Improvement of solidification model and analysis of 3D channel blockage with MPS method

Reo KAWAKAMI, Xin LI, Guangtao DUAN, Akifumi YAMAJI, Isamu SATO, Tohru SUZUKI

PDF(2650 KB)
PDF(2650 KB)
Front. Energy ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (4) : 946-958. DOI: 10.1007/s11708-021-0754-z
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Improvement of solidification model and analysis of 3D channel blockage with MPS method

Author information +
History +

Abstract

In a severe accident of a nuclear power reactor, coolant channel blockage by solidified molten core debris may significantly influence the core degradations that follow. The moving particle semi-implicit (MPS) method is one of the Lagrangian-based particle methods for analyzing incompressible flows. In the study described in this paper, a novel solidification model for analyzing melt flowing channel blockage with the MPS method has been developed, which is suitable to attain a sufficient numerical accuracy with a reasonable calculation cost. The prompt velocity diffusion by viscosity is prioritized over the prompt velocity correction by the pressure term (for assuring incompressibility) within each time step over the “mushy zone” (between the solidus and liquidus temperature) for accurate modeling of solidification before fixing the coordinates of the completely solidified particles. To sustain the numerical accuracy and stability, the corrective matrix and particle shifting techniques have been applied to correct the discretization errors from irregular particle arrangements and to recover the regular particle arrangements, respectively. To validate the newly developed algorithm, 2-D benchmark analyses are conducted for steady-state freezing of the water in a laminar flow between two parallel plates. Furthermore, 3-D channel blockage analyses of a boiling water reactor (BWR) fuel support piece have been performed. The results show that a partial channel blockage develops from the vicinity of the speed limiter, which does not fully develop into a complete channel blockage, but still diverts the incoming melt flow that follows to the orifice region.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

boiling water reactor (BWR) / severe accident / channel blockage / moving particle semi-implicit (MPS) method / solidification

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Reo KAWAKAMI, Xin LI, Guangtao DUAN, Akifumi YAMAJI, Isamu SATO, Tohru SUZUKI. Improvement of solidification model and analysis of 3D channel blockage with MPS method. Front. Energy, 2021, 15(4): 946‒958 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-021-0754-z

References

[1]
Yu Y, Yang Y. URANS simulation of the turbulent flow in tight lattice bundle. Frontiers in Energy, 2011, 5(4): 404–411
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Tolman E L, Kuan P, Broughton J M. TMI-2 accident scenario update. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 1988, 108(1–2): 45–54
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Gauntt R O, Humphries L L. Final results of the XR2–1 BWR metallic melt relocation experiment. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), 1997
[4]
Tokyo Electric Power Company. Evaluation of the situation of cores and containment vessels of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Units-1 to 3 and examination into unsolved issues in the accident progression progress. Tokyo Electric Power Company, Report No. 4, 2015
[5]
Sandia National Laboratories. MELCOR Computer Code Manuals Vol. 2: Reference Manual Version 2.2.9541 2017. SAND2017–0876 O, 2017
[6]
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency. Benchmark Study of the Accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (BSAF Project) Phase 1 Summary Report. NEA/CSNI/R18, 2015
[7]
Luxat D. Modular Accident Analysis Program (MAAP)-MELCOR Crosswalk Phase 1 Study. Technical Update, 2014
[8]
Koshizuka S, Oka Y. Moving-particle semi-implicit method for fragmentation of incompressible fluid. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 1996, 123(3): 421–434
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Chen R, Oka Y. Numerical analysis of freezing controlled penetration behavior of the molten core debris in an instrument tube with MPS. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2014, 71: 322–332
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Goto Y, Yamaji A. Analysis of eutectic and metallic melt flow and blockage in BWR control rod guide tube by MPS method. In: Proceedings of TopSafe 2017, Vienna, Austria, 2017
[11]
Takahashi N, Duan G, Furuya M, Analysis of hemispherical vessel ablation failure involving natural convection by MPS method with corrective matrix. International Journal of Advanced Nuclear Reactor Design and Technology, 2019, 1: 19–29
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Yamaji A, Li X. Development of MPS method for analyzing melt spreading behavior and MCCI in severe accidents. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2016, 739(1): 012002(in Chinese)
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Duan G, Yamaji A, Koshizuka S. A novel multiphase MPS algorithm for modeling crust formation by highly viscous fluid for simulating corium spreading. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2019, 343: 218–231
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Xu R, Stansby P, Laurence D. Accuracy and stability in incompressible SPH (ISPH) based on the projection method and a new approach. Journal of Computational Physics, 2009, 228(18): 6703–6725
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Khayyer A, Gotoh H, Shimizu Y. Comparative study on accuracy and conservation properties of two particle regularization schemes and proposal of an optimized particle shifting scheme in ISPH context. Journal of Computational Physics, 2017, 332: 236–256
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Duan G, Koshizuka S, Yamaji A, An accurate and stable multiphase moving particle semi-implicit method based on a corrective matrix for all particle interaction models. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2018, 115(10): 1287–1314
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Kikuchi Y, Shigemasa Y, Oe A, Steady-state freezing of liquids in laminar flow between two parallel plates. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 1986, 23(11): 979–991
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Vacondio R, Altomare C, De Leffe M, Grand challenges for smoothed particle hydrodynamics numerical schemes. Computational Particle Mechanics, 2021, 8: 575–588
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Jeong S M, Nam J W, Hwang S C, Numerical prediction of oil amount leaked from a damaged tank using two-dimensional moving particle simulation method. Ocean Engineering, 2013, 69: 70–78
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Sun P N, Colagrossi A, Le Touzé D, Extension of the δ-Plus-SPH model for simulating Vortex-Induced-Vibration problems. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2019, 90: 19–42
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Koshizuka S, Shibata K. MPS-SW-MAIN-Ver.2.0. P 8827–1. 2006
[22]
Spindler B, Veteau J M. Simulation of spreading with solidification: assessment synthesis of THEMA code. Rapport CEA-R-6053, 2004
[23]
Alsmeyer H, Cron T, Foit J J, Test report of the Melt Spreasding Tests ECOKATS-V1 and ECOKATS-1. 2004
[24]
Ramacciotti M, Journeau C, Sudreau F, Viscosity models for corium melts. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2001, 204(1–3): 377–389
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Duan G, Chen B. Large Eddy Simulation by particle method coupled with Sub-Particle-Scale model and application to mixing layer flow. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2015, 39(10–11): 3135–3149
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Kirillov P L, Terentieva M I, Deniskina N B. Thermophysical Properties of Materials for Nuclear Engineering. 2nd ed. Moscow: IzdAT Publishing House, 2007

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Nuclear Energy Science & Technology and Human Resource Development Project (through concentrating wisdom), the Advanced Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Waseda University, and the TCU priority promotion research supported by Tokyo City University.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2021 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(2650 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/