Multi-objective optimization of a hybrid distributed energy system using NSGA-II algorithm

Abstract

In this paper, a multi-objective optimization model is established for the investment plan and operation management of a hybrid distributed energy system. Considering both economic and environmental benefits, the overall annual cost and emissions of CO₂ equivalents are selected as the objective functions to be minimized. In addition, relevant constraints are included to guarantee that the optimized system is reliable to satisfy the energy demands. To solve the optimization model, the non-dominated sorting generic algorithm II (NSGA-II) is employed to derive a set of non-dominated Pareto solutions. The diversity of Pareto solutions is conserved by a crowding distance operator, and the best compromised Pareto solution is determined based on the fuzzy set theory. As an illustrative example, a hotel building is selected for study to verify the effectiveness of the optimization model and the solving algorithm. The results obtained from the numerical study indicate that the NSGA-II results in more diversified Pareto solutions and the fuzzy set theory picks out a better combination of device capacities with reasonable operating strategies.

Keywords

multi-objective optimization / hybrid distributed energy system / non-dominated sorting generic algorithm II / fuzzy set theory / Pareto optimal solution

References

[1] International Energy Agency. Energy, Climate Change & Environment: 2016 Insights. Technical Report, 2016

[2] World Economic Forum and Accenture. Digital Transformation of Industries Electricity Industry. Technical Report, 2016

[3] Liu M, Shi Y, Fang F. Combined cooling, heating and power systems: a survey. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 35: 1–22

[4] Qiu Y, Jiang J, Chen D. Development and present status of multi-energy distributed power generation system. In: IEEE Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference, Florence, Italy, 2016

[5] Ju L, Tan Z, Li H, Tan Q K, Yu X B, Song X H. Multi-objective operation optimization and evaluation model for CCHP and renewable energy based hybrid energy system driven by distributed energy resources in China. Energy, 2016, 111: 322–340

[6] Evins R. Multi-level optimization of building design, energy system sizing and operation. Energy, 2015, 90: 1775–1789

[7] Mehleri E D, Sarimveis H, Markatos N C, Papageorgiou L G. Optimal design and operation of distributed energy systems: application to Greek residential sector. Renewable Energy, 2013, 51(2): 331–342

[8] Cardoso G, Stadler M, Bozchalui M C, Sharma R, Marnay C, Barbosa-Póvoa A, Ferrão P. Optimal investment and scheduling of distributed energy resources with uncertainty in electric vehicle driving schedules. Energy, 2014, 64(1): 17–30

[9] Voll P, Klaffke C, Hennen M, Bardow A. Automated superstructure-based synthesis and optimization of distributed energy supply systems. Energy, 2013, 50(1): 374–388

[10] Bakken B H, Skjelbred H I, Wolfgang O. Transport: Investment planning in energy supply systems with multiple energy carriers. Energy, 2007, 32(9): 1676–1689

[11] Falke T, Krengel S, Meinerzhagen A K, Schnettler A. Multi-objective optimization and simulation model for the design of distributed energy systems. Applied Energy, 2016, 184:1508–1516

[12] Duan Z, Yan Y, Yan X, Liao Q, Zhang W, Liang Y T, Xia T. An MILP method for design of distributed energy resource system considering stochastic energy supply and demand. Energies, 2017, 11(1): 22

[13] Di Somma M, Yan B, Bianco N, Luh P B, Graditi G, Mongibello L, Naso V. Multi-objective operation optimization of a Distributed Energy System for a large-scale utility customer. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 101: 752–761

[14] Hu M, Cho H. A probability constrained multi-objective optimization model for CCHP system operation decision support. Applied Energy, 2014, 116(116): 230–242

[15] Zeng R, Li H, Liu L, Zhang X, Zhang G. A novel method based on multi-population genetic algorithm for CCHP–GSHP coupling system optimization. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 105: 1138–1148

[16] Gan L K, Shek J K H, Mueller M A. Optimised operation of an off-grid hybrid wind-diesel-battery system using genetic algorithm. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 126: 446–462

[17] Ghaem Sigarchian S, Orosz M S, Hemond H F, Malmquist A. Optimum design of a hybrid PV–CSP–LPG microgrid with Particle Swarm Optimization technique. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 109: 1031–1036

[18] Fazlollahi S, Mandel P, Becker G, Maréchal F. Methods for multi-objective investment and operating optimization of complex energy systems. Energy, 2012, 45(1): 12–22

[19] Wang J, Zhai Z, Jing Y, Zhang C. Particle swarm optimization for redundant building cooling heating and power system. Applied Energy, 2010, 87(12): 3668–3679

[20] Soheyli S, Shafiei Mayam M H, Mehrjoo M. Modeling a novel CCHP system including solar and wind renewable energy resources and sizing by a CC-MOPSO algorithm. Applied Energy, 2016, 184: 375–395

[21] Zitzler E, Thiele L. Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 1999, 3(4): 257–271

[22] Zitzler E, Thiele L.An Evolutionary Algorithm for Multiobjective Optimization: The Strength Pareto Approach. TIK-Report, 1998

[23] Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T. A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(2): 182–197

[24] Wang H, He C, Liu Y. Pareto optimization of power system reconstruction using NSGA-II algorithm. In: Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference, Chengdu, China, 2010

[25] Farina M, Amato P. A fuzzy definition of optimality for many-criteria optimization problems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Part A, Systems and Humans, 2004, 34(3): 315–326

[26] Sheng W, Liu Y, Meng X, Zhang T. An Improved Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm 2 with application to the optimization of distributed generations. Computers & Mathematics with Applications (Oxford, England), 2012, 64(5): 944–955

[27] Weber C, Keirstead J, Samsatli N, Shah N, Fisk D. Trade-offs between layout of cities and design of district energy systems. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on efficiency, cost, optimization, simulation and environmental impact of energy systems, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2010

[28] Shanghai Municipal Development & Reform Commission. Notice on implementing linkage adjustment of coal and electricity prices by Shanghai Price Bureau. 2016–01–05, http://www.shdrc.gov.cn/xxgk/cxxxgk/20806.htm

[29] National Development and Reform Commission. Notice on giving full play to price leverage to promote the healthy development of photovoltaic industry by the State Development and Reform Commission. 2013–08–26, http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/zcfb/zcfbtz/201308/t20130830_556000.html

[30] Shanghai Municipal Development & Reform Commission. Notice on issuing the special supporting fund for renewable energy and new energy development in Shanghai. 2016–11–16, http://www.shdrc.gov.cn/xxgk/cxxxgk/24835.htm

[31] Huo X L, Zhou W G, Ying-Jun R. The integrated optimization of sizing and operation strategy for BCHP (Buildings Cooling, Heating and Power) systems. Natural Gas Industry, 2009, 29(8): 119–122

[32] Ren H, Wu Q, Gao W, Zhou W. Optimal operation of a grid-connected hybrid PV/fuel cell/battery energy system for residential applications. Energy, 2016, 113: 702–712

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71804106), Shanghai Sailing Program (No. 17YF1406800), Shanghai Chenguang Program (No. 17CG57) and The Key Fund of Shanghai Science Technology Committee (No. 16020500900).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2018 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature