Jun 2008

Fold

Abstract

Different assessment indices for thermal environments were compared and selected for proper assessment of indoor thermal environments. 30 subjects reported their overall thermal sensation, thermal comfort, and thermal acceptability in uniform and non-uniform conditions. The results show that these three assessment indices provide equivalent evaluations in uniform environments. However, overall thermal sensation differs from the other two indices and cannot be used as a proper index for the evaluation of non-uniform environments. The relationship between the percentage and the mean vote for each index is established.

Cite this article

ZHANG Yufeng, SUN Shufeng, ZHAO Rongyi . Assessment indices for uniform and non-uniform thermal environments[J]. Frontiers in Energy, 2008 , 2(2) : 129 -133 . DOI: 10.1007/s11708-008-0029-y

References

1. Hagino M Hara J Development of a method forpredicting comfortable airflow in the passenger compartment. SAE TechnicalPaper SeriesNo.922131 New YorkSociety of Automotive Engineers 1992
2. Li Jun Studieson Characteristics of Personalized Ventilation and Human RresponseBeijingTsinghuaUniversity 2004 (in Chinese)
3. Zhang Yufeng Zhao Rongyi Effect of local exposure onoverall human responses: a reviewHeatingVentilation and Air Conditioning 2005 35(2)2534 (in Chinese)
4. Zhang H HumanThermal Sensation and Comfort in Transient and Non-uniform ThermalEnvironmentsBerkeleyUniversity of Carlifornia at Berkeley 2003
5. Schlegel J C McNall P E The effect of asymmetric radiationon the thermal and comfort sensations of sedentary subjectsASHRAE Transactions 1968 74(2)144153
6. Fanger P O ThermalComfortCopenhagenDanish Technical Press 1970
7. Gagge A P Nevins R G Effect of energy conservationguideline on comfort, acceptability and healthFinal reportof contract #CO-04-51891-00 USAFederal Energy Administration 1976
8. Berglund L G ThermalacceptabilityASHRAE Transactions 1979 85(2)825834
9. International StandardsOrganization. Moderate thermal environments-determination of the PMVand PPD indices and specification of the conditions for thermal comfortGenevaInternationalStandard ISO 7730 1994
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉