Catalytic steam reforming of tar for enhancing hydrogen production from biomass gasification: a review

Ru Shien TAN, Tuan Amran TUAN ABDULLAH, Anwar JOHARI, Khairuddin MD ISA

PDF(1241 KB)
PDF(1241 KB)
Front. Energy ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (3) : 545-569. DOI: 10.1007/s11708-020-0800-2
REVIEW ARTICLE
REVIEW ARTICLE

Catalytic steam reforming of tar for enhancing hydrogen production from biomass gasification: a review

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Presently, the global search for alternative renewable energy sources is rising due to the depletion of fossil fuel and rising greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Among alternatives, hydrogen (H2) produced from biomass gasification is considered a green energy sector, due to its environmentally friendly, sustainable, and renewable characteristics. However, tar formation along with syngas is a severe impediment to biomass conversion efficiency, which results in process-related problems. Typically, tar consists of various hydrocarbons (HCs), which are also sources for syngas. Hence, catalytic steam reforming is an effective technique to address tar formation and improve H2 production from biomass gasification. Of the various classes in existence, supported metal catalysts are considered the most promising. This paper focuses on the current researching status, prospects, and challenges of steam reforming of gasified biomass tar. Besides, it includes recent developments in tar compositional analysis, supported metal catalysts, along with the reactions and process conditions for catalytic steam reforming. Moreover, it discusses alternatives such as dry and autothermal reforming of tar.

Keywords

hydrogen / biomass gasification / tar / steam reforming / catalyst

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ru Shien TAN, Tuan Amran TUAN ABDULLAH, Anwar JOHARI, Khairuddin MD ISA. Catalytic steam reforming of tar for enhancing hydrogen production from biomass gasification: a review. Front. Energy, 2020, 14(3): 545‒569 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-020-0800-2

References

[1]
Nikolaidis P, Poullikkas A. A comparative overview of hydrogen production processes. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 67: 597–611
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Idrees M, Rangari V, Jeelani S. Sustainable packaging waste-derived activated carbon for carbon dioxide capture. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 2018, 26: 380–387
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Yaumi A L, Bakar M Z A, Hameed B H. Recent advances in functionalized composite solid materials for carbon dioxide capture. Energy, 2017, 124: 461–480
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Triantafyllidis S, Ries R J, Kaplanidou K K. Carbon dioxide emissions of spectators’ transportation in collegiate sporting events: cmparing on-campus and off-campus stadium locations. Sustainability, 2018, 10(1): 241
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
US Environmental Protection Agency. Inventory of US greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990–2014. Washington: US Environmental Protection Agency, 2016
[6]
Sreenivasulu B, Gayatri D V, Sreedhar I, Raghavan K V. A journey into the process and engineering aspects of carbon capture technologies. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 41: 1324–1350
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate. Climate Cange 2014: Migation of Cimate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015
[8]
Berry P, Ogawa-Onishi Y, McVey A. The vulnerability of threatened species: adaptive capability and adaptation opportunity. Biology (Basel), 2013, 2(3): 872–893
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Abdalla A M, Hossain S, Petra P M, Ghasemi M, Azad A K. Achievements and trends of solid oxide fuel cells in clean energy field: a perspective review. Frontiers in Energy, 2018, online, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-018-0546-2
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
International Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook 2017. Paris. France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2017
[11]
Parthasarathy P, Narayanan K S. Hydrogen production from steam gasification of biomass: influence of process parameters on hydrogen yield—a review. Renewable Energy, 2014, 66: 570–579
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Kalamaras C M, Efstathiou A M. Hydrogen production technologies: current state and future developments. Conference Papers in Energy. London. UK: Hindawi Publishing Corporation, 2013
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Riis T, Hagen E F, Vie P J, Ulleberg Ø. Hydrogen production and storage-R&D: priorities and gaps. IEA Hydrogen Implementing Agreement. Paris: International Energy Agency, 2006
[14]
Dodds P E, Staffell I, Hawkes A D, Li F, Grünewald P, McDowall W, Ekins P. Hydrogen and fuel cell technologies for heating: a review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(5): 2065–2083
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Pei A, Zhang L, Jiang B, Guo L, Zhang X, Lv Y, Jin H. Hydrogen production by biomass gasification in supercritical or subcritical water with raney-Ni and other catalysts. Frontiers of Energy and Power Engineering in China, 2009, 3(4): 456–464
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Moud P H, Kantarelis E, Andersson K J, Engvall K. Biomass pyrolysis gas conditioning over an iron-based catalyst for mild deoxygenation and hydrogen production. Fuel, 2018, 211: 149–158
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Sumrunronnasak S, Tantayanon S, Kiatgamolchai S, Sukonket T. Improved hydrogen production from dry reforming reaction using a catalytic packed-bed membrane reactor with Ni-based catalyst and dense pdagcu alloy membrane. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(4): 2621–2630
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Hosseini S E, Wahid M A, Ganjehkaviri A. An overview of renewable hydrogen production from thermochemical process of oil palm solid waste in Malaysia. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 94: 415–429
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Bhattacharyya R, Sandeep K, Kamath S, Mistry K. Hydrogen from alkaline water electrolysis: a case study on process economics of decentralized production in the present indian scenario. Emerging Trends in Chemical Engineering, 2018, 4(3): 1–17
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Lin M Y, Hourng L W, Huang S H, Tsai T H, Hsu W N. Analysis and study on polarization during water electrolysis hydrogen production. Chemical Engineering Communications, 2017, 204(2): 168–175
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Gu X, Yuan S, Ma M, Zhu J. Nanoenhanced materials for photolytic hydrogen production. Nanotechnology for Energy Sustainability, 2017: 629–648
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Chu K H, Ye L, Wang W, Wu D, Chan D K L, Zeng C, Yip H Y. Enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production from aqueous sulfide/sulfite solution by ZnO0.6S0.4 with simultaneous dye degradation under visible-light irradiation. Chemosphere, 2017, 47: 9873–9880
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Jacobs J D. Economic modeling of cost effective hydrogen production from water electrolysis by utilizing Iceland’s regulatory power market. Dissertation for the Degree of Master of Science. Iceland: Reykjavik University, 2016
[24]
Artetxe M, Alvarez J, Nahil M A, Olazar M, Williams P T. Steam reforming of different biomass tar model compounds over Ni/Al2O3 catalysts. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 136: 119–126
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Chiodo V, Urbani F, Zafarana G, Prestipino M, Galvagno A, Maisano S. Syngas production by catalytic steam gasification of citrus residues. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(46): 28048–28055
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Molino A, Chianese S, Musmarra D. Biomass gasification technology: the state of the art overview. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2016, 25(1): 10–25
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Hosseini S E, Wahid M A. Hydrogen production from renewable and sustainable energy resources: promising green energy carrier for clean development. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 57: 850–866
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Hernández J, Ballesteros R, Aranda G. Characterisation of tars from biomass gasification: effect of the operating conditions. Energy, 2013, 50: 333–342
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Singh R, Singh S, Balwanshi J. Tar removal from producer gas: a review. Research Journal of Engineering Sciences, 2014, 3: 16–22
[30]
Valderrama Rios M L, González A M, Lora E E S, Almazán del Olmo O A. Reduction of tar generated during biomass gasification: a review. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2018, 108: 345–370
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Artetxe M, Nahil M A, Olazar M, Williams P T. Steam reforming of phenol as biomass tar model compound over Ni/Al2O3 catalyst. Fuel, 2016, 184: 629–636
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Yoon S J, Choi Y C, Lee J G. Hydrogen production from biomass tar by catalytic steam reforming. Energy Conversion and Management, 2010, 51(1): 42–47
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Nakamura S, Kitano S, Yoshikawa K. Biomass gasification process with the tar removal technologies utilizing bio-oil scrubber and char bed. Applied Energy, 2016, 170: 186–192
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Osipovs S, Pučkins A. Choice the filter for tar removal from syngas. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Scientific and Practical Conference, Rezekne: Rezekne Academy of Technologies, 2017, 211–215
[35]
Choi Y K, Ko J H, Kim J S. Gasification of dried sewage sludge using an innovative three-stage gasifier: clean and H2-rich gas production using condensers as the only secondary tar removal apparatus. Fuel, 2018, 216: 810–817
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Woolcock P J, Brown R C. A review of cleaning technologies for biomass-derived syngas. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2013, 52: 54–84
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Ersoz A, Olgun H, Ozdogan S. Reforming options for hydrogen production from fossil fuels for pem fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources, 2006, 154(1): 67–73
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
McGlocklin K. Economic analysis of various reforming techniques and fuel sources for hydrogen production. Dissertation for the Degree of Master of Science. Auburn: Auburn University, 2006
[39]
Myers D B, Ariff G D, James B D, Lettow J S, Thomas C E, Kuhn R C. Cost and performance comparison of stationary hydrogen fueling appliances. In: Proceedings of the 2002 US DOE Hydrogen Program Review, Arlington: Directed Technologies, 2002
[40]
Forsberg O. Catalytic tar reforming in biomass gasification: tungsten bronzes and the effect of gas alkali during tar steam reforming. Dissertation for the Master Degree. Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2014
[41]
Qian K, Kumar A. Catalytic reforming of toluene and naphthalene (model tar) by char supported nickel catalyst. Fuel, 2017, 187: 128–136
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Meng J, Zhao Z, Wang X, Wu X, Zheng A, Huang Z, Zhao K, Li H. Effects of catalyst preparation parameters and reaction operating conditions on the activity and stability of thermally fused Fe-olivine catalyst in the steam reforming of toluene. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(1): 127–138
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Takise K, Manabe S, Muraguchi K, Higo T, Ogo S, Sekine Y. Anchoring effect and oxygen redox property of Co/La0.7Sr0.3AlO3–d perovskite catalyst on toluene steam reforming reaction. Applied Catalysis A, General, 2017, 538: 181–189
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
de Castro T P, Silveira E B, Rabelo-Neto R C, Borges L E P, Noronha F B. Study of the performance of Pt/Al2O3 and Pt/CeO2/Al2 catalysts for steam reforming of toluene, methane and mixtures. Catalysis Today, 2018, 299: 251–262
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Oh G, Park S Y, Seo M W, Kim Y K, Ra H W, Lee J G, Yoon S J. Ni/Ru–Mn/Al2O3 catalysts for steam reforming of toluene as model biomass tar. Renewable Energy, 2016, 86: 841–847
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Chen J, Tamura M, Nakagawa Y, Okumura K, Tomishige K. Promoting effect of trace Pd on hydrotalcite-derived Ni/Mg/Al catalyst in oxidative steam reforming of biomass tar. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2015, 179: 412–421
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Zhao X, Xue Y, Lu Z, Huang Y, Guo C, Yan C. Encapsulating Ni/CeO2-ZrO2 with SiO2 layer to improve it catalytic activity for steam reforming of toluene. Catalysis Communications, 2017, 101: 138–141
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Heo D H, Lee R, Hwang J H, Sohn J M. The effect of addition of Ca, K and Mn over Ni-based catalyst on steam reforming of toluene as model tar compound. Catalysis Today, 2016, 265: 95–102
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Zou X, Chen T, Zhang P, Chen D, He J, Dang Y, Ma Z, Chen Y, Toloueinia P, Zhu C, Xie J, Liu H, Suib S L. High catalytic performance of Fe-Ni/palygorskite in the steam reforming of toluene for hydrogen production. Applied Energy, 2018, 226: 827–837
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Ben-Iwo J, Manovic V, Longhurst P. Biomass resources and biofuels potential for the production of transportation fuels in nigeria. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 63: 172–192
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Feng Y, Xiao B, Goerner K, Cheng G, Wang J. Influence of catalyst and temperature on gasification performance by externally heated gasifier. Smart Grid and Renewable Energy, 2011, 2(03): 177–183
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
Kumar A, Jones D D, Hanna M A. Thermochemical biomass gasification: a review of the current status of the technology. Energies, 2009, 2(3): 556–581
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
Li C, Suzuki K. Tar property, analysis, reforming mechanism and model for biomass gasification—an overview. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2009, 13(3): 594–604
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Guan G, Hao X, Abudula A. Heterogeneous catalysts from natural sources for tar removal: a mini review. Journal of Advanced Catalysis Science and Technology, 2014, 1(1): 20–28
CrossRef Google scholar
[55]
Yu H, Zhang Z, Li Z, Chen D. Characteristics of tar formation during cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin gasification. Fuel, 2014, 118: 250–256
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Marano J J. Benchmarking biomass gasification technologies for fuels, chemicals and hydrogen production. US: National Energy Technology Laboratory, 2002
[57]
Etutu T G, Laohalidanond K, Kerdsuwan S. Gasification of municipal solid waste in a downdraft gasifier: analysis of tar formation. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology, 2016, 38(2): 221–228
[58]
Berrueco C, Montané D, Matas Güell B, del Alamo G. Effect of temperature and dolomite on tar formation during gasification of torrefied biomass in a pressurized fluidized bed. Energy, 2014, 66: 849–859
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Erkiaga A, Lopez G, Amutio M, Bilbao J, Olazar M. Influence of operating conditions on the steam gasification of biomass in a conical spouted bed reactor. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2014, 237: 259–267
CrossRef Google scholar
[60]
Qin Y H, Feng J, Li W Y. Formation of tar and its characterization during air-steam gasification of sawdust in a fluidized bed reactor. Fuel, 2010, 89(7): 1344–1347
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
Klein A, Themelis N J. Energy recovery from municipal solid wastes by gasification. In: 11th North American Waste-to-Energy Conference, Tampa: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2003, 241–252
[62]
Shen Y, Yoshikawa K. Recent progresses in catalytic tar elimination during biomass gasification or pyrolysis—a review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 21: 371–392
CrossRef Google scholar
[63]
Di Carlo A, Borello D, Sisinni M, Savuto E, Venturini P, Bocci E, Kuramoto K. Reforming of tar contained in a raw fuel gas from biomass gasification using nickel-mayenite catalyst. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(30): 9088–9095
CrossRef Google scholar
[64]
Wolfesberger U, Aigner I, Hofbauer H. Tar content and composition in producer gas of fluidized bed gasification of wood-influence of temperature and pressure. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 2009, 28(3): 372–379
CrossRef Google scholar
[65]
Nemanova V, Nordgreen T, Sjostrom K. Green methane from biomass gasification: final report. Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2010
[66]
Riis T, Hagen E F, Vie P J, Ulleberg Ø. Hydrogen production–gaps and priorities. IEA Hydrogen Implementing Agreement, 2006
[67]
Ghoneim S A, El-Salamony R A, El-Temtamy S A. Review on innovative catalytic reforming of natural gas to syngas. World Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2016, 4(01): 116–139
CrossRef Google scholar
[68]
Obonukut M E, Alabi S B, Bassey P G. Steam reforming of natural gas: a value addition to natural gas utilization in Nigeria. Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, 2016, 1: 28–41
[69]
Coll R, Salvado J, Farriol X, Montané D. Steam reforming model compounds of biomass gasification tars: conversion at different operating conditions and tendency towards coke formation. Fuel Processing Technology, 2001, 74(1): 19–31
CrossRef Google scholar
[70]
Guan G, Kaewpanha M, Hao X, Abudula A. Catalytic steam reforming of biomass tar: prospects and challenges. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 58: 450–461
CrossRef Google scholar
[71]
Laosiripojana N, Sutthisripok W, Charojrochkul S, Assabumrungrat S. Development of Ni-Fe bimetallic based catalysts for biomass tar cracking/reforming: effects of catalyst support and Co-fed reactants on tar conversion characteristics. Fuel Processing Technology, 2014, 127: 26–32
CrossRef Google scholar
[72]
Rached J A, El Hayek C, Dahdah E, Genneqiun C, Aouad S, Tidahy H L, Estephane J, Nsouli B, Aboukaïs A, Abi-Aad E. Ni based catalysts promoted with cerium used in the steam reforming of toluene for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 42: 12829–12840
CrossRef Google scholar
[73]
Silveira E, Rabelo-Neto R, Noronha F. Steam reforming of toluene, methane and mixtures over Ni/ZrO2 catalysts. Catalysis Today, 2017, 289: 289–301
CrossRef Google scholar
[74]
Josuinkas F M, Quitete C P, Ribeiro N F, Souza M M V M. Steam reforming of model gasification tar compounds over nickel catalysts prepared from hydrotalcite precursors. Fuel Processing Technology, 2014, 121: 76–82
CrossRef Google scholar
[75]
Ashok J, Kawi S. Steam reforming of toluene as a biomass tar model compound over CeO2 promoted Ni/CaO-Al2O3 catalytic systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(32): 13938–13949
CrossRef Google scholar
[76]
Chitsazan S, Sepehri S, Garbarino G, Carnasciali M M, Busca G. Steam reforming of biomass-derived organics: interactions of different mixture components on Ni/Al2O3 based catalysts. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2016, 187: 386–398
CrossRef Google scholar
[77]
Sehested J, Larsen N W, Falsig H, Hinnemann B. Sintering of nickel steam reforming catalysts: effective mass diffusion constant for Ni-OH at nickel surfaces. Catalysis Today, 2014, 228: 22–31
CrossRef Google scholar
[78]
Sehested J. Four challenges for nickel steam-reforming catalysts. Catalysis Today, 2006, 111(1–2): 103–110
CrossRef Google scholar
[79]
Vivanpatarakij S, Rulerk D, Assabumrungrat S. Removal of tar from biomass gasification process by steam reforming over nickel catalysts. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 2014, 37: 205–210
[80]
An L, Dong C, Yang Y, Zhang J, He L. The influence of Ni loading on coke formation in steam reforming of acetic acid. Renewable Energy, 2011, 36(3): 930–935
CrossRef Google scholar
[81]
Wojcieszak R, Zieliński M, Monteverdi S, Bettahar M M. Study of nickel nanoparticles supported on activated carbon prepared by aqueous hydrazine reduction. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2006, 299(1): 238–248
CrossRef Google scholar
[82]
Park H J, Park S H, Sohn J M, Park J, Jeon J K, Kim S S, Park Y K. Steam reforming of biomass gasification tar using benzene as a model compound over various Ni supported metal oxide catalysts. Bioresource Technology, 2010, 101(1): S101–S103
CrossRef Google scholar
[83]
Kim H W, Kang K M, Kwak H Y. Preparation of supported ni catalysts with a core/shell structure and their catalytic tests of partial oxidation of methane. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34(8): 3351–3359
CrossRef Google scholar
[84]
Kaewpanha M, Karnjanakom S, Guan G, Hao X, Yang J, Abudula A. Removal of biomass tar by steam reforming over calcined scallop shell supported Cu catalysts. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2017, 26(4): 660–666
CrossRef Google scholar
[85]
Zhao X Y, Xue Y P, Yan C F, Wang Z, Guo C, Huang S. Sorbent assisted catalyst of Ni-CaO-La2O3 for sorption enhanced steam reforming of bio-oil with acetic acid as the model compound. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 2017, 119: 106–112
CrossRef Google scholar
[86]
Sisinni M, Di Carlo A, Bocci E, Micangeli A, Naso V. Hydrogen-rich gas production by sorption enhanced steam reforming of woodgas containing tar over a commercial ni catalyst and calcined dolomite as CO2 sorbent. Energies, 2013, 6(7): 3167–3181
CrossRef Google scholar
[87]
Iida H, Noguchi K, Numa T, Igarashi A, Okumura K. Ru/12SrO–7Al2O3 (S12A7) catalyst prepared by physical mixing with Ru(PPh3)3Cl2 for steam reforming of toluene. Catalysis Communications, 2015, 72: 101–104
CrossRef Google scholar
[88]
Reina T R, Ivanova S, Laguna O, Centeno M A, Odriozola J A. WGS and CO-PrOx reactions using gold promoted copper-ceria catalysts: bulk CuOCeO2 vs. CuOCeO2/Al2O3 with low mixed oxide content. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2016, 197: 62–72
CrossRef Google scholar
[89]
Reina T R, Ivanova S, Delgado J J, Ivanov I. Viability of Au/CeO2–ZnO/Al2O catalysts for pure hydrogen production by the water-gas shift reaction. ChemCatChem, 2014, 6(5): 1401–1409
[90]
Zhou H P, Wu H S, Shen J, Yin A X, Sun L D, Yan C H. Thermally stable Pt/CeO2 hetero-nanocomposites with high catalytic activity. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2010, 132(14): 4998–4999
CrossRef Google scholar
[91]
Lin F H, Doong R A. Catalytic nanoreactors of Au@Fe3O4 yolk-shell nanostructures with various Au sizes for efficient nitroarene reduction. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2017, 121(14): 7844–7853
CrossRef Google scholar
[92]
Nan Beurden P. On the catalytic aspects of steam-methane reforming. Report No.: I-04–003. Petten: Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands, 2004
[93]
Bossola F, Pereira-Hernández X I, Evangelisti C, Wang Y, Dal Santo V. Investigation of the promoting effect of mn on a Pt/C catalyst for the steam and aqueous phase reforming of glycerol. Journal of Catalysis, 2017, 349: 75–83
CrossRef Google scholar
[94]
Jeong J H, Lee J W, Seo D J, Seo Y, Yoon W L, Lee D K, Kim D H. Ru-doped ni catalysts effective for the steam reforming of methane without the pre-reduction treatment with H2. Applied Catalysis A, General, 2006, 302(2): 151–156
CrossRef Google scholar
[95]
Xie C, Chen Y, Engelhard M H, Song C. Comparative study on the sulfur tolerance and carbon resistance of supported noble metal catalysts in steam reforming of liquid hydrocarbon fuel. ACS Catalysis, 2012, 2(6): 1127–1137
CrossRef Google scholar
[96]
Zhou H, Zhang T, Sui Z, Zhu Y A, Han C, Zhu K, Zhou X. A single source method to generate Ru-Ni-MgO catalysts for methane dry reforming and the kinetic effect of Ru on carbon deposition and gasification. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2018, 233: 143–159
CrossRef Google scholar
[97]
Higo T, Saito H, Ogo S, Sugiura Y, Sekine Y. Promotive effect of ba addition on the catalytic performance of Ni/LaAlO3 catalysts for steam reforming of toluene. Applied Catalysis A, General, 2017, 530: 125–131
CrossRef Google scholar
[98]
Oemar U, Ang M L, Hee W F, Hidajat K, Kawi S. Perovskite LaxM1−xNi0.8Fe0.2O3 catalyst for steam reforming of toluene: crucial role of alkaline earth metal at low steam condition. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2014, 148–149: 231–242
CrossRef Google scholar
[99]
Kang S, Sub Kwak B, Kang M. Synthesis of ni-alkaline earth metals particles encapsulated by porous SiO2 (NiMO@SiO2)and their catalytic performances on ethanol steam reforming. Ceramics International, 2014, 40(9): 14197–14206
CrossRef Google scholar
[100]
Yin K, Mahamulkar S, Xie J, Shibata H, Malek A, Li L, Jones C W, Agrawal P, Davis R J. Catalytic reactions of coke with dioxygen and steam over alkaline-earth-metal-doped cerium-zirconium mixed oxides. Applied Catalysis A, General, 2017, 535: 17–23
CrossRef Google scholar
[101]
Yang L, Choi Y, Qin W, Chen H, Blinn K, Liu M, Liu P, Bai J, Tyson T A, Liu M. Promotion of water-mediated carbon removal by nanostructured barium oxide/nickel interfaces in solid oxide fuel cells. Nature Communications, 2011, 2(1): 357
CrossRef Google scholar
[102]
Hu S, He L, Wang Y, Su S, Jiang L, Chen Q, Liu Q, Chi H, Xiang J, Sun L. Effects of oxygen species from Fe addition on promoting steam reforming of toluene over Fe–Ni/Al2O3 catalysts. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(40): 17967–17975
CrossRef Google scholar
[103]
Karnjanakom S, Guan G, Asep B, Du X, Hao X, Samart C, Abudula A. Catalytic steam reforming of tar derived from steam gasification of sunflower stalk over ethylene glycol assisting prepared Ni/MCM-41. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 98: 359–368
CrossRef Google scholar
[104]
Dam A H. Bimetallic catalyst system for steam reforming. Dissertaion for the Doctorial Degree. Norway: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2015
[105]
Li D, Lu M, Aragaki K, Koike M, Nakagawa Y, Tomishige K. Characterization and catalytic performance of hydrotalcite-derived Ni-Cu alloy nanoparticles catalysts for steam reforming of 1-methylnaphthalene. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2016, 192: 171–181
CrossRef Google scholar
[106]
You X, Wang X, Ma Y, Liu J, Liu W, Xu X, Peng H, Li C, Zhou W, Yuan P, Chen X. Ni-Co/Al2O3 bimetallic catalysts for CH4 steam reforming: elucidating the role of Co for improving coke resistance. ChemCatChem, 2014, 6(12): 3377–3386
CrossRef Google scholar
[107]
Yoon Y, Kim H, Lee J. Enhanced catalytic behavior of Ni alloys in steam methane reforming. Journal of Power Sources, 2017, 359: 450–457
CrossRef Google scholar
[108]
Ahmed T, Xiu S, Wang L, Shahbazi A. Investigation of Ni/Fe/Mg zeolite-supported catalysts in steam reforming of tar using simulated-toluene as model compound. Fuel, 2018, 211: 566–571
CrossRef Google scholar
[109]
Koike M, Li D, Watanabe H, Nakagawa Y, Tomishige K. Comparative study on steam reforming of model aromatic compounds of biomass tar over Ni and Ni-Fe alloy nanoparticles. Applied Catalysis A, General, 2015, 506: 151–162
CrossRef Google scholar
[110]
Li D, Koike M, Wang L, Nakagawa Y, Xu Y, Tomishige K. Regenerability of hydrotalcite-derived nickel–iron alloy nanoparticles for syngas production from biomass tar. ChemSusChem, 2014, 7(2): 510–522
CrossRef Google scholar
[111]
Mukai D, Murai Y, Higo T, Ogo S, Sugiura Y, Sekine Y. Effect of Pt addition to Ni/La0.7Sr0.3AlO3−d catalyst on steam reforming of toluene for hydrogen production. Applied Catalysis A, General, 2014, 471: 157–164
CrossRef Google scholar
[112]
Parizotto N, Zanchet D, Rocha K, Marques C M P, Bueno J M C. The effects of Pt promotion on the oxi-reduction properties of alumina supported nickel catalysts for oxidative steam-reforming of methane: temperature-resolved XAFS analysis. Applied Catalysis A, General, 2009, 366(1): 122–129
CrossRef Google scholar
[113]
Moraes T S, Rabelo Neto R C, Ribeiro M C, Mattos L V, Kourtelesis M, Ladas S, Verykios X, Noronha F B. Ethanol conversion at low temperature over CeO2-supported Ni-based catalysts. Effect of Pt addition to Ni catalyst. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2016, 181: 754–768
CrossRef Google scholar
[114]
Nurunnabi M, Fujimoto K I, Suzuki K, Li B, Kado S, Kunimori K, Tomishige K. Promoting effect of noble metals addition on activity and resistance to carbon deposition in oxidative steam reforming of methane over NiO-MgO solid solution. Catalysis Communications, 2006, 7(2): 73–78
CrossRef Google scholar
[115]
Jaiswar V K, Katheria S, Deo G, Kunzru D. Effect of Pt doping on activity and stability of Ni/MgAl2O4 catalyst for steam reforming of methane at ambient and high pressure condition. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(30): 18968–18976
CrossRef Google scholar
[116]
García-Diéguez M, Pieta I S, Herrera M C, Larrubia M A, Alemany L J. Nanostructured Pt- and Ni-based catalysts for CO2-reforming of methane. Journal of Catalysis, 2010, 270(1): 136–145
CrossRef Google scholar
[117]
Nabgan W, Tuan Abdullah T A, Mat R, Nabgan B, Gambo Y, Triwahyono S. Influence of Ni to Co ratio supported on ZrO2 catalysts in phenol steam reforming for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(48): 22922–22931
CrossRef Google scholar
[118]
Luo N, Ouyang K, Cao F, Xiao T. Hydrogen generation from liquid reforming of glycerin over Ni-Co bimetallic catalyst. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2010, 34(4): 489–495
CrossRef Google scholar
[119]
Zhang X, Yang C, Zhang Y, Xu Y, Shang S, Yin Y. Ni–Co catalyst derived from layered double hydroxides for dry reforming of methane. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(46): 16115–16126
CrossRef Google scholar
[120]
Cao J P, Ren J, Zhao X Y, Wei X Y, Takarada T. Effect of atmosphere on carbon deposition of Ni/Al2O3 and Ni-loaded on lignite char during reforming of toluene as a biomass tar model compound. Fuel, 2018, 217: 515–521
CrossRef Google scholar
[121]
Park S Y, Oh G, Kim K, Seo M W, Ra H W, Mun T Y, Lee J G, Yoon S J. Deactivation characteristics of Ni and Ru catalysts in tar steam reforming. Renewable Energy, 2017, 105: 76–83
CrossRef Google scholar
[122]
Liu X, Yang X, Liu C, Chen P, Yue X, Zhang S. Low-temperature catalytic steam reforming of toluene over activated carbon supported nickel catalysts. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2016, 65: 233–241
CrossRef Google scholar
[123]
Valle B, Aramburu B, Remiro A, Bilbao J, Gayubo A G. Effect of calcination/reduction conditions of Ni/La2O3-αAl2O3 catalyst on its activity and stability for hydrogen production by steam reforming of raw bio-oil/ethanol. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2014, 147: 402–410
CrossRef Google scholar
[124]
Boukha Z, Jiménez-González C, de Rivas B, González-Velasco J R, Gutiárrez-Ortiz J I, López-Fonseca R. Synthesis, characterisation and performance evaluation of spinel-derived Ni/Al2O3 catalysts for various methane reforming reactions. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2014, 158–159: 190–201
CrossRef Google scholar
[125]
Meng J, Wang X, Zhao Z, Wu X, Zheng A, Wei G, Huang Z, Li H. A highly carbon-resistant olivine thermally fused with metallic nickel catalyst for steam reforming of biomass tar model compound. RSC Advances, 2017, 7(62): 39160–39171
CrossRef Google scholar
[126]
Cárdenas-Espinosa D C, Vargas J C. Influence of the preparation conditions of Ca doped Ni/olivine catalysts on the improvement of gas quality produced by biomass gasification. Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, 2010, 175: 385–388
CrossRef Google scholar
[127]
Courson C, Udron L, Świerczyński D, Kiennemann A. Hydrogen production from biomass gasification on nickel catalysts: tests for dry reforming of methane. Catalysis Today, 2002, 76(1): 75–86
CrossRef Google scholar
[128]
Cui D, Liu J, Yu J, Yue J, Su F, Xu G. Necessity of moderate metal-support interaction in Ni/Al2O3 for syngas methanation at high temperatures. RSC Advances, 2015, 5(14): 10187–10196
CrossRef Google scholar
[129]
Pandey D, Deo G. Effect of support on the catalytic activity of supported Ni-Fe catalysts for the CO2 methanation reaction. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2016, 33: 99–107
CrossRef Google scholar
[130]
Villoria J A, Mota N, Al-Sayari S, Alvarez-Galvan M C, Navarro R M, Luis Garcia Fierro J. Perovskites as catalysts in the reforming of hydrocarbons: a review. Micro and Nanosystems, 2012, 4(3): 231–252
CrossRef Google scholar
[131]
Lian J, Fang X, Liu W, Huang Q, Sun Q, Wang H, Wang X, Zhou W. Ni supported on LaFeO3 perovskites for methane steam reforming: on the promotional effects of plasma treatment in H2-Ar atmosphere. Topics in Catalysis, 2017, 60(12–14): 831–842
CrossRef Google scholar
[132]
Aman D, Radwan D, Ebaid M, Mikhail S, van Steen E. Comparing nickel and cobalt perovskites for steam reforming of glycerol. Molecular Catalysis, 2018, 452: 60–67
CrossRef Google scholar
[133]
Quitete C P, Manfro R L, Souza M M. Perovskite-based catalysts for tar removal by steam reforming: effect of the presence of hydrogen sulfide. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(15): 9873–9880
CrossRef Google scholar
[134]
Rapagná S, Provendier H, Petit C, Kiennemann A, Foscolo P U. Development of catalysts suitable for hydrogen or syn-gas production from biomass gasification. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2002, 22(5): 377–388
CrossRef Google scholar
[135]
Oemar U, Ang P S, Hidajat K, Kawi S. Promotional effect of Fe on perovskite LaNixFe1−xO3 catalyst for hydrogen production via steam reforming of toluene. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(14): 5525–5534
CrossRef Google scholar
[136]
Qi Y, Cheng Z, Zhou Z. Steam reforming of methane over ni catalysts prepared from hydrotalcite-type precursors: catalytic activity and reaction kinetics. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2015, 23(1): 76–85
CrossRef Google scholar
[137]
Noor T. Sorption enhanced high temperature water gas shift reaction: materials and catalysis. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2013
[138]
Mitran G, Mieritz D G, Seo D K. Hydrotalcites with vanadium, effective catalysts for steam reforming of toluene. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(34): 21732–21740
CrossRef Google scholar
[139]
Nguyen-Thanh D, Duarte de Farias A M, Fraga M A. Characterization and activity of vanadia-promoted Pt/ZrO2 catalysts for the water-gas shift reaction. Catalysis Today, 2008, 138(3–4): 235–238
CrossRef Google scholar
[140]
Ballarini N, Battisti A, Cavani F, Cericola A, Lucarelli C, Racioppi S, Arpentinier P. The oxygen-assisted transformation of propane to COx/H2 through combined oxidation and wgs reactions catalyzed by vanadium oxide-based catalysts. Catalysis Today, 2006, 116(3): 313–323
CrossRef Google scholar
[141]
Kokumai T M, Cantane D A, Melo G T, Paulucci L B, Zanchet D. VOx-Pt/Al2O3 catalysts for hydrogen production. Catalysis Today, 2017, 289: 249–257
CrossRef Google scholar
[142]
Labhasetwar N, Saravanan G, Kumar Megarajan S, Manwar N, Khobragade R, Doggali P, Grasset F. Perovskite-type catalytic materials for environmental applications. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, 2015, 16(3): 036002
CrossRef Google scholar
[143]
Yousaf B. Hydrotalcite based ni-co bi-metallic catalysts for steam reforming of methane. NTNU, 2016
[144]
Higo T, Hashimoto T, Mukai D, Nagatake S, Ogo S, Sugiura Y, Sekine Y. Effect of hydrocarbon structure on steam reforming over Ni/perovskite catalyst. Journal of the Japan Petroleum Institute, 2015, 58(2): 86–96
CrossRef Google scholar
[145]
Zarei Senseni A, Seyed Fattahi S M, Rezaei M, Meshkani F. A comparative study of experimental investigation and response surface optimization of steam reforming of glycerol over nickel nano-catalysts. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(24): 10178–10192
CrossRef Google scholar
[146]
Gil M V, Fermoso J, Rubiera F, Chen D. H2 production by sorption enhanced steam reforming of biomass-derived bio-oil in a fluidized bed reactor: an assessment of the effect of operation variables using response surface methodology. Catalysis Today, 2015, 242: 19–34
CrossRef Google scholar
[147]
Huang C, Xu C, Wang B, Hu X, Li J, Liu J, Liu J, Li C. High production of syngas from catalytic steam reforming of biomass glycerol in the presence of methane. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2018, 119: 173–178
CrossRef Google scholar
[148]
Zhang C, Hu X, Yu Z, Zhang Z, Chen G, Li C, Liu Q, Xiang J, Wang Y, Hu S. Steam reforming of acetic acid for hydrogen production over attapulgite and alumina supported Ni catalysts: impacts of properties of supports on catalytic behaviors. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(11): 5230–5244
[149]
Jess A. Catalytic upgrading of tarry fuel gases: a kinetic study with model components. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 1996, 35(6): 487–494
CrossRef Google scholar
[150]
Quitete C P, Souza M M. Application of brazilian dolomites and mixed oxides as catalysts in tar removal system. Applied Catalysis A, General, 2017, 536: 1–8
CrossRef Google scholar
[151]
Pant K K, Jain R, Jain S. Renewable hydrogen production by steam reforming of glycerol over Ni/CeO2 catalyst prepared by precipitation deposition method. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2011, 28(9): 1859–1866
CrossRef Google scholar
[152]
Kimura T, Miyazawa T, Nishikawa J, Kado S, Okumura K, Miyao T, Naito S, Kunimori K, Tomishige K. Development of Ni catalysts for tar removal by steam gasification of biomass. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2006, 68(3–4): 160–170
CrossRef Google scholar
[153]
Jeon J, Nam S, Ko C H. Rapid evaluation of coke resistance in catalysts for methane reforming using low steam-to-carbon ratio. Catalysis Today, 2018, 309: 140–146
CrossRef Google scholar
[154]
Li Q, Wang Q, Kayamori A, Zhang J. Experimental study and modeling of heavy tar steam reforming. Fuel Processing Technology, 2018, 178: 180–188
CrossRef Google scholar
[155]
Tao J, Zhao L, Dong C, Lu Q, Du X, Dahlquist E. Catalytic steam reforming of toluene as a model compound of biomass gasification tar using Ni-CeO2/SBA-15 catalysts. Energies, 2013, 6(7): 3284–3296
CrossRef Google scholar
[156]
Gao N, Wang X, Li A, Wu C, Yin Z. Hydrogen production from catalytic steam reforming of benzene as tar model compound of biomass gasification. Fuel Processing Technology, 2016, 148: 380–387
CrossRef Google scholar
[157]
Gao N, Liu S, Han Y, Xing C, Li A. Steam reforming of biomass tar for hydrogen production over NiO/ceramic foam catalyst. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(25): 7983–7990
CrossRef Google scholar
[158]
Zhang R, Wang H, Hou X. Catalytic reforming of toluene as tar model compound: effect of Ce and Ce-Mg promoter using Ni/olivine catalyst. Chemosphere, 2014, 97: 40–46
CrossRef Google scholar
[159]
Liang T, Wang Y, Chen M, Yang Z, Liu S, Zhou Z, Li X. Steam reforming of phenol-ethanol to produce hydrogen over bimetallic NiCu catalysts supported on sepiolite. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(47): 28233–28246
CrossRef Google scholar
[160]
Italiano C, Luchters N T J, Pino L, Fletcher J V, Specchia S, Fletcher J C Q, Vita A. High specific surface area supports for highly active Rh catalysts: syngas production from methane at high space velocity. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(26): 11755–11765
CrossRef Google scholar
[161]
Compagnoni M, Tripodi A, Rossetti I. Parametric study and kinetic testing for ethanol steam reforming. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2017, 203: 899–909
CrossRef Google scholar
[162]
Pashchenko D. Numerical study of steam methane reforming over a pre-heated Ni-based catalyst with detailed fluid dynamics. Fuel, 2019, 236: 686–694
CrossRef Google scholar
[163]
Kim S, Chun D, Rhim Y, Lim J, Kim S, Choi H, Lee S, Yoo J. Catalytic reforming of toluene using a nickel ion-exchanged coal catalyst. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(35): 11855–11862
CrossRef Google scholar
[164]
Chen G, Tao J, Liu C, Yan B, Li W, Li X. Hydrogen production via acetic acid steam reforming: a critical review on catalysts. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 79: 1091–1098
CrossRef Google scholar
[165]
Lange J P. Catalysis for biorefineries-performance criteria for industrial operation. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2016, 6(13): 4759–4767
CrossRef Google scholar
[166]
Hashemnejad S M, Parvari M. Deactivation and regeneration of nickel-based catalysts for steam-methane reforming. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2011, 32(1–2): 273–279
CrossRef Google scholar
[167]
Argyle M, Bartholomew C. Heterogeneous catalyst deactivation and regeneration: a review. Catalysts, 2015, 5(1): 145–269
CrossRef Google scholar
[168]
Trimm D L. Catalysts for the control of coking during steam reforming. Catalysis Today, 1999, 49(1–3): 3–10
CrossRef Google scholar
[169]
Kathiraser Y, Ashok J, Kawi S. Synthesis and evaluation of highly dispersed SBA-15 supported Ni-Fe bimetallic catalysts for steam reforming of biomass derived tar reaction. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2016, 6(12): 4327–4336
CrossRef Google scholar
[170]
Iida H, Fujiyama A, Igarashi A, Okumura K. Steam reforming of toluene over Ru/SrCo3-Al2O3 catalysts. Fuel Processing Technology, 2017, 168: 50–57
CrossRef Google scholar
[171]
Oemar U, Ang M L, Hidajat K, Kawi S. Enhancing performance of Ni/La2O3 catalyst by Sr-modification for steam reforming of toluene as model compound of biomass tar. RSC Advances, 2015, 5(23): 17834–17842
CrossRef Google scholar
[172]
Broda M, Kierzkowska A M, Müller C R. Sorbent-enhanced steam methane reforming reaction studied over a Ca-based CO2 sorbent and Ni catalyst. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2013, 36(9): 1496–1502
CrossRef Google scholar
[173]
Quitete C P, Bittencourt R C P, Souza M M. Steam reforming of tar using toluene as a model compound with nickel catalysts supported on hexaaluminates. Applied Catalysis A, General, 2014, 478: 234–240
CrossRef Google scholar
[174]
Dou X, Veksha A, Chan W P, Oh W D, Liang Y N, Teoh F, Mohamed D K B, Giannis A, Lisak G, Lim T T. Poisoning effect of H2S and HCl on the naphthalene steam reforming and water-gas shift activities of Ni and Fe catalysts. Fuel, 2019, 241: 1008–1018
CrossRef Google scholar
[175]
Ashok J, Das S, Dewangan N, kawi S. H2S and NOx tolerance capability of CeO2 doped La1−xCe2Co0.5Ti0.5O3–δ perovskites for steam reforming of biomass tar model reaction. Energy Conversion and Management: X, 2019, 1: 100003
CrossRef Google scholar
[176]
Veksha A, Giannis A, Oh W D, Chang V W C, Lisak G, Lim T T. Catalytic activities and resistance to HCl poisoning of Ni-based catalysts during steam reforming of naphthalene. Applied Catalysis A, General, 2018, 557: 25–38
CrossRef Google scholar
[177]
Xu C C, Donald J, Byambajav E, Ohtsuka Y. Recent advances in catalysts for hot-gas removal of tar and NH3 from biomass gasification. Fuel, 2010, 89(8): 1784–1795
CrossRef Google scholar
[178]
Stemmler M, Müller M. Chemical hot gas cleaning concept for the “chrisgas” process. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2011, 35: S105–S115
CrossRef Google scholar
[179]
Torres W, Pansare S S, Goodwin J G Jr. Hot gas removal of tars, ammonia, and hydrogen sulfide from biomass gasification gas. Catalysis Reviews, 2007, 49(4): 407–456
CrossRef Google scholar
[180]
Garbarino G, Lagazzo A, Riani P, Busca G. Steam reforming of ethanol–phenol mixture on Ni/Al2O3: effect of Ni loading and sulphur deactivation. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2013, 129: 460–472
CrossRef Google scholar
[181]
Zuber C, Hochenauer C, Kienberger T. Test of a hydrodesulfurization catalyst in a biomass tar removal process with catalytic steam reforming. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2014, 156–157: 62–71
CrossRef Google scholar
[182]
Li C, Hirabayashi D, Suzuki K. A crucial role of O2− and O22− on mayenite structure for biomass tar steam reforming over Ni/Ca12Al14O33. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2009, 88(3–4): 351–360
CrossRef Google scholar
[183]
Savuto E, Navarro R, Mota N, Di Carlo A, Bocci E, Carlini M, Fierro J L G. Steam reforming of tar model compounds over Ni/mayenite catalysts: effect of Ce addition. Fuel, 2018, 224: 676–686
CrossRef Google scholar
[184]
Mawdsley J R, Krause T R. Rare earth-first-row transition metal perovskites as catalysts for the autothermal reforming of hydrocarbon fuels to generate hydrogen. Applied Catalysis A, General, 2008, 334(1–2): 311–320
CrossRef Google scholar
[185]
Hepola J, Simell P. Sulphur poisoning of nickel-based hot gas cleaning catalysts in synthetic gasification gas: I. Effect of different process parameters. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 1997, 14(3–4): 287–303
CrossRef Google scholar
[186]
Avasthi K S, Reddy R N, Patel S. Challenges in the production of hydrogen from glycerol-a biodiesel byproduct via steam reforming process. Procedia Engineering, 2013, 51: 423–429
CrossRef Google scholar
[187]
Schwengber C A, Alves H J, Schaffner R A, da Silva F A, Sequinel R, Bach V R, Ferracin R J. Overview of glycerol reforming for hydrogen production. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 58: 259–266
CrossRef Google scholar
[188]
Chapin D, Kiffer S, Nestell J. The very high temperature reactor: a technical summary. Alexandria. VA: MPR Associates Inc., 2004
[189]
Compagne P A. Multi-tubular steam reformer and process for catalytic steam reforming of a hydrocarbonaceous feedstock. 2014, US Patent Application: 14/008,906
[190]
Patra A. Oxide dispersion strengthened high temperature alloys. Journal of Masterials Science and Nanomaterials, 2017, 1(1): e101
[191]
Karim A, Bravo J, Gorm D, Conant T, Datye A. Comparison of wall-coated and packed-bed reactors for steam reforming of methanol. Catalysis Today, 2005, 110(1–2): 86–91
CrossRef Google scholar
[192]
Kundu A, Park J, Ahn J, Park S S, Shul Y G, Han H S. Micro-channel reactor for steam reforming of methanol. Fuel, 2007, 86(9): 1331–1336
CrossRef Google scholar
[193]
Iulianelli A, Ribeirinha P, Mendes A, Basile A. Methanol steam reforming for hydrogen generation via conventional and membrane reactors: a review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 29: 355–368
CrossRef Google scholar
[194]
Alauddin Z A B Z, Lahijani P, Mohammadi M, Mohamed A R. Gasification of lignocellulosic biomass in fluidized beds for renewable energy development: a review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2010, 14(9): 2852–2862
CrossRef Google scholar
[195]
Nam H, Wang Z, Shanmugam S R, Adhikari S, Abdoulmoumine N. Chemical looping dry reforming of benzene as a gasification tar model compound with Ni-and Fe-based oxygen carriers in a fluidized bed reactor. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(41): 18790–18800
CrossRef Google scholar
[196]
Bassano C, Deiana P. Carbon dioxide reforming of tar during biomass gasification. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 2014, 37: 97–102
CrossRef Google scholar
[197]
Abou Rached J, Cesario M R, Estephane J, Tidahy H L, Gennequin C, Aouad S, Aboukaïs A, Abi-Aad E. Effects of cerium and lanthanum on Ni-based catalysts for CO2 reforming of toluene. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2018, 6(4): 4743–4754
CrossRef Google scholar
[198]
Bao X, Kong M, Lu W, Fei J, Zheng X. Performance of Co/MgO catalyst for CO2 reforming of toluene as a model compound of tar derived from biomass gasification. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2014, 23(6): 795–800
CrossRef Google scholar
[199]
Jang W J, Shim J O, Kim H M, Yoo S Y, Roh H S. A review on dry reforming of methane in aspect of catalytic properties. Catalysis Today, 2019, 34: 15–26
CrossRef Google scholar
[200]
Rostrupnielsen J, Hansen J B. CO2-reforming of methane over transition metals. Journal of Catalysis, 1993, 144(1): 38–49
CrossRef Google scholar
[201]
Yu X, Wang N, Chu W, Liu M. Carbon dioxide reforming of methane for syngas production over la-promoted NiMgAl catalysts derived from hydrotalcites. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2012, 209: 623–632
CrossRef Google scholar
[202]
Wang Z, Oemar U, Ang M L, Kawi S. Oxidative steam reforming of biomass tar model compound via catalytic BaBi0.05Co0.8-Nb0.15O3−d hollow fiber membrane reactor. Journal of Membrane Science, 2016, 510: 417–425
CrossRef Google scholar
[203]
Mendiara T, Johansen J M, Utrilla R, Geraldo P, Jensen A D, Glarborg P. Evaluation of different oxygen carriers for biomass tar reforming (I): carbon deposition in experiments with toluene. Fuel, 2011, 90(3): 1049–1060
CrossRef Google scholar
[204]
Sengodan S, Lan R, Humphreys J, Du D, Xu W, Wang H, Tao S. Advances in reforming and partial oxidation of hydrocarbons for hydrogen production and fuel cell applications. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 82: 761–780
CrossRef Google scholar
[205]
Kolb G. Fuel processing: for fuel cells. Platinum Metals Review, 2008, 53(3): 172–173
[206]
Lin Y C. Catalytic valorization of glycerol to hydrogen and syngas. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(6): 2678–2700
CrossRef Google scholar
[207]
Nabgan W, Tuan Abdullah T A, Mat R, Nabgan B, Gambo Y, Ibrahim M, Ahmad A, Jalil A A, Triwahyono S, Saeh I. Renewable hydrogen production from bio-oil derivative via catalytic steam reforming: an overview. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 79: 347–357
CrossRef Google scholar
[208]
Di Giuliano A, Gallucci K. Sorption enhanced steam methane reforming based on nickel and calcium looping: a review. Chemical Engineering and Processing–Process Intensification, 2018, 130: 240–252
CrossRef Google scholar
[209]
Xie H, Yu Q, Lu H, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Qin Q. Thermodynamic study for hydrogen production from bio-oil via sorption-enhanced steam reforming: comparison with conventional steam reforming. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(48): 28718–28731
CrossRef Google scholar
[210]
Di Giuliano A, Giancaterino F, Courson C, Foscolo P U, Gallucci K. Development of a Ni-CaO-mayenite combined sorbent-catalyst material for multicycle sorption enhanced steam methane reforming. Fuel, 2018, 234: 687–699
CrossRef Google scholar
[211]
Wassie S A, Medrano J A, Zaabout A, Cloete S, Melendez J, Tanaka D A P, Amini S, van Sint Annaland M, Gallucci F. Hydrogen production with integrated CO2 capture in a membrane assisted gas switching reforming reactor: proof-of-concept. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(12): 6177–6190
CrossRef Google scholar
[212]
Dou B, Wang C, Song Y, Chen H, Jiang B, Yang M, Xu Y. Solid sorbents for in-situ CO2 removal during sorption-enhanced steam reforming process: a review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 53: 536–546
CrossRef Google scholar
[213]
Zhang L, Hu X, Hu K, Hu C, Zhang Z, Liu Q, Hu S, Xiang J, Wang Y, Zhang S. Progress in the reforming of bio-oil derived carboxylic acids for hydrogen generation. Journal of Power Sources, 2018, 403: 137–156
CrossRef Google scholar
[214]
Liu Y, Goeltl F, Ro I, Ball M R, Sener C, Aragão I B, Zanchet D, Huber G W, Mavrikakis M, Dumesic J A. Synthesis gas conversion over Rh-based catalysts promoted by Fe and Mn. ACS Catalysis, 2017, 7(7): 4550–4563
CrossRef Google scholar
[215]
Sharma Y C, Kumar A, Prasad R, Upadhyay S N. Ethanol steam reforming for hydrogen production: latest and effective catalyst modification strategies to minimize carbonaceous deactivation. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 74: 89–103
CrossRef Google scholar
[216]
Sinaei Nobandegani M, Sardashti Birjandi M R, Darbandi T, Khalilipour M M, Shahraki F, Mohebbi-Kalhori D. An industrial steam methane reformer optimization using response surface methodology. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2016, 36: 540–549
CrossRef Google scholar
[217]
Lior N. Quantifying sustainability for energy development. Energy Bull, 2015, 19: 8–24

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the University Teknologi Malaysia through Research University Grant (GUP Tier 1: 20H52) and by the Universiti Malaysia Perlis through Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS 9003-00764).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2020 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1241 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/