Crop residues: applications of lignocellulosic biomass in the context of a biorefinery
Maria Carolina ANDRADE, Caio de Oliveira GORGULHO SILVA, Leonora Rios de SOUZA MOREIRA, Edivaldo Ximenes FERREIRA FILHO
Crop residues: applications of lignocellulosic biomass in the context of a biorefinery
Interest in lignocellulosic biomass conversion technologies has increased recently because of their potential to reduce the dependency on non-renewable feedstocks. Residues from a variety of crops are the major source of lignocellulose, which is being produced in increasingly large quantities worldwide. The commercial exploitation of crop residues as feedstocks for biorefineries which could be used to produce a variety of goods such as biofuels, biochemicals, bioplastics, and enzymes is an attractive approach not only for adding value to residues but also for providing renewable products required by the expanding bioeconomy market. Moreover, the implementation of biorefineries in different regions has the potential to add value to the specific crop residues produced in the region. In this review, several aspects of crop residue application in biorefineries are discussed, including the role of crop residues in the bioeconomy and circular economy concepts, the main technical aspects of crop residue conversion in biorefineries, the main crop residues generated in different regions of the world and their availability, the potential value-added bioproducts that can be extracted or produced from each crop residue, and the major advantages and challenges associated with crop residue utilization in biorefineries. Despite their potential, most biomass refining technologies are not sufficiently advanced or financially viable. Several technical obstacles, especially with regard to crop residue collection, handling, and pre-treatment, prevent the implementation of biorefineries on a commercial scale. Further research is needed to resolve these scale-up-related challenges. Increased governmental incentives and bioeconomic strategies are expected to boost the biorefinery market and the cost competitiveness of biorefinery products.
crop residue / biorefinery / bioproduct / biomass / circular bioeconomy / enzyme
[1] |
Finkelstein M, Sheehan J. Biomass and biotechnology: a key to sustainability. Bioenergy: Knowledge Discovery Framework, 2009
|
[2] |
Energy EE& R. Bionergy basics. 2018–3-2, available at the website of Department of Energy
|
[3] |
Silva C O G, Vaz R P, Filho E X F. Bringing plant cell wall-degrading enzymes into the lignocellulosic biorefinery concept. Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining, 2018, 12: 277–289
|
[4] |
European Comission. A sustainable bioeconomy for Europe: strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment. 2018
|
[5] |
Bugge M M, Hansen T, Klitkou A. What is the bioeconomy? A review of the literature. Sustainability, 2016, 8: 22
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Bioeconomy BW. What is a bioeconomy? 2019–11–18, available at the website of biooekonomie-bw
|
[7] |
Bos H, Annevelink B R, van Ree O. The role of biomass, bioenergy and biorefining in a circular economy. IEA Bioenergy, 2017
|
[8] |
Tozlu A, Özahi E, Abuşoʇlu A. Waste to energy technologies for municipal solid waste management in Gaziantep. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 54: 809–815
|
[9] |
Nizami A S, Rehan M, Waqas M,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Venkata Mohan S, Nikhil G N, Chiranjeevi P,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Yang Y, Zhang P, Yang X,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Squinca P, Badino A C, Farinas C S. A closed-loop strategy for endoglucanase production using sugarcane bagasse liquefied by a home-made enzymatic cocktail. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 249: 976–982
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Silva C O G, Aquino E N, Ricart C A O,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Rosales-Calderon O, Arantes V. A review on commercial-scale high-value products that can be produced alongside cellulosic ethanol. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2019, 12(1):240
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Gomes H A R, Silva A J, Gómez-Mendoza D P,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Thorenz A, Wietschel L, Stindt D,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Silva C O G, Filho E X F. A review of holocellulase production using pretreated lignocellulosic substrates. BioEnergy Resource, 2017, 10: 592–602
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Lopes A de M, Ferreira Filho E X, de Souza Moreira L R. An update on enzymatic cocktails for lignocellulose breakdown. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2018, 125(3):632–645
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Yin X, Duan X, You Q,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
King S D.
|
[21] |
Lapola D M, Schaldach R, Alcamo J,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Fillat U, Martín-Sampedro R, Macaya-Sanz D,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Bech L, Herbst F, Grell M N,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Andreaus J, Ximenes Ferreira Filho E, Pinto da Silva Bon E. Biotechnology of holocellulose-degrading enzymes. In: Hou C T, Shaw J F, eds. Biocatalysis and Bioenergy. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2008, 195–229
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Hoogwijk M, Faaij A, van den Broek R,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Andrew S S. Crop residue removal for biomass energy production: effects on soils and recommendations. USDA-Natural Resource Conservation Service, 2006
|
[27] |
Daioglou V, Stehfest E, Wicke B,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Scarlat N, Martinov M, Dallemand J F. Assessment of the availability of agricultural crop residues in the European Union: potential and limitations for bioenergy use. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 2010, 30(10): 1889–1897
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[29] |
BCC Publishing. Global markets for enzymes in industrial applications. 2018–7-13, at the website of bccresearch
|
[30] |
Searle S, Malins C. A reassessment of global bioenergy potential in 2050. GCB Bioenergy, 2015, 7(2): 328–336
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[31] |
Zalfar S. A primer on agricultural residues. 2019–11–17, available at the website of bioenergyconsult
|
[32] |
Tripathi N, Hills C D, Singh R S,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[33] |
Cherubin M R, Oliveira D M D S, Feigl B J,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[34] |
Tarkalson B D D, Brown B, Kok H,
|
[35] |
Monteleone M, Cammerino A R B, Garofalo P,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[36] |
Sietske Boschma D, Kees I, Kwant W. Rice straw and wheat straw: potentials feedstocks for the biobased economy. NL Agency Ministry of Economic Affairs, 2013
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
Crop Residues FAO. Emissions database agriculture. 2017–6-28, available at the website of FAO
|
[39] |
Agbor V B, Cicek N, Sparling R,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[40] |
Nunes R de M, Guarda E A, Serra J C V,
|
[41] |
USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. Production, supply and distribution. 2018–3-18, available at the website of USDA
|
[42] |
Shalini R, Gupta D K. Utilization of pomace from apple processing industries: a review. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2010, 47(4): 365–371
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[43] |
Lal R. World crop residues production and implications of its use as a biofuel. Environment International, 2005, 31(4): 575–584
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[44] |
Ray D K, Mueller N D, West P C,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[45] |
Kim S, Dale B E. Global potential bioethanol production from wasted crops and crop residues. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2004, 26(4): 361–375
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[46] |
Bezerra T L, Ragauskas A J. A review of sugarcane bagasse for second-generation bioethanol and biopower production. Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining, 2016, 6: 246–256
|
[47] |
FAO. Part 3: Feeding the world. In: FAO Statistical Yearbook, 2013: 123–158
|
[48] |
Macauley H. Cereal crops: rice, maize, millet, sorghum, wheat. In: Conference of Feeding Africa: An action plan for African agricultural transformation, Dakar, Senegal, 2015, 1–36
|
[49] |
Assefa Y, Roozeboom K, Thompson C,
|
[50] |
Olesen J E, Trnka M, Kersebaum K C,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[51] |
Oerke E C, Dehne H W. Safeguarding production–losses in major crops and the role of crop protection. Crop Protection (Guildford, Surrey), 2004, 23(4): 275–285
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[52] |
Willer H, Lernoud J, Huber B,
|
[53] |
Wrigley C, Corke H, Seetharaman K,
|
[54] |
Medina J, Monreal C, Barea J M,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[55] |
NASA.Technology readiness level. 2019–11–17, available at the website of NASA
|
[56] |
Bacovsky D. Production facilities. 2020–4-25, available at website of ETIP Bioenergy
|
[57] |
Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy. Integrated biorefineries. 2020–4-25, available at the website of Department of Energy
|
[58] |
Bentsen N S, Felby C. Biomass for energy in the European Union–a review of bioenergy resource assessments. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2012, 5(1): 25
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[59] |
Beringer T, Lucht W, Schaphoff S. Bioenergy production potential of global biomass plantations under environmental and agricultural constraints. Global Change Biology. Bioenergy, 2011, 3(4): 299–312
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[60] |
Uçkun Kıran E, Trzcinski A P, Liu Y. Platform chemical production from food wastes using a biorefinery concept. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 2015, 90(8): 1364–1379
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[61] |
Gontard N, Sonesson U, Birkved M,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[62] |
Aouf C, Benyahya S, Esnouf A,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[63] |
de Jong E, Higson A, Walsh P,
|
[64] |
European Bioplastic. Bioplastics market data. 2018–9-25, available at the website of european-bioplastics
|
[65] |
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2019–2028. 2019, available at the website of FAO
|
[66] |
Philp J. Policies for bioplastics in the context of a bioeconomy. OECD Science, Tecnology and Industry Policy Papers, 2014
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[67] |
Newton T. Coffee isn’t world’s 2nd-most traded commodity (but it’s important). Perfect Daily Grind. 2020–9-28, available at the website of perfectdailygrind
|
[68] |
Wagner J. International trade in goods statistics by product Exports 2001–2019. International Trade in Goods, 2019, available at the website of intracen
|
[69] |
Conab. Monitoring the Brazilian coffee crop. Quarto levantamento. Brasília, 2019 (in Portuguese)
|
[70] |
Esquivel P, Jiménez V M. Functional properties of coffee and coffee by-products. Food Research International, 2012, 46(2): 488–495
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[71] |
Orozco A L, Pérez M I, Guevara O,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[72] |
Pandey A, Soccol C R, Mitchell D. New developments in solid state fermentation: I-bioprocesses and products. Process Biochemistry, 2000, 35(10): 1153–1169
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[73] |
Caetano N S, Caldeira D, Martins A A,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[74] |
Kondamudi N, Mohapatra S K, Misra M. Spent coffee grounds as a versatile source of green energy. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2008, 56(24): 11757–11760
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[75] |
Mazzafera P. Degradation of caffeine by microorganisms and potential use of decaffeinated coffee husk and pulp in animal feeding. Scientia Agrícola, 2002, 59(4): 815–821
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[76] |
Givens D I, Barber W P. In vivo evaluation of spent coffee grounds as a ruminant feed. Agricultural Wastes, 1986, 18(1): 69–72
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[77] |
Costa A S G, Alves R C, Vinha A F,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[78] |
Hijosa-Valsero M, Garita-Cambronero J, Paniagua-García A I,
|
[79] |
Licursi D, Antonetti C, Fulignati S,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[80] |
Murthy P S, Madhava Naidu M, Srinivas P. Production of α-amylase under solid-state fermentation utilizing coffee waste. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 2009, 84(8): 1246–1249
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[81] |
Cerda A, Mejías L, Gea T,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[82] |
Antier P, Minjares A, Roussos S,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[83] |
Sung S H, Chang Y, Han J. Development of polylactic acid nanocomposite films reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals derived from coffee silverskin. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2017, 169: 495–503
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[84] |
Carnier R, Berton R S, Coscione A R,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[85] |
Qureshi N, Saha B C, Cotta M A. Butanol production from wheat straw hydrolysate using Clostridium beijerinckii. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 2007, 30(6): 419–427
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[86] |
Navya P N, Pushpa S M. Production, statistical optimization and application of endoglucanase from Rhizopus stolonifer utilizing coffee husk. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 2013, 36(8): 1115–1123
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[87] |
Dias M, Melo M M, Schwan R F,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[88] |
Selvam K, Govarthanan M, Kamala-Kannan S,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[89] |
Battista F, Fino D, Mancini G. Optimization of biogas production from coffee production waste. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 200: 884–890
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[90] |
Hermosa V A B. Use of residues from semi-dry coffee processing to produce value-added compounds. Dissertation for the Master’s Degree.
|
[91] |
Machado C M M, Soccol C R, De Oliveira B H,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[92] |
Dias M. Utilization of coffee processing residues for the production of carotenoids by yeasts and bacteria. Dissertations for the Doctoral Degree. Lavras: Universidade Federal de Lavras, 2016 (in Portuguese)
|
[93] |
Salmones D, Mata G, Waliszewski K N. Comparative culturing of Pleurotus spp. on coffee pulp and wheat straw: biomass production and substrate biodegradation. Bioresource Technology, 2005, 96(5): 537–544
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[94] |
Nguyen T H, Ra C H, Sunwoo I Y,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[95] |
Pereira D M. Evaluation of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory capacity of soy protein isolate, okara and its hydrolysates. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 2017 (in Portuguese)
|
[96] |
Queiroz Santos V A, Nascimento C G, Schmidt C A P,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[97] |
Rodrigues C, Vandenberghe L P S, Goyzueta L D,
|
[98] |
Cunha J R B, Santos F C P, Assis F G V,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[99] |
Tombini J. Production of fungal lipase from by-products of soybean processing. Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, 2015 (in Portuguese)
|
[100] |
Ellilä S, Fonseca L, Uchima C, Cota J,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[101] |
Cunha L, Martarello R, De Souza P M,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[102] |
Zhu J, Zheng Y, Xu F, et al
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[103] |
Granjo J F O, Duarte B P M, Oliveira N M C. Integrated production of biodiesel in a soybean biorefinery: modeling, simulation and economical assessment. Energy, 2017, 129: 273–291
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[104] |
de Moraes Filho M L, Busanello M, Prudencio S H,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[105] |
Khare S K, Jha K, Gandhi A P. Citric acid production from okara (soy-residue) by solid-state fermentation. Bioresource Technology, 1995, 54(3): 323–325
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[106] |
Wanmolee W, Sornlake W, Rattanaphan N,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[107] |
Sekhon J K, Rosentrater K A, Jung S,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[108] |
Szczerbowski D, Pitarelo A P, Zandoná Filho A,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[109] |
Renewable Fuels Association. Building partnerships | growing markets 2017 ethanol industry outlook. In: Henderson M, Koehler N, Seurer J, Dinneen B, eds. National Ethanol Conference, 2017
|
[110] |
de Souza Moreira L R, de Carvalho Campos M, de Siqueira P H V M,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[111] |
Camassola M, Dillon A J P. Effect of different pretreatment of sugar cane bagasse on cellulase and xylanases production by the mutant Penicillium echinulatum 9A02S1 grown in submerged culture. BioMed Research International, 2014: 720740
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[112] |
Prajapati B P, Jana U K, Suryawanshi R K,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[113] |
Jain L, Agrawal D. Performance evaluation of fungal cellulases with dilute acid pretreated sugarcane bagasse: a robust bioprospecting strategy for biofuel enzymes. Renewable Energy, 2018, 115: 978–988
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[114] |
Kumar S, Sharma H K, Sarkar B C. Effect of substrate and fermentation conditions on pectinase and cellulase production by Aspergillus niger NCIM 548 in submerged (SmF) and solid state fermentation (SSF). Food Science and Biotechnology, 2011, 20(5): 1289–1298
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[115] |
Xue D S, Chen H Y, Lin D Q,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[116] |
Gelain L, da Cruz Pradella J G, da Costa A C. Mathematical modeling of enzyme production using Trichoderma harzianum P49P11 and sugarcane bagasse as carbon source. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 198: 101–107
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[117] |
He Y C, Xia D Q, Ma C L,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[118] |
Mokomele T, da Costa Sousa L, Bals B,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[119] |
Schmidt L M, Mthembu L D, Reddy P,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[120] |
Almeida F C R, Sales A, Moretti J P,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[121] |
Carpio L G T, De Souza F S. Competition between second-generation ethanol and bioelectricity using the residual biomass of sugarcane: effects of uncertainty on the production mix. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2019, 24: 1–15
|
[122] |
Menandro L M S, Cantarella H, Franco H C J,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[123] |
You X, van Heiningen A, Sixta H,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[124] |
Hernández-Pérez A F, de Arruda P V, Felipe M G A. Sugarcane straw as a feedstock for xylitol production by Candida guilliermondii FTI 20037. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 2016, 47(2): 489–496
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[125] |
Candido R G, Gonçalves A R. Synthesis of cellulose acetate and carboxymethylcellulose from sugarcane straw. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2016, 152: 679–686
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[126] |
Mariano A P, Dias M O S, Junqueira T L,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[127] |
Robl D, Costa S, Büchli F,
|
[128] |
de Souza Moreira L R, de Carvalho Campos M, de Siqueira P H V M,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[129] |
Pratto B, de Souza R B A, Sousa R Jr,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[130] |
Jin Q, Yang L, Poe N,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[131] |
Huang H, Liu W, Singh V,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[132] |
Bals B, Dale B, Balan V. Enzymatic hydrolysis of distiller’s dry grain and solubles (DDGS) using ammonia fiber expansion pretreatment. Energy & Fuels, 2006, 20(6): 2732–2736
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[133] |
Zaini N A B M, Chatzifragkou A, Charalampopoulos D. Microbial production of d-lactic acid from dried distiller’s grains with solubles. Engineering in Life Sciences, 2018
|
[134] |
Foo K Y. Value-added utilization of maize cobs waste as an environmental friendly solution for the innovative treatment of carbofuran. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2016, 100: 295–304
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[135] |
Miraboutalebi S M, Nikouzad S K, Peydayesh M,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[136] |
Indah S, Helard D, Sasmita A. Utilization of maize husk (Zea mays L.) as low-cost adsorbent in removal of iron from aqueous solution. Water Science and Technology, 2016, 73(12): 2929–2935
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[137] |
Guyo U, Makawa T, Moyo M,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[138] |
Agblevor F A, Ibrahim M M, El-Zawawy W K. Coupled acid and enzyme mediated production of microcrystalline cellulose from corn cob and cotton gin waste. Cellulose (London, England), 2007, 14(3): 247–256
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[139] |
Veljković V B, Biberdžić M O, Banković-Ilić I B,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[140] |
Mata T M, Sousa I R B G, Vieira S S,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[141] |
Böjti T, Kovöcs K L, Kakuk B,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[142] |
Samanta A K, Senani S, Kolte A P,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[143] |
Pérez-Rodríguez N, García-Bernet D, Domínguez J M. Extrusion and enzymatic hydrolysis as pretreatments on corn cob for biogas production. Renewable Energy, 2017, 107: 597–603
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[144] |
Xia L, Cen P. Cellulase production by solid state fermentation on lignocellulosic waste from the xylose industry. Process Bioche-mistry, 1999, 34(9): 909–912
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[145] |
Kapoor M, Panwar D, Kaira G S.
|
[146] |
Talebnia F, Karakashev D, Angelidaki I. Production of bioethanol from wheat straw: an overview on pretreatment, hydrolysis and fermentation. Bioresource Technology, 2010, 101(13): 4744–4753
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[147] |
Ballesteros I, Negro M J, Oliva J M,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[148] |
Mancini G, Papirio S, Lens P N L,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[149] |
Kaparaju P, Serrano M, Thomsen A B,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[150] |
Dang V B H, Doan H D, Dang-Vu T,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[151] |
Chen L, Hong F, Yang X,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[152] |
Chang C, Cen P, Ma X. Levulinic acid production from wheat straw. Bioresource Technology, 2007, 98(7): 1448–1453
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[153] |
Zhang R, Li X, Fadel J G. Oyster mushroom cultivation with rice and wheat straw. Bioresource Technology, 2002, 82(3): 277–284
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[154] |
Pourbafrani M, Forgács G, Horváth I S,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[155] |
Boluda-Aguilar M, López-Gómez A. Production of bioethanol by fermentation of lemon (Citrus limon L.) peel wastes pretreated with steam explosion. Industrial Crops and Products, 2013, 41: 188–197
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[156] |
Muthayya S, Sugimoto J D, Montgomery S,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[157] |
Bienvenido J O. Rice straw. Rice Knowledge Bank, 2016, available at the website of knowledgebank
|
[158] |
Kogo T, Yoshida Y, Koganei K,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[159] |
Bohlmann G M. Process economic considerations for production of ethanol from biomass feedstocks. Industrial Biotechnology (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2006, 2(1): 14–20
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[160] |
Pinzi S, Dorado M P. Vegetable-based feedstocks for biofuels production. In: Luque R, Campelo J, Clark J, eds. Handbook of Biofuels Production: Processes and Technologies. Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2011
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[161] |
Saritha M, Arora A, Singh S,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[162] |
Tiwari R, Rana S, Singh S,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[163] |
Moniz P, João L, Duarte L C,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[164] |
Moniz P, Pereira H, Duarte L C,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[165] |
Mohammadi A, Cowie A L, Cacho O,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[166] |
Do P T M, Ueda T, Kose R, et al
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[167] |
Nguyen D H, Zenitova L A, Le Q D,
|
[168] |
Chen W H, Chen Y C, Lin J G. Evaluation of biobutanol production from non-pretreated rice straw hydrolysate under non-sterile environmental conditions. Bioresource Technology, 2013, 135: 262–268
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[169] |
Kim I, Rehman M S U, Kim K H,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[170] |
Barana D, Salanti A, Orlandi M,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[171] |
Rivers D B. Biomass conversion technology: thoughts on the path forward to comercial adoption. Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining, 2012, 6: 246–256
|
[172] |
Farias M. Fire hits straw stock of the company Granbio in AL again. 2019–11–28, available at the website of globo
|
[173] |
Office of Energy efficiency & renewable energy. POET-DSM: project libert. 2020–4-25, available at the website of Department of Energy
|
[174] |
De Corato U, De Bari I, Viola E,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[175] |
Gibbs H K, Rausch L, Munger J,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[176] |
O’Hare M, Delucchi M, Edwards R,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[177] |
Hombach L E, Cambero C, Sowlati T,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[178] |
Plevin R J, Jones A D, Torn M S,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[179] |
Kim S, Dale B E. Indirect land use change for biofuels: testing predictions and improving analytical methodologies. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2011, 35(7): 3235–3240
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[180] |
Sorda G, Banse M, Kemfert C. An overview of biofuel policies across the world. Energy Policy, 2010, 38: 6977–6988
|
/
〈 | 〉 |