Impact of Ni particle size on CO2 activation and CO formation during reforming process: A density functional theory study
Juntian NIU, Shengzhuo CHEN, Xianrong ZHENG, Haiyu LIU, Yan JIN, Jingyu RAN
Impact of Ni particle size on CO2 activation and CO formation during reforming process: A density functional theory study
In recent years, the dry reforming of methane (DRM) reaction has gained widespread attention due to its effective utilization of two major greenhouse gases. Supported Ni-based catalysts for DRM exhibit a strong dependence on particle size, however, the reaction mechanisms involved remain unclear. In this work, the effect of metal particle size on CO2 activation and CO formation was explored in the DRM reaction using the density functional theory. Nix/MgO (x = 13, 25, 37) was constructed to investigate the CO2 activation and the formation of CO during the DRM reaction. It is found that CO2 is more inclined to undergo chemisorption on Nix/MgO before activation. With the variation in particle size, the main activation pathway of CO2 on the catalyst changes. On the smallest Ni13/MgO, CO2 tends to directly dissociate, while on the larger Ni25/MgO and Ni37/MgO, the hydrogenation dissociation of CO2 is more kinetically favorable. Compared to Ni13/MgO and Ni37/MgO, the oxidation of surface C atoms and the oxidation of CH occur more readily on Ni25/MgO. This indicates that C atoms are less likely to form on Ni25 particle and are more easily to be oxidized. To some extent, the results suggest that Ni25/MgO exhibits superior resistance to carbon formation.
particle size / Ni/MgO catalyst / CO2 activation / CO formation
[1] |
Soeder D J. Greenhouse gas sources and mitigation strategies from a geosciences perspective. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2021, 5(3): 274–285
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Keohane R O, Victor D G. Cooperation and discord in global climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 2016, 6(6): 570–575
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Barrett S. Coordination vs voluntarism and enforcement in sustaining international environmental cooperation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016, 113(51): 14515–14522
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Liu Z, Deng Z, He G.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Zhang C, Li Y, Chu Z.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Niu J, Zhang C, Liu H.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Lin B, Li Z. Towards world’s low carbon development: The role of clean energy. Applied Energy, 2022, 307: 118160
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Wang X, Pan C, Romero C E.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Alioui O, Badawi M, Erto A.
|
[10] |
Bradford M C J, Vannice M A. CO2 reforming of CH4. Catalysis Reviews. Science and Engineering, 1999, 41(1): 1–42
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Fan M S, Abdullah A Z, Bhatia S. Catalytic technology for carbon dioxide reforming of methane to synthesis gas. ChemCatChem, 2009, 1(2): 192–208
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Qian L, Cai W, Zhang L.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Wang L, Ao X, Wang S. Catalysts for carbon dioxide catalytic reforming of methane to synthesis gas. Progress in Chemistry, 2012, 2012(9): 1696–1706
|
[14] |
Gaur S, Pakhare D, Wu H.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Ghelamallah M, Granger P. Impact of barium and lanthanum incorporation to supported Pt and Rh on α-Al2O3 in the dry reforming of methane. Fuel, 2012, 97: 269–276
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Silva F A, Hori C E, da Silva A M.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Stolze B, Titus J, Schunk S A.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Noronha F B, Fendley E C, Soares R R.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Aghamohammadi S, Haghighi M, Maleki M.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Ibrahim A A, Al-Fatesh A S, Kumar N S.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Qin Z, Zhou Y, Jiang Y.
|
[22] |
Li Y, Wei Z, Wang Y. Ni/MgO catalyst prepared via dielectric-barrier discharge plasma with improved catalytic performance for carbon dioxide reforming of methane. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2014, 8(2): 133–140
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Niu J, Liu H, Jin Y.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Niu J, Zhang C, Li K.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Niu J, Li K, Zhang C.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Ochoa A, Bilbao J, Gayubo A G.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Argyle M D, Bartholomew C H. Heterogeneous catalyst deactivation and regeneration: A review. Catalysts, 2015, 5(1): 145–269
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Chen D, Christensen K O, Ochoa-Fernández E.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[29] |
Kim J H, Suh D J, Park T J.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[30] |
Lercher J A, Bitter J H, Hally W.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[31] |
Zhang J, Wang H, Dalai A K. Effects of metal content on activity and stability of Ni–Co bimetallic catalysts for CO2 reforming of CH4. Applied Catalysis A, General, 2008, 339(2): 121–129
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[32] |
Kim J H, Suh D J, Park T J.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[33] |
Guo Y, Feng J, Li W. Effect of the Ni size on CH4/CO2 reforming over Ni/MgO catalyst: A DFT study. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2017, 25(10): 1442–1448
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[34] |
Chen S, Niu J, Zheng X.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[35] |
Delley B. From molecules to solids with the DMol3 approach. Journal of Chemical Physics, 2000, 113(18): 7756–7764
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[36] |
Delley B. Fast calculation of electrostatics in crystals and large molecules. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1996, 100(15): 6107–6110
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[37] |
White J A, Bird D M. Implementation of gradient-corrected exchange-correlation potentials in Car-Parrinello total-energy calculations. Physical Review B: Condensed Matter, 1994, 50(7): 4954–4957
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[38] |
Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Physical Review Letters, 1996, 77(18): 3865–3868
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[39] |
Bai M, Song Z, Yang Z.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[40] |
Sao-Joao S, Giorgio S, Mottet C.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[41] |
Speziale S, Zha C S, Duffy T S.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[42] |
Guo J, Lou H, Mo L.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[43] |
Srivastava A K. CO2-activation and enhanced capture by C6Li6: A density functional approach. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, 2019, 119(20): e25904
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[44] |
Bradford M C J, Vannice M A. Catalytic reforming of methane with carbon dioxide over nickel catalysts II. Reaction kinetics. Applied Catalysis A, General, 1996, 142(1): 97–122
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[45] |
Luo J Z, Yu Z L, Ng C F.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[46] |
Wei J, Iglesia E. Isotopic and kinetic assessment of the mechanism of reactions of CH4 with CO2 or H2O to form synthesis gas and carbon on nickel catalysts. Journal of Catalysis, 2004, 224(2): 370–383
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |