Numerical study of novel OME1–6 combustion mechanism and spray combustion at changed ambient environments
Frederik WIESMANN, Dong HAN, Zeyan QIU, Lukas STRAUβ, Sebastian RIEβ, Michael WENSING, Thomas LAUER
Numerical study of novel OME1–6 combustion mechanism and spray combustion at changed ambient environments
For a climate-neutral future mobility, the so-called e-fuels can play an essential part. Especially, oxygenated e-fuels containing oxygen in their chemical formula have the additional potential to burn with significantly lower soot levels. In particular, polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers or oxymethylene ethers (PODEs or OMEs) do not contain carbon-carbon bonds, prohibiting the production of soot precursors like acetylene (C2H2). These properties make OMEs a highly interesting candidate for future climate-neutral compression-ignition engines. However, to fully leverage their potential, the auto-ignition process, flame propagation, and mixing regimes of the combustion need to be understood. To achieve this, efficient oxidation mechanisms suitable for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) calculations must be developed and validated. The present work aims to highlight the improvements made by developing an adapted oxidation mechanism for OME1–6 and introducing it into a validated spray combustion CFD model for OMEs. The simulations were conducted for single- and multi-injection patterns, changing ambient temperatures, and oxygen contents. The results were validated against high-pressure and high-temperature constant-pressure chamber experiments. OH*-chemiluminescence measurements accomplished the characterization of the auto-ignition process. Both experiments and simulations were conducted for two different injectors. Significant improvements concerning the prediction of the ignition delay time were accomplished while also retaining an excellent agreement for the flame lift-off length. The spatial zones of high-temperature reaction activity were also affected by the adaption of the reaction kinetics. They showed a greater tendency to form OH* radicals within the center of the spray in accordance with the experiments.
oxygenated fuels / reaction kinetics / oxidation mechanisms / computational fluid dynamics (CFD) / oxymethylene ethers (OME) / e-fuels / multi-injection / spray-combustion
[1] |
Huang Z, Zhu L, Li A.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Damyanov A, Hofmann P, Geringer B.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Liu J, Wang H, Li Y.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Härtl M, Gaukel K, Pélerin D, et al. Oxymethylene ether as potentially CO2-neutral fuel for clean diesel engines part 1: Engine testing. MTZ worldwide 2017, 78: 52–59
|
[5] |
Omari A, Heuser B, Pischinger S. Potential of oxymethylenether-diesel blends for ultra-low emission engines. Fuel, 2017, 209: 232–237
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Qiu Z, Zhong A, Huang Z.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Virt M, Arnold U. Effects of oxymethylene ether in a commercial diesel engine. Cognitive Sustainability, 2022, 1(3)
|
[8] |
Pélerin D, Gaukel K, Härtl M.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Gelner A D, Rothe D, Kykal C.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Dworschak P, Berger V, Härtl M, et al. Neat Oxymethylene Ethers: Combustion Performance and Emissions of OME2, OME3, OME4 and OME5 in a Single-Cylinder Diesel Engine. SAE Technical Report 2020-01-0805, 2020
|
[11] |
Strauß L, Rieß S, Wensing M. Mixture formation of OME3–5 and 1-octanol in comparison with diesel-like dodecane under ECN Spray A conditions. Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 9: 1083658
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Wiesmann F, Strauß L, Rieß S.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Wiesmann F, Bauer E, Kaiser S A, et al. Ignition and Combustion Characteristics of OME3–5 and N-Dodecane: A Comparison Based on CFD Engine Simulations and Optical Experiments. SAE Technical Report 2023-01-0305, 2023
|
[14] |
Niu B, Jia M, Chang Y.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
ASG. ASG analytik-service. 2022-8-2, available at website of ASG Analytik
|
[16] |
Pastor J V, García-Oliver J M, Micó C.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
,Chemkin-Pro 15131. San Diego: Reaction Design, 2013
|
[18] |
Cai L, Jacobs S, Langer R.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Hanjalić K, Popovac M, Hadžiabdić M. A robust near-wall elliptic-relaxation eddy-viscosity turbulence model for CFD. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2004, 25(6): 1047–1051
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Popovac M, Hanjalic K. Compound wall treatment for RANS computation of complex turbulent flows. In: Proceedings of the 3rd MIT Conference on Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics. Boston: Elsevier, 2005
|
[21] |
Reitz R D. Modeling atomization processes in high-pressure vaporizing sprays. Atomisation Spray Technology, 1987, 3: 309–337
|
[22] |
Taylor G. The instability of liquid surfaces when accelerated in a direction perpendicular to their planes. I. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1950, 201(1065): 192–196
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Brenn G, Deviprasath L J, Durst F. Computations and experiments on the evaporation of multi-component droplets. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conferences on Atomization and Spray Systems. Sorrento, 2003
|
[24] |
Abramzon B, Sirignano W. Droplet vaporization model for spray combustion calculations. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 1989, 32(9): 1605–1618
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
O’Rourke P J, Bracco F. Modelling of drop interactions in thick sprays and a comparison with experiments. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 1980, 404(80): 101–116
|
[26] |
Schiller L, Naumann A Z. A drag coefficient correlation. Zeitschrift des Vereins Deutscher Ingenieure, 1933, 77: 318–320
|
[27] |
Pickett L M, Manin J, Payri R, et al. Transient Rate of Injection Effects on Spray Development. SAE Technical Report 2013-24-0001, 2013
|
[28] |
CMT
|
[29] |
Peter A, Siewert B, Riess S.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[30] |
Frühhaber J, Peter A, Schuh S, et al. Modeling the Pilot Injection and the Ignition Process of a Dual Fuel Injector with Experimental Data from a Combustion Chamber Using Detailed Reaction Kinetics. SAE Technical Report 2018-01-1724, 2018
|
[31] |
AVL List GmbH. User Manual for FIRE General Gas Phase Reactions Module Version 2018, 2018
|
[32] |
Mueller C J. The Quantification of Mixture Stoichiometry When Fuel Molecules Contain Oxidizer Elements or Oxidizer Molecules Contain Fuel Elements. SAE Technical Report 2005-01-3705, 2005
|
[33] |
ECN. Engine combustion network. 2022-4-7, available at website of Sandia National Laboratories
|
[34] |
Riess S, Vogel T, Wensing M. Influence of exhaust gas recirculation on ignition and combustion of diesel fuel under engine conditions investigated by chemical luminescence. In: Proceedings of the 13th Triennial Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems. Tainan, China, 2015
|
[35] |
Peter A. Charakterisierung der Gemischbildung und Zündung in Diesel- und Dual-Fuel-Brennverfahren. In: Berichte zur Thermodynamik und Verfahrenstechnik. Düren: Shaker Verlag, 2022
|
[36] |
Tagliante F, Nguyen T M, Dhanji M P.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[37] |
Stiesch G. Modeling Engine Spray and Combustion Processes. Berlin: Springer Heideberg, 2003
|
[38] |
Pischinger F, Schulte H. Grundlagen und entwicklungslinien der diesel-motorischen brennverfahren. düsseldorf. VDI-Verlag, 1988, 714: 61–93
|
[39] |
Warnatz J, Maas U, Dibble R W. Combustion: Physical and Chemical Fundamentals, Modeling and Simulation, Experiments, Pollutant Formation. 4th ed. New York: Springer, 2006
|
Abbreviations | |
C2H2 | Acetylene molecule |
CFD | Computational fluid dynamics |
CH2O | Formaldehyde molecule |
CH3O(−CH2O)n−CH3 | Polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether molecule |
ECN | Engine Combustion Network |
FST | Institute of Fluid System Technology |
ID/IDT | Ignition delay timeJSR |
KHRT | Kelvin–Helmholtz–Rayleigh–Taylor |
LES | Large Eddy Simulation |
OH | Hydroxyl radical |
OME | Oxymethylene ethers |
PODE | Polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers |
OP1 | ECN Spray A low temperature conditions (800 K, 22.8 kg/m3, 15% O2) |
OP2 | ECN Spray A conditions (900 K, 22.8 kg/m3, 15% O2) |
OP3 | ECN Spray A high temperature conditions (1000 K, 22.8 kg/m3, 15% O2) |
OP4 | ECN Spray A conditions with multi-injection (900 K, 22.8 kg/m3, 15% O2 |
OP5 | ECN Spray A high oxygen content conditions (900 K, 22.8 kg/m3, 21% O2) |
RANS | Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes equations |
SJTU | Shanghai Jiao Tong University |
SOC | Start of combustion |
SOI | Start of injection |
Variables | |
CA | Injector nozzle hole area contraction coefficient |
d | Diameter |
k | Pre-exponential factor of reaction |
L | Length |
Mass flow | |
p | Pressure |
r/R | Radius |
S | Sensitivity coefficient |
t | Time |
T | Temperature |
x | Distance |
Z | Mixture fraction |
Zi | Element mass fraction |
Density | |
Ignition delay time | |
Equivalence ratio | |
Oxygen equivalence ratio | |
Oxygen ratio |
/
〈 | 〉 |