REVIEW ARTICLE

Evolving perspectives on biofuels in the United States

  • Lisa C. DIRKS 1 ,
  • Gary W. DIRKS 1 ,
  • Jianguo WU , 2
Expand
  • 1. Global Institute of Sustainability and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, USA
  • 2. Global Institute of Sustainability and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, USA; Sino-US Center for Conservation, Energy and Sustainability Science (SUCCESS), Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China

Received date: 01 Jul 2012

Accepted date: 19 Sep 2012

Published date: 05 Dec 2012

Copyright

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

Abstract

Biofuels represent an important source of renewable energy and may play a crucial role in developing sustainable energy strategies for many countries and the world as a whole. The pros and cons of biofuels, however, have been debated both scientifically and politically. They remain a topic of controversy. In this paper, the evolvement of the perspectives and policies on biofuels in the United States in the past several decades was reviewed. Four different periods, that is, the period prior to 1978 (marked by the passage of the Energy Act in 1978); 1978–1989 (ending with the passage of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990); 1990–2004 (ending with the passage of the energy act of 2005); and 2005 to the present, which were characterized by defining events of major policy importance were identified. Each time period was assessed using the Ostrom institutional analysis and development (IAD) framework to show the impact of the evolving interests and influences of global players on policy choices related to biofuels in the United States. The US has a long history of supporting corn-based ethanol and more recently advanced biofuels. Changes in perspectives on biofuels from largely unrelated groups led to changes in policy and market dynamics. Until the late 1990s, most perspectives and policies tended to be aligned and significantly supportive of corn-based ethanol in the United States. In the early 2000s, it became clear that the complications associated with first generation biofuels and corn-based ethanol in particular, were too numerous and too severe to overlook. The need for better options has spurred interest in new technologies and more environmentally benign feedstocks, but, there is little prospect for biofuels playing a significant role in the near term without greater alignment among key players.

Cite this article

Lisa C. DIRKS , Gary W. DIRKS , Jianguo WU . Evolving perspectives on biofuels in the United States[J]. Frontiers in Energy, 0 , 6(4) : 379 -393 . DOI: 10.1007/s11708-012-0213-y

1
Kates R W, Clark W C, Corell R, Hall J M, Jaeger C C, Lowe I, McCarthy J J, Schellnhuber H J, Bolin B, Dickson N M, Faucheux S, Gallopin G C, Grübler A, Huntley B, Jäger J, Jodha N S, Kasperson R E, Mabogunje A, Matson P, Mooney H, Moore III B, O’Riordan T, Svedlin U. Environment and development. Sustainability science. Science, 2001, 292(5517): 641–642

DOI PMID

2
Wu J. A landscape approach for sustainability science. In: Weinstein M P, Turner R E, eds. Sustainability Science: The Emerging Paradigm and the Urban Environment. New York: Springer. 2012, 59–78

3
Dale V H, Efroymson R A, Kline K L. The land use-climate change-energy nexus. Landscape Ecology, 2011, 26(6): 755–773

DOI

4
Holdren J P. Energy and sustainability. Science, 2007, 315(5813): 737

DOI PMID

5
Goldemberg J. Ethanol for a sustainable energy future. Science, 2007, 315(5813): 808–810

DOI PMID

6
Liu J, Wu J. Perspectives and prospects of biofuels. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(4): 1339–1353

7
Liu J, Wu J, Liu F, Han X. Quantitative assessment of bioenergy from crop stalk resources in Inner Mongolia, China. Applied Energy, 2012, 93: 305–318

DOI

8
Tilman D, Socolow R, Foley J A, Hill J, Larson E, Lynd L, Pacala S, Reilly J, Searchinger T, Somerville C, Williams R. Energy. Beneficial biofuels—The food, energy, and environment trilemma. Science, 2009, 325(5938): 270–271

DOI PMID

9
European Parliament. Directive 2003/30/EC of the European Parliament and the Council on the Promotion of the Use of Biofuels or Other Renewable Fuels for Transport. European Parliament 2003/30/EC. 2003, 1–5

10
Marris E. Sugar cane and ethanol: drink the best and drive the rest. Nature, 2006, 444(7120): 670–672

DOI PMID

11
Charles M B, Ryan R, Ryan N, Oloruntoba R. Public policy and biofuels: The way forward? Energy Policy, 2007, 25(11): 5737–5746

DOI

12
Mazurek J. A New Clean Air Strategy. Progressive Policy Institute (US). 2005, 1–15

13
Sims R E H, Hastings A, Schlamadinger B, Taylors G, Smith P. Energy crops: Current status and future prospects. Global Change Biology, 2006, 12(11): 2054–2076

DOI

14
Boddiger D. Boosting biofuel crops could threaten food security. Lancet, 2007, 370(9591): 923–924

DOI PMID

15
Patzek T, Pimentel D. Thermodynamics of energy production from biomass. Critical Reviews in Plant Science, 2005, 24(5,6): 327–364

16
Pimentel D. Ethanol fuels:energy security, economics and the environment. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, 1991, 4(1): 1–13

DOI

17
Pimentel D, Patzek T. Greenplants, fossil fuels, and now biofuels. Bioscience, 2006, 56(11): 875

DOI

18
Righelato R, Spracklen D V. Environment. Carbon mitigation by biofuels or by saving and restoring forests? Science, 2007, 317(5840): 902

DOI PMID

19
Ostrom E. Understanding Intitutional Diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005, 355

20
Hofstrand D. Ag Decision Maker (AgDM). 2012–<month>08</month>–<day>03</day>, http://www.extension.iastate.edu/agdm/energy/xls/d1-10ethanolprofitabilityxlsx

21
McAloon A, Taylor F, Yee W, Ibsen K, Wooley R. Determining the Cost of Producing Ethanol from Corn Starch and Lignocellulosic Feedstocks US. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Energy, NREL/TP-580–28893. 2000

22
Hayami Y, Godo Y. The three agricultural problems in the disequilibrium of world agriculture. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, 2004, (1): 3–14

23
Anderson K, Martin W, van der Mensbrugghe D. Distortions to world trade: impacts on agricultural markets and farm incomes. Review of Agricultural Economics, 2006, 28(2): 168–194

DOI

24
Kernohan D. Closing a Deal on Doha: Closer Than We Might Think? Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies. 2006, 1–8

25
Bowers D E, Rasmussen W D, Baker G L. History of agricultural price-support and adjustment programs, 1933–1984. Agriculture information bulletin-US Department of Agriculture, 1984, (485): 1–58

26
Murphy S. Globalization and corporate concentration in the food and agriculture sector. Development, 2008, 51(4): 527–533

DOI

27
Nickerson C, Ebel R, Borchers A, Carriazo F. Major Uses of Land in the United States, 2007. Economic Information Bulletin No EIB-89. USDA Economic Research Service, 2011

28
Nickerson C, Morehart M, Kuethe T, Beckman J, Ifft J, Williams R. Trends in U.S. Farmland Values and Ownership. Economic Information Bulletin No. EIB-89. USDA Economic Research Service, 2012

29
Crane K, Rabasa A, Dogo H, Light T, Johnson S E, Nader A. Rabasa A, Dogo H. Imported Oil and U.S. National Security. RAND Corporation, 2009

30
Stern R. Oil market power and United States national security. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006, 103(5): 1650–1655

DOI PMID

31
BP. BP statistical review of world energy 2010. 2011, http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/globalbp_uk_english/reports_and_publications/statistical_energy_review_2008/STAGING/local_assets/2010_downloads/statistical_review_of_world_energy_full_report_2010.pdf

32
Arrhenius S. Die vermutliche Ursache der Klimaschwankungen. Meddelanden fran K Vetenskapsakademiens Nobelinstitut (Band I, No 2). Stockholm, 1906, 1: 1–10 (in Swedish)

33
Gavett E E, Grinnell G E, Smith N. Fuel Ethanol and Agriculture: An Economic Assessment. Agricultural Economic Report No. 562. USDA Office of Energy, 1986

34
Farmdoc University of Illinois. US calender year average corn farm price received for the 1960–2009 calendar year(s). 2010, http://www.farmdoc.illinois.edu/

35
McDonald S. The energy tax act of 1978. Natural Resources Journal, 1979, 19(4): 859–870

36
Uri N D. Factors influencing voting by the United States congress on the national energy act. Environmental Management, 1980, 4(5): 375–380

DOI

37
Johnson R N, Libecap G D. Information distortion and competitive remedies in government transfer programs: the case of ethanol. Economics of Governance, 2001, 2(2): 101–134

DOI

38
Economics W T R G. A discussion of crude oil prices, the relationship between prices and rig count and the outlook for the future of the petroleum industry. 1999, http://www.wtrg.com/prices.html%5D

39
US Energy Information Administration. The Impact of Increased Use of Hydrogen on Petroleum Consumption and Carbon Dioxide Emissions. EIA Report SR-OIAF-CNEAF/2008–04. 2008

40
LeBlanc M, Reilly J. Kane S, Hrubovcak J, Hauver J. Ethanol: economic and policy tradeoffs. USDA Report PB-88–197264/XAB; USDA/AER-585. 1988, 1–58

41
National Academy of Sciences. Energy and Climate: Studies in Geophysics. Washington DC: The National Academies Press. 1977

42
Stedman D. Automobile carbon monoxide emission. Environmental Science & Technology, 1989, 23(2): 147–149

DOI

43
USDA. Food, agriculture, conservation, and trade act of 1990. 1990–<month>11</month>–<day>28</day>, http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/assets/farmbills/1990-4.pdf

44
USDA. Food security act of 1985. PL 99–198. 1985–<month>12</month>–<day>23</day>, http://awic.nal.usda.gov/public-law-99-198-food-security-act-1985-subtitle-f-animal-welfare

45
U.S. Congress. Food, agriculture, conservation, and trade act of 1990. PL 101–624

46
USDA. Provisions of the federal agriculture improvement and reform act of 1996. United States Department of Agriculture. 1996

47
WTO. Understanding the WTO. Geneva: World Trade Organization. 2007, 1–116

48
Ray D E, de la Torre Ugarte D G, Tiller K J. Rethinking US Agricultural Policy: Changing Course to Secure Farmer Livelihoods Worldwide. Agricultural Policy Analysis Center, University of Tennessee, 2003, 1–68

49
USDA. Farm income and balance sheet indicators, 1929–2009. United States Department of Agriculture, 2009

50
Thompson R L. The US farm bill and the doha negotiations: on parallel tracks or a collision course? 2005–<month>09</month>, http://www.wto.org/english/forums_e/ngo_e/posp52_ifatpc_e.pdf

51
FAO. The state of food and agriculture—biofuels: prospects, risks and opportunities. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization. 2008, 1–138

52
Murphy S, Suppan S. The 2008 farm bill and the doha agenda. 2008–<month>06</month>–<day>25</day>, http://www.iatp.org/files/451_2_103102.pdf

53
IPCC. Climate change 2007: Synthesis report summary for policymakers. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2007, 1–22

54
Dees S, Gasteuil A, Kaufmann R K, Mann M. Assessing the factors behind oil price changes. European Central Bank, 2008, 1–39

55
Hamilton J D. Causes and consequences of the oil shock 2007–08. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2009, 1–70

56
Juvenal L, Petrella I. Speculation in the oil market. 2012–<month>06</month>, http://researchstlouisfedorg/wp/2011/2011-027pdf

57
Hill J, Nelson E, Tilman D, Polasky S, Tiffany D. Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006, 103(30): 11206–11210

DOI PMID

58
Pimentel D. Ethanol fuels: energy balance, economics, and environmental impacts are negative. Natural Resources Research, 2003, 12(2): 127–134

DOI

59
Tilman D, Hill J, Lehman C. Carbon-negative biofuels from low-input high-diversity grassland biomass. Science, 2006, 314(5805): 1598–1600

DOI PMID

60
Enkvist P A, Naucler T, Rosander J. A cost curve for greenhouse gas reduction. McKinsey Quarterly, 2007, 1: 35–45

61
Greene D L, Leiby P N. The Oil Security Metrics Model. Oak Ridge National Laboratory ORNL, 2006, TM-2006(505): 1–119

62
Leiby P N. Estimating the energy security benefits of reduced U.S. oil imports. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. ORNL. U. S. Atomic Energy Commission, 2007, TM-2007(028): 1–49

63
Rubin O D, Carriquiry M, Hayes D. Implied objectives of U.S. biofuel subsidies. Working Paper 08-WP 459. Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, 2008, 1–33

64
Miranowski J. Biofuel incentives and the energy title of the 2007 farm bill. Ames: American Enterprise Institute, 2007, 1–30

65
Taheripour F, Tyner W. Ethanol subsidies, who gets the benefits? In: Biofuels, Food and Feed Tradeoffs Conference. St. Louis, 2007, 1–18

66
Johansson D J A, Azar C. A scenerio based analysis of land competition between food and bioenergy production in the US. Climatic Change, 2007, 82(3-4): 267–291

DOI

67
Rosenthal E U N. says biofuel subsidies raise food bill and hunger. The New York Times, 2008–<month>10</month>–<day>07</day>

68
USDA. USDA officials briefing with reporters on the case for food and fuel USDA. 2008–<month>05</month>–<day>19</day>, http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome?contentid=2008/05/0130.xml&contentidonly=true

Outlines

/