Numerical and experimental research of the characteristics of concentration solar cells

Zilong WANG, Hua ZHANG, Binlin DOU, Weidong WU, Guanhua ZHANG

PDF(1449 KB)
PDF(1449 KB)
Front. Energy ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (2) : 279-291. DOI: 10.1007/s11708-019-0637-8
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Numerical and experimental research of the characteristics of concentration solar cells

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The development of automatic tracking solar concentrator photovoltaic systems is currently attracting growing interest. High concentration photovoltaic systems (HCPVs) combining triple-junction InGaP/lnGaAs/Ge solar cells with a concentrator provide high conversion efficiencies. The mathematical model for triple-junction solar cells, having a higher efficiency and superior temperature characteristics, was established based on the one-diode equivalent circuit cell model. A paraboloidal concentrator with a secondary optic system and a concentration ratio in the range of 100X–150X along with a sun tracking system was developed in this study. The GaInP/GalnAs/Ge triple-junction solar cell, produced by AZUR SPACE Solar Power, was also used in this study. The solar cells produced by Shanghai Solar Youth Energy (SY) and Shenzhen Yinshengsheng Technology Co. Ltd. (YXS) were used as comparison samples in a further comparative study at different concentration ratios (200X–1000X). A detailed analysis on the factors that influence the electrical output characteristics of the InGaP/lnGaAs/Ge solar cell was conducted with a dish-style concentrating photovoltaic system. The results show that the short-circuit current (Isc) and the open-circuit voltage (Voc) of multi-junction solar cells increases with the increasing concentration ratio, while the cell efficiency (ηc) of the solar cells increases first and then decreases with increasing concentration ratio. With increasing solar cell temperature, Isc increases, while Voc and ηc decrease. A comparison of the experimental and simulation results indicate that the maximum root mean square error is less than 10%, which provides a certain theoretical basis for the study of the characteristics of triple-junction solar cell that can be applied in the analysis and discussion regarding the influence of the relevant parameters on the performance of high concentration photovoltaic systems.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

concentration / three-junction solar cell / mathematical model / electrical properties / solar energy

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zilong WANG, Hua ZHANG, Binlin DOU, Weidong WU, Guanhua ZHANG. Numerical and experimental research of the characteristics of concentration solar cells. Front. Energy, 2021, 15(2): 279‒291 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-019-0637-8

References

[1]
Zhang Y, Xu Y, Guo H, Zhang X, Guo C, Chen H. A hybrid energy storage system with optimized operating strategy for mitigating wind power fluctuations. Renewable Energy, 2018, 125: 121–132
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Renno C, Landi G, Petito F, Neitzert H C. Influence of a degraded triple-junction solar cell on the CPV system performances. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 160: 326–340
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Huang T H, Lo H, Lo C, Wu M C, Lour W S. Photovoltaic characteristics of each subcell evaluated in situ in a triple-junction solar cell. Solid-State Electronics, 2016, 126: 109–114
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Liu J, Chen H S, Xu Y J, Wang L, Tan C. A solar energy storage and power generation system based on supercritical carbon dioxide. Renewable Energy, 2014, 64(4): 43–51
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Corona B, Escudero L, Quéméré G, Luque-Heredia I, San Miguel G. Energy and environmental life cycle assessment of a high concentration photovoltaic power plant in Morocco. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2017, 22(3): 364–373
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Yang Z, Chen H, Wang L, Sheng Y, Ji L, Xie N. Experimental investigation on the thermal-energy storage characteristics of the subcritical water. Journal of Energy Engineering, 2017, 143(6): 04017061
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Wilson L R, Klampaftis E, Richards B S. Enhancement of power output from a large-area luminescent solar concentrator with 4.8x concentration via solar cell current matching. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 2017, 7(3): 802–809
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Liu M, Kinsey G S, Bagienski W, Nayak A, Garboushian V. Indoor and outdoor comparison of CPV III–V multijunction solar cells. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 2013, 3(2): 888–892
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Domınguez C, Anton I, Sala G. Multi-junction solar cell model for translating I–V characteristics as a function of irradiance, spectrum, and cell temperature. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2010, 18(4): 272–284
[10]
Kinsey G S, Edmondson K M. Spectral response and energy output of concentrator multi-junction solar cells. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2009, 17(5): 279–288
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Friedman D J. Progress and challenges for next-generation high-efficiency multi-junction solar cells. Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science, 2010, 14(6): 131–138
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Zeitouny J, Lalau N, Gordon J M, Katz E A, Flamant G, Dollet A, Vossier A. Assessing high-temperature photovoltaic performance for solar hybrid power plants. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2018, 182: 61–67
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Li D, Xuan Y, Yin E, Li Q. Conversion efficiency gain for concentrated triple-junction solar cell system through thermal management. Renewable Energy, 2018, 126: 960–968
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Mi Z, Chen J K, Chen N F, Bai Y, Wu W, Fu R, Liu H. Performance analysis of a grid-connected high concentrating photovoltaic system under practical operation conditions. Energies, 2016, 9(2): 117
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Yamaguchi M, Takamoto T, Araki K. Super high-efficiency multi-junction and concentrator solar cells. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2006, 90(18–19): 3068–3077
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Aiken D J, Stan M A, Endicter S P, Girard G, Sharps P R. A loss analysis for a 28% efficient 520X concentrator module. In: The 4th IEEE World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, 2007
[17]
Nishioka K, Takamoto T, Agui T, Kaneiwa M, Uraoka Y, Fuyuki T. Evaluation of InGaP/InGaAs/Ge triple-junction solar cell and optimization of solar cell’s structure focusing on series resistance for high-efficiency concentrator photovoltaic systems. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2006, 90(9): 1308–1321
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Kinsey G S, Hebert P, Barbour K E, Krut D D, Cotal H L, Sherif R A. Concentrator multi-junction solar cell characteristics under variable intensity and temperature. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2008, 16(6): 503–508
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Almonacid F, Pérez-Higueras P J, Fernández E F, Rodrigo P. Relation between the cell temperature of a HCPV module and atmospheric parameters. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2012, 105(19): 322–327
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Nishioka K, Takamoto T, Agui T, Kaneiwa M, Uraoka Y, Fuyuki T. Annual output estimation of concentrator photovoltaic systems using high-efficiency InGaP/InGaAs/Ge triple-junction solar cells based on experimental solar cell’s characteristics and field-test meteorological data. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2006, 90(1): 57–67
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Kinsey G S, Pien P, Hebert P, Sherif R A. Operating characteristics of multijunction solar cells. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2009, 93(6–7): 950–951
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Renno C, Petito F. Triple-junction cell temperature evaluation in a CPV system by means of a Random-Forest model. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 169: 124–136
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Rezk H, Hasaneen E S. A new MATLAB/Simulink model of triple-junction solar cell and MPPT based on artificial neural networks for photovoltaic energy systems. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 2015, 6(3): 873–881
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Catelani M, Ciani L, Kazimierczuk M K, Reatti A. Matlab PV solar concentrator performance prediction based on triple junction solar cell model. Measurement, 2016, 88: 310–317
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Nishioka K, Sueto T, Uchida M, Ota Y. Detailed analysis of temperature characteristics of an InGaP/InGaAs/Ge triple-junction solar cell. Journal of Electronic Materials, 2010, 39(6): 704–708
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Kurtz S, Myers D, Mcmahon W E, Geisz J, Steiner M. A comparison of theoretical efficiencies of multi-junction concentrator solar cells. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2008, 16(6): 537–546
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Gómez-Gil F J, Wang X, Barnett A. Analysis and prediction of energy production in concentrating photovoltaic (CPV) installations. Energies, 2012, 5(3): 770–789
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Wang Z, Zhang H, Wen D, Zhao W, Zhou Z. Characterization of the InGaP/InGaAs/Ge triple-junction solar cell with a two-stage dish-style concentration system. Energy Conversion and Management, 2013, 76: 177–184
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Nishioka K, Takamoto T, Agui T, Kaneiwab.M, Uraokaa Y, Fuyukia T. Evaluation of temperature characteristics of high-efficiency InGaP/InGaAs/Ge triple-junction solar cells under concentration. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 2005, 85(3): 429–436
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Bunthof L A A, Haverkamp E J, van der Woude D, Bauhuis G J, Corbeek W H M, Veelenturf S, Vlieg E, Schermer J J. Influence of laterally split spectral illumination on multi-junction CPV solar cell performance. Solar Energy, 2018, 170: 86–94
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Segev G, Mittelman G, Kribus A. Equivalent circuit models for triple-junction concentrator solar cells. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2012, 98: 57–65
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Reinhardt K C, Yeo Y K, Hengehold R L. Junction characteristics of Ga0.5In0.5P n+p diodes and solar cells. Journal of Applied Physics, 1995, 77(11): 5763–5772
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51606126 and 51676129), the Capacity Building Plan for Some Non-military Universities and Colleges of Shanghai Scientific Committee (Grant No. 18060502600), and the Open Project of Shanghai Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow and Heat Transfer in Power Engineering.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2021 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1449 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/