Thermo-economic analysis of a direct supercritical CO2 electric power generation system using geothermal heat
Xingchao WANG, Chunjian PAN, Carlos E. ROMERO, Zongliang QIAO, Arindam BANERJEE, Carlos RUBIO-MAYA, Lehua PAN
Thermo-economic analysis of a direct supercritical CO2 electric power generation system using geothermal heat
A comprehensive thermo-economic model combining a geothermal heat mining system and a direct supercritical CO2 turbine expansion electric power generation system was proposed in this paper. Assisted by this integrated model, thermo-economic and optimization analyses for the key design parameters of the whole system including the geothermal well pattern and operational conditions were performed to obtain a minimal levelized cost of electricity (LCOE). Specifically, in geothermal heat extraction simulation, an integrated wellbore-reservoir system model (T2Well/ECO2N) was used to generate a database for creating a fast, predictive, and compatible geothermal heat mining model by employing a response surface methodology. A parametric study was conducted to demonstrate the impact of turbine discharge pressure, injection and production well distance, CO2 injection flowrate, CO2 injection temperature, and monitored production well bottom pressure on LCOE, system thermal efficiency, and capital cost. It was found that for a 100 MWe power plant, a minimal LCOE of $0.177/kWh was achieved for a 20-year steady operation without considering CO2 sequestration credit. In addition, when CO2 sequestration credit is $1.00/t, an LCOE breakeven point compared to a conventional geothermal power plant is achieved and a breakpoint for generating electric power generation at no cost was achieved for a sequestration credit of $2.05/t.
geothermal heat mining / supercritical CO2 / power generation / thermo-economic analysis / optimization
[1] |
Romero C E, Wang X. Key technologies for ultra-low emissions from coal-fired power plants. In: Zhang Y S, Wang T, Pan W P, Romero C E, eds. Advances in Ultra-low Emission Control Technologies for Coal-fired Power Plants. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2019: 39–79
|
[2] |
OSTI. GOV. Electric power monthly. Technical Report, Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), 1995
|
[3] |
Figueroa J D, Fout T, Plasynski S,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Randolph J B, Saar M O. Coupling carbon dioxide sequestration with geothermal energy capture in naturally permeable, porous geologic formations: implications for CO2 sequestration. Energy Procedia, 2011, 4: 2206–2213
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Pan C, Chávez O, Romero C E,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Garapati N, Randolph J B, Saar M O. Brine displacement by CO2, energy extraction rates, and lifespan of a CO2-limited CO2-Plume Geothermal (CPG) system with a horizontal production well. Geothermics, 2015, 55: 182–194
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Adams B M, Kuehn T H, Bielicki J M,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Adams B M, Kuehn T H, Bielicki J M,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Zhang L, Cui G, Zhang Y,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Ahn Y, Bae S J, Kim M,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Turchi C S, Ma Z W, Dyreby J. Supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle configurations for use in concentrating solar power systems. In: Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2012: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2013
|
[12] |
Persichilli M, Kacludis A, Zdankiewicz E,
|
[13] |
Wright S A, Conboy T M, Rochau G E,
|
[14] |
Mecheri M, Le Moullec Y. Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles for coal-fired power plants. Energy, 2016, 103: 758–771
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Noaman M, Saade G, Morosuk T,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Park S, Kim J, Yoon M,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Sharan P, Neises T, Turchi C. Thermal desalination via supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle: optimal system design and techno-economic analysis without reduction in cycle efficiency. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 152: 499–514
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Li M, Xu J, Cao F,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Atrens A D, Gurgenci H, Rudolph V. Economic optimization of a CO2-based EGS power plant. Energy & Fuels, 2011, 25(8): 3765–3775
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Levy E K, Wang X, Pan C,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Wang X C. Investigation of geothermal heat extraction using supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2) and its utilization in sCO2-based power cycles and organic Rankine cycles–a thermodynamic & economic perspective. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Bethlehem: Lehigh University, 2018
|
[22] |
Wang X, Levy E K, Pan C,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Pruess K, Oldenburg C M, Moridis G J. TOUGH2 User’s Guide Version 2[R]. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), 1999, available at the website of UNT
|
[24] |
Pruess K. ECO2N: A TOUGH2 Fluid Property Module for Mixtures of Water, NaCl, and CO2[R]. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), 2005, available at the website of lbl
|
[25] |
Pan C, Romero C E, Levy E K,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Pan L, Freifeld B, Doughty C,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Pan L, Oldenburg C M. T2Well—an integrated wellbore-reservoir simulator. Computers & Geosciences, 2014, 65: 46–55
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Pan L, Webb S W, Oldenburg C M. Analytical solution for two-phase flow in a wellbore using the drift-flux model. Advances in Water Resources, 2011, 34(12): 1656–1665
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[29] |
Bezerra M A, Santelli R E, Oliveira E P,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[30] |
Montgomery D C. Design and Analysis of Experiments. Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2017
|
[31] |
Gunst R F, Myers R H, Montgomery D C. Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. Technometrics, 1996, 38(3): 285
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[32] |
Plus ASPEN. Aspen technology. Inc., version. 2009, available at the website of aspentech
|
[33] |
Peletiri S, Rahmanian N, Mujtaba I. CO2 pipeline design: a review. Energies, 2018, 11(9): 2184
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[34] |
Vandeginste V, Piessens K. Pipeline design for a least-cost router application for CO2 transport in the CO2 sequestration cycle. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2008, 2(4): 571–581
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[35] |
Sanyal S K. Cost of geothermal power and factors that affect it. In: Proceedings of 29th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford, California, USA, 2004
|
[36] |
Gross R, Heptonstall P, Blyth W. Investment in electricity generation: the role of costs, incentives and risks. Imperial College Centre for Energy Policy and Technology (ICEPT) for the Technology and Policy Assessment Function of the UK Energy Research Centre, 2007
|
[37] |
Boggs P T, Tolle J W. Sequential quadratic programming. Acta Numerica, 1995, 4: 1–51
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[38] |
Rubin E S, Chen C, Rao A B. Cost and performance of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(9): 4444–4454
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[39] |
USCODE. 26 USC 45Q: credit for carbon oxide sequestration. 2018
|
[40] |
Turton R, Bailie R C, Whiting W B,
|
[41] |
Silla H. Chemical Process Engineering: Design and Economics. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2003
|
[42] |
McCollum D L, Ogden J M. Techno-economic models for carbon dioxide compression, transport, and storage & correlations for estimating carbon dioxide density and viscosity. 2006, available at the website of repec
|
[43] |
Lemmon E W, Huber M L, McLinden M O. NIST reference fluid thermodynamic and transport properties–REFPROP. 2019–4, available at the website of NIST
|
[44] |
Morris D. RSMeans Mechanical Cost Data. 40th annual edition, Cordian RSMeans Data, Rockland, MA, USA, 2017
|
[45] |
Charles J. Communications with sales rep from Mueller Environmental Designs, Inc. 2017, available at the website of
|
[46] |
Qiao Z, Tang Y, Zhang L,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |