Transient performance comparison of grid-forming converters with different FRT control strategies

Abstract

Grid-forming converters (GFMs) are faced with the threat of transient inrush current and synchronization instability issues when subjected to grid faults. Instead of disconnecting from the grid unintentionally, GFMs are required to have fault ride through (FRT) capability to maintain safe and stable operation in grid-connected mode during grid fault periods. In recent studies, different FRT control strategies with distinguishing features and that are feasible for different operation conditions have been proposed for GFMs. To determine their application scope, an intuitive comparison of the transient performance of different FRT control strategies is presented in this paper. First, three typical FRT control strategies (virtual impedance, current limiters, and mode-switching control) are introduced and transient mathematical models are established. A detailed comparison analysis on transient inrush current and transient synchronization stability is then presented. The results will be useful for guiding the selection and design of FRT control strategies. Finally, simulation results based on PSCAD/EMTDC are considered to verify the correctness of the theoretical analysis.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

grid-forming converters (GFMs) / fault ride through (FRT) / transient stability / transient inrush current / transient modeling

References

[1] Shuai Z K, Shen C, Yin X. . Fault analysis of inverter-interfaced distributed generators with different control schemes. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2018, 33(3): 1223–1235

[2] Vandoorn T L, De Kooning J D M, Meersman B. . Review of primary control strategies for islanded microgrids with power-electronic interfaces. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 19: 613–628

[3] Rathnayake D B, Akrami M, Phurailatpam C. . Grid forming inverter modeling, control, and applications. IEEE Access: Practical Innovations, Open Solutions, 2021, 9: 114781–114807

[4] Zhong Q C, Weiss G. Synchronverters: inverters that mimic synchronous generators. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2011, 58(4): 1259–1267

[5] Wu H, Ruan X, Yang D. . Small-signal modeling and parameters design for virtual synchronous generators. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2016, 63(7): 4292–4303

[6] Shen C, Shuai Z K, Shen Y. . Transient stability and current injection design of paralleled current-controlled VSCs and virtual synchronous generators. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2021, 12(2): 1118–1134

[7] Shuai Z K, Shen C, Liu X. . Transient angle stability of virtual synchronous generators using Lyapunov’s direct method. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2019, 10(4): 4648–4661

[8] E.ON Netz Gmbh. Grid code—high and extra high voltage. Bayreuth, 2006

[9] JapaneseGrid—Interconnection Code, 2012, document JEAC 9701–2012, addendum-2012-No.1

[10] He X Q, Geng H, Li R. . Transient stability analysis and enhancement of renewable energy conversion system during LVRT. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2020, 11(3): 1612–1623

[11] Shuai Z K, Huang W, Shen C. . Characteristics and restraining method of fast transient inrush fault currents in synchronverters. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2017, 64(9): 7487–7497

[12] Sadeghkhani I, Hamedani Golshan M E, Guerrero J M. . A current limiting strategy to improve fault ride-through of inverter interfaced autonomous microgrids. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2017, 8(5): 2138–2148

[13] He J W, Li Y W. Analysis, design, and implementation of virtual impedance for power electronics interfaced distributed generation. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2011, 47(6): 2525–2538

[14] Lu X N, Wang J, Guerrero J M. . Virtual-impedance-based fault current limiters for inverter dominated AC microgrids. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2018, 9(3): 1599–1612

[15] Zhang W, Rocabert J, Candela J I. . Synchronous power control of grid-connected power converters under asymmetrical grid fault. Energies, 2017, 10(7): 950

[16] B . Rathore, S. Chakrabarti, L. Srivastava. A self-regulated virtual impedance control of VSG in a microgrid. Electric Power Systems Research, 2021, 197: 107289

[17] Bottrell N, Green T C. Comparison of current-limiting strategies during fault ride-through of inverters to prevent latch-up and wind-up. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2014, 29(7): 3786–3797

[18] Xin H H, Huang L B, Zhang L. . Synchronous instability mechanism of P-f droop-controlled voltage source converter caused by current saturation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2016, 31(6): 5206–5207

[19] Jongudomkarn J, Liu J, Ise T. Virtual synchronous generator control with reliable fault ride-through ability: a solution based on finite-set model predictive control. IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, 2020, 8(4): 3811–3824

[20] MoonM SJohnsonR W. DSP control of UPS inverter with overcurrent limit using droop method. In: 30th Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, Charleston, USA, 1999

[21] BarsaliSCeraoloMPelacchiP, . Control techniques of dispersed generators to improve the continuity of electricity supply. In: 2002 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting, New York, USA, 2002

[22] Taul M G, Golestan S, Wang X. . Modeling of converter synchronization stability under grid faults: the general case. IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, 2022, 10(3): 2790–2804

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52207190) and Jiangsu Excellent Postdoctoral Program, China (Grant No. 2022ZB80).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2022 Higher Education Press 2022