Experimental study on influence of operating parameters on tar components from corn straw gasification in fluidized bed

Abstract

Gasification is a promising approach for converting solid fuel sources, including renewable ones like biomass, for use. The main problem in biomass gasification is the formation of condensable tars, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). This paper investigated the conversion of tar components during corn straw gasification. It analyzed collected tar components using a gas chromatograph-mass spectrograph (GC-MS). Experimental results indicate that, with increasing temperature from 700°C to 900°C, the concentrations of benzene, indene, phenanthrene, naphthalene, acenaphthylene, fluorene, and pyrene increased whereas those of toluene, phenol, 1-methylnaphthalene, and 2-methylnaphthalene decreased. As the equivalence ratio (ER) increased from 0.21 to 0.34, the concentrations of indene and phenanthrene increased from 0.148% and 0.087% to 0.232% and 0.223%, respectively. Further, the phenol content increased as ER increased from 0.21 to 0.26 and then decreased as the ER increased further to 0.34. Other parameters like the steam/biomass (S/B) ratio and catalyst also played a critical role in tar reduction. This paper demonstrates the conversion of some tar components and elucidates their chemical properties during gasification.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

gasification / tar components / operating parameters

References

[1] Fremaux S, Beheshti S M, Ghassemi H, . An experimental study on hydrogen-rich gas production via steam gasification of biomass in a research-scale fluidized bed. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 91: 427–432

[2] Mayerhofer M, Fendt S, Spliethoff H, Fluidized bed gasification of biomass—in bed investigation of gas and tar formation. Fuel, 2014, 117(part B): 1248–1255

[3] Mayerhofer M, Mitsakis P, Meng X M, . Influence of pressure, temperature and steam on tar and gas in allothermal fluidized bed gasification. Fuel, 2012, 99: 204–209

[4] Horvat A, Pandey D S, Kwapinska M, . Tar yield and composition from poultry litter gasification in a fluidised bed reactor: effects of equivalence ratio, temperature and limestone addition. RSC Advances, 2019, 9(23): 13283–13296

[5] De Andrés J M, Narros A, Rodríguez M E. Behaviour of dolomite, olivine and alumina as primary catalysts in air-steam gasification of sewage sludge. Fuel, 2011, 90(2): 521–527

[6] Guo S, Wei X, Li J, . Experimental study on product gas and tar removal in air-steam gasification of corn straw in a bench-scale internally circulating fluidized bed. Energy & Fuels, 2020, 34(2): 1908–1917

[7] Qin Y H, Campen A, Wiltowski T, . The influence of different chemical compositions in biomass on gasification tar formation. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2015, 83: 77–84

[8] Zhang Z Y, Pang S S. Experimental investigation of biomass devolatilization in steam gasification in a dual fluidised bed gasifier. Fuel, 2017, 188: 628–635

[9] Zhou B L, Dichiara A, Zhang Y M, . Tar formation and evolution during biomass gasification: an experimental and theoretical study. Fuel, 2018, 234: 944–953

[10] Kirnbauer F, Wilk V, Hofbauer H. Performance improvement of dual fluidized bed gasifiers by temperature reduction: the behavior of tar species in the product gas. Fuel, 2013, 108: 534–542

[11] Feng D D, Zhao Y J, Zhang Y, . In-situ steam reforming of biomass tar over sawdust biochar in mild catalytic temperature. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2017, 107: 261–270

[12] Valderrama Rios M L, González A M, Lora E E S, . Reduction of tar generated during biomass gasification: a review. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2018, 108: 345–370

[13] Yu Q Z, Brage C, Nordgreen T, . Effects of Chinese dolomites on tar cracking in gasification of birch. Fuel, 2009, 88(10): 1922–1926

[14] Tian Y, Zhou X, Lin S H, . Syngas production from air-steam gasification of biomass with natural catalysts. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 645: 518–523

[15] Cortazar M, Lopez G, Alvarez J, . Behaviour of primary catalysts in the biomass steam gasification in a fountain confined spouted bed. Fuel, 2019, 253: 1446–1456

[16] Miccio F, Piriou B, Ruoppolo G, . Biomass gasification in a catalytic fluidized reactor with beds of different materials. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2009, 154(1–3): 369–374

[17] Min Z H, Asadullah M, Yimsiri P, . Catalytic reforming of tar during gasification. Part I. Steam reforming of biomass tar using ilmenite as a catalyst. Fuel, 2011, 90(5): 1847–1854

[18] Vreugdenhil B J, Zwart R W R. Tar formation in pyrolysis and gasification. Petten: Energy and Research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN: Report ECN-E-08–087, 2009

[19] Cortazar M, Alvarez J, Lopez G, . Role of temperature on gasification performance and tar composition in a fountain enhanced conical spouted bed reactor. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 171: 1589–1597

[20] Wu Z Q, Yang W C, Meng H Y, . Physicochemical structure and gasification reactivity of co-pyrolysis char from two kinds of coal blended with lignocellulosic biomass: effects of the carboxymethylcellulose sodium. Applied Energy, 2017, 207: 96–106

[21] Kim Y D, Yang C W, Kim B J, . Air-blown gasification of woody biomass in a bubbling fluidized bed gasifier. Applied Energy, 2013, 112: 414–420

[22] Ma X Y, Zhao X, Gu J Y, . Co-gasification of coal and biomass blends using dolomite and olivine as catalysts. Renewable Energy, 2019, 132: 509–514

[23] Meng J G, Wang X B, Zhao Z L, . Highly abrasion resistant thermally fused olivine as in-situ catalysts for tar reduction in a circulating fluidized bed biomass gasifier. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 268: 212–220

[24] Zhang Z Y, Pang S S. Experimental investigation of tar formation and producer gas composition in biomass steam gasification in a 100 kW dual fluidised bed gasifier. Renewable Energy, 2019, 132: 416–424

[25] State R N, Volceanov A, Muley P, . A review of catalysts used in microwave assisted pyrolysis and gasification. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 277: 179–194

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press