REVIEW ARTICLE

Photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide by titanium oxide-based semiconductors to produce fuels

  • Xi CHEN 1 ,
  • Fangming JIN , 2
Expand
  • 1. China-UK Low Carbon College, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 201306, China
  • 2. China-UK Low Carbon College, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 201306, China; School of Environmental Science and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China

Received date: 15 Dec 2018

Accepted date: 21 Feb 2019

Published date: 15 Jun 2019

Copyright

2019 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

Abstract

To tackle the crisis of global warming, it is imperative to control and mitigate the atmospheric carbon dioxide level. Photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide into solar fuels furnishes a gratifying solution to utilize and reduce carbon dioxide emission and simultaneously generate renewable energy to sustain the societies. So far, titanium oxide-based semiconductors have been the most prevalently adopted catalysts in carbon dioxide photoreduction. This mini-review provides a general summary of the recent progresses in titanium oxide-catalyzed photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide. It first illustrates the use of structural engineering as a strategy to adjust and improve the catalytic performances. Then, it describes the introduction of one/two exogenous elements to modify the photocatalytic activity and/or selectivity. Lastly, it discusses multi-component hybrid titanium oxide composites.

Cite this article

Xi CHEN , Fangming JIN . Photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide by titanium oxide-based semiconductors to produce fuels[J]. Frontiers in Energy, 2019 , 13(2) : 207 -220 . DOI: 10.1007/s11708-019-0628-9

Introduction

Global warming caused by the rapid and overwhelming emission of carbon dioxide (CO2) has become a serious and imperative worldwide issue concerning all human beings [13]. Due to intense anthropogenic activities, especially the massive combustion of fossil fuels, the original balance of nature carbon cycle has been gravely damaged. At present, the atmospheric CO2 level largely deviates from its reasonable values which have been maintained in the past millions of years and reaches almost the highest level of approximately 410 ppm in history [4]. Besides, new records of high concentrations are predicted in the coming years with the current increasing rate. To fight against climate change, scientists have made persistent endeavors to capture, store, and utilize CO2 in efficient and feasible ways [59]. It is devised that CO2 can be utilized as an ample, low-cost, and readily available C1 platform resource to produce diverse chemicals and fuels, including formic acid (HCOOH), methanol (CH3OH), carbon monoxide (CO), methane (CH4), ethane (C2H6), etc [1012] (see Fig. 1(a)). The C1 chemistry based on CO2 as a starting material puts forward a new direction to furnish the societies with energy and decrease the reliance on fossil oils, which could potentially close carbon cycle and realize zero-net carbon emission. Nevertheless, one important concern related with CO2 refinery into fuels is the required energy input to proceed the conversion which may partially or sometimes completely offset the produced energy fuels. As a result, if the used energy is generated from non-renewable fossil fuels, the energy consumption of the reaction systems must be minimized by all kinds. However, to maximize the efficacy of producing fuels from CO2, another option is to exploit renewable energy for the reduction of CO2 to generate chemicals and fuels.
Fig.1 Devised utilization of CO2 as an ample, low-cost, and readily available C1 platform resource

Full size|PPT slide

Solar energy represents a type of clean, sustainable, and abundant energy source. Based on estimations, the total solar energy reaching the planet per hour upon full utilization could approximately meet the demand of the annual global energy consumption [13]. Photocatalytic reduction of CO2 using semiconductors provides a viable and promising way to harness solar energy and store it in the form of chemical fuels. It resembles the natural photosynthesis in plants transforming CO2 and water into carbohydrates, whereas in photocatalytic reduction, rationally designed or modified semiconductors are employed as the catalysts to accelerate the reaction rates, adjust the selectivity toward different products and boost the production yields. Titanium oxide (TiO2)-based materials have been the most widespread semiconductors used for photocatalytic CO2 reduction since its first application in 1979 [14], primarily because it is non-toxic, inexpensive, stable, resistant to photo-corrosion, and abundant. The principle of photocatalytic reduction of CO2 is illustrated in Fig. 1(b). A semiconductor is characterized by its band gap structure. Above the gap lies the conduction band (CB), and below the gap lies the valence band (VB). For TiO2 materials, the band gap is usually around approximately 3 eV, and thus untreated TiO2 absorbs energy mainly in the ultraviolet (UV) range. Upon irradiation, an electron can be excited from the VB to the CB, which simultaneously creates an empty state referred to as a hole in the VB. The isolated electron and hole (the charge carrier) may transfer to the surface and serve as active sites to reduce or oxidize adsorbed reactants respectively. Thus, the efficient separation of the electron-hole pairs is fundamentally crucial to improve the photocatalytic efficiency.
Since UV light only accounts for less than 10% and visible light accounts for about 43% of the full spectra of solar energy, various methods have been explored to prepare visible light responsive TiO2 materials, most of which can often lead to concurrent improvements in charge separation, CO2 adsorption, etc. In addition, the suppression of hydrogen (H2) evolution from water is also targeted in catalyst design to enhance the photocatalytic selectivity toward CO2 reduction. Generally, these methods involve two major strategies: the nanostructure engineering of TiO2 or/and the introduction of other components to modify the catalytic system. The nanostructure engineering normally focuses on altering the crystal lattice, crystal phases, the morphology, etc. The introduction of other components includes the incorporation of one or more metal/non-metal elements, and the introduced component is often called the co-catalyst. Besides, multi-component hybrid TiO2 composites have also been broadly reported to well utilize the synergy in different constitutes. In this mini-review, it is objective to showcase the progresses in photocatalytic reduction of CO2 using TiO2-based semiconductors in the past years. First, nanostructure engineering of TiO2 to improve its photocatalytic activity in related works will be illustrated. Moreover, TiO2 modifications by incorporating one/two other metal elements will be summarized. Furthermore, TiO2 modifications with non-metal elements as well as multi-component hybrid TiO2 composites will also be exemplified. Prior to this review, there have been a plethora of excellent reviews [1522] of the reduction of CO2 into fuels and/or chemicals with a different emphasis that can be referred to if interested. Note that this mini-review mainly focuses on TiO2 as the photocatalyst and there have also been outstanding works using other catalysts which will not be covered here [2325].

Nanostructure engineering of TiO2

Crystal lattices and phases

The types and ratios of crystal phases in TiO2 can considerably affect its photocatalytic activity in CO2 reduction. Compared to single phase TiO2 (anatase, rutile or brookite), it was deduced that a mixture of different crystal phases was more advantageous in regards of photocatalytic activity due to the generation of heterojunctions that facilitates charge transfer and separation [26,27]. Kandiel et al. found that rutile TiO2 nanorods moderately decorated with anatase TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs) displayed a better activity than pure and overloaded rutile TiO2 in photocatalytic decomposition of acetaldehyde [28]. Moreover, Tan et al. synthesized oxygen-rich TiO2 NPs using a facile aqueous peroxo-titania route [29]. The oxygen-enriched synthesis environment stimulated the formation of rutile phase TiO2 at a relatively low calcination temperature of about 300°C (The temperature commonly required is above 600°C). As a result, the as-obtained TiO2 NPs contained both anatase and rutile crystal phases, forming a heterojunction to promote the electron-hole separation. Moreover, enriched oxygen has also led to enhanced visible light absorption. Owing to the improved charge separation and light absorption, the dual-phase TiO2 NPs showed>10 times higher activity than pure anatase TiO2 when the rutile composition was 17.5%. In addition, the morphology-induced crystal structure change was also disclosed to considerably influence the photocatalytic activity of TiO2, where the synergistic effects of both morphology and crystalline change contributed. For instance, hierarchical TiO2 nanofibers constituted by interconnected TiO2 NPs that formed one-dimension (1D) mesoporous nanofiber were fabricated by using a combined electrospinning and sol-gel method [30]. The 1D mesoporous nanofiber morphology boasted an improved charge transfer rate and a decreased electron-hole recombination rate, compared to the randomly aggregated TiO2 material. Furthermore, the 1D confinement effect induced partial phase transformation from anatase to rutile, and this heterojunction further promoted the charge separation. Using the 1D TiO2 nanofibers annealed under static argon (Ar), CO was dominantly produced at a rate of 10.2 mmol/(g∙h) at a pressure of 2 bar at 50°C under UV light irradiation.
Likewise, similar observations were made for crystal lattices. Previously, the (001) facets with high-surface-energy were known to display a better activity than (101) facets, and many techniques were established to upraise the portion of (001) facets in TiO2 crystals to enhance photocatalytic activity of TiO2 for CO2 reduction [3133]. Nonetheless, the merits of proper blends of these facets were proposed recently. In 2014, Yu et al. put forward a new concept of “surface heterojunction” and emphasized the pivotal role of cooperative effects between (001) and (101) facets [34]. A series of samples with varied facet composition were prepared using hydrofluoric acid (HF) treatment, and investigated by combined experiments and density functional theory (DFT) calculations. With a suitable ratio, the presence of (101) and (001) facets formed a heterojunction similar to type II band alignment in semiconductor-based heterostructures. The heterojunction assisted in the separation of electrons and holes to (101) and (001) facets respectively, and thus resulted in longer charge carrier lifetimes and an inhibited electron-hole recombination rate. With about 0.55 (101) facets, the highest CH4 yield was realized at 1.35 mmol/(g∙h) under UV light irradiation and atmospheric pressure at room temperature. In line with the work, oxygen-deficient TiO2 nanocrystals with coexposed (001) and (101) facets were also synthesized to exploit the combined, positive effects of mixed crystal facets and defective sites [35]. TiO2 nanocrystals with different exposed facets were synthesized for comparison by using a hydrothermal method, whose scanning electron microscope (SEM) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) characterizations were shown in Fig. 2. The surface and bulk Ti3+ /oxygen vacancy defective sites were generated by sodium borohydride (NaBH4) reduction, and these defects enabled the material to be visible light responsive. The developed catalyst exhibited a much higher activity than unmodified TiO2 and TiO2 with merely coexposed facets or merely oxygen defects. Using the synthesized catalyst, CO was formed as the major product in the photoreduction of CO2 by water vapor, and the yields were about 11.0 and 5.0 mmol/(g∙h) (The quantum yields were 0.3% and 0.1%.) respectively under UV-vis light or visible light irradiation. Based on in situ analysis, coexposed facets presumably rendered a favorable environment for reversible CO2 adsorption-desorption, while the defective sites offered extra sites for CO2 adsorption and activation.
Fig.2 SEM and HRTEM images of TiO2 nanocrystals with different crystal facets (adapted with permission from Ref. [35])

Full size|PPT slide

In material sciences, the change in shape and morphology can usually alter the crystal facets at the same time. Wu et al. conducted a mechanistic study by using DFT calculations and claimed that anatase TiO2 nanobelts with exposed (101) facets in its two main surfaces (as shown in Fig. 3) displayed superior photocatalytic activity to spherical TiO2 NPs with the same crystal phase and comparable specific surface area [36]. One important merit of the nanobelt was that the surfaces with (101) facets were highly reactive to interact with molecular oxygen gas (O2) and favored the formation of active superoxide radicals. The other prominent merit was its much enhanced efficiency in the separation of photogenerated electron and hole pairs. Several reasons were proposed to explain the improved charge separation: the longitudinal dimension of nanobelts led to a better charge mobility; the adsorbed O2 on the facet acted as electron traps to separate the charge carriers; and the number of localized states near and/or in the band gap were reduced.
Fig.3 SEM and bright-field TEM images of TiO2 nanobelts (reprinted with permission from Ref. [36]). Copyright 2010, American Chemical Society) (a) SEM image of the anatase TiO2 nanobelts; (b) bright-field TEM images with SAED patterns of the nanobelt, and the diagram to show the relationship between the incident beam and the nanobelt

Full size|PPT slide

In addition, the strategy to achieve an integrated engineering of the multilevel structures was sometimes employed in order to further enhance the photocatalytic activity. For example, hierarchical yolk@shell microspheres with a hollow chamber that self-assembled by TiO2 nanosheets (2–5 nm thickness) were synthesized, through a solvothermal process of organic amine-mediated alcoholysis of titanium (IV) precursor [37]. During the synthesis, carbon- and nitrogen-containing functional groups were simultaneously grafted onto the surface. With the special morphology, more energetic defective sites were generated on the interfaces to boost the reactivity. Meanwhile, the presence of carbon and nitrogen heteroatoms promoted the interaction and adsorption of CO2 and narrowed the bandgap to enable visible light absorption. In the synthesis, the solvothermal temperature had an essential influence on the crystallinity and morphology of the catalyst, and no such catalysts could be attained below 160°C, which means the temperature must exceed this threshold to make the successful formation of the desired catalysts. Besides, additional calcination step in air was attempted after the solvothermal process, nevertheless, this extra step reduced the nitrogen content and the surface functional groups of the catalyst which showed inferior photocatalytic activity. The best-performed catalyst was obtained at a solvothermal temperature of 200°C without calcination, and methanol was the major product with a highest yield of 2.1 mmol/(g∙h). The recycling tests were undertaken for this catalyst, which suggested that organic species might adsorb onto the catalyst surface and resulted in unsatisfactory catalytic stability, whereas it could be recovered by simply washing the catalyst after each run.

Black TiO2

In 2011, a breakthrough was made by Mao’s group in TiO2-based photocatalysis [38]. In their work, a distinct strategy was adopted to synthesize visible light responsive TiO2 materials, which introduced disorder in the surface layers of nanophase TiO2 through hydrogenation. After hydrogenation, the outer layer (about 1 nm thickness) became disordered and the material color turned from white to black with substantially enhanced light harvesting into visible light and infrared range. The bandgap of black TiO2 NPs prepared by a one-step reduction/crystallization displayed an estimated value of 1.85 eV. The unique crystalline and defective core/disordered shell morphology were the key factors in determining its electronic structure [39].
Black TiO2 has been widely used in photocatalysis for organic pollutant decomposition, water splitting, etc [4042]. In 2016, platinum (Pt) supported on black TiO2 catalyst was developed using an impregnation method followed by hydrogenation, and was adopted for visible light photocatalytic reduction of CO2 by CH4 (CO2 reforming of CH4, abbreviated as CRM reaction) at elevated temperatures [43]. The Pt/black TiO2 was further loaded onto the light-diffuse reflection surface of a silica dioxide (SiO2) substrate, in order to significantly intensify light absorption capacity. High reaction temperature was introduced in the system because based on the relationship between band gap values and the redox potentials (see Fig. 4), high temperature altered the CO2 redox potential to more easily produce CO. Simultaneously, the high temperature also favored the thermocatalytic reaction of CRM. Under the effects of supports and high temperature, exceptional H2 and CO yields of 120.0 mmol/(g∙h) and 270.0 mmol/(g∙h) were achieved respectively under visible light irradiation at 650°C, with a high apparent quantum yield of 57.8%.
Fig.4 Relationship between the bandgap and redox potentials of CRM (reprinted with permission from Ref. [43]. Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society)

Full size|PPT slide

TiO2 modifications by incorporating other elements

The incorporation can use a single metal element or multiple metal elements as the co-catalysts. Table 1 summarizes the type of co-catalyst employed and their performances in CO2 photoreduction.
Tab.1 Summary of reviewed papers using co-catalysts to modify TiO2
Co-catalyst TiO2 type Light source S/% Product Production /(mmol∙(g∙h)−1) Ref.
1 Ag NPs P25 UV-vis - CH4 (gas)
CH3OH (aqueous)
1.4
4.3
[44]
2 In P25 UV 69 CH4 244.0 [45]
3 Cu P25 UV-rich - HCOOH 25.7 [46]
4 CuO P25 UV - CO 14.5 [47]
5 Cu0 P25 UV - CH4 30.1 [47]
6 Pt-Cu2O P25 UV-vis 85 CH4 33.0 [48]
7 Pt-MgO P25 UV-vis 83 CH4 8.9 [49]
8 Au-Cu P25 Smulated sunlight 97 CH4 2000 [50]
9 Cu-Pt P25 UV-vis - CH4 11.4 [51]
10 Pt-Cu2O TiO2 NCs UV 97 CH4 1.4 [52]
11 Au-Cu SrTiO3/TiO2 UV-vis - CH4 421.2 [53]
12 Cu-Pt TiO2 NTAs Simulated sunlight - CH4 0.6 [54]
13 Au TiO2 NTAs Simulated sunlight - CH4 58.5 [55]
14 Ru TiO2 NTAs Simulated sunlight - CH4 26.4 [55]
15 Zn-Pd TiO2 NTAs Simulated sunlight - CH4 26.8 [55]
16 Ag-Pd N-doped TiO2 NSs Simulated sunlight - CH4 79.0 [56]
17 Cu-In P25 UV 99 CO 6.5 [58]
18 Ni-In P25 UV 99.7 CO 12.0 [59]
19 Au-In P25 UV 99 CO 9.0 [57]
20 Cu-In TiO2 NPs UV 92
66
CH4
CH3OH
181.0
68.0
[60]
21 Cu-V P25 & PU Visible - CH4
CO
933.0
588.0
[61]

Notes: NTA—nanotube arrays; NCs—nanocrystals; NSs—nanosheets; S%—selectivity%

Incorporation of a single metal element

The introduction of another element often imposes effects on the electron transfer and/or electron-hole separation, which modifies the reaction process. Noble metals were frequently used as the incorporating element to improve the performance of the commercialized TiO2 (P25). In the following paragraphs, the TiO2 referred to the P25 material if not specifically described. Yu et al. fabricated silver (Ag) NPs loaded TiO2 by a simple silver mirror method with enhanced photocatalytic activity due to the surface plasmonic resonance (SPR) and electron sink effect of the Ag component [44]. The SPR promoted visible light absorption and generated hot electrons on Ag, while the photoexcited electrons transferred from the surface of TiO2 to Ag concurrently because of the lower Fermi level. Hence, the electrons enriched on Ag surface to enhance the reduction capacity and retard the recombination of photogenerated electron-hole pairs. Since particle size influences the SPR, Ag NPs with a smaller size of 2–3 nm performed better than the larger NPs, reaching a CH4 yield of 1.4 mmol/(g∙h) under UV-vis light irradiation in the gas phase. When the photoreduction was conducted in aqueous phase, the major product was methanol with a yield of about 4.3 mmol/(g∙h). Possible explanations (see Fig. 5) were given for the altered reaction pathway that CO2 might undergo a chain of fast deoxygenation reactions in gas phase, whereas a chain of fast hydrogenation reactions occurred in aqueous phase because water existed in dominantly excessive amount.
Fig.5 Proposed reaction pathways for the selective photoreduction of CO2 into different products in gas and liquid phase respectively (adapted with permission from Ref. [44]. Copyright 2016, Royal Society of Chemistry)

Full size|PPT slide

Aside from noble metals, non-noble metals were also reported in TiO2 modifications. Tahir and Amin fabricated indium (In)-incorporated TiO2 NPs by a controlled sol-gel method [45]. The In mainly located on the surface of the NPs in its metallic state, which facilitated the formation of mesoporous anatase phase TiO2 NPs with smaller crystalline sizes, increased surface areas, and enlarged bandgaps. The incorporation of In also enhanced charge separation and transfer, leading to a higher yield of CH4 product in CO2 photoreduction with water vapor. Corma’s group reported copper (Cu)-modified TiO2 NPs prepared by a solvothermal method [46]. The Cu2+ was incorporated into the crystal matrix of TiO2, leading to a narrowed bandgap and an improved photocatalytic activity. Under UV-rich light, with Na2S as the sacrificial electron donor, the Cu-doped catalyst promoted the reduction of CO2 into formic acid with 25.7 mmol/(g∙h) yield in aqueous solution at room temperature after 15 h reaction time. In another work, Cu-modified TiO2 hollow microspheres were synthesized by a one-pot template-free method (see Fig. 6) [47]. The Cu element existed as copper oxide (CuO) and dominantly dispersed on the surface of the shell which did not insert into the crystal matrix of the anatase TiO2. The large surface area and hierarchical porous structure of the hollow microspheres enhanced the light harvesting of the catalyst, and the introduction of CuO improved the electron trapping ability. The 3 wt% CuO doped TiO2 hollow microsphere catalyst afforded a higher CO yield of 14.5 mmol/(g∙h), which was 5.8 times than that of using un-doped counterpart catalyst under UV light irradiation. Besides, Cu0 doped TiO2 hollow microsphere catalyst was obtained by hydrogenating the CuO-doped TiO2 catalyst, which promoted selective reduction of CO2 into CH4 with a yield of 30.1 mmol/(g∙h), because Cu0 favored the capture of holes and the H2 generation from water for CH4 formation.
Fig.6 Synthesis method to prepare CuO-TiO2 hollow microsphere (reprinted with permission from Ref. [47]. Copyright 2015, American Chemical Society)

Full size|PPT slide

Incorporation of dual metal co-catalysts

Wang’s group reported the binary co-catalysts Cu2O/Pt/TiO2 system and MgO (magnesium oxide)-Pt/TiO2 system for selective photoreduction of CO2 into CO and CH4 with water (at 50°C, 2 bar CO2 pressure) under UV-vis light irradiation [48,49]. The catalysts were synthesized by a stepwise photodeposition technique with Pt NPs/TiO2 formed first. Then, Cu2O was preferentially deposited on the Pt NPs forming a core-shell structure, while MgO was deposited onto the TiO2 as amorphous layers. The major role of Pt NPs as a co-catalyst was to capture and enrich the photogenerated electrons as well as to delay the electron-hole recombination. Nevertheless, Pt NPs promoted H2 formation significantly and led to low selectivity toward CO2 reduction. Incorporating Cu2O or MgO remarkably curbed the competing reaction of H2 generation and facilitated the chemisorption and activation of CO2. Hence, Cu2O/Pt/TiO2 and MgO-Pt/TiO2 catalysts achieved a high selectivity of 85% and 83% respectively, which were 2-fold of that using pristine TiO2 or Pt/TiO2. The highest yield of CH4 was obtained at about 33.0 mmol/(g∙h) with Cu2O/Pt/TiO2. Moreover, the reaction mode was proved to considerably affect the product yield, and higher CH4 yield was achieved in gas phase reaction mode presumably because of the low solubility of CO2 in water and the more severe side reaction in liquid water (see Fig. 7). Meanwhile, the synthesis method played a role in the catalytic performance that the catalysts obtained by the photodeposition method exhibited a better activity than those prepared by the impregnation H2-reduction method and the hydrazine-reduction method.
Fig.7 Schematic diagrams of different reaction modes for photocatalytic reduction of CO2 (reprinted with permission from Ref. [49]. Copyright 2014, American Chemical Society))

Full size|PPT slide

Garcia’s group developed the gold-copper (Au-Cu)/TiO2 catalyst for photoreduction of CO2 by water under simulated concentrate sunlight [50]. The Au-Cu bimetallic alloy NPs were fabricated by a stepwise deposition-precipitation method. The catalyst realized 97% of selectivity toward CH4, and a high production rate of about 2000 mmol/(g∙h) that was about 10 times of those using Au/TiO2 or Cu/TiO2 counterparts. Surface species were probed by using FTIR and chemical analysis, including CO2-, Cu-CO, and elemental carbon. As proposed, the role of Au was to induce the visible light responses, and the Cu adsorbed CO as an intermediate and governed the reduction pathway. The type of excitation lights played a crucial role in reaction pathways that UV light irradiation promoted the H2 evolution reaction whereas visible light illumination led to the generation of CH4 product (see Fig. 8). Afterwards, Cu-Pt bimetallic alloy NPs supported on TiO2 was developed by an impregnation-calcination method, and the size effect of the Cu-Pt nanoalloys were studied [51]. As the particle size decreased, the production yield of CH4 correspondingly increased. The highest yield of 11.4 mmol/(g∙h) was obtained when the size of Cu-Pt NPs was 1.2 nm under UV-vis light irradiation at 40°C. Several reasons were proposed for the size-dependent photoreduction of CO2. First, catalysts with smaller size might possess stronger reductive powder due to more quantized energy level, and enhanced binding capacity of CO2 with increased low-coordinated sites. Moreover, Cu-Pt NPs with a smaller size probably had reinforced interaction with the TiO2 support, which possibly enabled the co-adsorption of intermediates with –OH groups on the support. Besides, the Pt atoms of smaller Cu-Pt NPs were observed to show a stronger adsorption of protons for hydrogenation of intermediates.
Fig.8 Proposal mechanism to explain the different product distribution under different types of light sources using AuCu/TiO2 catalyst for photoreduction of CO2 by water (reprinted with permission from Ref. [50]. Copyright 2014, American Chemical Society)

Full size|PPT slide

Cu2O NPs and Pt NPs decorated on TiO2 nanocrystals with coexposed (101) and (001) facets were synthesized [52]. The facet-engineered TiO2 support was obtained by a solvothermal method and the NPs were prepared by a sodium borohydride (NaBH4) reduction method. The catalyst system significantly suppressed H2 production, improving the selectivity toward CH4 to 97% under UV light irradiation. The Cu2O NPs showed a poor adsorption toward water and thus inhibited the competing reaction, whereas they displayed enhanced chemisorption of CO2 by Cu2O NPs as verified by temperature programmed desorption (TPD)-CO2. Meanwhile, Pt NPs were found to not only extract the photogenerated electrons but also increase the electron density on Cu2O for selective eight-electron reduction of CO2 into CH4. Control experiments suggested that CH4 was primarily produced via the direct photocatalytic reduction of CO2, instead of the hydrogenation of CO/CO2. Likewise, special supports such as amorphous SrTiO3/TiO2 coaxial nanotube arrays were employed by Kang et al. with Au-Cu bimetallic alloys as the co-catalysts [53]. The support material could enhance the gas diffusion with its porosity and high surface area and promoted the photogenerated charge separation thanks to its heterostructures. Besides, hydrous hydrazine was used as the reducing agent which exhibited better reductive capacity and offered a protective atmosphere for the Au-Cu NPs. Under UV-vis light irradiation, the highest CH4 yield was obtained at 421.2 mmol/(g∙h) from diluted CO2 stream with Au3Cu co-catalysts. It was believed that the Au atom facilitated the desorption of CO and boosted the formation of hydrocarbons on the Cu atom, and the proposed mechanism mainly followed the glyoxal pathway.
Cu-Pt NPs supported on TiO2 nanotube arrays were prepared, with an emphasis on the influence of synthesis methods [54]. The transparent 1D TiO2 nanotube arrays as support provided more reaction sites and co-catalyst loading sites due to the high surface area. The photodeposited Cu-Pt NPs have an average size of about 1 nm, and a Schottky barrier was formed at the co-catalyst-TiO2 interface with an obvious band bending. Nevertheless, sputtered and thermally dewetted Cu-Pt NPs had larger particle sizes and the band bending was not observed. Using the photodeposition method, a higher CH4 yield of about 0.6 mmol/(cm2∙h) could be achieved which was nearly 20-fold than that when sputtered Cu-Pt NPs catalysts were used. In a following work, the group also synthesized Au, ruthenium (Ru), and zinc-palladium (Zn-Pd) NPs loaded TiO2 nanotube arrays and examined their photocatalytic activity for CO2 reduction [55]. Au NPs on the support generated CH4 at the highest yield of 58.5 mmol/(g∙h) possibly because of its smallest particle size. The metal NPs loaded TiO2 nanotube arrays could not only utilize UV protons but also the blue photons. Tan et al. prepared Ag-Pd bimetallic alloys on nitrogen-doped (N-doped) TiO2 nanosheets by a hydrazine-reduction method [56]. The doping of nitrogen into the nanosheets could favor charge separation and boost visible light absorption. By means of combined analytical methods, the well-dispersed Ag-Pd NPs (having a diameter of about 8.5 nm) facilitated visible-light response, charge transfer and separation, as well as the activation of CO2. The ratio of Ag and Pd was optimized and a linear growth of the product was found with the prolonged reaction time (see Figs. 9(a) and 9(b)). When simulating sunlight irradiation, the highest CH4 yield of 79.0 mmol/(g∙h) was obtained by using Ag-Pd/TiO2 nanosheets in CO2-saturated aqueous solution at room temperature and ambient pressure, which was 3-fold higher than using monometallic counterparts, and recycling tests were conducted to show the stability of the catalysts (see Figs. 9(c) and 9(d)).
Fig.9 Optimization, recycling tests and XRD analysis of Ag-Pd/TiO2 nanosheets

Full size|PPT slide

Amin’s group developed a series of dual components-incorporated TiO2 catalysts (Cu-In, nickel (Ni)-In, Au-In) using the sol-gel method for the photocatalytic reduction of CO2 into CO with H2 reductant in a monolith reactor [5759]. The dual elements displayed synergistic effects and significantly inhibited the recombination of photogenerated electron-hole pairs. In these catalysts, the elements located at the surface and existed as Cu+ and In3+ (Cu-In co-doped), Ni2+ and In3+ (Ni-In co-doped), and Au0 and In3+ (Au-In co-doped). The selectivity toward the CO product for these three co-doped catalysts were 99.3%, 99.7%, and 99.0% respectively, with the highest yields of 6.5, 12.0 and 9.0 mmol/(g∙h). In a following work, In and Cu-decorated TiO2 NPs with surface dispersed In3+ and Cu2+ were obtained by using the modified sol-gel method [60]. After the introduction of the two elements, the catalyst boasted smaller crystalline size, reduced bandgap, and enhanced charge separation, which resulted in a better CO2 photoreduction activity. Under optimal conditions, CH4 was formed at the highest yield of 181.0 mmol/(g∙h) with water as the reductant, and methanol was formed at the highest yield of 68.0 mmol/(g∙h) with water and H2 as the reductants. On the other hand, the introduction of a metal element and a non-metal element was exploited. Cu-vanadium (V) modified TiO2 was synthesized and supported on porous polyurethane (PU) with a honeycomb structure [61]. The use of support was to ease the recycling and increase the adsorption ability. The Cu element presented as Cu+ and Cu2+ species either on the surface or in the matrix. The V element existed as V4+ and V5+ species, with V4+ species incorporating into the lattice while V5+ species distributing on the surface. The Cu and V elements have induced the generation of Ti3+ and oxygen vacancies in the lattice, leading to an enhanced charge separation and CO2 adsorption. Under visible light irradiation, CO2 was efficiently reduced with water vapor into CH4 and CO with the production rates of 933.0 mmol/(g∙h) and 588.0 mmol/(g∙h).

TiO2 modifications by non-metal elements

Apart from metal elements, non-metal elements were also used to modify the structure of TiO2 to increase its visible light responses and CO2 adsorption ability. For example, N-doped TiO2 materials were widely used as photocatalysts [62]. Liu’s group synthesized N-doped anatase TiO2 microsheets with exposed (001) and (101) facets by using the hydrothermal method with HF and hydrochloric acid (HCl) using titanium nitride (TiN) as the precursor. The N-doped microsheets exhibited a much enhanced activity than undoped TiO2 for CO2 photoreduction into CH4 [63]. Zhang et al. fabricated 1D N-doped TiO2 nanorod arrays by a hydrothermal treatment using hydrazine or ammonia as the nitrogen source, and pointed out that the use of different nitrogen source had an impact on the selectivity of CO2 photoreduction [64]. The major product was CH4 and CO respectively when using hydrazine and ammonia as the source, probably because of the highly reductive N-N bonds introduced by hydrazine. In addition, hierarchical phosphate-doped (P-doped) TiO2 nanotubes were prepared and supported on Ti plates by simple pyrolytic phosphating and electrochemical anodic oxidation [65]. Hierarchical nanostructures would enhance the mass transfer and light harvesting. The incorporated P5+ fractionally substituted Ti4+ atoms in the crystal lattice to form Ti-O-P linkages, suppressing recombination rate of photogenerated electron-hole pairs. Besides, the P-doped material boasted a reduced bandgap, a higher activity, and a better selectivity. Under visible light irradiation, the maximal methanol yield was obtained at 286.8 mmol/(g∙h) by using water vapor as the reducing agent.
Sulfur-doped (S-doped) TiO2 anatase was synthesized by using the sonothermal method, and S atoms were predominantly incorporated as S4+ in the crystal lattice [66]. By DFT calculations, S-doping induced the generation of additional states in the bandgap closer to the VB, and presumably enhanced the surface conductivity, the charge transfer efficiency, and the photocatalytic activity. Under visible light irradiation, a production of 35.3 mmol/(g∙h) of CH4 and 167.9 mmol/(g∙h) of methanol was achieved in basic acetonitrile-water solution (CO2-saturated) with triethanolamine (TEOA) as sacrificial donor. Moreover, iodine-doped (I-doped) TiO2 nanosheets with high exposed (001) facets were developed by a two-step hydrothermal treatment followed by calcinations [67]. After doping, Ti4+ replacement by I5+ was observed with the formation of I-O-Ti and I-O-I bonds, leading to increased visible light responses. Meanwhile, the high exposed (001) facets favored water oxidation and the increased unsaturated Ti atoms curbed the recombination rate of electron-hole pairs. In gas phase, CH4 and CO were obtained at the yields of 9.1 mmol/(g∙h) and 3.4 mmol/(g∙h) respectively under visible light irradiation.

Multi-component hybrid TiO2 nanocomposites

Structurally blended TiO2 with carbon-based materials along with the addition of co-catalysts and/or other elements was employed in some studies to fabricate a hybrid nanocomposite in an effort to further utilize the synergistic effects among multiple components and improve the photocatalytic activity and/or stability. TiO2-graphene hybrid nanosheets were established by an in situ reduction-hydrolysis technique in ethylenediamine/water solvent [68]. The TiO2 NPs were chemically loaded onto graphene sheets via Ti-O-C linkages and generated a two-dimension (2D) sandwich-like nanostructure. The loaded TiO2 NPs stabilized the graphene nanosheets preventing them from restacking or collapsing. Abundant Ti3+ sites were identified at the surface of TiO2 NP in hybrid composites which could trap electrons and suppressed photogenerated electron-hole recombination. The hybrid composites selectively promoted the formation of C2H6 product, which was distinct from the single component counterparts. Besides, the yield of C2H6 correspondingly grew with the increased ratio of graphene in the composite, indicating that the construction of a hybrid composite might provide a facile way to adjust the reaction selectivity.
A hybrid RuRe/TiO2/graphic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) nanosheet was contrived by first anchoring a supramolecular Ru(II)-Re(I) binuclear complex onto rutile TiO2 NPs which were then coated on g-C3N4 nanosheets [69]. The band structure of the hybrid catalyst is shown in Fig. 10. The hybrid composites showed superior photocatalytic activity to the analog without TiO2 in CO2 reduction to produce CO, which demonstrated about 4-fold production rate and turnover number (TON). The improved photocatalytic activity was ascribed to the enhanced charge separation efficiency at the interface of TiO2 and g-C3N4, as indicated by the results from transient absorption spectroscopy. Moreover, the TiO2 NPs offered stronger sites to anchor the RuRe complexes than the carbon materials, leading to a better hybrid structure. These two factors in combination determined the improved performances of the hybrid composites.
Fig.10 Band structure of RuRe/TiO2/g-C3N4 hybrid nanosheets (reprinted with permission from Ref. [69]. Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society)

Full size|PPT slide

Jin et al. utilized a Cu-TiO2/g-C3N4 ternary photocatalyst for CO2 reduction to CH4 with water vapor under visible light irradiation [70]. The interface heterojunctions of the ternary system could efficiently boost the charge separation. Cu-loaded TiO2 NPs were first prepared by a NaBH4 reduction process, and then the composites were dispersed on g-C3N4 by stirring and annealing. The small Cu NPs were in metallic state and well-dispersed on the surface of TiO2 NPs, which promoted light absorption. Cu loading was identified as a critical factor to influence the photocatalytic activity with an optimal value of 2.5 wt%, which achieved CH4 formation at a rate of 23.9 mmol/(g∙h). The reaction mechanism was proposed that the photoexcited electrons were initially injected from the VB to CB of g-C3N4, and then migrated to the CB of TiO2 which eventually accumulated at Cu sites for efficient CO2 reduction.
Similarly, a Ag-TiO2/g-C3N4 catalyst was developed by adopting simple solvent evaporation-calcination processes [71]. The remarkable synergy among the components led to increased light harvesting and charge separation to more effectively reduce CO2 into CH4 and CO at simulated sunlight illumination. Photogenerated electrons were presumably transferred in this way g-C3N4→ TiO2→ Ag, and the collected electrons were further reinforced by the SPR effect. The multicomponent catalyst of Pt/CoOx/TiO2-SiO2 were synthesized [72] to demonstrate the spatial influence of the catalyst. Pt NPs and CoOx NPs were anchored at separated spatial locations on hierarchically ordered TiO2-SiO2 (HTSO) support which advanced the separation of charge carriers. The HTSO was prepared by the two template evaporate induced self-assemble (EISA) method, and CoOx NPs were in situ grown and embedded in the skeleton of the support during its formation. Afterwards, Pt NPs were decorated onto the outer surface of HTSO. The Pt NPs acted as electron reservoirs while CoOx NPs were effective hole collectors, and the physical isolation of the two co-catalysts notably retarded the recombination rate of photoexcited electron-hole pairs because the possibility of an electron recombined with a hole were reduced by the prolonged distance. Compared to randomly dispersed Pt-CoOx with contacts, spatially separated Pt NPs and CoOx NPs on HTSO exhibited a higher activity and selectivity to produce CH4 from CO2 at simulated solar light illumination. In addition, the composition, porous structure and specific surface area of the support are influential to the photocatalytic performance by mediating the light reflection, mass transfer, electron-hole recombination rate, etc [5356].

Conclusions and future remarks

Photocatalytic reduction of CO2 has attracted growing attention recently because it exploits clean and renewable solar energy to create fuels, which decreases the dependence on depleting fossil oils and points out a potentially low-carbon future for the sustainable development. TiO2-based materials are economically viable as photocatalysts because of its cheap price and high stability. The key factors affecting the performances of CO2 photoreduction mainly include the surface affinity, charge separation efficiency, and the light absorption ability of the catalyst employed. Surface affinity determines the adsorption of CO2 on the surface of the catalyst, while a strong affinity can help improve the selectivity toward CO2 conversion and suppress the side reaction, which will influence both the selectivity and yield. A common strategy to improve the affinity is to incorporate basic sites onto the surface. The charge separation efficiency and the light absorption ability are crucially associated with the quantum yields and product yields.
Although various methods have been used to enhance the performance of TiO2 catalysts, the production rate of photocatalytic reduction of CO2 is relatively low compared to conventional chemical transformations. Major challenges in CO2 photoreduction include the further enhancement in product yields, the efficiency of electron-hole separation, and the light harvesting efficiency. Therefore, in the future, different effective and cooperative strategies are anticipated to be developed to considerably increase the CO2 reduction efficiency and the production rate. For instance, the combined uses of photocatalysis and thermal catalysis may lead to much enhanced results [73]. In addition, the manipulations on reactors and reaction modes can be further studied and optimized in detail to adjust the process conditions. Besides, more rational and elaborate catalyst design is always essential to achieve highly selective reduction of CO2 with solar lights.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the State Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 21436007 and 51472159).
1
Frölicher T L, Fischer E M, Gruber N. Marine heatwaves under global warming. Nature, 2018, 560(7718): 360–364

DOI

2
Dottori F, Szewczyk W, Ciscar J C, Zhao F, Alfieri L, Hirabayashi Y, Bianchi A, Mongelli I, Frieler K, Betts R A, Feyen L. Increased human and economic losses from river flooding with anthropogenic warming. Nature Climate Change, 2018, 8(9): 781–786

DOI

3
Peters G P, Andrew R M, Boden T, Canadell J G, Ciais P, Le Quéré C, Marland G, Raupach M R, Wilson C. The challenge to keep global warming below 2°C. Nature Climate Change, 2013, 3(1): 4–6

DOI

4
Earth System Research Laboratory. Trends in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. Global Greenhouse Gas Reference Network, 2019

5
Buelens L C, Galvita V V, Poelman H, Detavernier C, Marin G B. Super-dry reforming of methane intensifies CO2 utilization via Le Chatelier’s principle. Science, 2016, 354(6311): 449–452

DOI

6
Senftle T P, Carter E A. The Holy Grail: Chemistry enabling an economically viable CO2 capture, utilization, and storage strategy. Accounts of Chemical Research, 2017, 50(3): 472–475

DOI

7
Meylan F D, Moreau V, Erkman S. CO2 utilization in the perspective of industrial ecology, an overview. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 2015, 12: 101–108

DOI

8
Zhai H, Ou Y, Rubin E S. Opportunities for decarbonizing existing U.S. coal-fired power plants via CO2 capture, utilization and storage. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(13): 7571–7579

DOI

9
Olajire A A. Valorization of greenhouse carbon dioxide emissions into value-added products by catalytic processes. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 2013, 3–4: 74–92

DOI

10
Moret S, Dyson P J, Laurenczy G. Direct synthesis of formic acid from carbon dioxide by hydrogenation in acidic media. Nature Communications, 2014, 5(1): 4017

DOI

11
Goeppert A, Czaun M, Jones J P, Surya Prakash G K, Olah G A. Recycling of carbon dioxide to methanol and derived products – closing the loop. Chemical Society Reviews, 2014, 43(23): 7995–8048

DOI

12
Qiao J, Liu Y, Hong F, Zhang J. A review of catalysts for the electroreduction of carbon dioxide to produce low-carbon fuels. Chemical Society Reviews, 2014, 43(2): 631–675

DOI

13
Lewis N S, Nocera D G. Powering the planet: chemical challenges in solar energy utilization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006, 103(43): 15729–15735

DOI

14
Inoue T, Fujishima A, Konishi S, Honda K. Photoelectrocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide in aqueous suspensions of semiconductor powders. Nature, 1979, 277(5698): 637–638

DOI

15
Low J, Cheng B, Yu J. Surface modification and enhanced photocatalytic CO2 reduction performance of TiO2: a review. Applied Surface Science, 2017, 392: 658–686

DOI

16
White J L, Baruch M F, Pander J E III, Hu Y, Fortmeyer I C, Park J E, Zhang T, Liao K, Gu J, Yan Y, Shaw T W, Abelev E, Bocarsly A B. Light-driven heterogeneous reduction of carbon dioxide: photocatalysts and photoelectrodes. Chemical Reviews, 2015, 115(23): 12888–12935

DOI

17
Habisreutinger S N, Schmidt-Mende L, Stolarczyk J K. Photocatalytic reduction of CO2 on TiO2 and other semiconductors. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2013, 52(29): 7372–7408

DOI

18
Sakakura T, Choi J C, Yasuda H. Transformation of carbon dioxide. Chemical Reviews, 2007, 107(6): 2365–2387

DOI

19
Wang W, Wang S, Ma X, Gong J. Recent advances in catalytic hydrogenation of carbon dioxide. Chemical Society Reviews, 2011, 40(7): 3703–3727

DOI

20
Roy S C, Varghese O K, Paulose M, Grimes C A. Toward solar fuels: photocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide to hydrocarbons. ACS Nano, 2010, 4(3): 1259–1278

DOI

21
Kim W, McClure B A, Edri E, Frei H. Coupling carbon dioxide reduction with water oxidation in nanoscale photocatalytic assemblies. Chemical Society Reviews, 2016, 45(11): 3221–3243

DOI

22
Zhang L, Zhao Z J, Gong J. Nanostructured materials for heterogeneous electrocatalytic CO2 reduction and their related reaction mechanisms. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2017, 56(38): 11326–11353

DOI

23
Ma K, Tian Y, Zhao Z J, Cheng Q, Ding T, Zhang J, Zheng L, Jiang Z, Abe T, Tsubaki N, Gong J, Li X. Achieving efficient and robust catalytic reforming on dual-sites of Cu species. Chemical Science (Cambridge), 2019, 10(9): 2578–2584

DOI

24
Li Z, Qu Y, Wang J, Highly selective conversion of carbon dioxide to aromatics over tandem catalysts. Joule, 2019, 3(2): 570–580

DOI

25
Wang Y, Zhang Z, Zhang L, Luo Z, Shen J, Lin H, Long J, Wu J C S, Fu X, Wang X, Li C. Visible-light driven overall conversion of CO2 and H2O to CH4 and O2 on 3D-SiC@2D-MoS2 heterostructure. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2018, 140(44): 14595–14598

DOI

26
Kawahara T, Konishi Y, Tada H, Tohge N, Nishii J, Ito S. A patterned TiO2 (anatase)/TiO2 (rRutile) bilayer-type photocatalyst: effect of the anatase/rutile junction on the photocatalytic activity. Angewandte Chemie, 2002, 114(15): 2935–2937

DOI

27
Ohno T, Tokieda K, Higashida S, Matsumura M. Synergism between rutile and anatase TiO2 particles in photocatalytic oxidation of naphthalene. Applied Catalysis A, General, 2003, 244(2): 383–391

DOI

28
Kandiel T A, Dillert R, Feldhoff A, Bahnemann D W. Direct synthesis of photocatalytically active rutile TiO2 nanorods partly decorated with anatase nanoparticles. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2010, 114(11): 4909–4915

DOI

29
Tan L L, Ong W J, Chai S P, Mohamed A R. Visible-light-activated oxygen-rich TiO2 as next generation photocatalyst: importance of annealing temperature on the photoactivity toward reduction of carbon dioxide. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 283: 1254–1263

DOI

30
Reñones P, Moya A, Fresno F, Collado L, Vilatela J J, de la Peña O’Shea V A. Hierarchical TiO2 nanofibres as photocatalyst for CO2 reduction: influence of morphology and phase composition on catalytic activity. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 2016, 15: 24–31

DOI

31
Han X, Kuang Q, Jin M, Xie Z, Zheng L. Synthesis of titania nanosheets with a high percentage of exposed (001) facets and related photocatalytic properties. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2009, 131(9): 3152–3153

DOI

32
Yang H G, Sun C H, Qiao S Z, Zou J, Liu G, Smith S C, Cheng H M, Lu G Q. Anatase TiO2 single crystals with a large percentage of reactive facets. Nature, 2008, 453(7195): 638–641

DOI

33
Selloni A. Anatase shows its reactive side. Nature Materials, 2008, 7(8): 613–615

DOI

34
Yu J, Low J, Xiao W, Zhou P, Jaroniec M. Enhanced photocatalytic CO2-reduction activity of anatase TiO2 by coexposed {001} and {101} facets. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2014, 136(25): 8839–8842

DOI

35
Liu L, Jiang Y, Zhao H, Chen J, Cheng J, Yang K, Li Y. Engineering coexposed {001} and {101} facets in oxygen-deficient TiO2 nanocrystals for enhanced CO2 photoreduction under visible light. ACS Catalysis, 2016, 6(2): 1097–1108

DOI

36
Wu N, Wang J, Tafen D N, Wang H, Zheng J G, Lewis J P, Liu X, Leonard S S, Manivannan A. Shape-enhanced photocatalytic activity of single-crystalline anatase TiO2 (101) nanobelts. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2010, 132(19): 6679–6685

DOI

37
Liu S, Xia J, Yu J. Amine-functionalized titanate nanosheet-assembled Yolk@Shell microspheres for efficient cocatalyst-free visible-light photocatalytic CO2 reduction. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2015, 7(15): 8166–8175

DOI

38
Chen X, Liu L, Yu P Y, Mao S S. Increasing solar absorption for photocatalysis with black hydrogenated titanium dioxide nanocrystals. Science, 2011, 331(6018): 746–750

DOI

39
Naldoni A, Allieta M, Santangelo S, Marelli M, Fabbri F, Cappelli S, Bianchi C L, Psaro R, Dal Santo V. Effect of nature and location of defects on bandgap narrowing in black TiO2 nanoparticles. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2012, 134(18): 7600–7603

DOI

40
Hu Y H. A highly efficient photocatalyst—hydrogenated black TiO2 for the photocatalytic splitting of water. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2012, 51(50): 12410–12412

DOI

41
Cui H, Zhao W, Yang C, Yin H, Lin T, Shan Y, Xie Y, Gu H, Huang F. Black TiO2 nanotube arrays for high-efficiency photoelectrochemical water-splitting. Journal of Materials Chemistry. A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2014, 2(23): 8612–8616

DOI

42
Leshuk T, Parviz R, Everett P, Krishnakumar H, Varin R A, Gu F. Photocatalytic activity of hydrogenated TiO2. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2013, 5(6): 1892–1895

DOI

43
Han B, Wei W, Chang L, Cheng P, Hu Y H. Efficient visible light photocatalytic CO2 reforming of CH4. ACS Catalysis, 2016, 6(2): 494–497

DOI

44
Yu B, Zhou Y, Li P, Tu W, Li P, Tang L, Ye J, Zou Z. Photocatalytic reduction of CO2 over Ag/TiO2 nanocomposites prepared with a simple and rapid silver mirror method. Nanoscale, 2016, 8(23): 11870–11874

DOI

45
Tahir M, Amin N S. Indium-doped TiO2 nanoparticles for photocatalytic CO2 reduction with H2O vapors to CH4. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2015, 162: 98–109

DOI

46
Gonell F, Puga A V, Julián-López B, García H, Corma A. Copper-doped titania photocatalysts for simultaneous reduction of CO2 and production of H2 from aqueous sulfide. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2016, 180: 263–270

DOI

47
Fang B, Xing Y, Bonakdarpour A, Zhang S, Wilkinson D P. Hierarchical CuO–TiO2 hollow microspheres for highly efficient photodriven reduction of CO2 to CH4. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2015, 3(10): 2381–2388

DOI

48
Zhai Q, Xie S, Fan W, Zhang Q, Wang Y, Deng W, Wang Y. Photocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide with water into methane: platinum and copper(I) oxide co-catalysts with a core–shell structure. Angewandte Chemie, 2013, 125(22): 5888–5891

DOI

49
Xie S, Wang Y, Zhang Q, Deng W, Wang Y. MgO- and Pt-Promoted TiO2 as an efficient photocatalyst for the preferential reduction of carbon dioxide in the presence of water. ACS Catalysis, 2014, 4(10): 3644–3653

DOI

50
Neaţu Ş, Maciá-Agulló J A, Concepción P, Garcia H. Gold–copper nanoalloys supported on TiO2 as photocatalysts for CO2 reduction by water. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2014, 136(45): 15969–15976

DOI

51
Lee S, Jeong S, Kim W D, Lee S, Lee K, Bae W K, Moon J H, Lee S, Lee D C. Low-coordinated surface atoms of CuPt alloy cocatalysts on TiO2 for enhanced photocatalytic conversion of CO2. Nanoscale, 2016, 8(19): 10043–10048

DOI

52
Xiong Z, Lei Z, Kuang C C, Chen X, Gong B, Zhao Y, Zhang J, Zheng C, Wu J C S. Selective photocatalytic reduction of CO2 into CH4 over Pt-Cu2O TiO2 nanocrystals: the interaction between Pt and Cu2O cocatalysts. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2017, 202: 695–703

DOI

53
Kang Q, Wang T, Li P, Liu L, Chang K, Li M, Ye J. Photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide by hydrous hydrazine over Au–Cu alloy nanoparticles supported on SrTiO3/TiO2 coaxial nanotube arrays. Angewandte Chemie, 2015, 127(3): 855–859

DOI

54
Farsinezhad S, Sharma H, Shankar K. Interfacial band alignment for photocatalytic charge separation in TiO2 nanotube arrays coated with CuPt nanoparticles. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2015, 17(44): 29723–29733

DOI

55
Kar P, Farsinezhad S, Mahdi N, Zhang Y, Obuekwe U, Sharma H, Shen J, Semagina N, Shankar K. Enhanced CH4 yield by photocatalytic CO2 reduction using TiO2 nanotube arrays grafted with Au, Ru, and ZnPd nanoparticles. Nano Research, 2016, 9(11): 3478–3493

DOI

56
Tan D, Zhang J, Shi J, Li S, Zhang B, Tan X, Zhang F, Liu L, Shao D, Han B. Photocatalytic CO2 transformation to CH4 by Ag/Pd bimetals supported on N-Doped TiO2 nanosheet. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2018, 10(29): 24516–24522

DOI

57
Tahir B, Tahir M, Amin N S. Gold–indium modified TiO2 nanocatalysts for photocatalytic CO2 reduction with H2 as reductant in a monolith photoreactor. Applied Surface Science, 2015, 338: 1–14

DOI

58
Tahir M, Amin N S. Photocatalytic CO2 reduction with H2 as reductant over copper and indium co-doped TiO2 nanocatalysts in a monolith photoreactor. Applied Catalysis A, General, 2015, 493: 90–102

DOI

59
Tahir M, Amin N S. Performance analysis of nanostructured NiO–In2O3/TiO2 catalyst for CO2 photoreduction with H2 in a monolith photoreactor. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 285: 635–649

DOI

60
Tahir M, Tahir B, Saidina Amin N A, Alias H. Selective photocatalytic reduction of CO2 by H2O/H2 to CH4 and CH3OH over Cu-promoted In2O3/TiO2 nanocatalyst. Applied Surface Science, 2016, 389: 46–55

DOI

61
Pham T D, Lee B K. Novel photocatalytic activity of Cu@V co-doped TiO2/PU for CO2 reduction with H2O vapor to produce solar fuels under visible light. Journal of Catalysis, 2017, 345: 87–95

DOI

62
Asahi R, Morikawa T, Irie H, Ohwaki T. Nitrogen-doped titanium dioxide as visible-light-sensitive photocatalyst: designs, developments, and prospects. Chemical Reviews, 2014, 114(19): 9824–9852

DOI

63
Akple M S, Low J, Qin Z, Wageh S, Al-Ghamdi A A, Yu J, Liu S. Nitrogen-doped TiO2 microsheets with enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity for CO2 reduction. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2015, 36(12): 2127–2134

DOI

64
Zhang Z, Huang Z, Cheng X, Wang Q, Chen Y, Dong P, Zhang X. Product selectivity of visible-light photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide using titanium dioxide doped by different nitrogen-sources. Applied Surface Science, 2015, 355: 45–51

DOI

65
Wang K, Yu J, Liu L, Hou L, Jin F. Hierarchical P-doped TiO2 nanotubes array@Ti plate: towards advanced CO2 photocatalytic reduction catalysts. Ceramics International, 2016, 42(14): 16405–16411

DOI

66
Olowoyo J O, Kumar M, Jain S L, Shen S, Zhou Z, Mao S S, Vorontsov A V, Kumar U. Reinforced photocatalytic reduction of CO2 to fuel by efficient S-TiO2: significance of sulfur doping. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(37): 17682–17695

DOI

67
He Z, Yu Y, Wang D, Tang J, Chen J, Song S. Photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide using iodine-doped titanium dioxide with high exposed {001} facets under visible light. RSC Advances, 2016, 6(28): 23134–23140

DOI

68
Tu W, Zhou Y, Liu Q, Yan S, Bao S, Wang X, Xiao M, Zou Z. An in situ simultaneous reduction-hydrolysis technique for fabrication of TiO2-graphene 2D sandwich-like hybrid nanosheets: graphene-promoted selectivity of photocatalytic-driven hydrogenation and coupling of CO2 into methane and ethane. Advanced Functional Materials, 2013, 23(14): 1743–1749

DOI

69
Wada K, Ranasinghe C S K, Kuriki R, Yamakata A, Ishitani O, Maeda K. Interfacialmanipulation by rutile TiO2 nanoparticles to boost CO2 reduction into CO on a metal-complex/semiconductor hybrid photocatalyst. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017, 9(28): 23869–23877

DOI

70
Jin B, Yao G, Jin F, Hu Y H. Photocatalytic conversion of CO2 over C3N4-based catalysts. Catalysis Today, 2018, 316: 149–154

DOI

71
Li H, Gao Y, Wu X, Lee P H, Shih K. Fabrication of heterostructured g-C3N4/Ag-TiO2 hybrid photocatalyst with enhanced performance in photocatalytic conversion of CO2 under simulated sunlight irradiation. Applied Surface Science, 2017, 402: 198–207

DOI

72
Dong C, Xing M, Zhang J. Double-cocatalysts promote charge separation efficiency in CO2 photoreduction: spatial location matters. Materials Horizons, 2016, 3(6): 608–612

DOI

73
Meng X, Wang T, Liu L, Ouyang S, Li P, Hu H, Kako T, Iwai H, Tanaka A, Ye J. Photothermal conversion of CO2 into CH4 with H2 over group VIII nanocatalysts: an alternative approach for solar fuel production. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2014, 53(43): 11478–11482

DOI

Outlines

/