Mapping the trends and prospects of battery cathode materials based on patent landscape
Chen YANG, Xin-Yu MU
Mapping the trends and prospects of battery cathode materials based on patent landscape
Advancing portable electronics and electric vehicles is heavily dependent on the cutting-edge lithium-ion (Li-ion) battery technology, which is closely linked to the properties of cathode materials. Identifying trends and prospects of cathode materials based on patent analysis is considered a kernel to optimize and refine battery related markets. In this paper, a patent analysis is performed on 6 popular cathode materials by comprehensively considering performance comparison, development trend, annual installed capacity, technology life cycle, and distribution among regions and patent assignees. In the technology life cycle, the cathode materials majorly used in electric vehicle have entered maturity stage, while the lithium cobalt oxide (LCO) cathode that is widely used in portable electronics is still in the growth stage. In global patent distributions, China holds more than 50% of total patents. In the top 10 patent assignees of 6 cathode materials, 2 institutes are from China with the rest being Japan (6) and Republic of Korea (2), indicating that the technology of cathode materials in China is relatively scattered while cathode research is highly concentrated in Japan and Republic of Korea. Moreover, the patent distribution has to consider practical issues as well as the impacts of core patents. For example, the high cost discourages the intention of applying international patents. This paper is expected to stimulate battery research, understand technical layout of various countries, and probably forecast innovative technology breakthroughs.
patent analysis / cathode / batteries / technology life cycle
[1] |
Yang C. Running battery electric vehicles with extended range: Coupling cost and energy analysis. Applied Energy, 2022, 306: 118116
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Li M, Lu J, Chen Z.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Mennel J A, Chidambaram D. A review on the development of electrolytes for lithium-based batteries for low temperature applications. Frontiers in Energy, 2023, 17(1): 43–71
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Schmuch R, Wagner R, Hörpel G.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Haji Akhoundzadeh M, Panchal S, Samadani E.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Aguilar P, Groß B. Battery electric vehicles and fuel cell electric vehicles, an analysis of alternative powertrains as a mean to decarbonise the transport sector. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2022, 53: 102624
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Cano Z P, Banham D, Ye S.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
da Silva Lima L, Quartier M, Buchmayr A.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Huang Y. The discovery of cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries from the view of interdisciplinarity. Interdisciplinary Materials, 2022, 1(3): 323–329
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
WhittinghamM S. Chalcogenide battery. US Patent, 4009052, 1977-2-22
|
[11] |
Monroe D. Building a better battery. MRS Bulletin, 2020, 45(3): 246–247
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Mizushima K, Jones P C, Wiseman P J.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Winter M, Barnett B, Xu K. Before Li ion batteries. Chemical Reviews, 2018, 118(23): 11433–11456
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Liang Y, Zhao C Z, Yuan H.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Thackeray M M, David W I F, Bruce P G.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Thackeray M M, Lee E, Shi B.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Iskandar Radzi Z, Helmy Arifin K, Zieauddin Kufian M.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Padhi A K, Nanjundaswamy K S, Goodenough J B. Phospho-olivines as positive-electrode materials for rechargeable lithium batteries. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 1997, 144(4): 1188–1194
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Tian J, Xiong R, Shen W.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Yang X G, Liu T, Wang C Y. Thermally modulated lithium iron phosphate batteries for mass-market electric vehicles. Nature Energy, 2021, 6(2): 176–185
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
MatsubaraYUedaMInoueH,
|
[22] |
LiuZYuALeeJ Y. Synthesis and characterization of LiNi1−x−yCoxMnyO2 as the cathode materials of secondary lithium batteries. Journal of Power Sources, 1999, 81–82: 416–419
|
[23] |
WhittinghamM S. History, evolution, and future status of energy storage. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2012, 100(Special Centennial Issue): 1518–1534
|
[24] |
Song L, Zheng Y, Xiao Z.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Feng X, Zheng S, He X.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Yan P, Zheng J, Xiao J.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Liu S, Wang B, Zhang X.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Mohanty D, Li J, Nagpure S C.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[29] |
Sathiya M, Rousse G, Ramesha K.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[30] |
Abbas A, Zhang L, Khan S U. A literature review on the state-of-the-art in patent analysis. World Patent Information, 2014, 37: 3–13
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[31] |
Lee S, Yoon B, Lee C.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[32] |
Qu Z, Zhang S, Zhang C. Patent research in the field of library and information science: Less useful or difficult to explore?. Scientometrics, 2017, 111(1): 205–217
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[33] |
Abraham B P, Moitra S D. Innovation assessment through patent analysis. Technovation, 2001, 21(4): 245–252
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[34] |
Evangelista A, Ardito L, Boccaccio A.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[35] |
Jin L, Sun X, Ren H.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[36] |
Ma S C, Xu J H, Fan Y. Characteristics and key trends of global electric vehicle technology development: A multi-method patent analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 338: 130502
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[37] |
Li D, Alkemade F, Frenken K.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[38] |
Wang H, Sun B. Diffusion mechanism of leading technology in the New Energy industry based on the Bass Model. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2021, 9: 586787
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[39] |
Wagner R, Preschitschek N, Passerini S.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[40] |
Sick N, Krätzig O, Eshetu G G.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[41] |
Ershadi M, Javanbakht M, Kiaei Z.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[42] |
Aaldering L J, Leker J, Song C H. Analysis of technological knowledge stock and prediction of its future development potential: The case of lithium-ion batteries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 223: 301–311
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[43] |
Pu G, Zhu X, Dai J.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[44] |
Mejia C, Kajikawa Y. Emerging topics in energy storage based on a large-scale analysis of academic articles and patents. Applied Energy, 2020, 263: 114625
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[45] |
Golembiewski B, vom Stein N, Sick N.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[46] |
Feng S, Magee C L. Technological development of key domains in electric vehicles: Improvement rates, technology trajectories and key assignees. Applied Energy, 2020, 260: 114264
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[47] |
Altenburg T, Corrocher N, Malerba F. China’s leapfrogging in electromobility. A story of green transformation driving catch-up and competitive advantage. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, 183: 121914
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[48] |
Clarivate. Derwent World Patents Index (DWPI). 2023-1-31, available at website of Clarivate
|
[49] |
Clarivate. Derwent Patents Citation Index. 2023-1-31, available at website of Clarivate
|
[50] |
ChenXSongW JNiuY T. New energy lithium battery series report. 2023-1-31, available at website of Dfcfw (in Chinese)
|
[51] |
QianzhanWebsite. Analysis of global lithium battery cathode material on market size and competition pattern in 2022. 2023-1-31, available at website of Qianzhan (in Chinese)
|
[52] |
CelineBLukaszBSamanthaW. As lithium-ion battery materials evolve, suppliers face new challenges. 2023-1-31, available at website of Spglobal
|
[53] |
Whittingham M S. Lithium batteries and cathode materials. Chemical Reviews, 2004, 104(10): 4271–4302
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[54] |
Zu C X, Li H. Thermodynamic analysis on energy densities of batteries. Energy & Environmental Science, 2011, 4(8): 2614–2624
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[55] |
Luo Y, Wei H, Tang L.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[56] |
Ding Y, Cano Z P, Yu A.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[57] |
Vaalma C, Buchholz D, Weil M.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[58] |
Wu X, Song K, Zhang X.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[59] |
Su Y, Zhang Q, Chen L.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[60] |
Zhang H, Liu H, Piper L F J.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[61] |
Su Y, Zhao J, Chen L.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[62] |
Lyu Y, Wu X, Wang K.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[63] |
GlobalMarket Insights. Lithium iron phosphate (LFP) battery market. 2023-6-6, available at website of Gminsights
|
[64] |
Fastmarkets
|
[65] |
GoodenoughJ BMizushimaKWisemanP J,
|
[66] |
Reddy M V, Mauger A, Julien C M.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[67] |
Blomgren G E. The development and future of lithium-ion batteries. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2017, 164(1): A5019–A5025
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[68] |
Chen S, Xiong J, Qiu Y.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[69] |
Kong L, Tang C, Peng H J.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[70] |
Eftekhari A. Lithium batteries for electric vehicles: From economy to research strategy. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2019, 7(6): 5602–5613
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[71] |
Pelegov D V, Pontes J. Main drivers of battery industry changes: Electric vehicles—A market overview. Batteries, 2018, 4(4): 65
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[72] |
Vernon R. International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1966, 80(2): 190–207
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[73] |
Haupt R, Kloyer M, Lange M. Patent indicators for the technology life cycle development. Research Policy, 2007, 36(3): 387–398
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[74] |
Lee M T, Su W N. Search for the developing trends by patent analysis: A case study of lithium-ion battery electrolytes. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(3): 952
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[75] |
Aaldering L J, Song C H. Tracing the technological development trajectory in post-lithium-ion battery technologies: A patent-based approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 241: 118343
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[76] |
Malhotra A, Zhang H, Beuse M.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |