Large eddy simulation of a 660 MW utility boiler under variable load conditions

Abstract

Large eddy simulation (LES) has become a promising tool for pulverized coal combustion with the development of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) technologies in recent years. LES can better capture the unsteady features and turbulent structures of coal jet flame than Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes (RANS). The coal-fired power plants in China are now required to be operated in a wide load range and quickly respond to the electric grid. The boiler performance of variable loads should be evaluated in terms of flow, heat transfer, and combustion processes. In this paper, LES was applied to simulate a 660 MW ultra-supercritical boiler under BMCR (boiler maximum continue rate), 75%THA-100, and 50%THA-100 conditions. The predicted gas velocities agree well with the thermal calculation and the temperature error is less than 130 K. The simulation results show that the operation load has significant effects on the boiler performance. It is also proved that LES can provide guidance for the design and operation of advanced coal-fired boilers.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

large eddy simulation / ultra-supercritical boiler / operation load

References

[1] China Electricity Council. Annual Statistics of China Power Industry 2018. 2019–6-10

[2] Poinsot T, Veynante D. Theoretical and numerical combustion. 2nd ed. USA: RT Edwards, Inc., 2005

[3] Luo K, Wang H, Fan J, Yi F. Direct numerical simulation of pulverized coal combustion in a hot vitiated co-flow. Energy & Fuels, 2012, 26(10): 6128–6136

[4] Luo K, Bai Y, Jin T, Qiu K, Fan J. Direct numerical simulation study on the stabilization mechanism of a turbulent lifted pulverized coal jet flame in a heated coflow. Energy & Fuels, 2017, 31(8): 8742–8757

[5] Chen L, Ghoniem A F. Simulation of oxy-coal combustion in a 100 kW_th test facility using RANS and LES: a validation study. Energy & Fuels, 2012, 26(8): 4783–4798

[6] Belosevic S, Sijercic M, Tucakovic D, Crnomarkovic N. A numerical study of a utility boiler tangentially-fired furnace under different operating conditions. Fuel, 2008, 87(15–16): 3331–3338

[7] Belosevic S, Sijercic M, Crnomarkovic N, Stankovic B, Tucakovic D. Numerical prediction of pulverized coal flame in utility boiler furnaces. Energy & Fuels, 2009, 23(11): 5401–5412

[8] Al-Abbas A H, Naser J. Computational fluid dynamic modelling of a 550 MW tangentially-fired furnace under different operating conditions. Procedia Engineering, 2013, 56: 387–392

[9] Tian D, Zhong L, Tan P, Ma L, Fang Q, Zhang C, Zhang D, Chen G. Influence of vertical burner tilt angle on the gas temperature deviation in a 700 MW low NO_x tangentially fired pulverised-coal boiler. Fuel Processing Technology, 2015, 138: 616–628

[10] Belošević S, Tomanović I, Crnomarković N, Milićević A, Tucaković D. Numerical study of pulverized coal-fired utility boiler over a wide range of operating conditions for in-furnace SO₂/NO_x reduction. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 94: 657–669

[11] Dong J, Zhou T, Wu X, Zhang J, Fan H, Zhang Z. Coupled heat transfer simulation of the spiral water wall in a double reheat ultra-supercritical boiler. Journal of Thermal Science, 2018, 27(6): 592–601

[12] Dong J, Fan H, Wu X, Zhou T, Zhang J, Zhang Z. Study on the effect of flame offset on water wall tube temperature in 600°C and 700°C ultra-supercritical boiler. Combustion Science and Technology, 2019, 191(3): 472–490

[13] Liu H, Zhang L, Li Q, Zhu H, Deng L, Liu Y, Che D. Effect of FGR position on the characteristics of combustion, emission and flue gas temperature deviation in a 1000 MW tower-type double-reheat boiler with deep-air-staging. Fuel, 2019, 246: 285–294

[14] Shen H, Wu Y, Xu K, Smith P J, Zhang H. Eulerian LES simulation of coal jet flame with a simplified DQMOM model. Fuel, 2018, 216: 475–483

[15] Sundén B, Faghri M. Transport Phenomena in Fires. Britain: WIT Press, 2008

[16] Pedel J, Thornock J N, Smith P J. Ignition of co-axial turbulent diffusion oxy-coal jet flames: experiments and simulations collaboration. Combustion and Flame, 2013, 160(6): 1112–1128

[17] Pedel J, Thornock J N, Smith S T, Smith P J. Large eddy simulation of polydisperse particles in turbulent coaxial jets using the direct quadrature method of moments. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2014, 63: 23–38

[18] Smoot L D, Smith P J. Coal Combustion and Gasification. New York: Plenum Press, 1985

[19] Schroeder B B, Smith S T, Smith P J, Fletcher T H, Packard A, Frenklach M, Hegde A, Li W, Oreluk J. Scale-bridging model development for coal particle devolatilization. arXiv, 2016:1609.00871

[20] Zhou M, Parra-Álvarez J C, Smith P J, Isaac B J, Thornock J N, Wang Y, Smith S T. Large-eddy simulation of ash deposition in a large-scale laboratory furnace. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2019, 37(4): 4409–4418

[21] Zhang Z, Wu Y, Chen D, Shen H, Li Z, Cai N, Zhou M, Smith S T, Thornock J N, Isaac B J. A semi-empirical NO_x model for LES in pulverized coal air-staged combustion. Fuel, 2019, 241: 402–409

[22] Shen H, Wu Y, Zhou M, Smith S T, Zhang H, Yue G. Identification of the initial particle size distribution for coal combustion simulations. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2019, 65: e16610

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press