Viability of a concentrated solar power system in a low sun belt prefecture
Received date: 25 May 2019
Accepted date: 21 Sep 2019
Published date: 15 Dec 2020
Copyright
Concentrating solar power (CSP) is considered as a comparatively economical, more efficient, and large capacity type of renewable energy technology. However, CSP generation is found restricted only to high solar radiation belt and installed where high direct normal irradiance is available. This paper examines the viability of the adoption of the CSP system in a low sun belt region with a lower direct normal irradiance (DNI). Various critical analyses and plant economics have been evaluated with a lesser DNI state. The obtained results out of the designed system, subjected to low DNI are not found below par, but comparable to some extent with the performance results of such CSP plants at a higher DNI. The analysis indicates that incorporation of the thermal energy storage reduces the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) and augments the plant capacity factor. The capacity factor, the plant efficiency, and the LCOE are found to be 32.50%, 17.56%, and 0.1952 $/kWh, respectively.
Rahul BHATTACHARJEE , Subhadeep BHATTACHARJEE . Viability of a concentrated solar power system in a low sun belt prefecture[J]. Frontiers in Energy, 2020 , 14(4) : 850 -866 . DOI: 10.1007/s11708-020-0664-5
1 |
Purohit I, Purohit P. Techno-economic evaluation of concentrating solar power generation in India. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(6): 3015–3029
|
2 |
Sharma C, Sharma A K, Mullick S C, Kandpal T C. Assessment of solar thermal power generation potential in India. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 42: 902–912
|
3 |
IRENA website. Renewable capacity statistics 2017. 2017–11–15
|
4 |
Ramdé EW, Azoumah Y, Hammond AB, Rungundu A, Tapsoba G. Site ranking and potential assessment for concentrating solar power in West Africa. Natural Resources, 2013, 4: 146–153
|
5 |
Bishoyi D, Sudhakar K. Modeling and performance simulation of 100 MW PTC based solar thermal power plant in Udaipur India. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 2017, 10: 216–226
|
6 |
Kaygusuz K. Prospect of concentrating solar power in Turkey: the sustainable future. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011, 15(1): 808–814
|
7 |
Sharma N K, Tiwari P K, Sood Y R. Solar energy in India: strategies, policies, perspectives and future potential. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012, 16(1): 933–941
|
8 |
Breyer C, Knies G. Global energy supply potential of concentrating solar power. In: Proceedings of the solar power and chemical energy systems, 2009, Berlin, Germany
|
9 |
Ummadisingu A, Soni M S. Concentrating solar power — technology, potential and policy in India. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011, 15(9): 5169–5175
|
10 |
Peterseim J H, White S, Tadros A, Hellwig U. Concentrated solar power hybrid plants, which technologies are best suited for hybridisation? Renewable Energy, 2013, 57: 520–532
|
11 |
Faraz T. Benefits of concentrating solar power over solar photovoltaic for power generation in Bangladesh. In: 2nd International Conference on Developments in Renewable Energy Technology, 2012, Dhaka, Bangladesh
|
12 |
Arora P R. A vital role of concentrating solar power plants of Rajasthan in future electricity demand of India. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 2013, 3(6): 1–7
|
13 |
Sahoo U, Kumar R, Pant P C, Chaudhary R. Resource assessment for hybrid solar-biomass power plant and its thermodynamic evaluation in India. Solar Energy, 2016, 139: 47–57
|
14 |
Bhattacharjee S, Bhakta S. Analysis of system performance indices of PV generator in a cloudburst precinct. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2013, 4: 62–71
|
15 |
Bhattacharjee S, Bhattacharjee R. Comprehensive solar energy resource characterization for an intricate Indian province. International Journal of Ambient Energy, 2018, online,
|
16 |
Bhattacharjee S, Acharya S. PV–wind hybrid power option for a low wind topography. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 89: 942–954
|
17 |
Hang Q, Jun Z, Xiao Y, Junkui C. Prospect of concentrating solar power in China—the sustainable future. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2008, 12(9): 2505–2514
|
18 |
Charabi Y, Gastli A. GIS assessment of large CSP plant in Duqum, Oman. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2010, 14(2): 835–841
|
19 |
Kuravi S, Trahan J, Goswami D Y, Rahman M M, Stefanakos E K. Thermal energy storage technologies and systems for concentrating solar power plants. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2013, 39(4): 285–319
|
20 |
Benammar S, Khellaf A, Mohammedi K. Contribution to the modeling and simulation of solar power tower plants using energy analysis. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014, 78: 923–930
|
21 |
Turchi C S, Ma Z. Co-located gas turbine/solar thermal hybrid designs for power production. Renewable Energy, 2014, 64: 172–179
|
22 |
Yu Q, Wang Z, Xu E. Analysis and improvement of solar flux distribution inside a cavity receiver based on multi-focal points of heliostat field. Applied Energy, 2014, 136: 417–430
|
23 |
Boudaoud S, Khellaf A, Mohammedi K, Behar O. Thermal performance prediction and sensitivity analysis for future deployment of molten salt cavity receiver solar power plants in Algeria. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 89: 655–664
|
24 |
Liu S J, Faille D, Fouquet M, El-Hefni B, Wang Y, Zhang J B, Wang Z F, Chen G F, Soler R. Dynamic simulation of a 1MWe CSP tower plant with two-level thermal storage implemented with control system. Energy Procedia, 2015, 69: 1335–1343
|
25 |
Mutuberria A, Pascual J, Guisado M V, Mallor F. Comparison of heliostat field layout design methodologies and impact on power plant efficiency. Energy Procedia, 2015, 69: 1360–1370
|
26 |
Santos M J, Merchán R P, Medina A, Calvo Hernández A. Seasonal thermodynamic prediction of the performance of a hybrid solar gas-turbine power plant. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 115: 89–102
|
27 |
Trabelsi S E, Chargui R, Qoaider L, Liqreina A, Guizani A A. Techno-economic performance of concentrating solar power plants under the climatic conditions of the southern region of Tunisia. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 119: 203–214
|
28 |
Astolfi M, Binotti M, Mazzola S, Zanellato L, Manzolini G. Heliostat aiming point optimization for external tower receiver. Solar Energy, 2017, 157: 1114–1129
|
29 |
Luo Y, Du X, Yang L, Xu C, Amjad M. Impacts of solar multiple on the performance of direct steam generation solar power tower plant with integrated thermal storage. Frontiers in Energy, 2017, 11(4): 461–471
|
30 |
Polo J, Fernández-Peruchena C, Gastón M. Analysis on the long-term relationship between DNI and CSP yield production for different technologies. Solar Energy, 2017, 155: 1121–1129
|
31 |
Arrif T, Benchabane A, Guermoui M, Gama A, Merarda H. Optical performance study of different shapes of solar cavity receivers used in central receiver system plant. International Journal of Ambient Energy, 2018, online,
|
32 |
Chen R, Rao Z, Liao S. Determination of key parameters for sizing the heliostat field and thermal energy storage in solar tower power plants. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 177: 385–394
|
33 |
Sorgulu F, Dincer I. Design and analysis of a solar tower power plant integrated with thermal energy storage system for cogeneration . International Journal of Energy Research, 2019, 43(12): 6151–6160
|
34 |
Fares M S B, Abderafi S. Water consumption analysis of Moroccan concentrating solar power station. Solar Energy, 2018, 172: 146–151
|
35 |
Alonso-Montesinos J, Polo J, Ballestrín J, Batlles F J, Portillo C. Impact of DNI forecasting on CSP tower plant power production. Renewable Energy, 2019, 138: 368–377
|
36 |
Hafez A A, Nassar Y F, Hammdan M I, Alsadi S Y. Technical and economic feasibility of utility-scale solar energy conversion systems in Saudi Arabia. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Electrical Engineering, 2020, 44: 213–265
|
37 |
Collado F J, Guallar J. Two-stages optimised design of the collector field of solar power tower plants. Solar Energy, 2016, 135: 884–896
|
38 |
Habte A, Sengupta M, Lopez A. Evaluation of the National Solar Radiation Database (NSRDB): 1998–2015. Technical Report. National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO, USA: NREL/TP-5D00-67722, 2018
|
39 |
Poživil P, Ackermann S, Steinfeld A. Numerical heat transfer analysis of a 50 kWth pressurized-air solar receiver. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 2015, 137(6): 064504
|
40 |
Wagner M J. Simulation and predictive performance modeling of utility-scale central receiver system power plants. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Madison: University of Wisconsin–Madison 2008
|
41 |
Wagner M J, Gilman P. Technical manual for the SAM physical trough model 2011. Technical Report. National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO, USA: NREL/TP-550–51825, 2018
|
42 |
Guédez R, Ferruzza D. Thermocline storage for concentrated solar power techno-economic performance evaluation of a multi-layered single tank storage for solar tower power plant. KTH School of Industrial Engineering and Management, 2015
|
43 |
Walter S, Packey D J, Thomas H. A manual for the economic evaluation of energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies. Technical Report. National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO, USA: NREL/TP-462-5173, 1995
|
44 |
Branker K, Pathak M J M, Pearce J M. A review of solar photovoltaic levelized cost of electricity. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011, 15(9): 4470–4482
|
45 |
European Commission. Concentrating Solar Power from Research to Implementation. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2007
|
46 |
NREL. Concentrating Solar Power Projects –Ivanpahsolar electric generating system. 2017–06–19
|
47 |
NREL. Concentrating Solar Power Projects– Andasol-1. 2017–06–19
|
/
〈 | 〉 |