Environmental, social, and economic assessment of energy utilization of crop residue in China

Abstract

This paper aims to discuss an environmental, social, and economic analysis of energy utilization of crop residues from life cycle perspectives in China. The methodologies employed to achieve this objective are environmental life cycle assessment (E-LCA), life cycle cost (LCC), and social life cycle assessment (S-LCA). Five scenarios are developed based on the conversion technologies and final bioenergy products. The system boundaries include crop residue collection, transportation, pre-treatment, and conversion process. The replaced amounts of energy are also taken into account in the E-LCA analysis. The functional unit is defined as 1 MJ of energy produced. Eight impact categories are considered besides climate change in E-LCA. The investment capital cost and salary cost are collected and compared in the life cycle of the scenarios. Three stakeholders and several subcategories are considered in the S-LCA analysis defined by UNEP/SETAS guidelines. The results show that the energy utilization of crop residue has carbon emission factors of 0.09–0.18 kg (CO₂ eq per 1 MJ), and presents a net carbon emissions reduction of 0.03–0.15 kg (CO₂ eq per 1 MJ) compared with the convectional electricity or petrol, but the other impacts should be paid attention to in the biomass energy scenarios. The energy utilization of crop residues can bring economic benefit to local communities and the society, but the working conditions of local workers need to be improved in future biomass energy development.

Key words： crop residue; life cycle assessment; life cycle cost; social life cycle assessment; energy production

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-020-0696-x and is accessible for authorized users.

References

1 Gracceva F, Zeniewski P. A systemic approach to assessing energy security in a low-carbon EU energy system. Applied Energy, 2014, 123: 335–348

2 Ang B W, Choong W, Ng T. Energy security: definitions, dimensions and indexes. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 42: 1077–1093

3 Chu S, Majumdar A. Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future. Nature, 2012, 488(7411): 294–303

4 Edenhofer O, Hirth L, Knopf B, Pahle M, Schlömer S, Schmid E, Ueckerdt F. On the economics of renewable energy sources. Energy Economics, 2013, 40: S12–S23

5 Lund H, Mathiesen B V. Energy system analysis of 100% renewable energy systems—the case of Denmark in years 2030 and 2050. Energy, 2009, 34(5): 524–531

6 Scarlat N, Dallemand J, Monforti-Ferrario F, Nita V. The role of biomass and bioenergy in a future bioeconomy: policies and facts. Environmental Development, 2015, 15: 3–34

7 Johnson E. Goodbye to carbon neutral: getting biomass footprints right. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2009, 29(3): 165–168

8 Budzianowski W M. Negative carbon intensity of renewable energy technologies involving biomass or carbon dioxide as inputs. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012, 16(9): 6507–6521

9 Arneth A, Sitch S, Pongratz J, Stocker B D, Ciais P, Poulter B, Bayer A D, Bondeau A, Calle L, Chini L P, Gasser T, Fader M, Friedlingstein P, Kato E, Li W, Lindeskog M, Nabel J E M S, Pugh T A M, Robertson E, Viovy N, Yue C, Zaehle S. Historical carbon dioxide emissions caused by land-use changes are possibly larger than assumed. Nature Geoscience, 2017, 10(2): 79–84

10 Lambin E F, Meyfroidt P. Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011, 108(9): 3465–3472

11 Bringezu S, O’Brien M, Schütz H. Beyond biofuels: assessing global land use for domestic consumption of biomass: a conceptual and empirical contribution to sustainable management of global resources. Land Use Policy, 2012, 29(1): 224–232

12 Abbasi T, Abbasi S. Biomass energy and the environmental impacts associated with its production and utilization. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2010, 14(3): 919–937

13 Joselin Herbert G M, Unni Krishnan A. Quantifying environmental performance of biomass energy. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 59: 292–308

14 Cherubini F, Bird N D, Cowie A, Jungmeier G, Schlamadinger B, Woess-Gallasch S. Energy-and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: key issues, ranges and recommendations. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2009, 53(8): 434–447

15 Cherubini F, Ulgiati S. Crop residues as raw materials for biorefinery systems—a LCA case study. Applied Energy, 2010, 87(1): 47–57

16 Liu L, Zhuang D, Jiang D, Fu J. Assessment of the biomass energy potentials and environmental benefits of Jatropha curcas L. in Southwest China. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2013, 56: 342–350

17 Renó M L G, Lora E E S, Palacio J C E, Venturini O J, Buchgeister J, Almazan O. A LCA (life cycle assessment) of the methanol production from sugarcane bagasse. Energy, 2011, 36(6): 3716–3726

18 Astrup T F, Tonini D, Turconi R, Boldrin A. Life cycle assessment of thermal waste-to-energy technologies: review and recommendations. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 2015, 37: 104–115

19 Patel M, Zhang X, Kumar A. Techno-economic and life cycle assessment on lignocellulosic biomass thermochemical conversion technologies: a review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 53: 1486–1499

20 Browne J, Nizami A, Thamsiriroj T, Murphy J D. Assessing the cost of biofuel production with increasing penetration of the transport fuel market: a case study of gaseous biomethane in Ireland. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011, 15(9): 4537–4547

21 Duer H, Christensen P O. Socio-economic aspects of different biofuel development pathways. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2010, 34(2): 237–243

22 Fazio S, Barbanti L. Energy and economic assessments of bio-energy systems based on annual and perennial crops for temperate and tropical areas. Renewable Energy, 2014, 69: 233–241

23 Keller H, Rettenmaier N, Reinhardt G A. Integrated life cycle sustainability assessment—a practical approach applied to biorefineries. Applied Energy, 2015, 154: 1072–1081

24 Ekener E, Hansson J, Larsson A, Peck P. Developing life cycle sustainability assessment methodology by applying values-based sustainability weighting-tested on biomass based and fossil transportation fuels. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 181: 337–351

25 Zhao G. Assessment of potential biomass energy production in China towards 2030 and 2050. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 2018, 37(1): 47–66

26 Asian Development Bank. Preparing National Strategy for Rural Biomass Renewable Energy Development. Building Science. Manila: Asian Development Bank, 2008

27 Ministry of Agriculture. National Inventory and Evaluation Report of Crop Straw Resources. Beijing: Ministry of Agriculture of China, 2010 (in Chinese)

28 Zhan H Y. Supply and utilization of non-wood fibers and waste papers in China’s per industry. China Pulp & Paper, 2010, 8: 021

29 Jiang B, Sun Z, Liu M. China’s energy development strategy under the low-carbon economy. Energy, 2010, 35(11): 4257–4264

30 Zhang Z X. China in the transition to a low-carbon economy. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(11): 6638–6653

31 Ministry of Agriculture of China. Agricultural Biomass Energy Development Plan (2007–2015). Beijing, China, 2007 (in Chinese)

32 National Energy Administration of China. China Plans Nationwide Use of Ethanol Gasoline by 2020. Beijing, China 2017 (in Chinese)

33 Jaleta M, Kassie M, Erenstein O. Determinants of maize stover utilization as feed, fuel and soil amendment in mixed crop-livestock systems, Ethiopia. Agricultural Systems, 2015, 134: 17–23

34 Lehtomäki A, Viinikainen T A, Rintala J A. Screening boreal energy crops and crop residues for methane biofuel production. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2008, 32(6): 541–550

35 International Energy Agency. Technology Roadmap-biofuels for Transport. Paris, France, 2011

36 Abdoulmoumine N, Adhikari S, Kulkarni A, Chattanathan S. A review on biomass gasification syngas cleanup. Applied Energy, 2015, 155: 294–307

37 Lan W, Chen G, Zhu X, Wang X, Xu B. Progress in techniques of biomass conversion into syngas. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2015, 88(2): 151–156

38 ISO. Environmental management–life cycle assessment–principles and framework. ISO 14040, 2006

39 ISO. Environmental management–life cycle assessment–requirements and guidelines. ISO 14044, 2006

40 Benoît C, Norris G A, Valdivia S, Ciroth A, Moberg A, Bos U, Prakash S, Ugaya C, Beck T. The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time! International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2010, 15(2): 156–163

41 Jørgensen A, Herrmann I T, Bjørn A. Analysis of the link between a definition of sustainability and the life cycle methodologies. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2013, 18(8): 1440–1449

42 Russo Garrido S, Parent J, Beaulieu L, Revéret J P. A literature review of type I S-LCA—making the logic underlying methodological choices explicit. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23(3): 432–444

43 Hoogmartens R, Van Passel S, Van Acker K, Dubois M. Bridging the gap between LCA, LCC and CBA as sustainability assessment tools. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2014, 48: 27–33

44 Valdivia S, Ugaya C M, Hildenbrand J, Traverso M, Mazijn B, Sonnemann G. A UNEP/SETAC approach towards a life cycle sustainability assessment—our contribution to Rio 20. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2013, 18(9): 1673–1685

45 Jiang D, Zhuang D, Fu J, Huang Y, Wen K. Bioenergy potential from crop residues in China: availability and distribution. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012, 16(3): 1377–1382

46 Agbor V B, Cicek N, Sparling R, Berlin A, Levin D B. Biomass pretreatment: fundamentals toward application. Biotechnology Advances, 2011, 29(6): 675–685

47 Evans A, Strezov V, Evans T J. Assessment of sustainability indicators for renewable energy technologies. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2009, 13(5): 1082–1088

48 United Nations Environment Programme. Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products. Paris: United Nations Environment Programme—Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry Life Cycle Initiative, 2009

49 Miret C, Chazara P, Montastruc L, Negny S, Domenech S. Design of bioethanol green supply chain: comparison between first and second generation biomass concerning economic, environmental and social criteria. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2016, 85: 16–35

50 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation. 2011, available at the website of srren.ipcc-wg3.de

51 Editorial Committee of China Electric Power. China Electric Power Yearbook 2015. Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 2015

52 Wernet G, Bauer C, Steubing B, Reinhard J, Moreno-Ruiz E, Weidema B. The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2016, 21(9): 1218–1230

53 Qiu H, Yan J, Lei Z, Sun D. Rising wages and energy consumption transition in rural China. Energy Policy, 2018, 119: 545–553

54 Wang X, Yamauchi F, Otsuka K, Huang J. Wage growth, landholding, and mechanization in Chinese agriculture. World Development, 2016, 86: 30–45

55 Benoit-Norris C, Cavan D A, Norris G. Identifying social impacts in product supply chains: overview and application of the social hotspot database. Sustainability, 2012, 4(9): 1946–1965

56 Subramanian K, Chau C, Yung W K. Relevance and feasibility of the existing social LCA methods and case studies from a decision-making perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 171: 690–703

57 Tonini D, Astrup T. LCA of biomass-based energy systems: a case study for Denmark. Applied Energy, 2012, 99: 234–246

58 Yang J, Chen B. Global warming impact assessment of a crop residue gasification project—a dynamic LCA perspective. Applied Energy, 2014, 122: 269–279

59 González-García S, Iribarren D, Susmozas A, Dufour J, Murphy R J. Life cycle assessment of two alternative bioenergy systems involving Salix spp. biomass: bioethanol production and power generation. Applied Energy, 2012, 95: 111–122

60 Thornley P, Gilbert P, Shackley S, Hammond J. Maximizing the greenhouse gas reductions from biomass: the role of life cycle assessment. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2015, 81: 35–43

61 Boschiero M, Cherubini F, Nati C, Zerbe S. Life cycle assessment of bioenergy production from orchards woody residues in Northern Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 112: 2569–2580

62 Turconi R, Tonini D, Nielsen C F, Simonsen C G, Astrup T. Environmental impacts of future low-carbon electricity systems: detailed life cycle assessment of a Danish case study. Applied Energy, 2014, 132: 66–73

63 Gullberg A T, Ohlhorst D, Schreurs M. Towards a low carbon energy future—renewable energy cooperation between Germany and Norway. Renewable Energy, 2014, 68: 216–222

64 Yan H, Liu J, Huang H Q, Tao B, Cao M. Assessing the consequence of land use change on agricultural productivity in China. Global and Planetary Change, 2009, 67(1-2): 13–19

65 Finkbeiner M. Indirect land use change–help beyond the hype? Biomass and Bioenergy, 2014, 62: 218–221

66 Nishiguchi S, Tabata T. Assessment of social, economic, and environmental aspects of woody biomass energy utilization: direct burning and wood pellets. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 57: 1279–1286

67 Cowell R, Bristow G, Munday M. Acceptance, acceptability and environmental justice: the role of community benefits in wind energy development. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2011, 54(4): 539–557

68 Sun J, Chen J, Xi Y, Hou J. Mapping the cost risk of agricultural residue supply for energy application in rural China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2011, 19(2-3): 121–128

69 Zhang S Q, Deng M S, Shan M, Zhou C, Liu W, Xu X, Yang X. Energy and environmental impact assessment of straw return and substitution of straw briquettes for heating coal in rural China. Energy Policy, 2019, 128: 654–664

70 Liska A J, Yang H, Milner M, Goddard S, Blanco-Canqui H, Pelton M P, Fang X X, Zhu H, Suyker A E. Biofuels from crop residue can reduce soil carbon and increase CO₂ emissions. Nature Climate Change, 2014, 4(5): 398–401

71 Cambero C, Sowlati T. Assessment and optimization of forest biomass supply chains from economic, social and environmental perspectives—a review of literature. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 36: 62–73