Thermodynamic and economic analyses of a coal and biomass indirect coupling power generation system

Abstract

The coal and biomass coupling power generation technology is considered as a promising technology for energy conservation and emission reduction. In this paper, a novel coal and biomass indirect coupling system is proposed based on the technology of biomass gasification and co-combustion of coal and gasification gas. For the sake of comparison, a coal and biomass direct coupling system is also introduced based on the technology of co-combustion of coal and biomass. The process of the direct and the indirect coupling system is simulated. The thermodynamic and economic performances of two systems are analyzed and compared. The simulation indicates that the thermodynamic performance of the indirect coupling system is slightly worse, but the economic performance is better than that of the direct coupling system. When the blending ratio of biomass is 20%, the energy and exergy efficiencies of the indirect coupling system are 42.70% and 41.14%, the internal rate of return (IRR) and discounted payback period (DPP) of the system are 25.68% and 8.56 years. The price fluctuation of fuels and products has a great influence on the economic performance of the indirect coupling system. The environmental impact analysis indicates that the indirect coupling system can inhibit the propagation of NO_x and reduce the environmental cost.

Key words： biomass; indirect coupling system; process simulation; thermodynamic analysis; economic analysis

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 30919012104) and the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFB0600100).

References

1 Lund H. Renewable energy strategies for sustainable development. Energy, 2007, 32(6): 912–919

2 Lior N. Energy resources and use: the present situation and possible paths to the future. Energy, 2008, 33(6): 842–857

3 Shafiee S, Topal E. When will fossil fuel reserves be diminished? Energy Policy, 2009, 37(1): 181–189

4 Sun Y, Cai W, Chen B, Guo X, Hu J, Jiao Y. Economic analysis of fuel collection, storage, and transportation in straw power generation in China. Energy, 2017, 132: 194–203

5 Bhattacharya A, Manna D, Paul B, Datta A. Biomass integrated gasification combined cycle power generation with supplementary biomass firing: energy and exergy based performance analysis. Energy, 2011, 36(5): 2599–2610

6 Mao J X. Co-firing biomass with coal for power generation. Distributed Energy, 2017, 2(5): 47–54 (in Chinese)

7 Bhuiyan A A, Blicblau A S, Islam A K M S, Naser J. A review on thermo-chemical characteristics of coal/biomass co-firing in industrial furnace. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2018, 91(1): 1–18

8 Laursen K, Grace J R. Some implications of co-combustion of biomass and coal in a fluidized bed boiler. Fuel Processing Technology, 2002, 76(2): 77–89

9 Munir S, Nimmo W, Gibbs B M. Co-combustion of agricultural residues with coal: turning waste into energy. Energy & Fuels, 2010, 24(3): 2146–2153

10 Luo R, Zhou Q. Combustion kinetic behavior of different ash contents coals co-firing with biomass and the interaction analysis. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2017, 128(1): 567–580

11 Li Y, Zhou H, Li N, Tao C, Liu Z, Cen K. Experimental study of the combustion and NO emission behaviors during cofiring coal and biomass in O₂/N₂ and O₂/H₂O. Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2018, 13(3): e2198

12 Likun P K W, Zhang H, Xiao R. Co-firing behaviors and kinetics of different coals and biomass. Journal of Biobased Materials and Bioenergy, 2017, 11(2): 132–141

13 Nowak K, Wojdyga K, Rabczak S. Effect of coal and biomass co-combustion on the concentrations of selected gaseous pollutants. In: IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 2019, 214(1): 012130

14 Ma X, Li F, Ma M, Fang Y. Fusion characteristics of blended ash from Changzhi coal and biomass. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2018, 46(2): 129–137

15 Wu D, Wang Y, Wang Y, Li S, Wei X. Release of alkali metals during co-firing biomass and coal. Renewable Energy, 2016, 96: 91–97

16 Wang G, Zhang J, Shao J, Liu Z, Zhang G, Xu T, Guo J, Wang H, Xu R, Lin H. Thermal behavior and kinetic analysis of co-combustion of waste biomass/low rank coal blends. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 124: 414–426

17 Zhang R, Lei K, Ye B Q, Cao J, Liu D.. Effects of alkali and alkaline earth metal species on the combustion characteristics of single particles from pine sawdust and bituminous coal. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 268: 278–285

18 National Energy Administration, Ministry of Ecology and Environment. Notice on the Pilot Project of Coal and Biomass Coupling Power Generation Technical Transformation, 000019705/2017–00325, China. 2017 (in Chinese)

19 Wang L N. Co-firing biomass with coal technology. Environmental Protection and Technology, 2017, 23(6): 61–64 (in Chinese)

20 Wu Z Q, Han Z H, Xiang P, Qi C, Wu Y. Energy and exergy flow analysis of biomass gasification-coal coupling power generation system. Distributed Energy, 2017, 2(6): 8–14 (in Chinese)

21 Zhang X, Li K, Zhao W, Huang Y.Simulation on operation efficiency and pollutant emissions of coal-fired boiler with bio-gas co-firing. . Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 34(1): 194–202 (in Chinese)

22 Fang Y P, Hu N S, Wangi J, Li Q. Energy loss analysis on 600 MW super critical steam turbine generator unit. Turbine Technology, 2007, 49(1): 8–11 (in Chinese)

23 Mathews J P, Krishnamoorthy V, Louw E, Tchapda A H N, Castro-Marcano F, Karri V, Alexis D A, Mitchell G D. A review of the correlations of coal properties with elemental composition. Fuel Processing Technology, 2014, 121: 104–113

24 Wang L G, Yang Y P, Dong C Q, Yang Z P, Xu G. Thermodynamic calculation and simulation of power plant boiler based on Aspen Plus. In: 2011 Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC 2011). Wuhan, China, 2011: 5749132

25 Zhang R. Thermodynamic and economic analysis of a coal staged conversion utilization polygeneration system. Energy Technology (Weinheim), 2015, 3(6): 646–657

26 Guo Z, Wang Q, Fang M, Luo Z, Cen K. Thermodynamic and economic analysis of polygeneration system integrating atmospheric pressure coal pyrolysis technology with circulating fluidized bed power plant. Applied Energy, 2014, 113: 1301–1314

27 Yang C M. Simulation Operation of 600 MW Supercritical Pressure Thermal Power Unit System. Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 2009 (in Chinese)

28 Zhang R, Chen Y, Lei K, Ye B, Cao J, Liu D. Thermodynamic and economic analyses of a novel coal pyrolysis-gasification-combustion staged conversion utilization polygeneration system. Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2018, 13(2): e2171

29 Kotowicz J, Michalski S. Efficiency analysis of a hard-coal-fired supercritical power plant with a four-end high-temperature membrane for air separation. Energy, 2014, 64: 109–119

30 Djerad S, Crocoll M, Kureti S, Tifouti L, Weisweiler W. Effect of oxygen concentration on the NO_x reduction with ammonia over V₂O₅-WO₃/TiO₂ catalyst. Catalysis Today, 2006, 113(3–4): 208–214

31 Nova I, Ciardelli C, Tronconi E, Chatterjee D, Weibel M. Unifying redox kinetics for standard and fast NH₃-SCR over a V₂O₅-WO₃/TiO₂ catalyst. AIChE Journal. 2009, 55(6): 1514–1529

32 Xiong S, Xiao X, Liao Y, Dang H, Shan W, Yang S. Global kinetic study of NO reduction by NH₃ over V₂O₅-WO₃/TiO₂: relationship between the SCR performance and the key factors. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2015, 54(44): 11011–11023

33 Gutiérrez Ortiz F J, Vidal F, Ollero P, Salvador L, Cortés V, Giménez A. Pilot-plant technical assessment of wet flue gas desulfurization using limestone. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2006, 45(4): 1466–1477

34 Lan W, Chen G, Zhu X, Wang X, Liu C, Xu B. Biomass gasification-gas turbine combustion for power generation system model based on Aspen Plus. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 628–629: 1278–1286

35 Adams T A II, Barton P I. Combining coal gasification and natural gas reforming for efficient polygeneration. Fuel Processing Technology, 2011, 92(3): 639–655

36 Lin Y, ten Kate A, Mooijeri M, Delgado J. Comparison of activity coefficient models for electrolyte systems. AIChE Journal, 2010, 56(5): 1334–1351

37 Song G, Chen L, Xiao J, Shen L. Exergy evaluation of biomass steam gasification via interconnected fluidized beds. International Journal of Energy Research, 2013, 37(14): 1743–1751

38 Wang N, Wu D, Yang Y, Yang Z, Fu P. Exergy evaluation of a 600 MW_e supercritical coal-fired power plant considering pollution emissions. Energy Procedia, 2014, 61: 1860–1863

39 Li S, Gao L, Zhang X, Lin H, Jin H. Evaluation of cost reduction potential for a coal based polygeneration system with CO₂ capture. Energy, 2012, 45(1): 101–106

40 Yi Q, Lu B, Feng J, Wu Y, Li W. Evaluation of newly designed polygeneration system with CO₂ recycle. Energy & Fuels, 2012, 26(2): 1459–1469

41 Mignard D. Correlating the chemical engineering plant cost index with macro-economic indicators. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2014, 92(2): 285–294

42 Meerman J C, Ramírez A, Turkenburg W C, Faaij A P C. Performance of simulated flexible integrated gasification polygeneration facilities, part b: economic evaluation. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012, 16(8): 6083–6102

43 Electric Power Planning and Design General Institute. Reference Cost Index for Limited Design of Thermal Power Projects (2011 Level). Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 2012 (in Chinese)

44 Hamelinck C, Faaij A, Denuil H, Boerrigter H. Production of FT transportation fuels from biomass, technical options, process analysis and optimisation, and development potential. Energy, 2004, 29(11): 1743–1771

45 Clausen L R, Elmegaard B, Houbak N. Technoeconomic analysis of a low CO₂ emission dimethyl ether (DME) plant based on gasification of torrefied biomass. Energy, 2010, 35(12): 4831–4842

46 Li A. Selection and techno-economic analysis of thermal power flue gas denitrification. Dissertation for the Master’s Degree. Beijing: North China Electric Power University, 2015 (in Chinese)

47 Wang Q. Design and optimizing of wet limestone-gypsum flue gas desulphurization system in power plant. Dissertation for the Master’s Degree. Wuhan: Wuhan University, 2005 (in Chinese)

48 Hartman J C, Schafrick I C. The relevant internal rate of return. Engineering Economist, 2004, 49(2): 139–158

49 Wang X, Bierwirth A, Christ A, Whittaker P, Regenauer-Lieb K, Chua H T. Application of geothermal absorption air-conditioning system: a case study. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2013, 50(1): 71–80

50 Xiao J, Shen L, Zhang Y, Gu J. Integrated analysis of energy, economic, and environmental performance of biomethanol from rice straw in China. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2009, 48(22): 9999–10007

51 Lin H, Jin H, Gao L, Han W. Techno-economic evaluation of coal-based polygeneration systems of synthetic fuel and power with CO₂ recovery. Energy Conversion and Management, 2011, 52(1): 274–283

52 Wu G Q, Ni H. The influence of biomass gasification coupled coal-fired boiler on combustion safety. Technology Innovation and Application, 2017, (19): 68–70 (in Chinese)