A review of bifacial solar photovoltaic applications

Aydan GARROD, Aritra GHOSH

PDF(2044 KB)
PDF(2044 KB)
Front. Energy ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (6) : 704-726. DOI: 10.1007/s11708-023-0903-7
REVIEW ARTICLE
REVIEW ARTICLE

A review of bifacial solar photovoltaic applications

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Bifacial photovoltaics (BPVs) are a promising alternative to conventional monofacial photovoltaics given their ability to exploit solar irradiance from both the front and rear sides of the panel, allowing for a higher amount of energy production per unit area. The BPV industry is still emerging, and there is much work to be done until it is a fully mature technology. There are a limited number of reviews of the BPV technology, and the reviews focus on different aspects of BPV. This review comprises an extensive in-depth look at BPV applications throughout all the current major applications, identifying studies conducted for each of the applications, and their outcomes, focusing on optimization for BPV systems under different applications, comparing levelized cost of electricity, integrating the use of BPV with existing systems such as green roofs, information on irradiance and electrical modeling, as well as providing future scope for research to improve the technology and help the industry.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

bifacial photovoltaics (BPVs) / bifacial / photovoltaics / applications / review / solar

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Aydan GARROD, Aritra GHOSH. A review of bifacial solar photovoltaic applications. Front. Energy, 2023, 17(6): 704‒726 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-023-0903-7

References

[1]
Kuşkaya S, Bilgili F, Muğaloğlu E. . The role of solar energy usage in environmental sustainability: Fresh evidence through time−frequency analyses. Renewable Energy, 2023, 206: 858–871
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Chandio A A, Shah M I, Sethi N. . Assessing the effect of climate change and financial development on agricultural production in asean-4: The role of renewable energy, institutional quality, and human capital as moderators. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2022, 29(9): 13211–13225
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Assi A F, Zhakanova Isiksal A, Tursoy T. Renewable energy consumption, financial development, environmental pollution, and innovations in the ASEAN + 3 group: Evidence from (P-ARDL) model. Renewable Energy, 2021, 165: 689–700
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Karaaslan A, Çamkaya S. The relationship between CO2 emissions, economic growth, health expenditure, and renewable and non-renewable energy consumption: Empirical evidence from turkey. Renewable Energy, 2022, 190: 457–466
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Liu H, Khan I, Zakari A. . Roles of trilemma in the world energy sector and transition towards sustainable energy: A study of economic growth and the environment. Energy Policy, 2022, 170: 113238
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
IEA. Global energy review 2021. 2023–9–28, available at the website of IEA
[7]
IEA. Global energy review 2022. 2023–9–28, available at the website of IEA
[8]
Liu W, Shen A. How renewable energy investment, environmental regulations, and financial development derive renewable energy transition: Evidence from G7 countries. Renewable Energy, 2023, 206: 1188–1197
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Taghizadeh-Hesary F, Yoshino N. The way to induce private participation in green finance and investment. Finance Research Letters, 2019, 31: 98–103
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Wu H. Evaluating the role of renewable energy investment resources and green finance on the economic performance: evidence from OECD economies. Resources Policy, 2023, 80: 103149
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
IPCC. Climate Change 2022—Mitigation of Climate Change: Working Group III Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022
[12]
Madurai Elavarasan R, Nadarajah M, Pugazhendhi R. . The untold subtlety of energy consumption and its influence on policy drive towards sustainable development goal 7. Applied Energy, 2023, 334: 120698
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
UnitedNations General Assembly. Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. 2023–9–28, available at the website of UN
[14]
Nundy S, Ghosh A, Mesloub A. . Impact of Covid-19 pandemic on socio-economic, energy-environment and transport sector globally and sustainable development goal (SDG). Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 312: 127705
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Liu W, Shen Y, Razzaq A. How renewable energy investment, environmental regulations, and financial development derive renewable energy transition: Evidence from G7 countries. Renewable Energy, 2023, 206: 1188–1197
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Babayomi O O, Dahoro D A, Zhang Z. Affordable clean energy transition in developing countries: Pathways and technologies. iScience, 2022, 25(5): 104178
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Sueyoshi T, Mo F, Wang D D. Sustainable development of countries all over the world and the impact of renewable energy. Renewable Energy, 2022, 184: 320–331
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Cordroch L, Hilpert S, Wiese F. Why renewables and energy efficiency are not enough—The relevance of sufficiency in the heating sector for limiting global warming to 1.5 °C. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, 175: 121313
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Chapman A, Shigetomi Y, Ohno H. . Evaluating the global impact of low-carbon energy transitions on social equity. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2021, 40: 332–347
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Nakaishi T, Chapman A, Kagawa S. Shedding light on the energy-related social equity of nations toward a just transition. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2022, 83: 101350
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Tran T T D, Smith A D. Incorporating performance-based global sensitivity and uncertainty analysis into LCOE calculations for emerging renewable energy technologies. Applied Energy, 2018, 216: 157–171
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Bolinger M, Wiser R, O’Shaughnessy E. Levelized cost-based learning analysis of utility-scale wind and solar in the united states. iScience, 2022, 25(6): 104378
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Fritts C E. On a new form of selenium cell, and some electrical discoveries made by its use. American Journal of Science, 1883, s3-26(156): 465–472
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Green M A, Dunlop E D, Siefer G. . Solar cell efficiency tables (version 61). Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2023, 31(1): 3–16
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Garud S, Trinh C T, Abou-Ras D. . Toward high solar cell efficiency with low material usage: 15% efficiency with 14 mm polycrystalline silicon on glass. Solar RRL, 2020, 4(6): 2000058
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Rawat S, Gupta R, Gohri S. Performance assessment of CIGS solar cell with different CIGS grading profile. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2023
[27]
Bhattarai S, Mhamdi A, Hossain I. . A detailed review of perovskite solar cells: Introduction, working principle, modelling, fabrication techniques, future challenges. Micro and Nanostructures, 2022, 172: 207450
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Hong L, Ge Z. Single-component organic solar cells with over 11% efficiency. Chem, 2021, 7(8): 1987–1989
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
van Zalk J, Behrens P. The spatial extent of renewable and non-renewable power generation: A review and meta-analysis of power densities and their application in the U.S. Energy Policy, 2018, 123: 83–91
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Fontani D, Jafrancesco D, Sansoni P. . Field optimization for bifacial modules. Optical Materials, 2023, 138: 113715
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Guerrero-Lemus R, Vega R, Kim T. . Bifacial solar photovoltaics—A technology review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 60: 1533–1549
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Gu W, Ma T, Ahmed S. . A comprehensive review and outlook of bifacial photovoltaic (BPV) technology. Energy Conversion and Management, 2020, 223: 113283
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Lorenzo E. On the historical origins of bifacial PV modelling. Solar Energy, 2021, 218: 587–595
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Raina G, Sinha S. A holistic review approach of design considerations, modelling, challenges and future applications for bifacial photovoltaics. Energy Conversion and Management, 2022, 271: 116290
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
de Bastiani M, Subbiah A S, Babics M. . Bifacial perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells. Joule, 2022, 6(7): 1431–1445
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Mouhib E, Micheli L, Almonacid F M. . Overview of the fundamentals and applications of bifacial photovoltaic technology: Agrivoltaics and aquavoltaics. Energies, 2022, 15(23): 8777
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Molto C, Oh J, Mahmood F I. . Review of potential-induced degradation in bifacial photovoltaic modules. Energy Technology, 2023, 11(4): 2200943
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Eguren J, Martínez-Moreno F, Merodio P. . First bifacial PV modules early 1983. Solar Energy, 2022, 243: 327–335
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Cuevas A, Luque A, Eguren J. . 50 percent more output power from an albedo-collecting flat panel using bifacial. Solar Cells, 1982, 29(5): 419–420
[40]
Raina G, Sinha S. A comprehensive assessment of electrical performance and mismatch losses in bifacial PV module under different front and rear side shading scenarios. Energy Conversion and Management, 2022, 261: 115668
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Muehleisen W, Loeschnig J, Feichtner M. . Energy yield measurement of an elevated PV system on a white flat roof and a performance comparison of monofacial and bifacial modules. Renewable Energy, 2021, 170: 613–619
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Khan M R, Hanna A, Sun X. . Vertical bifacial solar farms: Physics, design, and global optimization. Applied Energy, 2017, 206: 240–248
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Guo S, Walsh T M, Peters M. Vertically mounted bifacial photovoltaic modules: A global analysis. Energy, 2013, 61: 447–454
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Hou Q, Zhang N, Du E. . Probabilistic duck curve in high PV penetration power system: Concept, modeling, and empirical analysis in China. Applied Energy, 2019, 242: 205–215
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Patel M T, Khan M R, Sun X. . A worldwide cost-based design and optimization of tilted bifacial solar farms. Applied Energy, 2019, 247: 467–479
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Appelbaum J. Bifacial photovoltaic panels field. Renewable Energy, 2016, 85: 338–343
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Khan M R, Sakr E, Sun X. . Ground sculpting to enhance energy yield of vertical bifacial solar farms. Applied Energy, 2019, 241: 592–598
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Perin Gasparin F, Detzel Kipper F, Schuck de Oliveira F. . Assessment on the variation of temperature coefficients of photovoltaic modules with solar irradiance. Solar Energy, 2022, 244: 126–133
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Prasad M, Prasad R. Bifacial vs monofacial grid-connected solar photovoltaic for small islands: A case study of Fiji. Renewable Energy, 2022, 203: 686–702
[50]
Tahir F, Baloch A A B, Al-Ghamdi S G. Impact of climate change on solar monofacial and bifacial photovoltaics (PV) potential in Qatar. Energy Reports, 2022, 8: 518–522
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Li J, Zhou Y, Niu X. . Performance evaluation of bifacial PV modules using high thermal conductivity fins. Solar Energy, 2022, 245: 108–119
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
Xia T, Chen H, Wang H. Self-protecting concave microstructures on glass surface for daytime radiative cooling in bifacial solar cells. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2023, 142: 106666
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
Ma T, Kazemian A, Habibollahzade A. . A comparative study on bifacial photovoltaic/thermal modules with various cooling methods. Energy Conversion and Management, 2022, 263: 115555
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Gao Y, Wang C, Wu D. . A numerical evaluation of the bifacial concentrated PV-STEG system cooled by mini-channel heat sink. Renewable Energy, 2022, 192: 716–730
CrossRef Google scholar
[55]
Zainali S, Qadir O, Parlak S C. . Computational fluid dynamics modelling of microclimate for a vertical agrivoltaic system. Energy Nexus, 2023, 9: 100173
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Dinesh H, Pearce J M. The potential of agrivoltaic systems. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 54: 299–308
CrossRef Google scholar
[57]
Reasoner M, Ghosh A. Agrivoltaic engineering and layout optimization approaches in the transition to renewable energy technologies: A review. Challenges, 2022, 13(2): 43
CrossRef Google scholar
[58]
Handler R, Pearce J M. Greener sheep: Life cycle analysis of integrated sheep agrivoltaic systems. Cleaner Energy Systems, 2022, 3: 100036
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Ramkiran B, Sundarabalan C K, Sudhakar K. Sustainable passive cooling strategy for PV module: A comparative analysis. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 2021, 27: 101317
CrossRef Google scholar
[60]
Campana P E, Stridh B, Amaducci S. . Optimisation of vertically mounted agrivoltaic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 325: 129091
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
Williams H J, Hashad K, Wang H. . The potential for agrivoltaics to enhance solar farm cooling. Applied Energy, 2023, 332: 120478
CrossRef Google scholar
[62]
KreininLBordinNKarsentyA, . PV module power gain due to bifacial design. Preliminary experimental and simulation data. In: 2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Honolulu, HI, USA, 2010, 002171–002175
[63]
Ziar H, Sönmez F F, Isabella O. . A comprehensive albedo model for solar energy applications: Geometric spectral albedo. Applied Energy, 2019, 255: 113867
CrossRef Google scholar
[64]
Zheng L, Zhao G, Dong J. . Spatial, temporal, and spectral variations in albedo due to vegetation changes in China’s grasslands. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2019, 152: 1–12
CrossRef Google scholar
[65]
Wang R, Chen J M, Pavlic G. . Improving winter leaf area index estimation in coniferous forests and its significance in estimating the land surface albedo. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2016, 119: 32–48
CrossRef Google scholar
[66]
Katsikogiannis O A, Ziar H, Isabella O. Integration of bifacial photovoltaics in agrivoltaic systems: A synergistic design approach. Applied Energy, 2022, 309: 118475
CrossRef Google scholar
[67]
Marrou H, Guilioni L, Dufour L. . Microclimate under agrivoltaic systems: Is crop growth rate affected in the partial shade of solar panels?. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2013, 177: 117–132
CrossRef Google scholar
[68]
Amaducci S, Yin X, Colauzzi M. Agrivoltaic systems to optimise land use for electric energy production. Applied Energy, 2018, 220: 545–561
CrossRef Google scholar
[69]
Deline C, MacAlpine S, Marion B. . Assessment of bifacial photovoltaic module power rating methodologies-inside and out. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 2017, 7(2): 575–580
CrossRef Google scholar
[70]
Riaz M H, Imran H, Younas R. . The optimization of vertical bifacial photovoltaic farms for efficient agrivoltaic systems. Solar Energy, 2021, 230: 1004–1012
CrossRef Google scholar
[71]
Ding L, Zhu Y, Zheng L. . What is the path of photovoltaic building (BIPV or BAPV) promotion?—The perspective of evolutionary games.. Applied Energy, 2023, 340: 121033
CrossRef Google scholar
[72]
Peng C, Huang Y, Wu Z. Building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPV) in architectural design in China. Energy and Building, 2011, 43(12): 3592–3598
CrossRef Google scholar
[73]
BarkasziS FDunlopJ P. Discussion of strategies for mounting photovoltaic arrays on rooftops. In: Solar Engineering 2001—Forum 2001 Solar Energy—The Power to Choose, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Washington, DC, USA, 2001, 333–338
[74]
Custódio I, Quevedo T, Melo A P. . A holistic approach for assessing architectural integration quality of solar photovoltaic rooftops and shading devices. Solar Energy, 2022, 237: 432–446
CrossRef Google scholar
[75]
Liu K, Zhu B, Chen J. Low-carbon design path of building integrated photovoltaics: A comparative study based on green building rating systems. Buildings, 2021, 11(10): 469
CrossRef Google scholar
[76]
Ghosh A. Potential of building integrated and attached/applied photovoltaic (BIPV/BAPV) for adaptive less energy-hungry building’s skin: A comprehensive review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 276: 123343
CrossRef Google scholar
[77]
Peng C, Huang Y, Wu Z. Building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPV) in architectural design in China. Energy and Building, 2011, 43(12): 3592–3598
CrossRef Google scholar
[78]
Mazzeo D, Matera N, Peri G. . Forecasting green roofs’ potential in improving building thermal performance and mitigating urban heat island in the Mediterranean area: An artificial intelligence-based approach. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2023, 222: 119879
CrossRef Google scholar
[79]
Baumann T, Nussbaumer H, Klenk M. . Photovoltaic systems with vertically mounted bifacial PV modules in combination with green roofs. Solar Energy, 2019, 190: 139–146
CrossRef Google scholar
[80]
Tillmann P, Jäger K, Becker C. Minimising the levelised cost of electricity for bifacial solar panel arrays using Bayesian optimisation. Sustainable Energy & Fuels, 2023, (4): 254–264
CrossRef Google scholar
[81]
MartinS. What PV installers expect in 2023. 2023–9–28, available at the website of PV-magazine
[82]
Bretz S E, Akbari H. Long-term performance of high-albedo roof coatings. Energy and Building, 1997, 25(2): 159–167
CrossRef Google scholar
[83]
Ramamurthy P, Sun T, Rule K. . The joint influence of albedo and insulation on roof performance: An observational study. Energy and Building, 2015, 93: 249–258
CrossRef Google scholar
[84]
Del Barrio E P. Analysis of the green roofs cooling potential in buildings. Energy and Building, 1998, 27(2): 179–193
CrossRef Google scholar
[85]
Santamouris M. Cooling the cities—A review of reflective and green roof mitigation technologies to fight heat island and improve comfort in urban environments. Solar Energy, 2014, 103: 682–703
CrossRef Google scholar
[86]
Xiao B, Bowker M A. Moss-biocrusts strongly decrease soil surface albedo, altering land-surface energy balance in a dryland ecosystem. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 741: 140425
CrossRef Google scholar
[87]
Yang T, Athienitis A K. A review of research and developments of building-integrated photovoltaic/thermal (BIPV/T) systems. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 66: 886–912
CrossRef Google scholar
[88]
Ghosh A, Sundaram S, Mallick T K. Investigation of thermal and electrical performances of a combined semi-transparent PV-vacuum glazing. Applied Energy, 2018, 228: 1591–1600
CrossRef Google scholar
[89]
Roy A, Ghosh A, Bhandari S. . Perovskite solar cells for BIPV application: A review. Buildings, 2020, 10(7): 129
CrossRef Google scholar
[90]
Chen M, Zhang W, Xie L. . Improvement of the electricity performance of bifacial PV module applied on the building envelope. Energy and Building, 2021, 238: 110849
CrossRef Google scholar
[91]
Zhao O, Zhang W, Xie L. . Investigation of indoor environment and thermal comfort of building installed with bifacial PV modules. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2022, 76: 113463
CrossRef Google scholar
[92]
Akbari Paydar M. Optimum design of building integrated PV module as a movable shading device. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2020, 62: 102368
CrossRef Google scholar
[93]
Kang S, Hwang T, Kim J T. Theoretical analysis of the blinds integrated photovoltaic modules. Energy and Building, 2012, 46: 86–91
CrossRef Google scholar
[94]
Thebault M, Clivillé V, Berrah L. . Multicriteria roof sorting for the integration of photovoltaic systems in urban environments. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2020, 60: 102259
CrossRef Google scholar
[95]
Kubota T, Chyee D T H, Ahmad S. The effects of night ventilation technique on indoor thermal environment for residential buildings in hot-humid climate of Malaysia. Energy and Building, 2009, 41(8): 829–839
CrossRef Google scholar
[96]
Guo W, Kong L, Chow T. . Energy performance of photovoltaic (PV) windows under typical climates of China in terms of transmittance and orientation. Energy, 2020, 213: 118794
CrossRef Google scholar
[97]
Roy A, Ghosh A, Bhandari S. . Color comfort evaluation of dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC) based building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) glazing after 2 years of ambient exposure. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2019, 123(39): 23834–23837
CrossRef Google scholar
[98]
Ghosh A. Fenestration integrated BIPV (FIPV): A review. Solar Energy, 2022, 237: 213–230
CrossRef Google scholar
[99]
Ghosh A, Sundaram S, Mallick T K. Colour properties and glazing factors evaluation of multicrystalline based semi-transparent photovoltaic-vacuum glazing for BIPV application. Renewable Energy, 2019, 131: 730–736
CrossRef Google scholar
[100]
Tina G M, Scavo F B, Aneli S. . Assessment of the electrical and thermal performances of building integrated bifacial photovoltaic modules. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 313: 127906
CrossRef Google scholar
[101]
Gagliano A, Nocera F, Aneli S. Thermodynamic analysis of ventilated façades under different wind conditions in summer period. Energy and Building, 2016, 122: 131–139
CrossRef Google scholar
[102]
Guillén I, Gómez-Lozano V, Fran J M. . Thermal behavior analysis of different multilayer façade: Numerical model versus experimental prototype. Energy and Building, 2014, 79: 184–190
CrossRef Google scholar
[103]
Ciampi M, Leccese F, Tuoni G. Ventilated facades energy performance in summer cooling of buildings. Solar Energy, 2003, 75(6): 491–502
CrossRef Google scholar
[104]
Yoo S H, Lee E T. Efficiency characteristic of building integrated photovoltaics as a shading device. Building and Environment, 2002, 37(6): 615–623
CrossRef Google scholar
[105]
Chae Y T, Kim J, Park H. . Building energy performance evaluation of building integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) window with semi-transparent solar cells. Applied Energy, 2014, 129: 217–227
CrossRef Google scholar
[106]
Alrashidi H, Ghosh A, Issa W. . Thermal performance of semitransparent CDTE BIPV window at temperate climate. Solar Energy, 2020, 195: 536–543
CrossRef Google scholar
[107]
Assoa Y B, Thony P, Messaoudi P. . Study of a building integrated bifacial photovoltaic facade. Solar Energy, 2021, 227: 497–515
CrossRef Google scholar
[108]
Tina G M, Bontempo Scavo F, Merlo L. . Comparative analysis of monofacial and bifacial photovoltaic modules for floating power plants. Applied Energy, 2021, 281: 116084
CrossRef Google scholar
[109]
Ghosh A. A comprehensive review of water based PV: Flotavoltaics, under water, offshore & canal top. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 281: 115044
CrossRef Google scholar
[110]
El Hammoumi A, Chtita S, Motahhir S. . Solar PV energy: From material to use, and the most commonly used techniques to maximize the power output of PV systems: A focus on solar trackers and floating solar panels. Energy Reports, 2022, 8: 11992–12010
CrossRef Google scholar
[111]
Essak L, Ghosh A. Floating photovoltaics: A review. Cleanroom Technology, 2022, 4(3): 752–769
CrossRef Google scholar
[112]
Nisar H, Janjua A K, Hafeez H. . Thermal and electrical performance of solar floating PV system compared to on-ground PV system—An experimental investigation. Solar Energy, 2022, 241: 231–247
CrossRef Google scholar
[113]
Rosa-Clot M, Tina G M, Nizetic S. Floating photovoltaic plants and wastewater basins: An Australian project. Energy Procedia, 2017, 134: 664–674
CrossRef Google scholar
[114]
Sacramento E M, Carvalho P C M, de Araújo J C. . Scenarios for use of floating photovoltaic plants in Brazilian reservoirs. IET Renewable Power Generation, 2015, 9(8): 1019–1024
CrossRef Google scholar
[115]
Cazzaniga R, Rosa-Clot M. The booming of floating PV. Solar Energy, 2021, 219: 3–10
CrossRef Google scholar
[116]
Rosa-ClotMTinaG M. Submerged and Floating Photovoltaic Systems: Modelling, Design and Case Studies. London: Elsevier, 2018
[117]
Kakoulaki G, Gonzalez Sanchez R, Gracia Amillo A. . Benefits of pairing floating solar photovoltaics with hydropower reservoirs in Europe. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2023, 171: 112989
CrossRef Google scholar
[118]
Silvério N M, Barros R M, Tiago Filho G L. . Use of floating PV plants for coordinated operation with hydropower plants: Case study of the hydroelectric plants of the São Francisco river basin. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 171: 339–349
CrossRef Google scholar
[119]
Ji Q, Li K, Wang Y. . Effect of floating photovoltaic system on water temperature of deep reservoir and assessment of its potential benefits, a case on Xiangjiaba reservoir with hydropower station. Renewable Energy, 2022, 195: 946–956
CrossRef Google scholar
[120]
Cogley J G. The albedo of water as a function of latitude. Monthly Weather Review, 1979, 107(6): 775–781
CrossRef Google scholar
[121]
Du J, Zhou H, Jacinthe P A. . Retrieval of lake water surface albedo from Sentinel-2 remote sensing imagery. Journal of Hydrology, 2023, 617: 128904
CrossRef Google scholar
[122]
Hasan A, Dincer I. A new performance assessment methodology of bifacial photovoltaic solar panels for offshore applications. Energy Conversion and Management, 2020, 220: 112972
CrossRef Google scholar
[123]
Cuce E, Cuce P M, Saboor S. . Floating PVs in terms of power generation, environmental aspects, market potential, and challenges. Sustainability, 2022, 14(5): 2626
CrossRef Google scholar
[124]
HutchinsM. Investigating bifacial for floating PV. 2023–9-28, available at PV-magazine
[125]
Enaganti P K, Bhattacharjee A, Ghosh A. . Experimental investigations for dust build-up on low-iron glass exterior and its effects on the performance of solar PV systems. Energy, 2022, 239: 122213
CrossRef Google scholar
[126]
Chanchangi Y N, Ghosh A, Sundaram S. . Dust and PV performance in Nigeria: A review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2020, 121: 109704
CrossRef Google scholar
[127]
Ghosh A. Soiling losses: A barrier for India’s energy security dependency from photovoltaic power. Challenges, 2020, 11(1): 9
CrossRef Google scholar
[128]
Kumar Yadav S, Manoj Kumar N, Ghosh A. . Assessment of soiling impacts and cleaning frequencies of a rooftop BAPV system in composite climates of India. Solar Energy, 2022, 242: 119–129
CrossRef Google scholar
[129]
Untila G G, Kost T N, Chebotareva A B. . Bifacial concentrator Ag-free crystalline n-type Si solar cell. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2015, 23(5): 600–610
CrossRef Google scholar
[130]
Ohtsuka H, Sakamoto M, Koyama M. . Characteristics of bifacial solar cells under bifacial illumination with various intensity levels. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2001, 9(1): 1–13
CrossRef Google scholar
[131]
Singh J P, Walsh T M, Aberle A G. A new method to characterize bifacial solar cells. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2014, 22(8): 903–909
CrossRef Google scholar
[132]
Alam M, Gul M S, Muneer T. Performance analysis and comparison between bifacial and monofacial solar photovoltaic at various ground albedo conditions. Renewable Energy Focus, 2023, 44: 295–316
CrossRef Google scholar
[133]
IqbalM. An Introduction to Solar Radiation. London: Elsevier, 1983
[134]
Rodríguez-Gallegos C D, Bieri M, Gandhi O. . Monofacial vs bifacial Si-based PV modules: Which one is more cost-effective?. Solar Energy, 2018, 176: 412–438
CrossRef Google scholar
[135]
Martin N, Ruiz J M. Calculation of the PV modules angular losses under field conditions by means of an analytical model. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2001, 70(1): 25–38
CrossRef Google scholar
[136]
Martín N, Ruiz J M. Annual angular reflection losses in PV modules. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2005, 13(1): 75–84
CrossRef Google scholar
[137]
Gueymard C A. Direct and indirect uncertainties in the prediction of tilted irradiance for solar engineering applications. Solar Energy, 2009, 83(3): 432–444
CrossRef Google scholar
[138]
Yang D. Solar radiation on inclined surfaces: Corrections and benchmarks. Solar Energy, 2016, 136: 288–302
CrossRef Google scholar
[139]
Perez R, Stewart R, Arbogast C. . An anisotropic hourly diffuse radiation model for sloping surfaces: Description, performance validation, site dependency evaluation. Solar Energy, 1986, 36(6): 481–497
CrossRef Google scholar
[140]
Perez R, Seals R, Ineichen P. . A new simplified version of the Perez diffuse irradiance model for tilted surfaces. Solar Energy, 1987, 39(3): 221–231
CrossRef Google scholar
[141]
Perez R, Stewart R, Seals R, et al. The development and verification of the Perez diffuse radiation model. US Technical Report SAND88-7030, 1988
[142]
Perez R, Ineichen P, Seals R. . Modeling daylight availability and irradiance components from direct and global irradiance. Solar Energy, 1990, 44(5): 271–289
CrossRef Google scholar
[143]
Marion B. Numerical method for angle-of-incidence correction factors for diffuse radiation incident photovoltaic modules. Solar Energy, 2017, 147: 344–348
CrossRef Google scholar
[144]
MarionBMacAlpineSDelineC, . A practical irradiance model for bifacial PV modules. In: 2017 IEEE 44th Photovoltaic Specialist Conference, Washington, DC, USA, 2017, 1537–1542
[145]
Shoukry I, Libal J, Kopecek R. . Modelling of bifacial gain for stand-alone and in-field installed bifacial PV modules. Energy Procedia, 2016, 92: 600–608
CrossRef Google scholar
[146]
Yusufoglu U A, Pletzer T M, Koduvelikulathu L J. . Analysis of the annual performance of bifacial modules and optimization methods. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 2015, 5(1): 320–328
CrossRef Google scholar
[147]
Durusoy B, Ozden T, Akinoglu B G. Solar irradiation on the rear surface of bifacial solar modules: A modeling approach. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1): 13300
CrossRef Google scholar
[148]
Sun B, Lu L, Yuan Y. . Development and validation of a concise and anisotropic irradiance model for bifacial photovoltaic modules. Renewable Energy, 2023, 209: 442–452
CrossRef Google scholar
[149]
Zhou M, Chen G, Dong Z. . Estimation of surface albedo from meteorological observations across China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2020, 281: 107848
CrossRef Google scholar
[150]
Bradley A, Thornes J, Chapman L. . Modeling spatial and temporal road thermal climatology in rural and urban areas using a GIS. Climate Research, 2002, 22: 41–55
CrossRef Google scholar
[151]
TahaHSailorDAkbariH. High-albedo materials for reducing building cooling energy use. US Technical Report LBL-31721, 1992
[152]
RosenbergN JBladB LVermaS B. Biology and environment, Microclimate, 1983
[153]
Radionov V, Bryazgin N, Alexandrov E. The snow cover of the arctic basin. US Technical Report APL-UW TR, 9701, 1997
[154]
Laudani A, Riganti Fulginei F, Salvini A. . One diode circuital model of light soaking phenomena in DYE-sensitized solar cells. Optik, 2018, 156: 311–317
CrossRef Google scholar
[155]
Raina G, Sinha S. A comprehensive assessment of electrical performance and mismatch losses in bifacial PV module under different front and rear side shading scenarios. Energy Conversion and Management, 2022, 261: 115668
CrossRef Google scholar
[156]
Lopez-Garcia J, Casado A, Sample T. Electrical performance of bifacial silicon PV modules under different indoor mounting configurations affecting the rear reflected irradiance. Solar Energy, 2019, 177: 471–482
CrossRef Google scholar
[157]
Skoplaki E, Palyvos J A. On the temperature dependence of photovoltaic module electrical performance: A review of efficiency/power correlations. Solar Energy, 2009, 83(5): 614–624
CrossRef Google scholar
[158]
Kratochvil J, Boyson W, King D. Photovoltaic array performance model. Sandia National Laboratories Technical Report SAND2004–3535, 2004
[159]
Fanney A, Davis M, Dougherty B. Short-term characterization of building integrated photovoltaic panel. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 2003, 125(1): 13–20
CrossRef Google scholar
[160]
KingD LKratochvilJ ABoysonW E. Measuring solar spectral and angle-of-incidence effects on photovoltaic modules and solar irradiance sensors. In: Conference Record of the 26th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Anaheim, CA, USA, 1997
[161]
Kasten F, Young A T. Revised optical air mass tables and approximation formula. Applied Optics, 1989, 28(22): 4735–4738
CrossRef Google scholar
[162]
ArnoSKlausJOlindoI, . Solar Energy: The Physics and Engineering of Photovoltaic Conversion, Technologies and Systems. Cambridge: UIT, 2016
[163]
Mannino G, Tina G M, Cacciato M. . A photovoltaic degradation evaluation method applied to bifacial modules. Solar Energy, 2023, 251: 39–50
CrossRef Google scholar
[164]
Kim J, Rabelo M, Padi S P. . A review of the degradation of photovoltaic modules for life expectancy. Energies, 2021, 14(14): 4278
CrossRef Google scholar
[165]
Theristis M, Stein J S, Deline C. . Onymous early-life performance degradation analysis of recent photovoltaic module technologies. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2023, 31(2): 149–160
CrossRef Google scholar
[166]
da Silva M K, Gul M S, Chaudhry H. Review on the sources of power loss in monofacial and bifacial photovoltaic technologies. Energies, 2021, 14(23): 7935
CrossRef Google scholar
[167]
HutchinsM. Filling in the (micro)cracks. 2023–9–28, available at the website of PV-magazine
[168]
Guo B, Javed W, Khoo Y S. . Solar PV soiling mitigation by electrodynamic dust shield in field conditions. Solar Energy, 2019, 188: 271–277
CrossRef Google scholar
[169]
Ratnaparkhi A, Dave D, Valerino M. . Reduction in solar PV soiling loss using hydrophobic coating with and without dew suppression. Solar Energy, 2023, 253: 332–342
CrossRef Google scholar
[170]
Rodríguez-Gallegos C D, Liu H, Gandhi O. . Global techno-economic performance of bifacial and tracking photovoltaic systems. Joule, 2020, 4(7): 1514–1541
CrossRef Google scholar
[171]
PapapetrouMKosmadakisG. Chapter 9—Resource, environmental, and economic aspects of SGHE. In: Tamburini A, Cipollina A, Micale G, eds. Salinity Gradient Heat Engines. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 2022, 319–353
[172]
Rodríguez-Gallegos C D, Gandhi O, Bieri M. . A diesel replacement strategy for off-grid systems based on progressive introduction of PV and batteries: An Indonesian case study. Applied Energy, 2018, 229: 1218–1232
CrossRef Google scholar
[173]
Rodríguez-Gallegos C D, Yang D, Gandhi O. . A multi-objective and robust optimization approach for sizing and placement of PV and batteries in off-grid systems fully operated by diesel generators: An Indonesian case study. Energy, 2018, 160: 410–429
CrossRef Google scholar
[174]
Chang R, Cao Y, Lu Y. . Should BIPV technologies be empowered by innovation policy mix to facilitate energy transitions?—Revealing stakeholders’ different perspectives using Q methodology.. Energy Policy, 2019, 129: 307–318
CrossRef Google scholar
[175]
Rogge K S, Schleich J. Do policy mix characteristics matter for low-carbon innovation? A survey-based exploration of renewable power generation technologies in Germany.. Research Policy, 2018, 47(9): 1639–1654
CrossRef Google scholar
[176]
Shubbak M H. The technological system of production and innovation: The case of photovoltaic technology in China. Research Policy, 2019, 48(4): 993–1015
CrossRef Google scholar
[177]
Che X J, Zhou P, Chai K H. Regional policy effect on photovoltaic (PV) technology innovation: Findings from 260 cities in China. Energy Policy, 2022, 162: 112807
CrossRef Google scholar
[178]
Gao X, Rai V. Local demand-pull policy and energy innovation: Evidence from the solar photovoltaic market in China. Energy Policy, 2019, 128: 364–376
CrossRef Google scholar
[179]
Lin B, Luan R. Do government subsidies promote efficiency in technological innovation of China’s photovoltaic enterprises?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 254: 120108
CrossRef Google scholar
[180]
Costantini V, Crespi F, Martini C. . Demand-pull and technology-push public support for eco-innovation: The case of the biofuels sector. Research Policy, 2015, 44(3): 577–595
CrossRef Google scholar
[181]
Johnstone N, Haščič I, Popp D. Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: Evidence based on patent counts. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2010, 45(1): 133–155
CrossRef Google scholar
[182]
Ra N, Ghosh A, Bhattacharjee A. IoT-based smart energy management for solar vanadium redox flow battery powered switchable building glazing satisfying the HVAC system of EV charging stations. Energy Conversion and Management, 2023, 281: 116851
CrossRef Google scholar
[183]
Ghosh A. Possibilities and challenges for the inclusion of the electric vehicle (EV) to reduce the carbon footprint in the transport sector: A review. Energies, 2020, 13(10): 2602
CrossRef Google scholar
[184]
Bhattacharjee A, Samanta H, Ghosh A. . Optimized integration of hybrid renewable sources with long-life battery energy storage in microgrids for peak power shaving and demand side management under different tariff scenario. Energy Technology, 2021, 9(9): 2100199
CrossRef Google scholar
[185]
Khan S, Sudhakar K, bin Yusof M H. Comparison of mono and bifacial modules for building integration and electric vehicle charging: A case study in Sweden. Energy Conversion and Management, 2023, 20: 100420
CrossRef Google scholar

Competing interests

The authors declare that they no competing interests.

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Notations

a'Sky geometry factor according to Perez model
arAngular loss coefficient
AMAir mass
AMaAbsolute air mass
AmModule azimuth angle/(° )
AsSun azimuth angle/(° )
AOIfFront side angle of incidence/(° )
bBifaciality factor
c'Sky geometry factor according to Perez model
Cini,invCost of initial investment/$
cinsInstallation cost/$
cins,labLabor costs/$
cins,matMaterial costs/$
civt(0)Inverter cost/$
cspCost of solar panels/$
CwarWarranty extension cost/$
CFiConfiguration factor for ith segment
CFskySky configuration factor
DNIDirect normal irradiance/(W·m–2)
DRDiscount rate/%
E0Extra-terrestrial normal irradiance/(W·m–2)
f1Spectral irradiance contribution
F1Coefficient expressing degree of circumsolar and horizon anisotropy
F2Coefficient expressing degree of circumsolar and horizon anistropy
GHIGlobal horizontal irradiance/(W·m–2)
GRIiGround reflected irradiance for ith segment
gvfGround view factor
hmgModule height/m
HRIHorizontal reflected irradiance/(W·m–2)
ICurrent generated/A
I0Reverse saturation current/A
Idiff,fFront side diffuse irradiance/(W·m–2)
Idiff,rRear side diffuse irradiance/(W·m–2)
Idir,fFront side direct irradiance/(W·m–2)
Idir,rRear side direct irradiance/(W·m–2)
IfFront side irradiance/(W·m–2)
Ignd,fFront side ground reflected irradiance/(W·m–2)
Ignd,rRear side ground reflected irradiance/(W·m–2)
Iph(F+R)Front + rear photogenerated current/A
IrRear side irradiance/(W·m–2)
IRInflation rate/%
Jsc,frontShort circuit current density of front side/(mA·cm–2)
Jsc,rearShort circuit current density of rear side/(mA·cm–2)
lmModule length/m
lSSystem lifetime/year
lS/wivtNumber of warranty extensions over lifetime
nDiode ideality factor
NsNumber of cells
PPVPV power production/W
PSTC,fFront side power production at STC/W
RsSeries resistance/Ω
PSHShunt resistance/Ω
rlcir,f Front side reflection loss for circumsolar component
rldir,fReflection loss for direct front side irradiance
rlhor,fFront side reflection loss for horizontal contribution
rlsky,fFront side reflection loss for sky contribution
svfSky view factor
TaAmbient air temperature/°C
TcCell temperature/°C
TINOCTPV panel installed normal operating temperature/°C
VVoltage/V
VtThermal voltage/V
xmountCoefficient based on selected mounting structure
yAge of panel/year
zSun zenith angle/(° )
aCircumsolar half angle/rad
β0Initial cell degradation/%
β1Yearly degradation rate/(%·year–1)
γPower temperature coefficient/(%·°C–1)
ηsc,frontFront side efficiency/%
ηsc,rearRear side efficiency/%
θmModule tilt angle/(° )
ρGround albedo
ε'Sky clearness
Sky brightness
χc, χh, ψh, ψcIntermediate parameters in Perez model

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 The Authors. This article is published with open access at link.springer.com and journal.hep.com.cn
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(2044 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/