Energy budget and economic analysis in conventional and organic rice production systems and organic scenarios in the transition period in Iran
Received date: 25 May 2012
Accepted date: 20 Aug 2012
Published date: 05 Dec 2012
Copyright
Compared to conventional agriculture, organic agriculture is reported to be more efficient and effective in reducing water and soil pollution, greenhouse gases (GHGs) emission and risk of human health. In additional, field management under organic condition can be useful for increasing energy efficiency. Rice is one of the important crops which are cultivated in two forms, organic and conventional, in Iran. In order to compare the energy efficiency and economic analysis of rice production in organic and conventional systems in Iran, needed information was collected by face-to-face questionnaire in 2011 and three scenarios were designed to predict the changes of energy budget and economic analysis in the transition period that included: 25%, 50% and 75% organic management in rice production. The results showed that all energy indexes were improved in organic rice production compared to conventional condition. Higher values of benefit to cost ratio, gross and net return and lower value of total cost of production were obtained from organic rice production which indicated that the organic management of farm improved economically in comparison with the conventional rice production system. The shares of direct and renewable energies were increased by approach to organic management. Increase in energy efficiency and productivity was predicted for the transition period but decrease trend in economic indexes was projected for this period in all scenarios. The main reason for decreasing economic indexes in organic scenarios was that the market price of organic rice was the same as that of conventional rice in the transition period.
Key words: energy efficiency; specific energy; net return; Cobb-Douglas function
Hamed MANSOORI , Parviz Rezvani MOGHADDAM , Rooholla MORADI . Energy budget and economic analysis in conventional and organic rice production systems and organic scenarios in the transition period in Iran[J]. Frontiers in Energy, 0 , 6(4) : 341 -350 . DOI: 10.1007/s11708-012-0206-x
1 |
Beheshti Tabar I, Keyhani A, Rafiee S. Energy balance in Iran’s agronomy (1990–2006). Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2010, 14(2): 849–855
|
2 |
MAJ (Ministry of Agriculture of the I.R. of Iran). Planning and Economics Department, Statistics Bank of Iranian Agriculture. http://www.maj. ir/english/Statistic/Default.asp?p=statistic
|
3 |
IOA (Iran Organic Association). Statistics Bank of organic Iranian Agriculture. http://www.iranorganic.com/fa/index.php
|
4 |
Erdemir G. Energy use on organic farming: A comparative analysis on organic versus conventional apricot production on small holdings in Turkey. Energy Conversion and Management, 2006, 47(18,19): 3351–3359
|
5 |
Mohammadi A, Tabatabaeefar A, Shahin S, Rafiee S, Keyhani A. Energy use and economical analysis of potato production in Iran, a case study: Ardabil province. Energy Conversion and Management, 2008, 49(12): 3566–3570
|
6 |
Gallaher M, Delhotal K, Petrusa J. Estimating the potential CO2 mitigation from agricultural energy efficiency in the United States. Energy Efficiency, 2009, 2(2): 207–220
|
7 |
Haas G, Wetterich F, Köpke U. Comparing intensive, extensified and organic grassland farming in southern Germany by process life cycle assessment. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2001, 83(1–2): 43–53
|
8 |
Karimi M, Beheshti-Tabar I, Khubbakht G M. Energy production in Iran’s agronomy. American-Eurasian Journal Agricultural Environ Science, 2008, 4: 172–177
|
9 |
Rathke G W, Diepenbrock W. Energy balance of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) cropping as related to nitrogen supply and preceding crop. European Journal of Agronomy, 2006, 24(1): 35–44
|
10 |
Chizari M, Ommani A R. The analysis of dryland sustainability. Sustainable Agriculture, 2009, 33(8): 848–861
|
11 |
Dalgaard T, Halberg N, Porter J R. A model for fossil energy use in Danish agriculture used to compare organic and conventional farming. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2001, 87(1): 51–65
|
12 |
Dalgaard T, Halberg N, Fenger J. Fossil energy use and emissions of greenhouse gases—Three scenarios for conversion to 100% organic farming in Denmark. In: van Lerland E, Lansink A O, Schmieman E, eds. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Energy: New Challenges for Agriculture and Implications for Land Use, Wageningen, 2000
|
13 |
Guzmán G, Alonso A M. A comparison of energy use in conventional and organic olive oil production in Spain. Agricultural Systems, 2008, 98(3): 167–176
|
14 |
Dazhong W, Pimentel D. Energy flow through an organic agroecosystem in china. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 1984, 11(2): 145–160
|
15 |
Jorgensen U, Dalgaard T E, Kristensen S. Biomass energy in organic farming-the potential role of short rotation coppice. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2005, 28(2): 237–248
|
16 |
Moreno M M, Lacasta Mecoc C R, Moreno C. Rainfed crop energy balance of different farming systems and crop rotations in a semi-arid environment: Results of a long-term trial. Soil & Tillage Research, 2011, 114(1): 18–27
|
17 |
Franzluebbers A J, Francis C A. Energy output-input ratio of maize and sorghum management systems in Eastern Nebraska. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 1995, 53(3): 271–278
|
18 |
Gundogmus E. Energy use on organic farming: A comparative analysis on organic versus conventional apricot production on small holdings in Turkey. Energy Conversion and Management, 2006, 47(18,19): 3351–3359
|
19 |
Alonso A M, Guzmán G J. Comparison of the efficiency and use of energy in organic and conventional farming in Spanish agricultural systems. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 2010, 34(3): 312–338
|
20 |
Alam M S, Alam M R, Islam K K. Energy flow in agriculture: Bangladesh. American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2005, 1(3): 213–220
|
21 |
Topak R, Süheri S, Acar B. Comparison of energy of irrigation regimes in sugar beet production in a semi-arid region. Energy, 2010, 35(12): 5464–5471
|
22 |
Omid M, Ghojabeige F, Delshad M, Ahmadi H. Energy use pattern and benchmarking of selected greenhouses in Iran using data envelopment analysis. Energy Conversion and Management, 2011, 52(1): 153–162
|
23 |
Deike S, Pallutt B, Christen O. Investigations on the energy efficiency of organic and integrated farming with specific emphasis on pesticide use intensity. European Journal of Agronomy, 2008, 28(3): 461–470
|
24 |
Singh J M. On farm energy use pattern in different cropping systems in Haryana, India. Dissertation for the Master Degree. Germany: University of Flensburg, 2002
|
25 |
Demircan V, Ekinci K, Keener H M, Akbolat D, Ekinci C. Energy and economic analysis of sweet cherry production in Turkey: A case study from Isparta province. Energy Conversion and Management, 2006, 47(13,14): 1761–1769
|
26 |
Taylor E B, O’Callaghan P W, Probert S D. Energy audit of an English farm. Applied Energy, 1993, 44(4): 315–335
|
27 |
Pathak B S, Binning A S. Energy use pattern and potential for energy saving in rice-wheat cultivation. Energy in Agriculture, 1985, 4: 271–278
|
28 |
Helsel Z R. Energy and alternatives for fertilizer and pesticide use. In: Fluck R C, ed. Energy in Farm Production. Energy in World Agriculture. New York: Elsevier, 1992, 177–201
|
29 |
Iqbal T. Energy input and output for production of boro rice in Bangladesh. EJEAFChe, 2007, 6: 2144–2149
|
30 |
Ozkan B, Akcaoz H, Fert C. Energy input–output analysis in Turkish agriculture. Renewable Energy, 2004, 29(1): 39–51
|
31 |
Singh G, Singh S, Singh J. Optimization of energy inputs for wheat crop in Punjab. Energy Conversion and Management, 2004, 45(3): 453–465
|
32 |
Hatrili S A, Ozkan B, Fert C. An econometric analysis of energy input–output in Turkish agriculture. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2005, 9(6): 608–623
|
33 |
Hatrili S A, Ozkan B, Fert C. Energy inputs and crop yield relationship in greenhouse tomato production. Renewable Energy, 2006, 31(4): 427–438
|
34 |
Heady E O, Dillon J L. Agricultural Production Functions. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1961, 8–30
|
35 |
Kaltsas A M, Mamolos A P, Tsatsarelisb C A, Nanosc G D, Kalburtji K L. Energy budget in organic and conventional olive groves. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2007, 122(2): 243–251
|
36 |
Panesar B S, Fluck R C. Energy productivity of a production system-analysis and measurement. Agricultural Systems, 1993, 43(4): 415–437
|
37 |
Mrini M, Senhaji F, Pimentel D. Energy analysis of sugar beet production under traditional and intensive farming systems and impacts on sustainable agriculture in Morocco. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 2002, 20(4): 5–28
|
38 |
Strapatsa A V, Nanos G D, Tsatsarelis C A. Energy flow for integrated apple production in Greece. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2006, 116(3,4): 176–180
|
39 |
Dalgaard T, Halberg N, Porter J R. A model for fossil energy use in Danish agriculture used to compare organic and conventional farming. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2001, 87(1): 51–65
|
40 |
Slesser M. Energy subsidy as a criterion in food policy planning. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1973, 24(10): 1193–1207
|
41 |
Schneider U A, Smith P. Energy intensities and greenhouse gas emission mitigation in global agriculture. Energy Efficiency, 2009, 2(2): 195–206
|
/
〈 | 〉 |