Key problems and solutions in supercritical CO2 fracturing technology
Received date: 30 Aug 2018
Accepted date: 12 Oct 2018
Published date: 15 Dec 2019
Copyright
Supercritical CO2 fracturing is considered to be a new method for efficient exploitation of unconventional reservoirs, such as shale gas, coal bed methane, and tight sand stone gas. Supercritical CO2 has many special properties including low viscosity, high diffusion coefficient, and lack of surface tension, which brings about great advantages for fracturing. However, these properties also cause several problems, such as difficulty in proppant transportation, high friction loss, and high pump displacement. In this paper, the above problems were analyzed by combining field test with laboratory study and specific solutions to these problems are given. The high frictionloss in the pipeline could be reduced by developing a new drag reducing agent and selecting large-size casing. Besides, for the problem of poor capacity in proppant carrying and sand plug, the methods of adding tackifier into supercritical CO2, increasing pump displacement and selecting ultra-low density proppants are proposed. Moreover, for the problem of fast leak-off and high requirement for pump displacement, the displacement can be increased or the pad fluid can be injected into the reservoir. After solving the above three problems, the field test of supercritical CO2 fracturing can be conducted. The research results can promote the industrialization process of supercritical CO2 fracturing.
Key words: supercritical CO2; fracturing; friction loss; proppant carrying; flied test problem
Haizhu WANG , Gensheng LI , Bin ZHU , Kamy SEPEHRNOORI , Lujie SHI , Yong ZHENG , Xiaomei SHI . Key problems and solutions in supercritical CO2 fracturing technology[J]. Frontiers in Energy, 2019 , 13(4) : 667 -672 . DOI: 10.1007/s11708-019-0626-y
1 |
Wang H, Li G, Shen Z. A feasibility analysis on shale gas exploitation with supercritical carbon dioxide. Energy Source Part A, 2012, 34(15): 1426–1435
|
2 |
Wang H, Shen Z, Li G,
|
3 |
Li G, Wang H, Shen Z,
|
4 |
Li G, Wang H, Shen Z,
|
5 |
Liu H, Wang F, Zhang J,
|
6 |
Wang Z, Sun B, Sun X,
|
7 |
Ni H, Song W, Wang R,
|
8 |
Hu Y, Liu Y, Cai C,
|
9 |
Wang H, Li L, He Z,
|
10 |
Cheng Y, Li G, Wang H,
|
11 |
Hou L, Jiang T, Liu H,
|
12 |
Li G, Wang H, Shen Z,
|
13 |
Feng Y, Gray K E. Modeling lost circulation through drilling-induced fractures. SPE Journal, 2018, 23(1): 1–19
|
14 |
Li X, Li G, Yu W,
|
15 |
Li X, Li G, Sepehrnoori K,
|
16 |
Li X, Li G, Wang G,
|
17 |
Wang H, Shen Z, Li G. Wellbore flow model of coiled tubing drilling with supercritical carbon dioxide. Energy Sources: Part A, 2012, 34(14):1347–1362
|
18 |
Liu L, Zhu W, Wei C,
|
19 |
Wang J, Sun B, Wang Z,
|
20 |
Liu S, Wang J, He H,
|
21 |
Feng Y, Li X, Gray K E. Development of a 3D numerical model for quantifying fluid-driven interface debonding of an injector well. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2017, 62: 76–90
|
22 |
Wang X, Wu J, Zhang J. Application of CO2 fracturing technology for terrestrial shale gas reservoirs. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(1): 64–67 (in Chinese)
|
23 |
Song Z, Su W, Yang Y,
|
24 |
Huo H, Wang H, Ni H,
|
25 |
Sun B, Sun W. Research progress and prospective of supercritical CO2 thickening technology. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2015 (3): 76–83 (in Chinese)
|
26 |
Yin H, Zhou J, Xian X,
|
27 |
Zhang X, Lu Y, Tang J, Zhou Z,
|
28 |
Rui Z, Wang X, Zhang Z,
|
29 |
Ao X, Lu Y Y, Tang J R,
|
/
〈 | 〉 |