A comprehensive review of greenhouse shapes and its applications

Abstract

Greenhouse technology is a practical option for the production and drying of agricultural products in controlled environment. For the successful design of a greenhouse, the selection of a suitable shape and orientation is of great importance. Of various shapes of greenhouses, the even-span roof and the Quonset shape greenhouses are the most commonly used for crop cultivation and drying. The orientation of greenhouses is kept east–west for maximum utilization of solar radiations. Hybrid and modified greenhouse dryers have been proposed for drying of products. The agricultural products dried in greenhouses are found to be better in quality as compared to open sun drying because they are protected from dust, rain, insects, birds and animals. Moreover, various greenhouses shapes along with their applications have been reviewed.

Keywords

greenhouse shapes / drying / solar energy / agriculture products / orientation

References

[1] Food and Agriculture Organization of the Unite Nations. FAO Statistical Year Book 2013: World Food and Agriculture. Rome, 2013

[2] El-Sebaii A A, Shalaby S M. Solar drying of agricultural products: a review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012, 16(1): 37–43

[3] Esper A, Muhlbauer W. Solar drying-an effective means of food preservation. Renewable Energy, 1998, 15(1–4): 95–100

[4] Brown L R. Who will feed China? Wake-up call for a small planet. London: London England Earthscan Publications, 1995

[5] Sharma A, Chen C R, Vu Lan N. Solar-energy drying systems: a review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2009, 13(6–7): 1185–1210

[6] Belessiotis V, Delyannis E. Solar drying. Solar Energy, 2011, 85(8): 1665–1691

[7] Yaldiz O, Ertekin C, Uzun H I. Mathematical modeling of thin layer solar drying of sultana grapes. Energy, 2001, 26(5): 457–465

[8] Condorí M, Saravia L. The performance of forced convection greenhouse driers. Renewable Energy, 1998, 13(4): 453–469

[9] Tiwari G N. Greenhouse Technology for Controlled Environment.New Delhi: Narosa Publishing House, 2003

[10] Horticulture Statistics. International greenhouse vegetable production—statistics (2015 edition).2016, available at cuestaroble.com website

[11] Controlled Environment Agriculture Center (CEAC), The University of Arizona Board of Regents. Research, instruction & extention for producing crops with sustainability, efficiency & eco-friendliness. 2016, available at ag.arizona.edu website

[12] Kumar A, Tiwari G N, Kumar S, Pandey M. Role of greenhouse in agricultural engineering. International Journal of Agricultural Research, 2006, 1(4): 364–372

[13] Gupta R, Tiwari G N. Effect of latitude on weighted solar fraction of north partition wall for various shapes of solarium. Building and Environment, 2004, 39(5): 547–556

[14] Sethi V P, Arora S. Improvement in greenhouse solar drying using inclined north wall reflection. Solar Energy, 2009, 83(9): 1472–1484

[15] Joudi K A, Farhan A A. Greenhouse heating by solar air heaters on the roof. Renewable Energy, 2014, 72: 406–414

[16] Tiwari S, Tiwari G N, Al-Helal I M. Performance analysis of photovoltaic–thermal (PVT) mixed mode greenhouse solar dryer. Solar Energy, 2016, 133: 421–428

[17] Sutar R F, Tiwari G N. Analytical and numerical study of a controlled-environment agricultural system for hot and dry climatic conditions. Energy and Building, 1995, 23(1): 9–18

[18] Tiwari G N, Dubey A K, Goyal R K. Analytical study of an active winter greenhouse. Energy, 1997, 22(4): 389–392

[19] Tiwari G N, Sharma P K, Goyal R K, Sutar R F. Estimation of an efficiency factor for a greenhouse: a numerical and experimental study. Energy and Building, 1998, 28(3): 241–250

[20] Tiwari G N, Sutar R F, Singh H N, Goyal R K. Performance studies of earth air tunnel cum greenhouse technology. Energy Conversion and Management, 1998, 39(14): 1497–1502

[21] Lafont F, Balmat J F. Optimized fuzzy control of a greenhouse. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2002, 128(1): 47–59

[22] Jain D, Tiwari G N. Effect of greenhouse on crop drying under natural and forced convection I: evaluation of convective mass transfer coefficient. Energy Conversion and Management, 2004, 45(5): 765–783

[23] Jain D, Tiwari G N. Effect of greenhouse on crop drying under natural and forced convection II: thermal modelling and experimental validation. Energy Conversion and Management, 2004, 45(17): 2777–2793

[24] Ghosal M K, Tiwari G N. Mathematical modelling for greenhouse heating by using thermal curtain and geothermal energy. Solar Energy, 2004, 76(5): 603–613

[25] Ghosal M K, Tiwari G N, Srivastava N S L. Thermal modelling of a greenhouse with an integrated earth to air heat exchanger: an experimental validation. Energy and Building, 2004, 36(3): 219–227

[26] Tiwari G N, Akhtar M A, Shukla A, Emran Khan M. Annual thermal performance of greenhouse with an earth air heat exchanger—an experimental validation. Renewable Energy, 2006, 31(15): 2432–2446

[27] Ghosal M K, Tiwari G N, Das K P, Pandey K P. Modeling and comparative thermal performance of ground air collector and earth air heater exchanger for heating of greenhouse. Energy and Building, 2005, 37(6): 613–621

[28] Tiwari G N, Kumar S, Prakash O. Evaluation of convective mass transfer coefficient during drying of jaggery. Journal of Food Engineering, 2004, 63(2): 219–227

[29] Kumar A, Tiwari G N. Effect of shape and size on convective mass transfer coefficient during greenhouse drying (GHD) of Jaggery. Journal of Food Engineering, 2006, 73(2): 121–134

[30] Kumar A, Tiwari G N. Thermal modelling of natural convection greenhouse drying systems for jaggery: an experimental validation. Solar Energy, 2006, 80(9): 1135–1144

[31] Kumar A, Tiwari G N. Effect of mass on convective mass transfer coefficient during open sun and greenhouse drying of onion flakes. Journal of Food Engineering, 2007, 79(4): 1337–1350

[32] Nayak S, Tiwari G N. Energy and exergy analysis of photovoltaic/thermal integrated with a solar greenhouse. Energy and Building, 2008, 40(11): 2015–2021

[33] Das T, Tiwari G N. Heat and mass transfer of greenhouse fish drying under forced convection mode. International Journal of Agricultural Research, 2008, 3(1): 69–76

[34] Barnwal P, Tiwari G N. Grape drying by using hybrid photovoltaic-thermal (PV/T) greenhouse dryer: an experimental study. Solar Energy, 2008, 82(12): 1131–1144

[35] Sarkar B and Tiwari G N. Thermal modeling a greenhouse fish pond system. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR Ejournal, 2009, 7: 1–18

[36] Sethi V P. On the selection of shape and orientation of a greenhouse: thermal modeling and experimental validation. Solar Energy, 2009, 83(1): 21–38

[37] Ganguly A, Ghosh S. Model development and experimental validation of a floriculture greenhouse under natural ventilation. Energy and Building, 2009, 41(5): 521–527

[38] Panwar N L, Kaushik S C, Kothari S. Solar greenhouse an option for renewable and sustainable farming. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011, 15(8): 3934–3945

[39] Berroug F, Lakhal E K, El Omari M, Faraji M, El Qarnia H. Thermal performance of a greenhouse with a phase change material north wall. Energy and Building, 2011, 43(11): 3027–3035

[40] Ganguly A, Ghosh S. Performance analysis of solar PV-fuel cell integrated floriculture greenhouse. In: Proceedings of the ASME 5th International Conference on Energy Sustainability (ES2011). Washington, DC, USA, 2011, 1–6

[41] Gupta R, Tiwari G N, Kumar A, Gupta Y. Calculation of total solar fraction for different orientation of greenhouse using 3D-shadow analysis in Auto-CAD. Energy and Building, 2012, 47: 27–34

[42] Almuhanna E A. Utilization of a solar greenhouse as a solar dryer for drying dates under the climatic conditions of the eastern province of Saudi Arabia part I: thermal performance analysis of a solar dryer. Journal of Agricultural Science, 2012, 4(3): 237–246

[43] Kumar A, Prakash O, Kaviti A, Tomar A. Experimental analysis of greenhouse dryer in no-load conditions. Journal of Environmental Research and Development, 2013, 7(4): 1399–1406

[44] Kumar M. Experimental study on natural convection greenhouse drying of papad. Journal of Energy in Southern Africa, 2013, 24(4): 37–43

[45] Kumar M. Forced convection greenhouse papad drying: an experimental study. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 2013, 8(2): 177–189

[46] Vadiee A, Martin V. Energy analysis and thermoeconomic assessment of the closed greenhouse—the largest commercial solar building. Applied Energy, 2013, 102: 1256–1266

[47] Esen M, Yuksel T. Experimental evaluation of using various renewable energy sources for heating a greenhouse. Energy and Building, 2013, 65: 340–351

[48] Prakash O, Kumar A. Performance evaluation of greenhouse dryer with opaque north wall. Heat and Mass Transfer, 2014, 50(4): 493–500

[49] Prakash O, Kumar A. Thermal performance evaluation of modified active greenhouse dryer. Journal of Building Physics, 2014, 37(4): 395–402

[50] Prakash O, Kumar A. ANFIS prediction of a modified active greenhouse dryer in no-load conditions in the month of January. International Journal of Advance Computer Research, 2013, 3(1): 220–223

[51] Prakash O, Kumar A. Design, development, and testing of a modified greenhouse dryer under conditions of natural convection. Heat Transfer Research, 2014, 45(5): 433–451

[52] Prakash O, Kumar A. Environmental analysis and mathematical modelling for tomato flakes drying in a modified greenhouse dryer under active mode. International Journal of Food Engineering, 2014, 10(4): 669–681

[53] Prakash O, Kumar A. ANFIS modelling of a natural convection greenhouse drying system for jaggery: an experimental validation. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 2014, 33(2): 316–335

[54] Prakash O, Kumar A. Solar greenhouse drying: a review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 29: 905–910

[55] Kumar M. Effect of size on forced convection greenhouse drying of khoa. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2014, 7: 1157–1167

[56] Kumar M.Effect of size on the convective heat and mass transfer coefficients during natural convection greenhouse drying of khoa—a heat desiccated milk product. International Journal of Renewable Energy & Biofuels, 2014, 2014: 1–11

[57] ELkhadraoui A, Kooli S, Hamdi I, Farhat A. Experimental investigation and economic evaluation of a new mixed mode solar greenhouse dryer for drying of red pepper and grape. Renewable Energy, 2015, 77: 1–8

[58] Condorí M, Echazu R, Saravia L. Solar drying of sweet pepper and garlic using the tunnel greenhouse drier. Renewable Energy, 2001, 22(4): 447–460

[59] Fadhel A, Kooli S, Farhat A, Bellghith A. Study of the solar drying of grapes by three different processes. Desalination, 2005, 185(1–3): 535–541

[60] Öztürk H H. Experimental evaluation of energy and exergy efficiency of a seasonal latent heat storage system for greenhouse heating. Energy Conversion and Management, 2005, 46(9–10): 1523–1542

[61] Janjai S, Lamlert N, Intawee P, Mahayothee B, Bala B K, Nagle M, Müller J. Experimental and simulated performance of a PV-ventilated solar greenhouse dryer for drying of peeled logan and banana. Solar Energy, 2009, 83(9): 1550–1565

[62] Djevic M, Dimitrijevic A. Energy consumption for different greenhouse constructions. Energy, 2009, 34(9): 1325–1331

[63] Ayyappan S, Mayilsamy K. Experimental investigation on a solar tunnel drier for copra drying. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 2010, 69(8): 635–638

[64] Kaewkiew J, Nabnean S, Janjai S. Experimental investigation of the performance of a large-scale greenhouse type solar dryer for drying chilli in Thailand. Procedia Engineering, 2012, 32: 433–439

[65] Bala B K, Debnath N. Solar drying technology: potentials and developments. Journal of Fundamentals of Renewable Energy and Applications., 2012, 2: 1–5

[66] Sangamithra A, Swamy G J, Prema R S, Priyavarshini R, Chandrasekar V, Sasikala S. An overview of a polyhouse dryer. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 40: 902–910

[67] Arun S, Velmurugan K, Balaji S S. Experimental studies on drying characteristics of coconuts in a solar tunnel greenhouse dryer. International Journal of Innovative and Exploring Engineering, 2014, 4(5): 51–55

[68] Arun S, Balaji S S, Selvan P. Experimental studies on drying characteristics of coconuts in a solar greenhouse dryer coupled with biomass backup heater. International Journal of Innovative and Exploring Engineering, 2014, 4(5): 56–60

[69] Arun S, Velnurugan K, Kumar V. Optimization and comparison studies of solar tunnel greenhouse dryer coupled with and without biomass backup heater. International Journal of Innovative Science and Modern Engineering, 2014, 2(11): 41–47

[70] Fadhel A, Kooli S, Farhat A, Belghith A. Experimental study of hot red pepper in the open air, under greenhouse and in as solar drier. International Journal of Renewable Energy & Biofuels, 2014: 1–14, 515285

[71] Phusampao C, Nilnout W, Janjai S. Performance of a greenhouse solar dryer for drying macadamia Nuts. In: Green Energy for Sustainable Development, International Conference and Utility Exhibition (ICUE 2014). IEEE, 2014: 1–5

[72] Panwar N L, Rathore N S, Wadhawan N. Thermal Modelling and Experimental Validation of a walk-in type solar dryer for drying Fenugreek Leaves (Methi) in Indian Climate. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 2015, 20(3): 211–223

[73] Ayyappan S, Mayilswamy K, Sreenarayanan V V. Performance improvement studies in a solar greenhouse drier using sensible heat storage materials. Heat and Mass Transfer, 2015, 52(3): 1–9

[74] Odesola I F, Ezekwem C. The effect of shape and orientation on a greenhouse: a review. AFRREV STECH, 2012, 1(1): 122–130

[75] Goswami D Y, Lavania A, Shahbazi S, Masood M. Analysis of a geodesic dome solar fruit dryer. Drying Technology, 1991, 9(3): 677–691

[76] Tiwari G N, Gupta A A. Comparison of greenhouse with various shapes: a parametric study. International journal of Ambient Energy, 2002, 23(3): 136–148

[77] Kumari N, Tiwari G N, Sodha M. Performance evaluation of greenhouse having passive or active heating in different climatic zones of India. 2017, available at cigrjournal.org website

[78] Dragicevic S M. Determining the optimum orientation of a greenhouse on the basis of the total solar radiation availability. Thermal Science, 2011, 15(1): 215–221

[79] Saravia L, Echazu R, Cadena C, Condori M, Cabanillas C, Iriarte A, Bistoni S. Greenhouse solar heating in the Argentinian northwest. Renewable Energy, 1997, 11(1): 119–128

[80] Candy S, Moore G, Freere P. Design and Modeling of a greenhouse for a remote region in Nepal. Procedia Engineering, 2012, 49: 152–160

[81] Bouadila S, Kooli S, Skouri S, Lazaar M, Farhat A. Improvement of the greenhouse climate using a solar air heater with latent heat storage energy. Energy, 2014, 64: 663–672

[82] Bouadila S, Lazaar M, Skouri S, Kooli S, Farhat A. Assessment of the greenhouse climate with a new packed-bed solar air heater at night, in Tunisia. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 35: 31–41

[83] Bouadila S, Skouri S, Kooli S, Lazaar M, Farhat A. Solar energy storage application in Tunisian greenhouse by means of phase change materials. In: International Conference on Composite Materials & Renewable Energy Application. Sousse, Tunisia, 2014, 1–4

[84] Bouadila S, Skouri S, Kooli S, Lazaar M. Experimental study of two insulated solar greenhouses one of them use a solar air heater with latent heat. In: 6th International Renewable Energy Congress (IREC). Sousse, Tunisia, 2015: 1–4

[85] Kooli S, Bouadila S, Lazaar M, Farhat A. The effect of nocturnal shutter on insulated greenhouse using a solar air heater with latent storage energy. Solar Energy, 2015, 115: 217–228

[86] Condorí M, Saravia L. Analytical model for the performance of the tunnel-type greenhouse drier. Renewable Energy, 2003, 28(3): 467–485

[87] Patil R, Gawande R. A review on solar tunnel greenhouse drying system. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 56: 196–214

[88] Boonyasri M, Lertsatitthanakorn C, Wiset L, Poomsa-ad N. Performance analysis and economic evaluation of a greenhouse dryer for pork drying. KKU Engineering Journal, 2011, 38(4): 433–443

[89] Impron I, Hemming S, Bot G P A. Simple greenhouse climate model as a design tool for greenhouse in tropical lowland. Biosystems Engineering, 2007, 98(1): 79–89

[90] Ntinas G K, Fragos V P, Martzopolou C N. Thermal analysis of a hybrid solar energy saving system inside a greenhouse. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014, 81: 428–439

[91] Shyam, Al-Helal I M, Singh A K, Tiwari G N. Performance evaluation of photovoltaic thermal greenhouse dryer and development of characteristic curve. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 2015, 7(3): 033109

[92] Tanwanichkul B, Thepa S, Rordprapat W. Thermal modelling of the forced convection sandwich greenhouse drying system for rubber sheets. Energy Conversion and Management, 2013, 74: 511–523

[93] Tiwari G N, Sharma P K. Off-season cultivation of cucumber in a solar greenhouse. Energy, 1999, 24(2): 151–156

[94] Banaeian N, Omid M, Ahmadi H. Energy and economic analysis of greenhouse strawberry production in Tehran province of Iran. Energy Conversion and Management, 2011, 52(2): 1020–1025

[95] Alsadon A, Al-Helal I, Ibrahim A, Abdel-Ghany A, Al-Zaharani S, Ashour T. The effect of plastic greenhouse covering on cucumber (cucumber sativus L.) growth. Ecological Engineering, 2016, 87: 305–312

[96] Usmani J A, Tiwari G N, Chandra A. Performance characteristic of a greenhouse integrated biogas system. Energy Conversion and Management, 1996, 37(9): 1423–1433

[97] Kumar K V, Bai R K. Solar greenhouse assisted biogas plant in hilly region—a field study. Solar Energy, 2008, 82(10): 911–917

[98] Zhang S, Bi X T, Clift R. Life cycle analysis of a biogas-centred integrated dairy farm-greenhouse system in British Columbia. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2015, 93: 18–30

[99] Manchanda H, Kumar M. A comprehensive decade review and analysis on designs and performance parameters of passive solar still. Renewable. Wind, Water, and Solar, 2015, 2(1): 1–24

[100] Speitel T W, Siegel B Z, Massey J, Cade W, LaRosa A. Seawater agriculture utilizing a solar still greenhouse. In OCEANS’76, IEEE, 1976: 313–315

[101] Yadav Y P, Tiwari G N. Transient analysis of a winter greenhouse integrated with solar still. Energy Conversion and Management, 1987, 27(3): 267–273

[102] Lawrence S A, Tiwari G N. Performance of a greenhouse cum solar still for the climatic condition of Port Moresby. Renewable Energy, 1991, 1(2): 249–255

[103] Fath H E S. Transient analysis of naturally ventilated greenhouse with built-in solar still and waste heat and mass recovery system. Energy Conversion and Management, 1994, 35(11): 955–965

[104] Papanicolaou E, Voropoulos K, Belessiotis V. Natural convective heat transfer in an asymmetric greenhouse-type solar still–effect of angle of inclination. Numerical Heat Transfer: Part A: Applications, 2002, 42(8): 855–880

[105] Radhwan A M, Fath H E. Thermal performance of greenhouses with a built-in solar distillation system: experimental study. Desalination, 2005, 181(1–3): 193–205

[106] Marı E G, Colomer R P, Blaise-Ombrecht C A. Performance analysis of a solar still integrated in a greenhouse. Desalination, 2007, 203(1–3): 435–443

[107] Mutasher S A, Mir-Nasiri N, Wong S Y, Ngoo K C, Wong L Y. Improving a conventional greenhouse solar still using sun tracking system to increase clean water yield. Desalination and Water Treatment, 2010, 24(1–3): 140–149

[108] Al-Ismaili A M, Jayasuriya H. Seawater greenhouse in Oman: a sustainable technique from freshwater conservation and production. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 54: 653–664

[109] Sarkar B, Tiwari G N. Thermal modeling of a greenhouse fish pond system. available atcigrjournal.org website

[110] Das T, Tiwari G N, Sarkar B. Thermal performance of a greenhouse fish pond integrated with flat plate collector. International Journal of Agricultural Research, 2006, 1(5): 406–419

[111] Sarkar B, Tiwari G N. Thermal modeling and parametric studies of a greenhouse fish pond in the Central Himalayan Region. Energy Conversion and Management, 2006, 47(18–19): 3174–3184

[112] Tiwari G N, Sarkar B. Energy inputs and fish yield relationship for open and greenhouse pond. Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 2006, 1(2): 171–180

[113] Jain D. Modeling the thermal performance of an aquaculture pond heating with greenhouse. Building and Environment, 2007, 42(2): 557–565

[114] Ghosh L, Tiwari G N. Computer modeling of dissolved oxygen performance in greenhouse fishpond: an experimental validation. International Journal of Agricultural Research, 2008, 3(2): 83–97

[115] Critten D J, Bailey B J. A review of greenhouse engineering developments during the 1990s. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2002, 112(1): 1–22

[116] Cemek B, Demir Y, Uzun S, Ceyhan V. The effects of different greenhouse covering materials on energy requirement, growth and yield of aubergine. Energy, 2006, 31(12): 1780–1788

[117] Gupta M J, Chandra P. Effect of greenhouse design parameters on conservation of energy for greenhouse environmental control. Energy, 2002, 27(8): 777–794

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2017 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg