Reassessment of fenestration characteristics for residential buildings in hot climates: energy and economic analysis

Abstract

This paper attempts to resolve the reported contradiction in the literature about the characteristics of high-performance/cost-effective fenestration of residential buildings, particularly in hot climates. The considered issues are the window glazing property (ten commercial glazing types), facade orientation (four main orientations), window-to-wall ratio (WWR) (0.2–0.8), and solar shading overhangs and side-fins (nine shading conditions). The results of the simulated runs reveal that the glazing quality has a superior effect over the other fenestration parameters and controls their effect on the energy consumption of residential buildings. Thus, using low-performance windows on buildings yields larger effects of WWR, facade orientation, and solar shading than high-performance windows. As the WWR increases from 0.2 to 0.8, the building energy consumption using the low-performance window increases 6.46 times than that using the high-performance window. The best facade orientation is changed from north to south according to the glazing properties. In addition, the solar shading need is correlated as a function of a window-glazing property and WWR. The cost analysis shows that the high-performance windows without solar shading are cost-effective as they have the largest net present cost compared to low-performance windows with or without solar shading. Accordingly, replacing low-performance windows with high-performance ones, in an existing residential building, saves about 12.7 MWh of electricity and 11.05 tons of CO₂ annually.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

parametric analysis / high-performance window / window-to-wall ratio (WWR) / facade orientation / solar shading / cost analysis

References

[1] IEA. Tracking Building 2020. 2020–7, available at website of iea

[2] Nejat P, Jomehzadeh F, Taheri M M, A global review of energy consumption, CO₂ emissions and policy in the residential sector (with an overview of the top ten CO₂ emitting countries). Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 43: 843–862

[3] Ihm P, Krarti M. Design optimization of energy efficient residential buildings in Tunisia. Building and Environment, 2012, 58: 81–90

[4] AlAjmi A, Abou-Ziyan H, Ghoneim A. Achieving annual and monthly net-zero energy of existing building in hot climate. Applied Energy, 2016, 165: 511–521

[5] Belussi L, Barozzi B, Bellazzi A, A review of performance of zero energy buildings and energy efficiency solutions. Journal of Building Engineering, 2019, 25: 100772

[6] Lu Y, Wang S, Shan K. Design optimization and optimal control of grid-connected and standalone nearly/net zero energy buildings. Applied Energy, 2015, 155: 463–477

[7] Alaidroos A, Krarti M. Optimal design of residential building envelope systems in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Energy and Building, 2015, 86: 104–117

[8] Dias Barkokebas R, Chen Y, Yu H, Achieving housing energy-efficiency requirements: methodologies and impacts on housing construction cost and energy performance. Journal of Building Engineering, 2019, 26: 100874

[9] Boafo F E, Ahn J G, Kim S M, Fenestration refurbishment of an educational building: experimental and numerical evaluation of daylight, thermal and building energy performance. Journal of Building Engineering, 2019, 25: 100803

[10] Abediniangerabi B, Shahandashti S M, Makhmalbaf A. A data-driven framework for energy-conscious design of building facade systems. Journal of Building Engineering, 2020, 29: 101172

[11] Gao Y, He F, Meng X, Thermal behavior analysis of hollow bricks filled with phase-change material (PCM). Journal of Building Engineering, 2020, 31: 101447

[12] Bhamare D K, Rathod M K, Banerjee J. Numerical model for evaluating thermal performance of residential building roof integrated with inclined phase change material (PCM) layer. Journal of Building Engineering, 2020, 28: 101018

[13] Stritih U, Tyagi V V, Stropnik R, Integration of passive PCM technologies for net-zero energy buildings. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2018, 41: 286–295

[14] Sun Y, Wilson R, Wu Y. A review of Transparent Insulation Material (TIM) for building energy saving and daylight comfort. Applied Energy, 2018, 226: 713–729

[15] Feng G, Chi D, Xu X, Study on the influence of window-wall ratio on the energy consumption of nearly zero energy buildings. Procedia Engineering, 2017, 205: 730–737

[16] Persson M L, Roos A, Wall M. Influence of window size on the energy balance of low energy houses. Energy and Building, 2006, 38(3): 181–188

[17] Manz H, Menti U P. Energy performance of glazings in European climates. Renewable Energy, 2012, 37(1): 226–232

[18] Potrč Obrecht T, Premrov M, Žegarac Leskovar V. Influence of the orientation on the optimal glazing size for passive houses in different European climates (for non-cardinal directions). Solar Energy, 2019, 189: 15–25

[19] Dutta A, Samanta A, Neogi S. Influence of orientation and the impact of external window shading on building thermal performance in tropical climate. Energy and Building, 2017, 139: 680–689

[20] Leskovar V Ž, Premrov M. An approach in architectural design of energy-efficient timber buildings with a focus on the optimal glazing size in the south-oriented facade. Energy and Building, 2011, 43(12): 3410–3418

[21] Leskovar V Ž, Premrov M. Design approach for the optimal model of an energy-efficient timber building with enlarged glazing surface on the south facade. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 2012, 11(1): 71–78

[22] Leskovar V Ž, Premrov M. Influence of glazing size on energy efficiency of timber-frame buildings. Construction & Building Materials, 2012, 30: 92–99

[23] Ayse A, Muhsin K. Influence of window parameters on the thermal performance of office rooms in different climate zones of Turkey. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research, 2019, 9: 226–243

[24] Gasparella A, Pernigotto G, Cappelletti F, Analysis and modelling of window and glazing systems energy performance for a well insulated residential building. Energy and Building, 2011, 43(4): 1030–1037

[25] Jaber S, Ajib S. Thermal and economic windows design for different climate zones. Energy and Building, 2011, 43(11): 3208–3215

[26] Dutta A, Samanta A. Reducing cooling load of buildings in the tropical climate through window glazing: a model to model comparison. Journal of Building Engineering, 2018, 15: 318–327

[27] Ihm P, Park L, Krarti M, Impact of window selection on the energy performance of residential buildings in South Korea. Energy Policy, 2012, 44: 1–9

[28] Mesloub A, Ghosh A, Touahmia M, Performance analysis of photovoltaic integrated shading devices (PVSDs) and semi-transparent photovoltaic (STPV) devices retrofitted to a prototype office building in a hot desert climate. Sustainability, 2020, 12(23): 10145

[29] Mesloub A, Ghosh A, Albaqawy G A, Energy and daylighting evaluation of integrated semitransparent photovoltaic windows with internal light shelves in open-office buildings. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2020, 2020: 1–21

[30] Ebrahimpour A, Maerefat M. Application of advanced glazing and overhangs in residential buildings. Energy Conversion and Management, 2011, 52(1): 212–219

[31] Sherif A, El-Zafarany A, Arafa R. External perforated window solar screens: the effect of screen depth and perforation ratio on energy performance in extreme desert environments. Energy and Building, 2012, 52: 1–10

[32] Chua K J, Chou S K. Evaluating the performance of shading devices and glazing types to promote energy efficiency of residential buildings. Building Simulation, 2010, 3(3): 181–194

[33] Palmero-Marrero A I, Oliveira A C. Effect of louver shading devices on building energy requirements. Applied Energy, 2010, 87(6): 2040–2049

[34] Al-Saadi S N, Al-Jabri K S. Optimization of envelope design for housing in hot climates using a genetic algorithm (GA) computational approach. Journal of Building Engineering, 2020, 32: 101712

[35] US Department of Energy. EnergyPlus energy simulation software. 2020–8-8, available at website of energyplus

[36] Tuhus-Dubrow D, Krarti M. Genetic-algorithm based approach to optimize building envelope design for residential buildings. Building and Environment, 2010, 45(7): 1574–1581

[37] Zhao J, Du Y. Multi-objective optimization design for windows and shading configuration considering energy consumption and thermal comfort: a case study for office building in different climatic regions of China. Solar Energy, 2020, 206: 997–1017

[38] Harenberg D, Marelli S, Sudret B, Uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis for economic models. Quantitative Economics, 2019, 10(1): 1–41

[39] Sheikhshahrokhdehkordi M, Khalesi J, Goudarzi N. High-performance building: sensitivity analysis for simulating different combinations of components of a two-sided windcatcher. Journal of Building Engineering, 2020, 28: 101079

[40] Alberto A, Ramos N M M, Almeida R M S F. Parametric study of double-skin facades performance in mild climate countries. Journal of Building Engineering, 2017, 12: 87–98

[41] Ioannou A, Itard L C M. Energy performance and comfort in residential buildings: sensitivity for building parameters and occupancy. Energy and Building, 2015, 92: 216–233

[42] Tian W. A review of sensitivity analysis methods in building energy analysis. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 20: 411–419

[43] Linton R, Frutiger T, Blanc S, American society of heating, refrigerating and air-conditioning engineers, inc. (ASHRAE). New York, NY1977, 1977

[44] Al Busaidi A S, Kazem H A, Al-Badi A H, A review of optimum sizing of hybrid PV-Wind renewable energy systems in Oman. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 53: 185–193

[45] Kazem H A. Renewable energy in Oman: status and future prospects. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011, 15(8): 3465–3469

[46] Climate OneBuilding Org. Climate data for building performance simulation. 2021–1, available at website of climate.onebuilding.org

[47] Crawley D B, Lawrie L K, Winkelmann F C, EnergyPlus: creating a new-generation building energy simulation program. Energy and Building, 2001, 33(4): 319–331

[48] Crawley D B, Hand J W, Kummert M, Contrasting the capabilities of building energy performance simulation programs. Building and Environment, 2008, 43(4): 661–673

[49] Zhang Y. Use jEPlus as an efficient building design optimisation tool. In: CIBSE ASHRAE Technical Symposium, London, UK, 2012

[50] Zhang Y. “Parallel” EnergyPlus and the development of a parametric analysis tool. International Building Performance Simulation Association, 2019

[51] United States Department of Energy (DOE). EnergyPlus: Engineering Reference. California, USA 2014.

[52] Kneifel J, Webb D. Life cycle cost manual for the federal energy management program. National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2020

[53] Kuwait M E W. Electricity statistics year book, latest version 2019. 2020–8, available at website of mew.gov.kw

[54] Cerezo C, Sokol J, AlKhaled S, Comparison of four building archetype characterization methods in urban building energy modeling (UBEM): a residential case study in Kuwait City. Energy and Building, 2017, 154: 321–334

Acknowledgment

This work was funded by the Public Authority for Applied Education and Training (PAAET) under project number TS-08-14.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2021 Higher Education Press