RESEARCH ARTICLE

Energy budget and economic analysis in conventional and organic rice production systems and organic scenarios in the transition period in Iran

  • Hamed MANSOORI ,
  • Parviz Rezvani MOGHADDAM ,
  • Rooholla MORADI
Expand
  • Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad 91779-4897, Iran

Received date: 25 May 2012

Accepted date: 20 Aug 2012

Published date: 05 Dec 2012

Copyright

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

Abstract

Compared to conventional agriculture, organic agriculture is reported to be more efficient and effective in reducing water and soil pollution, greenhouse gases (GHGs) emission and risk of human health. In additional, field management under organic condition can be useful for increasing energy efficiency. Rice is one of the important crops which are cultivated in two forms, organic and conventional, in Iran. In order to compare the energy efficiency and economic analysis of rice production in organic and conventional systems in Iran, needed information was collected by face-to-face questionnaire in 2011 and three scenarios were designed to predict the changes of energy budget and economic analysis in the transition period that included: 25%, 50% and 75% organic management in rice production. The results showed that all energy indexes were improved in organic rice production compared to conventional condition. Higher values of benefit to cost ratio, gross and net return and lower value of total cost of production were obtained from organic rice production which indicated that the organic management of farm improved economically in comparison with the conventional rice production system. The shares of direct and renewable energies were increased by approach to organic management. Increase in energy efficiency and productivity was predicted for the transition period but decrease trend in economic indexes was projected for this period in all scenarios. The main reason for decreasing economic indexes in organic scenarios was that the market price of organic rice was the same as that of conventional rice in the transition period.

Cite this article

Hamed MANSOORI , Parviz Rezvani MOGHADDAM , Rooholla MORADI . Energy budget and economic analysis in conventional and organic rice production systems and organic scenarios in the transition period in Iran[J]. Frontiers in Energy, 0 , 6(4) : 341 -350 . DOI: 10.1007/s11708-012-0206-x

1
Beheshti Tabar I, Keyhani A, Rafiee S. Energy balance in Iran’s agronomy (1990–2006). Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2010, 14(2): 849–855

DOI

2
MAJ (Ministry of Agriculture of the I.R. of Iran). Planning and Economics Department, Statistics Bank of Iranian Agriculture. http://www.maj. ir/english/Statistic/Default.asp?p=statistic

3
IOA (Iran Organic Association). Statistics Bank of organic Iranian Agriculture. http://www.iranorganic.com/fa/index.php

4
Erdemir G. Energy use on organic farming: A comparative analysis on organic versus conventional apricot production on small holdings in Turkey. Energy Conversion and Management, 2006, 47(18,19): 3351–3359

DOI

5
Mohammadi A, Tabatabaeefar A, Shahin S, Rafiee S, Keyhani A. Energy use and economical analysis of potato production in Iran, a case study: Ardabil province. Energy Conversion and Management, 2008, 49(12): 3566–3570

DOI

6
Gallaher M, Delhotal K, Petrusa J. Estimating the potential CO2 mitigation from agricultural energy efficiency in the United States. Energy Efficiency, 2009, 2(2): 207–220

DOI

7
Haas G, Wetterich F, Köpke U. Comparing intensive, extensified and organic grassland farming in southern Germany by process life cycle assessment. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2001, 83(1–2): 43–53

DOI

8
Karimi M, Beheshti-Tabar I, Khubbakht G M. Energy production in Iran’s agronomy. American-Eurasian Journal Agricultural Environ Science, 2008, 4: 172–177

9
Rathke G W, Diepenbrock W. Energy balance of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) cropping as related to nitrogen supply and preceding crop. European Journal of Agronomy, 2006, 24(1): 35–44

DOI

10
Chizari M, Ommani A R. The analysis of dryland sustainability. Sustainable Agriculture, 2009, 33(8): 848–861

DOI

11
Dalgaard T, Halberg N, Porter J R. A model for fossil energy use in Danish agriculture used to compare organic and conventional farming. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2001, 87(1): 51–65

DOI

12
Dalgaard T, Halberg N, Fenger J. Fossil energy use and emissions of greenhouse gases—Three scenarios for conversion to 100% organic farming in Denmark. In: van Lerland E, Lansink A O, Schmieman E, eds. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Energy: New Challenges for Agriculture and Implications for Land Use, Wageningen, 2000

13
Guzmán G, Alonso A M. A comparison of energy use in conventional and organic olive oil production in Spain. Agricultural Systems, 2008, 98(3): 167–176

DOI

14
Dazhong W, Pimentel D. Energy flow through an organic agroecosystem in china. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 1984, 11(2): 145–160

DOI

15
Jorgensen U, Dalgaard T E, Kristensen S. Biomass energy in organic farming-the potential role of short rotation coppice. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2005, 28(2): 237–248

DOI

16
Moreno M M, Lacasta Mecoc C R, Moreno C. Rainfed crop energy balance of different farming systems and crop rotations in a semi-arid environment: Results of a long-term trial. Soil & Tillage Research, 2011, 114(1): 18–27

DOI

17
Franzluebbers A J, Francis C A. Energy output-input ratio of maize and sorghum management systems in Eastern Nebraska. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 1995, 53(3): 271–278

18
Gundogmus E. Energy use on organic farming: A comparative analysis on organic versus conventional apricot production on small holdings in Turkey. Energy Conversion and Management, 2006, 47(18,19): 3351–3359

DOI

19
Alonso A M, Guzmán G J. Comparison of the efficiency and use of energy in organic and conventional farming in Spanish agricultural systems. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 2010, 34(3): 312–338

DOI

20
Alam M S, Alam M R, Islam K K. Energy flow in agriculture: Bangladesh. American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2005, 1(3): 213–220

DOI

21
Topak R, Süheri S, Acar B. Comparison of energy of irrigation regimes in sugar beet production in a semi-arid region. Energy, 2010, 35(12): 5464–5471

DOI

22
Omid M, Ghojabeige F, Delshad M, Ahmadi H. Energy use pattern and benchmarking of selected greenhouses in Iran using data envelopment analysis. Energy Conversion and Management, 2011, 52(1): 153–162

DOI

23
Deike S, Pallutt B, Christen O. Investigations on the energy efficiency of organic and integrated farming with specific emphasis on pesticide use intensity. European Journal of Agronomy, 2008, 28(3): 461–470

DOI

24
Singh J M. On farm energy use pattern in different cropping systems in Haryana, India. Dissertation for the Master Degree. Germany: University of Flensburg, 2002

25
Demircan V, Ekinci K, Keener H M, Akbolat D, Ekinci C. Energy and economic analysis of sweet cherry production in Turkey: A case study from Isparta province. Energy Conversion and Management, 2006, 47(13,14): 1761–1769

DOI

26
Taylor E B, O’Callaghan P W, Probert S D. Energy audit of an English farm. Applied Energy, 1993, 44(4): 315–335

DOI

27
Pathak B S, Binning A S. Energy use pattern and potential for energy saving in rice-wheat cultivation. Energy in Agriculture, 1985, 4: 271–278

DOI

28
Helsel Z R. Energy and alternatives for fertilizer and pesticide use. In: Fluck R C, ed. Energy in Farm Production. Energy in World Agriculture. New York: Elsevier, 1992, 177–201

29
Iqbal T. Energy input and output for production of boro rice in Bangladesh. EJEAFChe, 2007, 6: 2144–2149

30
Ozkan B, Akcaoz H, Fert C. Energy input–output analysis in Turkish agriculture. Renewable Energy, 2004, 29(1): 39–51

DOI

31
Singh G, Singh S, Singh J. Optimization of energy inputs for wheat crop in Punjab. Energy Conversion and Management, 2004, 45(3): 453–465

DOI

32
Hatrili S A, Ozkan B, Fert C. An econometric analysis of energy input–output in Turkish agriculture. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2005, 9(6): 608–623

DOI

33
Hatrili S A, Ozkan B, Fert C. Energy inputs and crop yield relationship in greenhouse tomato production. Renewable Energy, 2006, 31(4): 427–438

DOI

34
Heady E O, Dillon J L. Agricultural Production Functions. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1961, 8–30

35
Kaltsas A M, Mamolos A P, Tsatsarelisb C A, Nanosc G D, Kalburtji K L. Energy budget in organic and conventional olive groves. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2007, 122(2): 243–251

DOI

36
Panesar B S, Fluck R C. Energy productivity of a production system-analysis and measurement. Agricultural Systems, 1993, 43(4): 415–437

DOI

37
Mrini M, Senhaji F, Pimentel D. Energy analysis of sugar beet production under traditional and intensive farming systems and impacts on sustainable agriculture in Morocco. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 2002, 20(4): 5–28

DOI

38
Strapatsa A V, Nanos G D, Tsatsarelis C A. Energy flow for integrated apple production in Greece. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2006, 116(3,4): 176–180

DOI

39
Dalgaard T, Halberg N, Porter J R. A model for fossil energy use in Danish agriculture used to compare organic and conventional farming. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2001, 87(1): 51–65

DOI

40
Slesser M. Energy subsidy as a criterion in food policy planning. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1973, 24(10): 1193–1207

DOI PMID

41
Schneider U A, Smith P. Energy intensities and greenhouse gas emission mitigation in global agriculture. Energy Efficiency, 2009, 2(2): 195–206

DOI

Outlines

/