REVIEW ARTICLE

China’s policy framework for carbon capture, utilization and storage: Review, analysis, and outlook

  • Qiao MA , 1 ,
  • Shan WANG 1 ,
  • Yan FU 2 ,
  • Wenlong ZHOU 3 ,
  • Mingwei SHI 2 ,
  • Xueting PENG 2 ,
  • Haodong LV 2 ,
  • Weichen ZHAO 4 ,
  • Xian ZHANG 2
Expand
  • 1. National Engineering Laboratory for Reducing Emissions from Coal Combustion, Engineering Research Center of Environmental Thermal Technology of the Ministry of Education, Shandong Key Laboratory of Energy Carbon Reduction and Resource Utilization, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China
  • 2. The Administrative Center for China’s Agenda 21, Beijing 100038, China
  • 3. Center for Sustainable Development and Energy Policy Research, School of Energy and Mining Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
  • 4. The Bartlett School of Sustainable Construction, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, UK
maq@sdu.edu.cn

Received date: 17 Aug 2022

Accepted date: 26 Dec 2022

Copyright

2023 Higher Education Press

Abstract

Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) is estimated to contribute substantial CO2 emission reduction to carbon neutrality in China. There is yet a large gap between such enormous demand and the current capacity, and thus a sound enabling environment with sufficient policy support is imperative for CCUS development. This study reviewed 59 CCUS-related policy documents issued by the Chinese government as of July 2022, and found that a supporting policy framework for CCUS is taking embryonic form in China. More than ten departments of the central government have involved CCUS in their policies, of which the State Council, the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), and the Ministry of Ecological Environment (MEE) have given the greatest attention with different focuses. Specific policy terms are further analyzed following the method of content analysis and categorized into supply-, environment- and demand-type policies. The results indicate that supply-type policies are unbalanced in policy objectives, as policy terms on technology research and demonstration greatly outnumber those on other objectives, and the attention to weak links and industrial sectors is far from sufficient. Environment-type policies, especially legislations, standards, and incentives, are inadequate in pertinence and operability. Demand-type policies are absent in the current policy system but is essential to drive the demand for the CCUS technology in domestic and foreign markets. To meet the reduction demand of China’s carbon neutral goal, policies need to be tailored according to needs of each specific technology and implemented in an orderly manner with well-balanced use on multiple objectives.

Cite this article

Qiao MA , Shan WANG , Yan FU , Wenlong ZHOU , Mingwei SHI , Xueting PENG , Haodong LV , Weichen ZHAO , Xian ZHANG . China’s policy framework for carbon capture, utilization and storage: Review, analysis, and outlook[J]. Frontiers in Energy, 2023 , 17(3) : 400 -411 . DOI: 10.1007/s11708-023-0862-z

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Cooperative Project of the Chinese Academy of Engineering (Grant No. 202001SDZD01).

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-023-0862-z and is accessible for authorized users.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
1
IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland, 2014

2
IEA. Energy Technology Perspectives 2020: Special Report on Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage. Paris: International Energy Agency, 2020

3
ShuklaP RSkea JSladeR, . Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022

4
ChineseAcademy of Environmental Planning (CAEP), Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, the Administrative Center for China’s Agenda 21. 2021: China Status of CO2 Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS) (2021) ——China CCUS Pathway. Beijing, 2021 (in Chinese)

5
GCCSI. Global Status of CCS 2021. Melbourne: Global CCS Institute, 2021

6
Zhang W, Dai C, Luo X. . Policy incentives in carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) investment based on real options analysis. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2021, 23(4): 1311–1326

DOI

7
GuY. Carbon Capture & Storage Policy in China. Sabin Center for Climate Change Law White Papers. Columbia University, 2015

8
Jiang K, Ashworth P, Zhang S. . China’s carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) policy: A critical review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2020, 119: 109601

DOI

9
Lui L C, Leamon G. Developments towards environmental regulation of CCUS projects in China. Energy Procedia, 2014, 63: 6903–6911

DOI

10
Cai B F, Pang L Y, Cao L B. . Two-year implementation assessment (2016–2018) of China’s technical Guideline on environmental risk assessment for carbon dioxide capture, utilization and storage (on trial). Environmental Engineering, 2019, 37(2): 1–7

11
Diao Y J, Yang Y, Li X F. . Management on developing deep undergroundspace for CO2 geological storage. Proceedings of CSEE, 2020, 41(4): 1267–1273

12
Zhang X, Fan J L, Wei Y M. Technology roadmap study on carbon capture, utilization and storage in China. Energy Policy, 2013, 59(Aug): 536–550

DOI

13
Li Q, Zhang J T, Jia L. . How to “capture the future by utilization of the past” in the coming revision of China CO2 technology roadmap?. Energy Procedia, 2014, 63: 6912–6916

DOI

14
Downie C, Drahos P. US institutional pathways to clean coal and shale gas: Lessons for China. Climate Policy, 2017, 17(2): 246–260

DOI

15
Liu H, Gallagher K S. Driving carbon capture and storage forward in China. Energy Procedia, 2009, 1(1): 3877–3884

DOI

16
Li Z, Zhang D, Ma L. . The necessity of and policy suggestions for implementing a limited number of large scale, fully integrated ccs demonstrations in China. Energy Policy, 2011, 39(9): 5347–5355

DOI

17
Li Q, Chen Z A, Zhang J T. . Positioning and revision of CCUS technology development in China. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2016, 46: 282–293

DOI

18
Yang L, Xu M, Yang Y. . Comparison of subsidy schemes for carbon capture utilization and storage investment based on real option approach: evidence from China. Applied Energy, 2019, 255: 113828

DOI

19
Wei N, Li X, Liu S. . A strategic framework for commercialization of carbon capture, geological utilization, and storage technology in China. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2021, 110: 103420

DOI

20
Wei N, Jiao Z S, Ellett K. . Decarbonizing the coal-fired power sector in China via carbon capture, geological utilization, and storage technology. Environmental Science & Technology, 2021b, 55(19): 13164–13173

DOI

21
Tang H, Zhang S, Chen W. Assessing representative CCUS layouts for China’s power sector toward carbon neutrality. Environmental Science & Technology, 2021, 55(16): 11225–11235

DOI

22
Fan J L, Xu M, Wei S J. . Carbon reduction potential of China’s coal-fired power plants based on a CCUS source-sink matching model. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2021, 168: 105320

DOI

23
Zhang X, Wang X, Chen J. . A novel modeling based real option approach for CCS investment evaluation under multiple uncertainties. Applied Energy, 2014, 113(jan): 1059–1067

DOI

24
Zhou W, Zhu B, Chen D. . How policy choice affects investment in low-carbon technology: The case of CO2 capture in indirect coal liquefaction in China. Energy, 2014, 73: 670–679

DOI

25
Yang X L, Heidug W, Cooke D. An adaptive policy-based framework for China’s carbon capture and storage development. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 2019, 6(1): 78–86

DOI

26
Li J Q, Yu B Y, Tang B J. . Investment in carbon dioxide capture and storage combined with enhanced water recovery. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2020, 94: 102848

DOI

27
Zhang X, Li Y, Ma Q. . Development of carbon capture, utilization and storage technology in China. Strategic Study of CAE, 2021, 23(6): 70–80

28
Hsieh H F, Shannon S E. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 2005, 15(9): 1277–1288

DOI

29
RothwellRZegveld W. Industrial Innovation and Public Policy: Preparing for the 1980s and 1990s. London: Frances Printer, 1981

30
RothwellRZegveld W. Reindusdalization and Technology. London: Logman Group Limited, 1985

31
HuangJChen Q ZZhongP, . The Assessment Report for Carbon Dioxide Utilization Technology in China. Beijing: Science Press, 2021

32
IPCC. IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridage: Cambridge University Press, 2005

33
GCCSI. Global Status of CCS 2020. Melbourne: Global CCS Institute, 2020

34
UnitedStates Congress. S.986–Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage Tax Credit Amendments Act of 2021. 2021, available at the website of US Congress

35
JenkinsJ DMayfield E NFarbesJ, . Preliminary Report: The Climate and Energy Impacts of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. REPEAT Project, Princeton, USA, 2022

36
Governmentof Canada. Coal-fired Electricity Generation Regulations—Overview. 2013, available at the website of Canada government

37
IEA. CO2 Tax. 2013, available at the website of IEA

38
NagabhushanDThompsonJ. Carbon capture and storage in the United States power sector: The impact of 45Q tax credits. 2019, available at the website of Clean Air Task Force

Outlines

/