Performance enhancement, economic analysis, and futuristic insight of single-well medium-deep and deep geothermal systems

Ang Li, R.S. Anand, Wenbo Huang, Juanwen Chen, Zhibin Li, Jian Guo, Qingshan Ma, Fangming Jiang

PDF(2315 KB)
PDF(2315 KB)
Front. Energy ›› DOI: 10.1007/s11708-024-0971-3
REVIEW ARTICLE

Performance enhancement, economic analysis, and futuristic insight of single-well medium-deep and deep geothermal systems

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Geothermal energy is clean and renewable, derived from the heat stored within accessible depths of the Earth’s crust. The adoption of a single-well system for medium-deep and deep geothermal energy extraction has attracted significant interest from the scientific and industrial communities because it effectively circumvents issues such as downhole inter-well connections and induced seismicity. However, the low heat transfer capacity in geothermal formations limits the heat extraction performance of single-well systems and hinders their commercial deployment. This review covers various enhancement concepts for optimizing the heat transfer within single-well systems, emphasizing critical parameters such as heat transfer area, heat transfer coefficient, and temperature difference. Additionally, it presents the thermo-economic evaluation of different configurations of single-well borehole heat exchangers and super-long gravity heat pipes (SLGHPs). The SLHGP, utilizing phase-change heat transfer, is recognized as a highly effective and continuously productive technology, capable of extracting over 1 MW of heat. Its pumpless operation and ease of installation in abandoned wells make it cost-effective, offering a promising economic advantage over traditional geothermal systems. It also highlights the challenges and potential research opportunities that can help identify gaps in research to enhance the performance of single-well geothermal systems.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

borehole heat exchanger / coaxial downhole heat exchangers / geothermal energy exploitation / single-well system / super-long gravity heat pipe

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ang Li, R.S. Anand, Wenbo Huang, Juanwen Chen, Zhibin Li, Jian Guo, Qingshan Ma, Fangming Jiang. Performance enhancement, economic analysis, and futuristic insight of single-well medium-deep and deep geothermal systems. Front. Energy, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-024-0971-3

References

[1]
Huang Y, Zhang Y, Hu Z. . Economic analysis of heating for an enhanced geothermal system based on a simplified model in Yitong Basin, China. Energy Science & Engineering, 2019, 7(6): 2658–2674
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Zhu J, Hu K, Lu X. . A review of geothermal energy resources, development, and applications in China: Current status and prospects. Energy, 2015, 93: 466–483
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Srimuang W, Amatachaya P. A review of the applications of heat pipe heat exchangers for heat recovery. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012, 16(6): 4303–4315
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Moya D, Aldás C, Kaparaju P. Geothermal energy: Power plant technology and direct heat applications. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 94: 889–901
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
BeerepootM. Technology roadmap—Geothermal heat and power. International Energy Agency 44 Report, 2011
[6]
Tester J W, Beckers K F, Hawkins A J. . The evolving role of geothermal energy for decarbonizing the United States. Energy & Environmental Science, 2021, 14(12): 6211–6241
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Huang Y, Zhang Y, Xie Y. . Long-term thermal performance analysis of deep coaxial borehole heat exchanger based on field test. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 278: 123396
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
International Renewable Energy Agency (IREA). Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2021. 2022
[9]
Giardini D. Geothermal quake risks must be faced. Nature, 2009, 462(7275): 848–849
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Olasolo P, Juárez M C, Morales M P. . Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS): A review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 56: 133–144
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Tester J W, Anderson B J, Batchelor A S. . Impact of enhanced geothermal systems on US energy supply in the twenty-first century. Philosophical Transactions—Royal Society. Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 2007, 365(1853): 1057–1094
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Liao Y, Sun X, Sun B. . Geothermal exploitation and electricity generation from multibranch U-shaped well-enhanced geothermal system. Renewable Energy, 2021, 163: 2178–2189
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Zhu N, Hu P, Xu L. . Recent research and applications of ground source heat pump integrated with thermal energy storage systems: A review. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2014, 71(1): 142–151
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Haraden J. The status of hot dry rock as an energy source. Energy, 1992, 17(8): 777–786
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Huang Y, Zhang Y, Yu Z. . Experimental investigation of seepage and heat transfer in rough fractures for enhanced geothermal systems. Renewable Energy, 2019, 135: 846–855
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Huang W, Cao W, Jiang F. Heat extraction performance of EGS with heterogeneous reservoir: A numerical evaluation. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2017, 108: 645–657
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Lu S M. A global review of enhanced geothermal system (EGS). Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 81: 2902–2921
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Cao W, Huang W, Jiang F. Numerical study on variable thermophysical properties of heat transfer fluid affecting EGS heat extraction. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2016, 92: 1205–1217
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Kim K, Ree J, Kim Y. . Assessing whether the 2017 MW 5.4 Pohang earthquake in South Korea was an induced event. Science, 1979, 2018(1009): 1007–1009
[20]
CollinsM A, Law R. The development and deployment of geothermal single well (DGSW) technology in the United Kingdom. European Geologist, 2017: 63–68
[21]
Wang Z, McClure M W, Horne R N. Modeling studies of single-well EGS configurations. Transactions—Geothermal Resources Council, 2009, 33: 243–247
[22]
Liang H, Guo X, Gao T. . Performance analysis of single-well enhanced geothermal system for building heating. The Scientific World Journal, 2020, 2020: 1–8
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Erol S, Harcouët-Menou V, Laenen B. . Efficiency of single-well geothermal systems with multi-lateral drills. Geothermics, 2021, 89: 101928
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Alimonti C, Soldo E, Bocchetti D. . The wellbore heat exchangers: A technical review. Renewable Energy, 2018, 123: 353–381
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
WangZ, Mcclure M W, HorneR N. A single-well EGS configuration using a thermosiphon. In: 34th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, 2009
[26]
Lyu Z, Song X, Li G. . Numerical analysis of characteristics of a single U-tube downhole heat exchanger in a geothermal well. Geothermics, 2018, 72: 15–23
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Lund J W. The use of downhole heat exchangers. Geothermics, 2003, 32(4-6): 535–543
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Nalla G, Shook G M, Mines G L. . Parametric sensitivity study of operating and design variables in wellbore heat exchangers. Geothermics, 2005, 34(3): 330–346
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Ozgener O, Hepbasli A. Performance analysis of a solar-assisted ground-source heat pump system for greenhouse heating: An experimental study. Building and Environment, 2005, 40(8): 1040–1050
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Wang G, Song X, Shi Y. . Comparison of production characteristics of various coaxial closed-loop geothermal systems. Energy Conversion and Management, 2020, 225: 113437
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Shi Y, Song X, Li G. . Numerical investigation on heat extraction performance of a downhole heat exchanger geothermal system. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2018, 134: 513–526
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
AcuñaJ. Improvements of U-pipe borehole heat exchangers. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2010
[33]
Yildirim N, Parmanto S, Akkurt G G. Thermodynamic assessment of downhole heat exchangers for geothermal power generation. Renewable Energy, 2019, 141: 1080–1091
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
AcuñaJ. Distributed thermal response tests new insights on U-pipe and coaxial heat exchangers in groundwater-filled boreholes. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2013
[35]
Wang J. Comparative heat transfer efficiency study of coaxial and U-loop boreholes. GSTF Journal of Engineering Technology, 2014, 2: 1–6
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Wang H J, Xu Y S, Sun Y K. . Heat extraction by deep coaxial borehole heat exchanger for clean space heating near Beijing, China: Field test, model comparison and operation pattern evaluation. Renewable Energy, 2022, 199: 803–815
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Dai J, Li J, Wang T. . Thermal performance analysis of coaxial borehole heat exchanger using liquid ammonia. Energy, 2023, 263: 125986
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Gascuel V, Raymond J, Rivard C. . Design and optimization of deep coaxial borehole heat exchangers for cold sedimentary basins. Geothermics, 2022, 105: 102504
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Gascuel V, Rivard C, Raymond J. Deep geothermal doublets versus deep borehole heat exchangers: A comparative study for cold sedimentary basins. Applied Energy, 2024, 361: 122826
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Jiang F, Huang W, Cao W. Mining hot dry rock geothermal energy by heat pipe: conceptual design and technical feasibility study. Advances in New and Renewable Energy, 2017, 5: 426–434
[41]
Huang W, Chen J, Cen J. . Heat extraction from hot dry rock by super-long gravity heat pipe: Effect of key parameters. Energy, 2022, 248: 123527
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Anand R S, Li A, Huang W. . Super-long gravity heat pipe for geothermal energy exploitation—A comprehensive review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2024, 193: 114286
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Li Z, Huang W, Chen J. . An enhanced super-long gravity heat pipe geothermal system: Conceptual design and numerical study. Energy, 2023, 267: 126524
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Huang Y, Zhang Y, Xie Y. . Field test and numerical investigation on deep coaxial borehole heat exchanger based on distributed optical fiber temperature sensor. Energy, 2020, 210: 118643
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Chen J, Li Z, Huang W. . Super-long gravity heat pipe geothermal space heating system: A practical case in Taiyuan, China. Energy, 2024, 299: 131521
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Chen J, Huang W, Cen J. . Heat extraction from hot dry rock by super-long gravity heat pipe: Selection of working fluid. Energy, 2022, 255: 124531
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Chen J, Cen J, Huang W. . Multiphase flow and heat transfer characteristics of an extra-long gravity-assisted heat pipe: An experimental study. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2021, 164: 120564
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Huang W, Chen J, Ma Q. . Developing kilometers-long gravity heat pipe for geothermal energy exploitation. Energy & Environmental Science, 2024, 17(13): 4508–4518
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Chen J, Huang W, Cen J. . Operational characteristics of the super-long gravity heat pipe for geothermal energy exploitation. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2024, 236: 121530
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Lei H, Liu X, Dai C. Experiment of heat transfer in downhole heat exchangers with a promoter pipe. Transactions—Geothermal Resources Council, 2012, 36(1): 255–258
[51]
AllisR G, James R. Natural-convection promoter for geothermal wells. In: Proceedings of Geothermal Resource Council annual meeting, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 1980
[52]
Carotenuto A, Casarosa C, Dell’isola M. . An aquifer-well thermal and fluid dynamic model for downhole heat exchangers with a natural convection promoter. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 1997, 40(18): 4461–4472
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
Carotenuto A, Casarosa C. A lumped parameter model of the operating limits of one-well geothermal plant with down hole heat exchangers. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2000, 43(16): 2931–2948
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Freeston D H, Pan H. The application and design of downhole heat exchanger. Geothermics, 1985, 14(2‒3): 343–351
CrossRef Google scholar
[55]
CulverJ W, Lund G. Downhole heat exchangers. Geo-Heat Center Quarterly Bulletin, 1999
[56]
BoydT T. Design of a convection cell for a downhole heat exchanger system in klamath falls, Oregon. In: Proceedings of 34th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering Stanford University, Stanford, USA, 2009
[57]
Yu C, Zhang Y, Tan Y. . Performance comprehensive evaluation of downhole heat exchanger geothermal systems with various configurations and working fluids. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2022, 213: 118745
CrossRef Google scholar
[58]
Feng Y, Tyagi M, White C D. A downhole heat exchanger for horizontal wells in low-enthalpy geopressured geothermal brine reservoirs. Geothermics, 2015, 53: 368–378
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Zhang Y, Yu C, Li G. . Performance analysis of a downhole coaxial heat exchanger geothermal system with various working fluids. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 163: 114317
CrossRef Google scholar
[60]
Cheng W L, Li T T, Le Nian Y. . Evaluation of working fluids for geothermal power generation from abandoned oil wells. Applied Energy, 2014, 118: 238–245
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
Hu Z, Xu T, Feng B. . Thermal and fluid processes in a closed-loop geothermal system using CO2 as a working fluid. Renewable Energy, 2020, 154: 351–367
CrossRef Google scholar
[62]
Chen J, Huang W, Cen J. . Heat extraction from hot dry rock by super-long gravity heat pipe: Selection of working fluid. Energy, 2022, 255: 124531
CrossRef Google scholar
[63]
Diglio G, Roselli C, Sasso M. . Borehole heat exchanger with nanofluids as heat carrier. Geothermics, 2018, 72: 112–123
CrossRef Google scholar
[64]
Daneshipour M, Rafee R. Nanofluids as the circuit fluids of the geothermal borehole heat exchangers. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2017, 81: 34–41
CrossRef Google scholar
[65]
PengY, Wang Y, DuR. The effect of nanofluid to vertical single U-tube ground heat exchanger. In: Proceedings of BSO 4th Building Simulation and Optimization Conference, Cambridge, UK, 2018
[66]
Sun X H, Yan H, Massoudi M. . Numerical simulation of nanofluid suspensions in a geothermal heat exchanger. Energies, 2018, 11(4): 1–18
CrossRef Google scholar
[67]
Javadi H, Urchueguia J F, Mousavi Ajarostaghi S S M. . Impact of employing hybrid nanofluids as heat carrier fluid on the thermal performance of a borehole heat exchanger. Energies, 2021, 14(10): 2892
CrossRef Google scholar
[68]
Jahanbin A, Semprini G, Pulvirenti B. Nanofluid suspensions as heat carrier fluids in single U-tube borehole heat exchangers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, 2116: 0–4
CrossRef Google scholar
[69]
Jahanbin A, Semprini G, Pulvirenti B. Performance evaluation of U-tube borehole heat exchangers employing nanofluids as the heat carrier fluid. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2022, 212: 118625
CrossRef Google scholar
[70]
Chappidi S, Kumar A, Singh J. Geothermal energy extraction from abandoned oil and gas wells using mono and hybrid nanofluids. Geothermics, 2023, 114: 102794
CrossRef Google scholar
[71]
Liu J, Wang F, Cai W. . Numerical study on the effects of design parameters on the heat transfer performance of coaxial deep borehole heat exchanger. International Journal of Energy Research, 2019, 43(12): 6337–6352
CrossRef Google scholar
[72]
Hu X, Banks J, Wu L. . Numerical modeling of a coaxial borehole heat exchanger to exploit geothermal energy from abandoned petroleum wells in Hinton, Alberta. Renewable Energy, 2020, 148: 1110–1123
CrossRef Google scholar
[73]
Śliwa T, Kruszewski M, Zare A. . Potential application of vacuum insulated tubing for deep borehole heat exchangers. Geothermics, 2018, 75: 58–67
CrossRef Google scholar
[74]
Kujawa T, Nowak W, Stachel A A. Utilization of existing deep geological wells for acquisitions of geothermal energy. Energy, 2006, 31(5): 650–664
CrossRef Google scholar
[75]
Li G, Yang J, Zhu X. . Numerical study on the heat transfer performance of coaxial shallow borehole heat exchanger. Energy and Built Environment, 2021, 2(4): 445–455
CrossRef Google scholar
[76]
Cheng W L, Liu J, Le Nian Y. . Enhancing geothermal power generation from abandoned oil wells with thermal reservoirs. Energy, 2016, 109: 537–545
CrossRef Google scholar
[77]
GedziusI, Teodoriu C. Innovative development concepts for hot-dry-rock project in the North German Basin. In: DGMK/ÖGEWSpring Conference, Department of Execution and Production, Kassel, Germany, 2011
[78]
Song X, Shi Y, Li G. . Numerical simulation of heat extraction performance in enhanced geothermal system with multilateral wells. Applied Energy, 2018, 218: 325–337
CrossRef Google scholar
[79]
TischnerT, Evers H, HauswirthH, et al. New concepts for extracting geothermal energy from one well: The gene sys-project. In: Proceedings of World Geothermal Congress, Bali, Indonesia, 2010
[80]
Jung R, Orzol J, Kehrer P, et al.Collaborative project: Genesys – Feasibility study—Testing the waterfrac technique and the single well two-layer process for direct heat use from low-permeability sedimentary rocks, Final Report, 2006
[81]
Breede K, Dzebisashvili K, Liu X. . A systematic review of enhanced (or engineered) geothermal systems: Past, present and future. Geothermal Energy, 2013, 1(1): 4
CrossRef Google scholar
[82]
Falcone G, Liu X, Okech R R. . Assessment of deep geothermal energy exploitation methods: The need for novel single-well solutions. Energy, 2018, 160: 54–63
CrossRef Google scholar
[83]
Cui G, Ren S, Zhang L. . Geothermal exploitation from hot dry rocks via recycling heat transmission fluid in a horizontal well. Energy, 2017, 128: 366–377
CrossRef Google scholar
[84]
Sun F, Yao Y, Li G. . Performance of geothermal energy extraction in a horizontal well by using CO2 as the working fluid. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 171: 1529–1539
CrossRef Google scholar
[85]
Hu X, Banks J, Guo Y. . Retrofitting abandoned petroleum wells as doublet deep borehole heat exchangers for geothermal energy production—A numerical investigation. Renewable Energy, 2021, 176: 115–134
CrossRef Google scholar
[86]
Jalaluddin A, Miyara K. . Experimental study of several types of ground heat exchanger using a steel pile foundation. Renewable Energy, 2011, 36(2): 764–771
CrossRef Google scholar
[87]
Xia C, Sun M, Zhang G. . Experimental study on geothermal heat exchangers buried in diaphragm walls. Energy and Building, 2012, 52: 50–55
CrossRef Google scholar
[88]
Park H, Lee S R, Yoon S. . Evaluation of thermal response and performance of PHC energy pile: Field experiments and numerical simulation. Applied Energy, 2013, 103: 12–24
CrossRef Google scholar
[89]
Song X, Shi Y, Li G. . Heat extraction performance simulation for various configurations of a downhole heat exchanger geothermal system. Energy, 2017, 141: 1489–1503
CrossRef Google scholar
[90]
Liu Y, Zhang Y, Gong S. . Analysis on the performance of ground heat exchangers in ground source heat pump systems based on heat transfer enhancements. Procedia Engineering, 2015, 121: 19–26
CrossRef Google scholar
[91]
Liu X, Xiao Y, Inthavong K. . Experimental and numerical investigation on a new type of heat exchanger in ground source heat pump system. Energy Efficiency, 2015, 8(5): 845–857
CrossRef Google scholar
[92]
Serageldin A A, Sakata Y, Katsura T. . Thermo-hydraulic performance of the U-tube borehole heat exchanger with a novel oval cross-section: Numerical approach. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 177: 406–415
CrossRef Google scholar
[93]
Choi H K, Yoo G J, Pak J H. . Numerical study on heat transfer characteristics in branch tube type ground heat exchanger. Renewable Energy, 2018, 115: 585–599
CrossRef Google scholar
[94]
Luo J, Zhao H, Gui S. . Thermo-economic analysis of four different types of ground heat exchangers in energy piles. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 108: 11–19
CrossRef Google scholar
[95]
Mehrizi A A, Porkhial S, Bezyan B. . Energy pile foundation simulation for different configurations of ground source heat exchanger. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2016, 70: 105–114
CrossRef Google scholar
[96]
Sáez Blázquez C, Farfán Martín A, Martín Nieto I. . Efficiency analysis of the main components of a vertical closed-loop system in a borehole heat exchanger. Energies, 2017, 10(2): 1–15
CrossRef Google scholar
[97]
Westphal D, Weijermars R. Economic appraisal and scoping of geothermal energy extraction projects using depleted hydrocarbon wells. Energy Strategy Reviews, 2018, 22: 348–364
CrossRef Google scholar
[98]
Dahi Taleghani A. An improved closed-loop heat extraction method from geothermal resources. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 2013, 135(4): 1–7
CrossRef Google scholar
[99]
Sharma P, Al Saedi A Q, Kabir C S. Geothermal energy extraction with wellbore heat exchanger: Analytical model and parameter evaluation to optimize heat recovery. Renewable Energy, 2020, 166: 1–8
CrossRef Google scholar
[100]
Gascuel V, Rivard C, Raymond J. Deep geothermal doublets versus deep borehole heat exchangers: A comparative study for cold sedimentary basins. Applied Energy, 2024, 361: 122826
CrossRef Google scholar
[101]
BüchiH F. Method and apparatus for extracting and utilizing geothermal energy. US Patent No. 4912941 A, 1990
[102]
HaraH. Geothermal well using graphite as solid conductor. US Patent No. 20110232858 A1, 2011
[103]
RenaudT, Verdin P, FalconeG, et al. Heat transfer modelling of an unconventional, closed-loop geothermal well. In: Proceedings of World Geothermal Congress 2020+1, Reykjavik, Iceland, 2021
[104]
Li Z, Huang W, Chen J. . An enhanced super-long gravity heat pipe geothermal system: Conceptual design and numerical study. Energy, 2023, 267: 126524
CrossRef Google scholar
[105]
Sliwa T, Rosen M A. Efficiency analysis of borehole heat exchangers as grout varies via thermal response test simulations. Geothermics, 2017, 69: 132–138
CrossRef Google scholar
[106]
Chen F, Mao J, Chen S. . Efficiency analysis of utilizing phase change materials as grout for a vertical U-tube heat exchanger coupled ground source heat pump system. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2018, 130: 698–709
CrossRef Google scholar
[107]
Oh K, Lee S, Park S. . Field experiment on heat exchange performance of various coaxial-type ground heat exchangers considering construction conditions. Renewable Energy, 2019, 144: 84–96
CrossRef Google scholar
[108]
EswiasiA. Novel pipe configuration for enhanced efficiency of vertical ground heat exchanger (VGHE). Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Victoria: University of Victoria, 2021
[109]
Song X, Zheng R, Li G. . Heat extraction performance of a downhole coaxial heat exchanger geothermal system by considering fluid flow in the reservoir. Geothermics, 2018, 76: 190–200
CrossRef Google scholar
[110]
HellerK, Teodoriu C, FalconeG. A new deep geothermal concept based on the geyser principle. In: Proceedings of 39th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering Stanford University, Stanford, USA, 2014
[111]
TeodoriuC, Falcone G, BarcelosJ. The artificial geyser concept—New insights. In: Proceedings of 14th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, USA, 2015
[112]
He Y L, Tao W Q. Convective heat transfer enhancement: Mechanisms, techniques, and performance evaluation. In: Advances in Heat Transfer, 2014, 46: 87–186
CrossRef Google scholar
[113]
Li Z, Guo J, Huang W. . Heat extraction performance of the super-long gravity heat pipe applied to geothermal reservoirs of multi-aquifers. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2024, 225: 125440
CrossRef Google scholar
[114]
Huang W, Cao W, Jiang F. A novel single-well geothermal system for hot dry rock geothermal energy exploitation. Energy, 2018, 162: 630–644
CrossRef Google scholar
[115]
Yildirim N, Parmanto S, Akkurt G G. Thermodynamic assessment of downhole heat exchangers for geothermal power generation. Renewable Energy, 2019, 141: 1080–1091
CrossRef Google scholar
[116]
EPRI. Single-well enhanced geothermal system front-end engineering and design, optimization of a renewable geothermal system for harvesting heat from hot, dry rock. 2011 Technical Report-Electric Power Research Institute, 2011
[117]
ParrellaM J. Heat pipes for a single well engineered geothermal system. US Patent No.0248345,2017
[118]
MontalvoF E. Current status of geothermal resources development in central America. In: Short Course on Geothermal Development and Geothermal Wells, Santa Tecla, El Salvador, 2012
[119]
Zhu Y, Li K, Liu C. . Geothermal power production from abandoned oil reservoirs using in situ combustion technology. Energies, 2019, 12(23): 4476
CrossRef Google scholar
[120]
Tozlu A, Gençaslan B, Özcan H. Thermoeconomic analysis of a hybrid cogeneration plant with use of near-surface geothermal sources in Turkey. Renewable Energy, 2021, 176: 237–250
CrossRef Google scholar
[121]
Cao Y, Dhahad H A, Togun H. . Exergetic and financial parametric analyses and multi-objective optimization of a novel geothermal-driven cogeneration plant; adopting a modified dual binary technique. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2021, 48: 101442
CrossRef Google scholar
[122]
Chen H, Wang Y, Li J. . Thermodynamic analysis and economic assessment of an improved geothermal power system integrated with a biomass-fired cogeneration plant. Energy, 2022, 240: 122477
CrossRef Google scholar
[123]
Wang L, Huang X, Babaei M. . Full-scale utilization of geothermal energy: A high-efficiency CO2 hybrid cogeneration system with low-temperature waste heat. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 403: 136866
CrossRef Google scholar
[124]
Wang D, Ali M A, Alizadeh A. . Thermoeconomic appraisal of a novel power and hydrogen cogeneration plant with integration of biomass and geothermal energies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 52: 385–400
CrossRef Google scholar
[125]
Xiao F, Zhao Z, Yang L. Innovative measures for thermal performance enhancement of single well-based deep geothermal systems: Existing solutions and some viable options. Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-energy and Geo-resources, 2022, 8(5): 1–19
CrossRef Google scholar
[126]
126. An enhanced geothermal system combining gravity heat pipes for integrated geothermal development and utilization. China Patent No. CN202111114527.3, 2021 (in Chinese)
[127]
Bu X, Jiang K, Guo Z. Storing high temperature solar thermal energy in shallow depth artificial reservoir for space heating. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12(1): 1–13
CrossRef Google scholar
[128]
JiangF, Ma Q, Huang W, et al. A solar-thermal integrated super-long gravity heat pipe geothermal power generation system. China Patent No. CN 219638904U, 2023 (in Chinese)
[129]
GoldsteinB, Hiriart G, BertaniR, et al. Chapter 4—Geothermal energy: Geothermal energy in IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation. 2011
[130]
Jiang F, Chen J, Huang W, et al. An integrated geothermal system with heat pipe heat extraction for simultaneous cooling, power generation and heating applications. China Patent No. CN113847745A, 2020 (in Chinese)
[131]
Kohl T, Brenni R, Eugster W. System performance of a deep borehole heat exchanger. Geothermics, 2002, 31(6): 687–708
CrossRef Google scholar
[132]
Berger E, Grünenfelder T, Keller B. . Geothermal drilling in Lucerne. Bulletin of the Swiss Association of Petroleum Geologists and Engineers, 1994, 61: 17–43
[133]
KohlT, Salton M, RybachL. Data analysis of the deep borehole heat exchanger plant Weissbad (Switzerland). In: Proceedings of World Geothermal Congress 2000, Kyushu, Japan, 2000
[134]
Gaschnitz R, Preuße A. Deep geothermal heat exchangers—Technical and commercial aspects. Technical Report, RWTH Aachen University, 2001,
[135]
Dijkshoorn L, Speer S, Pechnig R. Measurements and design calculations for a deep coaxial borehole heat exchanger in Aachen, Germany. International Journal of Geophysics, 2013, 2013: 1–14
CrossRef Google scholar
[136]
CollinsM A, Law R. The development and deployment of deep geothermal single well (DGSW) technology in the United Kingdom. European Geologist Journal—Geothermal–The Energy of the Future, 2017
[137]
ZhangL, Wu Z, DengB. Experimental analysis and modification of an super-long gravity heat pipe. Energy Conservation, 2015, 397: 77–80 (in Chinese)
[138]
Huang W, Cen J, Chen J. . Heat extraction from hot dry rock by super-long gravity heat pipe: A field test. Energy, 2022, 247: 123492
CrossRef Google scholar
[139]
MaQ, ChenJ, HuangW, et al. Effect of working fluid on super-long gravity heat pipe geothermal power generation system. In: Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Smart Grid and Smart Cities, Lanzhou, China, 2023
[140]
Geothermal Engineering Ltd, Arup, and St Andrews University. Feasibility Report for the Deep Geothermal Single Well (DGSW) at Aberdeen Exhibition and Conference Centre. 2016
[141]
Bu X, Ran Y, Zhang D. Experimental and simulation studies of geothermal single well for building heating. Renewable Energy, 2019, 143: 1902–1909
CrossRef Google scholar
[142]
Jia G S, Ma Z D, Xia Z H. . A finite-volume method for full-scale simulations of coaxial borehole heat exchangers with different structural parameters, geological and operating conditions. Renewable Energy, 2022, 182: 296–313
CrossRef Google scholar
[143]
Ma Q, Chen J, Huang W. . Power generation analysis of super-long gravity heat pipe geothermal systems. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2024, 242: 122533
CrossRef Google scholar
[144]
Xiao D, Liu M, Li L. . Model for economic evaluation of closed-loop geothermal systems based on net present value. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2023, 231: 121008
CrossRef Google scholar
[145]
Huang W, Cao W, Li T, Jiang F. Numerical study and economic analysis of gravity heat pipe hot dry rock geothermal system. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72: 1302–1313
CrossRef Google scholar
[146]
Ma Q, Huang W, Chen J. . Thermodynamic and economic performance of super-long gravity heat pipe geothermal power plant. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2024, 248: 123115
CrossRef Google scholar
[147]
Akbarzadeh A, Johnson P, Nguyen T. . Formulation and analysis of the heat pipe turbine for production of power from renewable sources. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2001, 21(15): 1551–1563
CrossRef Google scholar
[148]
Franco A, Vaccaro M. On the use of heat pipe principle for the exploitation of medium-low temperature geothermal resources. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2013, 59(1-2): 189–199
CrossRef Google scholar
[149]
LakicN. Self-contained in-ground geothermal genera tor and heat exchanger with in-line pump. US Patent No. 20130055714 A1, 2018
[150]
HuisenV. Geothermal exchange system. US Patent No. 3470943 A, 1969
[151]
KayaT, Hoshan P. Corrosion and materials selection for geothermal systems. In: Proceedings of World Geothermal Congress 2005, Antalya, Turkey, 2005
[152]
Selamat S, Miyara A, Kariya K. Numerical study of horizontal ground heat exchangers for design optimization. Renewable Energy, 2016, 95: 561–573
CrossRef Google scholar
[153]
Cao S J, Kong X R, Deng Y. . Investigation on thermal performance of steel heat exchanger for ground source heat pump systems using full-scale experiments and numerical simulations. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 115: 91–98
CrossRef Google scholar
[154]
Kim W J, Yoon S, Kim M J. . Thermal performance evaluation of stainless steel pipe as a ground heat exchanger. In: Proceedings of 15th Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Fukuoka, Japan, 2015,
CrossRef Google scholar
[155]
Hantsch A, Gross U. Numerical investigation of partially-wetted geothermal heat pipe performance. Geothermics, 2013, 47: 97–103
CrossRef Google scholar
[156]
Demir H, Koyun A, Atayilmaz Ş Ö. . Investigation of the effects of geometrical parameters on heat transfer from buried finned pipes. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2013, 27(8): 2497–2506
CrossRef Google scholar
[157]
Bouhacina B, Saim R, Oztop H F. Numerical investigation of a novel tube design for the geothermal borehole heat exchanger. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2015, 79: 153–162
CrossRef Google scholar
[158]
Saeidi R, Noorollahi Y, Esfahanian V. Numerical simulation of a novel spiral type ground heat exchanger for enhancing heat transfer performance of geothermal heat pump. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 168: 296–307
CrossRef Google scholar
[159]
Jamshidi N, Mosaffa A. Investigating the effects of geometric parameters on finned conical helical geothermal heat exchanger and its energy extraction capability. Geothermics, 2018, 76: 177–189
CrossRef Google scholar
[160]
Huang Y, Li W, Xu D. . Spatiotemporal rule of heat transfer on a soil/finned tube interface. Sensors, 2019, 19(5): 1159
CrossRef Google scholar
[161]
Saeidi R, Noorollahi Y, Chang S, Yousefi H. A comprehensive study of Fin-assisted horizontal ground heat exchanger for enhancing the heat transfer performance. Energy Conversion and Management: X, 2023, 18: 100359
CrossRef Google scholar
[162]
Ma P, Mo L, Zhang J. . Enhanced heat transfer performance of a new horizontal buried tube heat exchanger. Thermal Science, 2023, 27(2 Part B): 1507–1516
CrossRef Google scholar
[163]
Alizadeh M, Ganji D D. Heat transfer characteristics and optimization of the efficiency and thermal resistance of a finned thermosyphon. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2021, 183: 116136
CrossRef Google scholar
[164]
Maleki Zanjani A, Gharali K, Al-Haq A. . Dynamic and static investigation of ground heat exchangers equipped with internal and external fins. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(23): 1–19
CrossRef Google scholar
[165]
Naresh Y, Balaji C. Experimental investigations of heat transfer from an internally finned two phase closed thermosyphon. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 112: 1658–1666
CrossRef Google scholar
[166]
Hakim I I, Putra N, Gunawan Y. Experimental study for heat pipe applications on low enthalpy geothermal energy utilization for agricultural products dryers. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, 2019, 56: 68–77
[167]
Kim Y, Kim J S, Shin D H. . Enhanced thermal performance of a thermosyphon for waste heat recovery: Microporous coating at evaporator and hydrophobic coating at condenser. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2020, 175: 115332
CrossRef Google scholar
[168]
Ng V O, Yu H, Wu H A. . Thermal performance enhancement and optimization of two-phase closed thermosyphon with graphene-nanoplatelets coatings. Energy Conversion and Management, 2021, 236: 114039
CrossRef Google scholar
[169]
Hosseinzadeh K, Ganji D D, Ommi F. Effect of SiO2 super-hydrophobic coating and self-rewetting fluid on two phase closed thermosyphon heat transfer characteristics: An experimental and numerical study. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2020, 315: 113748
CrossRef Google scholar
[170]
Liu H, Gan W, Yao H. . Visualization and heat transfer comparative analysis of two phase closed thermosyphon. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2022, 217: 119172
CrossRef Google scholar
[171]
Liu H, Wang X, Zheng L. . Temperature response and thermal performance analysis of a super-long flexible thermosyphon for shallow geothermal utilization: Field test and numerical simulation. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2022, 192: 122915
CrossRef Google scholar
[172]
Javed S, Spitler J. Accuracy of borehole thermal resistance calculation methods for grouted single U-tube ground heat exchangers. Applied Energy, 2017, 187: 790–806
CrossRef Google scholar
[173]
ASHRAE. Geothermal Energy. In: ASHRAE Handbook—HVAC Applications (SI). 2015
[174]
Mahmoud M, Ramadan M, Pullen K. . A review of grout materials in geothermal energy applications. International Journal of Thermofluids, 2021, 10: 100070
CrossRef Google scholar
[175]
Lyne Y, Paksoy H, Farid M. Laboratory investigation on the use of thermally enhanced phase change material to improve the performance of borehole heat exchangers for ground source heat pumps. International Journal of Energy Research, 2019, 43(9): 4148–4156
CrossRef Google scholar
[176]
Maheshwary P B, Handa C C, Nemade K R. Effect of shape on thermophysical and heat transfer properties of ZnO/R-134a nanorefrigerant. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2018, 5(1): 1635–1639
CrossRef Google scholar
[177]
Kasaeian A, Hosseini S M, Sheikhpour M. . Applications of eco-friendly refrigerants and nanorefrigerants: A review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 96: 91–99
CrossRef Google scholar
[178]
Jiang F, Zhu J, Xin G. Experimental investigation on Al2O3–R123 nanorefrigerant heat transfer performances in evaporator based on organic Rankine cycle. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2018, 127: 145–153
CrossRef Google scholar
[179]
Sharif M Z, Azmi W H, Mamat R. . Mechanism for improvement in refrigeration system performance by using nanorefrigerants and nanolubricants—A review. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2018, 92: 56–63
CrossRef Google scholar
[180]
Celen A, Çebi A, Aktas M. . A review of nanorefrigerants: Flow characteristics and applications. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2014, 44: 125–140
CrossRef Google scholar
[181]
Abas N, Kalair A R, Khan N. . Natural and synthetic refrigerants, global warming: A review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 90: 557–569
CrossRef Google scholar
[182]
Alimoradi H, Shams M, Ashgriz N. Enhancement in the pool boiling heat transfer of copper surface by applying electrophoretic deposited graphene oxide coatings. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2023, 159: 104350
CrossRef Google scholar
[183]
Ahmadi V E, Khaksaran M H, Apak A M. . Graphene-coated sintered porous copper surfaces for boiling heat transfer enhancement. Carbon Trends, 2022, 8: 100171
CrossRef Google scholar
[184]
Wu C H, Lee Y A, Lai Y J. . Heat transfer enhancement of a multilayer graphene coating surface. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2020, 118: 110175
CrossRef Google scholar
[185]
Pecherkin N, Pavlenko A, Volodin O. . Experimental study of heat transfer enhancement in a falling film of R21 on an array of horizontal tubes with MAO coating. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2021, 129: 105743
CrossRef Google scholar
[186]
Surtaev A, Kuznetsov D, Serdyukov V. . Structured capillary-porous coatings for enhancement of heat transfer at pool boiling. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2018, 133: 532–542
CrossRef Google scholar
[187]
Joseph A, Mohan S, Sujith Kumar C S. . An experimental investigation on pool boiling heat transfer enhancement using sol-gel derived nano-CuO porous coating. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2019, 103: 37–50
CrossRef Google scholar
[188]
Xu P, Li Q, Xuan Y. Enhanced boiling heat transfer on composite porous surface. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2015, 80: 107–114
CrossRef Google scholar
[189]
Lee S, Seo G H, Lee S. . Layer-by-layer carbon nanotube coatings for enhanced pool boiling heat transfer on metal surfaces. Carbon, 2016, 107: 607–618
CrossRef Google scholar
[190]
Lee J, Kim J, Seo B. . Layer-by-layer solution-processed two-dimensional graphene oxide–polyethylenimine thin-film coatings for enhanced pool boiling heat transfer. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2023, 209: 124067
CrossRef Google scholar
[191]
Brusly Solomon A, Mathew A, Ramachandran K. . Thermal performance of anodized two phase closed thermosyphon (TPCT). Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2013, 48: 49–57
CrossRef Google scholar
[192]
Hong S J, Zheng X, Park C W. Enhanced flow boiling heat transfer characteristics of R134a on graphene-Cu nanocomposite coating on copper substrate. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2019, 108: 104343
CrossRef Google scholar
[193]
Senthilkumar C, Krishnan A S, Solomon A B. Effect of thin porous copper coating on the performance of wickless heat pipe with R134a as working fluid. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2020, 139(2): 963–973
CrossRef Google scholar
[194]
Sarangi S, Weibel J A, Garimella S V. Effect of particle size on surface-coating enhancement of pool boiling heat transfer. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2015, 81: 103–113
CrossRef Google scholar
[195]
Li C, Zou Y, Shen Z. . Effect of graphene oxide coating on bubble dynamics and nucleate pool boiling heat transfer. Advanced Powder Technology, 2023, 34:
CrossRef Google scholar
[196]
Raymond J, Mercier S, Nguyen L. Designing coaxial ground heat exchangers with a thermally enhanced outer pipe. Geothermal Energy, 2015, 3(1): 7
CrossRef Google scholar
[197]
Gupta S K, Misra R D. An experimental investigation on flow boiling heat transfer enhancement using Cu-TiO2 nanocomposite coating on copper substrate. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2018, 98: 406–419
CrossRef Google scholar
[198]
Choi G, Yun M, Hsu W T. . Enhanced boiling heat transfer by nucleation patterning with self-assembly of reduced graphene oxide coating. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2022, 197: 123329
CrossRef Google scholar
[199]
Behera A, Mallick P, Mohapatra S S. Nanocoatings for anticorrosion: An introduction. In: Corrosion Protection at the Nanoscale, 2020, 227–243
CrossRef Google scholar
[200]
Nhiem L T, Oanh D T Y, Hieu N H. Nanocoating toward anti-corrosion: A review. Vietnam Journal of Chemistry, 2023, 61(3): 284–293
CrossRef Google scholar
[201]
Yu W, France D M, Routbort J L. . Review and comparison of nanofluid thermal conductivity and heat transfer enhancements. Heat Transfer Engineering, 2008, 29(5): 432–460
CrossRef Google scholar
[202]
Quintino L. Overview of coating technologies. Surface Modification by Solid State Processing, 2014, 1–24
CrossRef Google scholar
[203]
Wang X Q, Mujumdar A S. Heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids: A review. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2007, 46(1): 1–19
CrossRef Google scholar
[204]
Panda A, Pati A R, Kumar A. . Dropwise evaporation of hydrophilic coolant droplets: A methodology for the development of hydrophilic coating and attainment of enhanced heat transfer. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2019, 105: 19–27
CrossRef Google scholar
[205]
Li C, Zou Y, Shen Z. . Effect of graphene oxide coating on bubble dynamics and nucleate pool boiling heat transfer. Advanced Powder Technology, 2023, 34(8): 104080
CrossRef Google scholar
[206]
Chen Y, Fu R, Yan Y. Enhanced pool boiling heat transfer on grooved surfaces by wettability modification with nanoparticle coatings. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2022, 137: 106298
CrossRef Google scholar
[207]
Gupta M, Singh V, Kumar S. . Experimental analysis of heat transfer behavior of silver, MWCNT and hybrid (silver + MWCNT) nanofluids in a laminar tubular flow. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2020, 142(4): 1545–1559
CrossRef Google scholar
[208]
Ahammed N, Asirvatham L G, Wongwises S. Entropy generation analysis of graphene–alumina hybrid nanofluid in multiport minichannel heat exchanger coupled with thermoelectric cooler. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2016, 103: 1084–1097
CrossRef Google scholar
[209]
Sundar L S, Singh M K, Sousa A C M. Turbulent heat transfer and friction factor of nanodiamond-nickel hybrid nanofluids flow in a tube: An experimental study. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2018, 117: 223–234
CrossRef Google scholar
[210]
Askari S, Koolivand H, Pourkhalil M. . Investigation of Fe3O4/graphene nanohybrid heat transfer properties: Experimental approach. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2017, 87: 30–39
CrossRef Google scholar
[211]
Hashemzadeh S, Hormozi F. An experimental study on hydraulic and thermal performances of hybrid nanofluids in mini-channel: A new correlation for viscosity of hybrid nanofluids. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2020, 140(3): 891–903
CrossRef Google scholar
[212]
Ataei M, Sadegh Moghanlou F, Noorzadeh S. . Heat transfer and flow characteristics of hybrid Al2O3/TiO2–water nanofluid in a minichannel heat sink. Heat and Mass Transfer, 2020, 56: 2757–2567
CrossRef Google scholar
[213]
Megatif L, Ghozatloo A, Arimi A. . Investigation of laminar convective heat transfer of a novel TiO2-carbon nanotube hybrid water-based nanofluid. Experimental Heat Transfer, 2016, 29(1): 124–138
CrossRef Google scholar
[214]
Bhattad A, Sarkar J, Ghosh P. Experimentation on effect of particle ratio on hydrothermal performance of plate heat exchanger using hybrid nanofluid. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 162: 114309
CrossRef Google scholar
[215]
Allahyar H R, Hormozi F, ZareNezhad B. Experimental investigation on the thermal performance of a coiled heat exchanger using a new hybrid nanofluid. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2016, 76: 324–329
CrossRef Google scholar
[216]
Bhattad A, Sarkar J, Ghosh P. Heat transfer characteristics of plate heat exchanger using hybrid nanofluids: Effect of nanoparticle mixture ratio. Heat and Mass Transfer, 2020, 56: 2457–2472
CrossRef Google scholar
[217]
Fotowat S, Askar S, Ismail M. . A study on corrosion effects of a water based nanofluid for enhanced thermal energy applications. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2017, 24: 39–44
CrossRef Google scholar
[218]
HuntR D. Method of enhanced heat extraction from a geothermal heat source for the production of electricity thermoelectrically and mechanically via the high-pressure injection of a cryogen into a U-tube or open tube heat exchanger within a geothermal heat source, US Patent: US20010906951, 2001-7-16
[219]
BrysonM. Conversion of low grade heat into electricity using the thermosyphon rankine engine and trilateral flash cycle. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Melbourne: RMIT University, 2007
[220]
Nguyen T, Johnson P, Akbarzadeh A. . Design, manufacture and testing of a closed cycle thermosyphon rankine engine. Heat Recovery Systems and CHP, 1995, 15(4): 333–346
CrossRef Google scholar
[221]
NguyenT, Mochizuki M, MashikoM, et al. Heat pipe turbine for production of electrical power from renewable sources. In: Proceedings of 5th ASME/JSME Thermal Engineering Joint Conference, San Diego, USA, 1999
[222]
Xie H, Wang J, Liao J. . A novel in-situ power generator system for geothermal resources without fluid extraction. In: Proceedings of 55th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Virtual, 2021,
[223]
Anand R S, Jawahar C P, Brusly Solomon A. . Experimental investigations on modified thermosyphons using R134a/Al2O3 and comparative machine learning analysis. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2022, 212: 118554
CrossRef Google scholar
[224]
Kyuil H, Cho D H. A comparison of the heat transfer performance of thermosyphon using a straight groove and helical groove. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2005, 19(12): 2296–2302
CrossRef Google scholar
[225]
Han K I, Yee S S, Park S H. . A study on the improvement of heat transfer performance in low temperature closed thermosyphon. KSME International Journal, 2002, 16(9): 1102–1111
CrossRef Google scholar
[226]
Alammar A A, Al-Mousawi F N, Al-Dadah R K. . Enhancing thermal performance of a two-phase closed thermosyphon with an internal surface roughness. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 185: 128–136
CrossRef Google scholar
[227]
Joudi K A, Witwit A M. Improvements of gravity assisted wickless heat pipes. Energy Conversion and Management, 2000, 41(18): 2041–2061
CrossRef Google scholar
[228]
Lin L, Groll M, Rösler S. One-dimensional analysis of maximum performance in a closed two-phase thermosyphon with a crossover flow separator. Heat Transfer Engineering, 1996, 17(3): 19–28
CrossRef Google scholar
[229]
Weinand J M, Vandenberg G, Risch S. . Low-carbon lithium extraction makes deep geothermal plants cost-competitive in future energy systems. Advances in Applied Energy, 2023, 11: 100148
CrossRef Google scholar
[230]
Morita K, Bollmeier WS, Mizogami H. An experiment to prove the concept of the downhole coaxial heat exchanger (DCHE) in Hawaii. Transactions—Geothermal Resources Council, 1992, 16: 9–16
[231]
Faghri A. Heat pipe science and technology. Fuel and Energy Abstracts, 1995, 36(4): 285
[232]
DunnP D, Reay D A. Heat pipes. 4th ed. Oxford: Pergamon, 1994

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant Nos. 2021YFB1507300 and 2021YFB1507302), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52206126 and 52206287), the Jiangyin Science and Technology Innovation Special Fund, China (Grant No. JY0604A021015210001PB), and the Jiangsu Provincial Carbon Peak Carbon Neutralization Technology Innovation Special Fund, China (Grant No. BE2022012).

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Notations

CDHE Coaxial downhole heat exchanger
DHE Downhole heat exchangers
EGS Enhanced geothermal system
HDR Hot dry rock
NPV Net present value
SLGHP Super-long gravity heat pipe
CCAP Capital investment/$
Ccost(t) Costs in the t-th years/(million $)
Cex Costs of exploration for geothermal resources/(million $)
Cwell Cost of well drilling and completion in the vertical segment/($·m–1)
Cfuel(t) Fuel cost in the t-th years/(million $)
Cplant Installation cost of the plant per kilowatt/($·kW–1)
CM Maintenance cost/$
Cma Material costs/(million $)
CO Operating cost/$
c Specific heat/(J·(kg·K)–1)
Csc Surface construction costs/(million $)
E Electricity generated/kW
Fw Drilling and completion costs/yuan
Fm Maintenance cost/yuan
Fo Operation cost/yuan
Fp Plant construction cost/yuan
Fe Total revenue/yuan
H Vertical length of the horizontal well/m
Iincome Incomes in the t-th years/(million $)
k Cost per unit power, million/($· kW–1)
L Horizontal length of the horizontal well/m
Lh Horizontal length of geothermal well/m
Lcoe Levelized cost of energy
Lv Vertical length of geothermal well/m
M Initial total cost/$
Mwell Initial cost of a horizontal well including drilling and completion/$
Mm Maintenance cost/$
Mplant Power generation equipment purchase and installation cost/$
N Pump power consumption/W
Welec Power generation rate/kW
Me Total heat output/J
n Time duration of the geothermal exploitation/years
Pprice−e Price of the electricity/($·kWh–1)
Q Heat transfer rate/(W·(m2·K)–1)
Qpump Total power consumed in water injection and circulation/kWh
Qpow Total electric power generation/kWh
r Discount rate/%
Sp Electric power cost of pump operation/(yuan·kWh–1)
Se2 Price of geothermal secondary utilization/(yuan·kWh–1)
Se1 Price of geothermal power/(yuan·kWh–1)
t Annual operation time/year
t0 Annual production time/s
T Temperature/K
Tres Temperature in the reservoir/K
Tt Temperature in the tube/K
Wp Pump load/W
Zoverall Overall thermal resistance/(K·W–1)
ρ Density/(kg·m–3)
ηp Pump efficiency/%
λ Thermal conductivity/(W·(m·K )–1)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 Higher Education Press 2024
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(2315 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/