RESEARCH ARTICLE

A coal-fired power plant integrated with biomass co-firing and CO2 capture for zero carbon emission

  • Xiaojun XUE ,
  • Yuting WANG ,
  • Heng CHEN ,
  • Gang XU
Expand
  • Beijing Key Laboratory of Emission Surveillance and Control for Thermal Power Generation, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China

Received date: 12 May 2021

Accepted date: 01 Aug 2021

Published date: 15 Apr 2022

Copyright

2021 Higher Education Press

Abstract

A promising scheme for coal-fired power plants in which biomass co-firing and carbon dioxide capture technologies are adopted and the low-temperature waste heat from the CO2 capture process is recycled to heat the condensed water to achieve zero carbon emission is proposed in this paper. Based on a 660 MW supercritical coal-fired power plant, the thermal performance, emission performance, and economic performance of the proposed scheme are evaluated. In addition, a sensitivity analysis is conducted to show the effects of several key parameters on the performance of the proposed system. The results show that when the biomass mass mixing ratio is 15.40% and the CO2 capture rate is 90%, the CO2 emission of the coal-fired power plant can reach zero, indicating that the technical route proposed in this paper can indeed achieve zero carbon emission in coal-fired power plants. The net thermal efficiency decreases by 10.31%, due to the huge energy consumption of the CO2 capture unit. Besides, the cost of electricity (COE) and the cost of CO2 avoided (COA) of the proposed system are 80.37 $/MWh and 41.63 $/tCO2, respectively. The sensitivity analysis demonstrates that with the energy consumption of the reboiler decreasing from 3.22 GJ/tCO2 to 2.40 GJ/ tCO2, the efficiency penalty is reduced to 8.67%. This paper may provide reference for promoting the early realization of carbon neutrality in the power generation industry.

Cite this article

Xiaojun XUE , Yuting WANG , Heng CHEN , Gang XU . A coal-fired power plant integrated with biomass co-firing and CO2 capture for zero carbon emission[J]. Frontiers in Energy, 2022 , 16(2) : 307 -320 . DOI: 10.1007/s11708-021-0790-8

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51806062), the Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51821004), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 2020MS006).
1
Gai S, Yu J, Yu H, Process simulation of a near-zero-carbon-emission power plant using CO2 as the renewable energy storage medium. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2016, 47: 240–249

DOI

2
Tao Y, Wen Z, Xu L, Technology options: can Chinese power industry reach the CO2 emission peak before 2030? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2019, 147: 85–94

DOI

3
Li D, Huang G, Zhu S, How to peak carbon emissions of provincial construction industry? Scenario analysis of Jiangsu Province. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, 144: 110953

DOI

4
Liu J. China’s renewable energy law and policy: a critical review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019, 99: 212–219

DOI

5
Shen W. Who drives China’s renewable energy policies? Understanding the role of industrial corporations. Environmental Development, 2017, 21: 87–97

DOI

6
China Electricity Council. China Electric Power Industry Annual Development Report 2020. Beijing, China, 2020 (in Chinese)

7
BP. Statistical Review of World Energy 2020. 2020, available at the website of bp.com

8
Dai J, Yang X, Wen L. Development of wind power industry in China: a comprehensive assessment. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 97: 156–164

DOI

9
van der Spek M, Roussanaly S, Rubin E S. Best practices and recent advances in CCS cost engineering and economic analysis. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2019, 83: 91–104

DOI

10
Zhou L, Xu G, Zhao S, Parametric analysis and process optimization of steam cycle in double reheat ultra-supercritical power plants. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 99: 652–660

DOI

11
Zhai R, Qi J, Zhu Y, Novel system integrations of 1000 MW coal-fired power plant retrofitted with solar energy and CO2 capture system. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 125: 1133–1145

DOI

12
Ashworth P, Sun Y, Ferguson M, Comparing how the public perceive CCS across Australia and China. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2019, 86: 125–133

DOI

13
Yun S, Oh S, Kim J. Techno-economic assessment of absorption-based CO2 capture process based on novel solvent for coal-fired power plant. Applied Energy, 2020, 268: 114933

DOI

14
Skorek-Osikowska A, Bartela A, Kotowicz J. Thermodynamic and ecological assessment of selected coal-fired power plants integrated with carbon dioxide capture. Applied Energy, 2017, 200: 73–88

DOI

15
Li K, Leigh W, Feron P, Systematic study of aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA)-based CO2 capture process: techno-economic assessment of the MEA process and its improvements. Applied Energy, 2016, 165: 648–659

DOI

16
Xu C, Li X, Xin T, A thermodynamic analysis and economic assessment of a modified de-carbonization coal-fired power plant incorporating a supercritical CO2 power cycle and an absorption heat transformer. Energy, 2019, 179: 30–45

DOI

17
Rubin E S, Davison J E, Herzog H J. The cost of CO2 capture and storage. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2015, 40: 378–400

DOI

18
Wang D, Li S, Liu F, Post combustion CO2 capture in power plant using low temperature steam upgraded by double absorption heat transformer. Applied Energy, 2018, 227: 603–612

DOI

19
Nimmo W, Daood S S, Gibbs B M. The effect of O2 enrichment on NOx formation in biomass co-fired pulverised coal combustion. Fuel, 2010, 89(10): 2945–2952

DOI

20
Basu P, Butler J, Leon M A. Biomass co-firing options on the emission reduction and electricity generation costs in coal-fired power plants. Renewable Energy, 2011, 36(1): 282–288

DOI

21
Nian V. The carbon neutrality of electricity generation from woody biomass and coal, a critical comparative evaluation. Applied Energy, 2016, 179: 1069–1080

DOI

22
Luan C, You C, Zhang D. Composition and sintering characteristics of ashes from co-firing of coal and biomass in a laboratory-scale drop tube furnace. Energy, 2014, 69: 562–570

DOI

23
Pérez-Jeldres R, Cornejo P, Flores M, A modeling approach to co-firing biomass/coal blends in pulverized coal utility boilers: synergistic effects and emissions profiles. Energy, 2017, 120: 663–674

DOI

24
Bhuiyan A A, Naser J. Computational modelling of co-firing of biomass with coal under oxy-fuel condition in a small scale furnace. Fuel, 2015, 143: 455–466

DOI

25
Zhao C, Guo Y, Yan J, Enhanced CO2 sorption capacity of amine-tethered fly ash residues derived from co-firing of coal and biomass blends. Applied Energy, 2019, 242: 453–461

DOI

26
Schakel W, Meerman H, Talaei A, Comparative life cycle assessment of biomass co-firing plants with carbon capture and storage. Applied Energy, 2014, 131: 441–467

DOI

27
Yang B, Wei Y, Hou Y, Life cycle environmental impact assessment of fuel mix-based biomass co-firing plants with CO2 capture and storage. Applied Energy, 2019, 252: 113483

DOI

28
Ruhul Kabir M, Kumar A. Comparison of the energy and environmental performances of nine biomass/coal co-firing pathways. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 124: 394–405

DOI

29
Xu G, Hu Y, Tang B, Integration of the steam cycle and CO2 capture process in a decarbonization power plant. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2014, 73(1): 277–286

DOI

30
Soltani S M, Fennell P S, Mac Dowell N. A parametric study of CO2 capture from gas-fired power plants using monoethanolamine (MEA). International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2017, 63: 321–328

DOI

31
Razi N, Svendsen H F, Bolland O. Cost and energy sensitivity analysis of absorber design in CO2 capture with MEA. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2013, 19: 331–339

DOI

32
Liu Q, Shi Y, Zhong W, Yu A. Co-firing of coal and biomass in oxy-fuel fluidized bed for CO2 capture: a review of recent advances. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2019, 27(10): 2261–2272

DOI

33
Verma M, Loha C, Sinha A N, Drying of biomass for utilising in co-firing with coal and its impact on environment – a review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 71: 732–741

DOI

34
Zhang X, Li K, Zhang C, Performance analysis of biomass gasification coupled with a coal-fired boiler system at various loads. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 2020, 105: 84–91

DOI

35
Yan L, Wang Z, Cao Y, Comparative evaluation of two biomass direct-fired power plants with carbon capture and sequestration. Renewable Energy, 2020, 147: 1188–1198

DOI

36
Singh S, Lu H, Cui Q, China baseline coal-fired power plant with post-combustion CO2 capture: 2. Techno-economics. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2018, 78: 429–436

DOI

37
Xu G, Yang Y, Ding J, Analysis and optimization of CO2 capture in an existing coal-fired power plant in China. Energy, 2013, 58: 117–127

DOI

38
Jana K, De S. Biomass integrated combined power plant with post combustion CO2 capture – performance study by ASPEN Plus®. Energy Procedia, 2014, 54: 166–176

DOI

39
Wang A, Han X, Liu M, Thermodynamic and economic analyses of a parabolic trough concentrating solar power plant under off-design conditions. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 156: 340–350

DOI

40
China Coal Market Online. Price indices of typical coals. 2021, available at the website of cctd.com.cn (in Chinese)

41
Zhao X G, Feng T T, Yu M, Analysis on investment strategies in China: the case of biomass direct combustion power generation sector. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 42: 760–772

DOI

42
Xu G, Yang Y, Ding J, Analysis and optimization of CO2 capture in an existing coal-fired power plant in China. Energy, 2013, 58: 117–127

DOI

43
Institute CEPP. The Reference Cost Index of Thermal Power Engineering Rationed Design (2018). Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 2019

44
National Energy Technology Laboratory of USA. Cost and performance baseline for fossil energy plants volume 1a. 2015–07–06, available at the website of netl.doe.gov

45
Abbas Z, Mezher T, Abu-Zahra M R M. CO2 purification. Part II: techno-economic evaluation of oxygen and water deep removal processes. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2013, 16: 335–341

DOI

46
Bassano C, Deiana P, Girardi G. Modeling and economic evaluation of the integration of carbon capture and storage technologies into coal to liquids plants. Fuel, 2014, 116: 850–860

DOI

47
Campanari S, Chiesa P, Manzolini G, Economic analysis of CO2 capture from natural gas combined cycles using Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells. Applied Energy, 2014, 130: 562–573

DOI

48
Xu C, Gao Y, Xu G, A thermodynamic analysis and economic evaluation of an integrated cold-end energy utilization system in a de-carbonization coal-fired power plant. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 180: 218–230

DOI

49
Xu C, Bai P, Xin T, A novel solar energy integrated low-rank coal fired power generation using coal pre-drying and an absorption heat pump. Applied Energy, 2017, 200: 170–179

DOI

50
Zhang W, Jin X, Tu W, Development of MEA-based CO2 phase change absorbent. Applied Energy, 2017, 195: 316–323

DOI

51
Zhou Q, He Q, Lu C, Techno-economic analysis of advanced adiabatic compressed air energy storage system based on life cycle cost. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 265: 121768

DOI

Outlines

/