An experimental study on spray auto-ignition of RP-3 jet fuel and its surrogates

Abstract

Jet fuel is widely used in air transportation, and sometimes for special vehicles in ground transportation. In the latter case, fuel spray auto-ignition behavior is an important index for engine operation reliability. Surrogate fuel is usually used for fundamental combustion study due to the complex composition of practical fuels. As for jet fuels, two-component or three-component surrogate is usually selected to emulate practical fuels. The spray auto-ignition characteristics of RP-3 jet fuel and its three surrogates, the 70% mol n-decane/30% mol 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene blend (Surrogate 1), the 51% mol n-decane/49% mol 1, 2, 4-trimethylbenzene blend (Surrogate 2), and the 49.8% mol n-dodecane/21.6% mol iso-cetane/28.6% mol toluene blend (Surrogate 3) were studied in a heated constant volume combustion chamber. Surrogate 1 and Surrogate 2 possess the same components, but their blending percentages are different, as the two surrogates were designed to capture the H/C ratio (Surrogate 1) and DCN (Surrogate 2) of RP-3 jet fuel, respectively. Surrogate 3 could emulate more physiochemical properties of RP-3 jet fuel, including molecular weight, H/C ratio and DCN. Experimental results indicate that Surrogate 1 overestimates the auto-ignition propensity of RP-3 jet fuel, whereas Surrogates 2 and 3 show quite similar auto-ignition propensity with RP-3 jet fuel. Therefore, to capture the spray auto-ignition behaviors, DCN is the most important parameter to match when designing the surrogate formulation. However, as the ambient temperature changes, the surrogates matching DCN may still show some differences from the RP-3 jet fuel, e.g., the first-stage heat release influenced by low-temperature chemistry.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

RP-3 jet fuel / surrogate / spray auto-ignition / constant volume combustion chamber

References

[1] Dagaut P, Cathonnet M. The ignition, oxidation, and combustion of kerosene: a review of experimental and kinetic modeling. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2006, 32(1): 48–92

[2] Liu W, Zhai J Q, Lin B Y, Soot size distribution in lightly sooting premixed flames of benzene and toluene. Frontiers in Energy, 2020, 14(1): 18–26

[3] Li X, Zhang W Z, Huang Z, Pre-chamber turbulent jet ignition of methane/air mixtures with multiple orifices in a large bore constant volume chamber: effect of air-fuel equivalence ratio and pre-mixed pressure. Frontiers in Energy, 2019, 13(3): 483–493

[4] Kang D, Kalaskar V, Kim D, Experimental study of autoignition characteristics of jet-A surrogates and their validation in a motored engine and a constant-volume combustion chamber. Fuel, 2016, 184(15): 565–580

[5] Liu W, Zhang J B, Huang Z, Applicability of high dimensional model representation correlations for ignition delay times of n-heptane/air mixtures. Frontiers in Energy, 2019, 13(2): 367–376

[6] Gao Z H, Hu E J, Xu Z H, Effect of 2,5-dimethylfuran addition on ignition delay times of n-heptane at high temperatures. Frontiers in Energy, 2019, 13(3): 464–473

[7] Dean A J, Penyazkov O G, Sevruk K L, Autoignition of surrogate fuels at elevated temperatures and pressures. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2007, 31(2): 2481–2488

[8] Dagaut P, El Bakali A, Ristori A. The combustion of kerosene: experimental results and kinetic modelling using 1- to 3-component surrogate model fuels. Fuel, 2006, 85(7–8): 944–956

[9] Mairinger G, Frassoldati A, Cuoci A, Experimental and computational investigation of autoignition of jet fuels and surrogates in nonpremixed flows at elevated pressures. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2019, 37(2): 1605–1614

[10] Dooley S, Won S H, Chaos M, A jet fuel surrogate formulated by real fuel properties. Combustion and Flame, 2010, 157(12): 2333–2339

[11] Malewicki T, Gudiyella S, Brezinsky K. Experimental and modeling study on the oxidation of jet A and the n-dodecane/iso-octane/n-propylbenzene/1,3,5-trimethylbenzene surrogate fuel. Combustion and Flame, 2013, 160(1): 17–30

[12] Yu W B, Yang W M, Tay K L, An optimization method for formulating model-based jet fuel surrogate by emulating physical, gas phase chemical properties and threshold sooting index (TSI) of real jet fuel under engine relevant conditions. Combustion and Flame, 2018, 193: 192–217

[13] Mao Y B, Yu L, Wu Z Y, Experimental and kinetic modeling study of ignition characteristics of RP-3 kerosene over low-to-high temperature ranges in a heated rapid compression machine and a heated shock tube. Combustion and Flame, 2019, 203: 157–169

[14] Zhang C, Hui X, Lin Y Z, Recent development in studies of alternative jet fuel combustion: progress, challenges, and opportunities. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 54: 120–138

[15] Zhang C H, Li B, Rao F, A shock tube study of the autoignition characteristics of RP-3 jet fuel. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2015, 35(3): 3151–3158

[16] Yan Y W, Liu Y C, Fang W, A simplified chemical reaction mechanism for two-component RP-3 kerosene surrogate fuel and its verification. Fuel, 2018, 227: 127–134

[17] Liu Y X, Richter S, Naumann C, Combustion study of a surrogate jet fuel. Combustion and Flame, 2019, 202: 252–261

[18] Xu J Q, Guo J J, Liu A K, Construction of autoignition mechanisms for the combustion of RP-3: surrogate fuel and kinetics simulation. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2015, 31(4): 643–652 (in Chinese)

[19] Yu J, Gou X L. Comprehensive surrogate for emulating physical and kinetic properties of jet fuels. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2018, 34(3): 679–689

[20] Zheng D, Yu W M, Zhong B J, RP-3 aviation kerosene surrogate fuel and the chemical reaction kinetic model. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2015, 31(4): 636–642 (in Chinese)

[21] Yi R, Chen X, Chen C P. Surrogate for emulating physicochemical and kinetics characteristics of RP-3 aviation fuel. Energy & Fuels, 2019, 33(4): 2872–2879

[22] Liang X, Zhong A H, Sun Z Y, Autoignition of n-heptane and butanol isomers blends in a constant volume combustion chamber. Fuel, 2019, 254(15): 115638

[23] Han D, Zhai J Q, Huang Z. Autoignition of n-hexane, cyclohexane and methylcyclohexane in a constant volume combustion chamber. Energy & Fuels, 2019, 33(4): 3576–3583

[24] Han D, Duan Y Z, Zhai J Q. Autoignition comparison of n-dodecane/benzene and n-dodecane/toluene blends in a constant volume combustion chamber. Energy & Fuels, 2019, 33(6): 5647–5654

[25] Design Institute for Physical Properties. D IPPR Project 801, Full Version. Sponsored by AICHE, 2012

[26] ASTM International. ASTM D7668–14 standard test method for determination of derived cetane number (DCN) of diesel fuel oils ignition delay using a constant volume combustion chamber method. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, 2014

[27] Poon H M, Pang K M, Ng H K, Development of multi-component diesel surrogate fuel models – Part II: validation of the integrated mechanisms in 0-D kinetic and 2-D CFD spray combustion simulations. Fuel, 2016, 181: 120–130

[28] Woschni G. A universally applicable equation for the instantaneous heat transfer coefficient in the internal combustion engine. SAE Technical Paper, 1967

[29] Shao J K, Choudhary R, Peng Y Z, A shock tube study of n-heptane, iso-octane, n-dodecane and iso-octane/n-dodecane blends oxidation at elevated pressures and intermediate temperatures. Fuel, 2019, 243: 541–553

[30] Yehia O R, Reuter C B, Ju Y G. On the chemical characteristics and dynamics of n-alkane low-temperature multistage diffusion flames. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2019, 37(2): 1717–1724

[31] Zheng Z L, Badawy T, Henein N, Investigation of physical and chemical delay periods of different fuels in the ignition quality tester. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2013, 135(6): 061501

[32] Assanis D N, Filipi Z S, Fiveland S B, A predictive ignition delay correlation under steady-state and transient operation of a direct injection diesel engine. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2003, 125(2): 450–457

Acknowledgments

This research work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51776124 and 51861135303) and the Belt and Road International Collaboration Program by Shanghai Science and Technology Committee (Grant No. 19160745400).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2021 Higher Education Press